00:00:06theory that’s going to have a little bit
00:00:07of credibility or at least some
00:00:09plausibility is to work backwards
00:00:11basically progressive analysis now what
00:00:14you do is you find some evidence it
00:00:16doesn’t fit with the official story and
00:00:17you go about hypothesizing what can
00:00:19account for them evidence this is the
00:00:21basic scientific method that’s used for
00:00:23everything else from the Social Sciences
00:00:25to physics and chemistry so what we’re
00:00:27going to do is we’re going to take a
00:00:28look at those who looked at the evidence
00:00:30first and then regrettably theorized
00:00:32from there now as far as the Twin Towers
00:00:35go the most popular theory to the kind
00:00:38of presupposes some foul play is the
00:00:41demolition theory now this simply states
00:00:43that there’s no precedent of skyscrapers
00:00:46anywhere in history collapsing from fire
00:00:48essentially these fires don’t burn hot
00:00:50enough to compromise the structural
00:00:52integrity of the buildings themselves
00:00:54now of course there are those who
00:00:56counter that it was the actual impact of
00:00:58the 747 that compromised the structure
00:01:00of the buildings but there’s still some
00:01:03circumstantial evidence that maybe the
00:01:05structural integrity wasn’t compromised
00:01:08by the initial impact themselves mainly
00:01:10because the buildings didn’t fall for
00:01:12some time so the theory goes a little
00:01:14bit something like this the buildings
00:01:16fell because they were rigged with
00:01:17explosives they were rigged with
00:01:19explosives because either a the tax were
00:01:22anticipated and known about or be they
00:01:24were actually planned and incited by
00:01:26elements within the US themselves those
00:01:29five factors of people fall back on when
00:01:31they want to advance that the buildings
00:01:32were demolished rather than just the
00:01:34structural integrity giving out and
00:01:35having them collapse the first is radial
00:01:37symmetry the towers came straight down
00:01:39and debris was blown symmetrically in
00:01:42every direction
00:01:47without a premeditated and calculated
00:01:50demolition this type of collapse pattern
00:01:52would violate the second law of
00:01:54thermodynamics then there’s the rapid
00:01:57the same the towers came down just
00:01:59slightly slower than the rate of a free
00:02:02fall in a vacuum in other words rather
00:02:08than just coming down because the
00:02:10support from underneath was knocked out
00:02:11there was a little bit of a pause as the
00:02:14building collapsed
00:02:19suggesting that flows floors were blown
00:02:22out one by one the third factor is
00:02:25demolition waves the towers were
00:02:27consumed by synchronized rows of
00:02:29confluent explosions there are those who
00:02:32have analyzed the footage and actually
00:02:34point to signs of lower floors having
00:02:37windows blown out of them before the
00:02:39building comes down this of course is
00:02:42open to speculation for a number of
00:02:44reasons and one is the pancake theory
00:02:47that was the result of above floors
00:02:50falling on lower floors however there
00:02:52are those who don’t believe that’s
00:02:54plausible the fourth factor would be
00:02:56demolition squibs the towers exhibited
00:02:59high velocity gas ejections well below
00:03:02the descending rubble
00:03:07explosions on lower floors blew out
00:03:10everything holding up the above floors
00:03:11this is the case of the windows blowing
00:03:14out again that is also up to debate
00:03:16according to the pancake theory but it
00:03:18still seems more plausible to the
00:03:20conspiracy theorists anyway that this is
00:03:22exactly what went down
”