Press "Enter" to skip to content

WMNews: Gawker vs Hulk Hogan and Peter Thiel Facts


it’s the sex tape that shook the media

it’s the sex tape that shook the media the sensational trial pitting the former

the sensational trial pitting the former

the sensational trial pitting the former WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker

WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker

WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker on the ropes we make clear editorial

on the ropes we make clear editorial

on the ropes we make clear editorial judgments about what is worth publishing

judgments about what is worth publishing

judgments about what is worth publishing know what’s legal but what’s worth

know what’s legal but what’s worth

know what’s legal but what’s worth publishing and what’s not welcome to

publishing and what’s not welcome to

publishing and what’s not welcome to watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you

watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you

watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you should know about the legal battle

should know about the legal battle

should know about the legal battle between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s

between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s

between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s

lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s

lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s morals but Gawker’s putting its very

morals but Gawker’s putting its very

morals but Gawker’s putting its very culture on trial number 10

culture on trial number 10

culture on trial number 10 why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October

why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October

why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October 2012 the media website Gawker published

2012 the media website Gawker published

2012 the media website Gawker published a montage clip taken from a sex tape

a montage clip taken from a sex tape

a montage clip taken from a sex tape involving the professional wrestler Hulk

involving the professional wrestler Hulk

involving the professional wrestler Hulk Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with

Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with

Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with Heather Klem the then girlfriend of

Heather Klem the then girlfriend of

Heather Klem the then girlfriend of Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love

Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love

Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love Sponge Clem the encounter in question

Sponge Clem the encounter in question

Sponge Clem the encounter in question reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan

reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan

reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan was still married to the mother of his

was still married to the mother of his

was still married to the mother of his two children Hogan who claimed he was

two children Hogan who claimed he was

two children Hogan who claimed he was unaware that he was being filmed settled

unaware that he was being filmed settled

unaware that he was being filmed settled with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker

with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker

with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker in a multi-million dollar high-profile

in a multi-million dollar high-profile

in a multi-million dollar high-profile court case saying that the published

court case saying that the published

court case saying that the published clip was not newsworthy and was posted

clip was not newsworthy and was posted

clip was not newsworthy and was posted only for financial gain

only for financial gain

only for financial gain causing Hogan emotional distress

causing Hogan emotional distress

causing Hogan emotional distress Burswood did to me as a person but he

Burswood did to me as a person but he

Burswood did to me as a person but he was it was even embarrassing as number 9

was it was even embarrassing as number 9

was it was even embarrassing as number 9 who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real

who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real

who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real name is Terry Bollea is an American

name is Terry Bollea is an American

name is Terry Bollea is an American professional wrestler and reality TV

professional wrestler and reality TV

professional wrestler and reality TV star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed

star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed

star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed massive popularity during the 80s and

massive popularity during the 80s and

massive popularity during the 80s and 90s featuring on the rosters for both

90s featuring on the rosters for both

90s featuring on the rosters for both the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a

the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a

the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a 12-time world champion and a

12-time world champion and a

12-time world champion and a back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well

back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well

back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well known for his running leg drop finishing

known for his running leg drop finishing

known for his running leg drop finishing move ripping his way out of his shirt

move ripping his way out of his shirt

move ripping his way out of his shirt and for exaggeratedly playing to the

and for exaggeratedly playing to the

and for exaggeratedly playing to the audience Hulk’s crossover popularity

audience Hulk’s crossover popularity

audience Hulk’s crossover popularity also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood

also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood

also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood acting career

and established him as a TV personality

and established him as a TV personality with shows such as Hogan knows best

with shows such as Hogan knows best

with shows such as Hogan knows best ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan

ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan

ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan no she’s not going out and American

no she’s not going out and American

no she’s not going out and American Gladiators number eight what is gar

Gladiators number eight what is gar

Gladiators number eight what is gar first launched in 2003 and founded by

first launched in 2003 and founded by

first launched in 2003 and founded by Nick Denton Gawker is an online media

Nick Denton Gawker is an online media

Nick Denton Gawker is an online media company consisting of seven main

company consisting of seven main

company consisting of seven main lifestyle blogs including the gadget

lifestyle blogs including the gadget

lifestyle blogs including the gadget oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin

oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin

oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin and women targeted site Jezebel Business

and women targeted site Jezebel Business

and women targeted site Jezebel Business Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million

Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million

Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million dollars with it’s worth steadily

dollars with it’s worth steadily

dollars with it’s worth steadily increasing every year in 2013 judge

increasing every year in 2013 judge

increasing every year in 2013 judge pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take

pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take

pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take down the clip of Hogan but it refused

down the clip of Hogan but it refused

down the clip of Hogan but it refused the case against the company has since

the case against the company has since

the case against the company has since become a case in point for journalism in

become a case in point for journalism in

become a case in point for journalism in general with many high-profile

general with many high-profile

general with many high-profile supporters including eBay co-founder

supporters including eBay co-founder

supporters including eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter

Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter

Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter Thiel a German American entrepreneur

Thiel a German American entrepreneur

Thiel a German American entrepreneur co-founder of PayPal and the first

co-founder of PayPal and the first

co-founder of PayPal and the first outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel

outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel

outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest

is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest

is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest success stories in May 2016

success stories in May 2016

success stories in May 2016 teal revealed during an interview with

teal revealed during an interview with

teal revealed during an interview with the New York Times that he had given ten

the New York Times that he had given ten

the New York Times that he had given ten million dollars to finance several

million dollars to finance several

million dollars to finance several lawsuits against Gawker Media including

lawsuits against Gawker Media including

lawsuits against Gawker Media including Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker

Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker

Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker published an article in 2007 discussing

published an article in 2007 discussing

published an article in 2007 discussing teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he

teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he

teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but

isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but

isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but rather by a desire to fight back against

rather by a desire to fight back against

rather by a desire to fight back against privacy violations by the press

privacy violations by the press

privacy violations by the press according to teal Gawker has quote

according to teal Gawker has quote

according to teal Gawker has quote ruined people’s lives for no reason

ruined people’s lives for no reason

ruined people’s lives for no reason number 6 what was garz argument for

number 6 what was garz argument for

number 6 what was garz argument for publishing the article the entire

publishing the article the entire

publishing the article the entire lawsuit is built around the idea of news

lawsuit is built around the idea of news

lawsuit is built around the idea of news and what legally counts as newsworthy

and what legally counts as newsworthy

and what legally counts as newsworthy while Hogan claims that the sex tape

while Hogan claims that the sex tape

while Hogan claims that the sex tape isn’t appropriate for the public domain

isn’t appropriate for the public domain

isn’t appropriate for the public domain and equates to commercial exploitation

and equates to commercial exploitation

and equates to commercial exploitation Gawker claims protection by the First

Gawker claims protection by the First

Gawker claims protection by the First Amendment arguing that the tape is a

Amendment arguing that the tape is a

Amendment arguing that the tape is a matter of legitimate public concern

matter of legitimate public concern

matter of legitimate public concern given Hogan’s huge public profile and

given Hogan’s huge public profile and

given Hogan’s huge public profile and the fact that he has openly discussed

the fact that he has openly discussed

the fact that he has openly discussed his sex life in the past most of the

his sex life in the past most of the

his sex life in the past most of the stories that we publish I’m not just

stories that we publish I’m not just

stories that we publish I’m not just happy to defend I’m delighted to defend

happy to defend I’m delighted to defend

happy to defend I’m delighted to defend because

because

because I think that they are essential to free

I think that they are essential to free

I think that they are essential to free expression and the free press

expression and the free press

expression and the free press Gawker also argued that the clip was

Gawker also argued that the clip was

Gawker also argued that the clip was presented in a newsworthy manner as it

presented in a newsworthy manner as it

presented in a newsworthy manner as it was accompanied by a 1,400 word article

was accompanied by a 1,400 word article

was accompanied by a 1,400 word article and had been edited down from 30 minutes

and had been edited down from 30 minutes

and had been edited down from 30 minutes to just a couple number five what was

to just a couple number five what was

to just a couple number five what was the final verdict a verdict was

the final verdict a verdict was

the final verdict a verdict was delivered on March 18th 2016 when the

delivered on March 18th 2016 when the

delivered on March 18th 2016 when the six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan

six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan

six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan and found Gawker Media libel for 115

and found Gawker Media libel for 115

and found Gawker Media libel for 115 million dollars in compensatory damages

million dollars in compensatory damages

million dollars in compensatory damages and 25 million dollars in punitive

and 25 million dollars in punitive

and 25 million dollars in punitive damages

damages

damages Gawker mounted an appeal but was

Gawker mounted an appeal but was

Gawker mounted an appeal but was unsuccessful in overturning the decision

unsuccessful in overturning the decision

unsuccessful in overturning the decision as of early June 2016

as of early June 2016

as of early June 2016 Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a

Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a

Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a released statement quote Gawker has

released statement quote Gawker has

released statement quote Gawker has failed and continues to fail in

failed and continues to fail in

failed and continues to fail in recognizing their obligation to Belaya

recognizing their obligation to Belaya

recognizing their obligation to Belaya for their reprehensible behavior and

for their reprehensible behavior and

for their reprehensible behavior and method of doing what they call

method of doing what they call

method of doing what they call journalism number four could this

journalism number four could this

journalism number four could this lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine

lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine

lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine figure award is a huge sum in a trial of

figure award is a huge sum in a trial of

figure award is a huge sum in a trial of this type far exceeding average payouts

this type far exceeding average payouts

this type far exceeding average payouts for major physical injuries and even

for major physical injuries and even

for major physical injuries and even wrongful death in America and for Gawker

wrongful death in America and for Gawker

wrongful death in America and for Gawker it could prove to be impossible to

it could prove to be impossible to

it could prove to be impossible to recover from such a financial hit if the

recover from such a financial hit if the

recover from such a financial hit if the judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond

judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond

judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond then the company is likely to collapse

then the company is likely to collapse

then the company is likely to collapse under figures that are simply too

under figures that are simply too

under figures that are simply too massive to manage in the wake of Nick

massive to manage in the wake of Nick

massive to manage in the wake of Nick Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s

Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s

Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s right to publish the video The Guardian

right to publish the video The Guardian

right to publish the video The Guardian reports that he could go down as quote

reports that he could go down as quote

reports that he could go down as quote both creator and destroyer of the web

both creator and destroyer of the web

both creator and destroyer of the web blog business number three has Gawker

blog business number three has Gawker

blog business number three has Gawker been sued before he only has himself to

been sued before he only has himself to

been sued before he only has himself to blame for the predicament that he’s in

blame for the predicament that he’s in

blame for the predicament that he’s in though it has never been involved in a

though it has never been involved in a

though it has never been involved in a trial as high-profile or as damaging as

trial as high-profile or as damaging as

trial as high-profile or as damaging as this one Gawker is no stranger to the

this one Gawker is no stranger to the

this one Gawker is no stranger to the courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood

courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood

courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood director Quentin Tarantino filed a

director Quentin Tarantino filed a

director Quentin Tarantino filed a copyright lawsuit against the company

copyright lawsuit against the company

copyright lawsuit against the company after it published links to the 146 page

after it published links to the 146 page

after it published links to the 146 page screenplay for the hateful eight got me

screenplay for the hateful eight got me

screenplay for the hateful eight got me one more quote Gawker Media has made a

one more quote Gawker Media has made a

one more quote Gawker Media has made a business of predatory journalism

business of predatory journalism

business of predatory journalism violating people’s rights to make a buck

violating people’s rights to make a buck

violating people’s rights to make a buck set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf

set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf

set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf Gawker has also been sued from within as

Gawker has also been sued from within as

Gawker has also been sued from within as in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed

in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed

in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed for minimum wage payment for their

for minimum wage payment for their

for minimum wage payment for their roles in the company in this instance

roles in the company in this instance

roles in the company in this instance the court ruled in favor of Gawker

the court ruled in favor of Gawker

the court ruled in favor of Gawker number two could this effect journalism

number two could this effect journalism

number two could this effect journalism while many will have cheered Hogan’s

while many will have cheered Hogan’s

while many will have cheered Hogan’s potential knockout blow to Gawker in

potential knockout blow to Gawker in

potential knockout blow to Gawker in court the ruling against the media

court the ruling against the media

court the ruling against the media company may have harsh implications for

company may have harsh implications for

company may have harsh implications for journalism in general the 140 million

journalism in general the 140 million

journalism in general the 140 million dollar total damages set a new precedent

dollar total damages set a new precedent

dollar total damages set a new precedent for cases of this type and indicates a

for cases of this type and indicates a

for cases of this type and indicates a significant shift in power other firms

significant shift in power other firms

significant shift in power other firms that have watched gawkers punishment

that have watched gawkers punishment

that have watched gawkers punishment unfold may vow to never find themselves

unfold may vow to never find themselves

unfold may vow to never find themselves in a similar position which could result

in a similar position which could result

in a similar position which could result in increasingly safe journalism in the

in increasingly safe journalism in the

in increasingly safe journalism in the future regardless of whether the Hogan

future regardless of whether the Hogan

future regardless of whether the Hogan sex tape should have been published or

sex tape should have been published or

sex tape should have been published or not the trial has forced the media to

not the trial has forced the media to

not the trial has forced the media to rethink its practices because one bad

rethink its practices because one bad

rethink its practices because one bad decision could place your company at the

decision could place your company at the

decision could place your company at the brink of bankruptcy number one what is

brink of bankruptcy number one what is

brink of bankruptcy number one what is goes next step I think in many people’s

goes next step I think in many people’s

goes next step I think in many people’s eyes you know just trying to draw the

eyes you know just trying to draw the

eyes you know just trying to draw the line between privacy and the Free Press

line between privacy and the Free Press

line between privacy and the Free Press Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to

Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to

Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to

continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to

continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to clear the company’s name and escape the

clear the company’s name and escape the

clear the company’s name and escape the payment of damages we do put the story

payment of damages we do put the story

payment of damages we do put the story first and I am unapologetic about that

first and I am unapologetic about that

first and I am unapologetic about that in response to Peter Thiel’s

in response to Peter Thiel’s

in response to Peter Thiel’s confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer

confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer

confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer Gawker now has a Silicon Valley

Gawker now has a Silicon Valley

Gawker now has a Silicon Valley billionaire in its own corner eBay

billionaire in its own corner eBay

billionaire in its own corner eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and

co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and

co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and teal are previously linked as eBay

teal are previously linked as eBay

teal are previously linked as eBay bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal

bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal

bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal eventually left the company along with

eventually left the company along with

eventually left the company along with other former PayPal executives as of May

other former PayPal executives as of May

other former PayPal executives as of May 2016 Denton was reportedly considering a

2016 Denton was reportedly considering a

2016 Denton was reportedly considering a potential sale of Gawker after the

potential sale of Gawker after the

potential sale of Gawker after the company’s motion for a new trial was

company’s motion for a new trial was

company’s motion for a new trial was denied it’s a serious case so while

denied it’s a serious case so while

denied it’s a serious case so while Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal

Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal

Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal win for the time being that doesn’t mean

win for the time being that doesn’t mean

win for the time being that doesn’t mean the story isn’t set to rumble on for

the story isn’t set to rumble on for

the story isn’t set to rumble on for some time

did these facts get you thinking to vote

did these facts get you thinking to vote for which new story is covered next

for which new story is covered next

for which new story is covered next head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest

head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest

head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest and be sure to hit that subscribe button

and be sure to hit that subscribe button

and be sure to hit that subscribe button for more newsworthy top 10s published

for more newsworthy top 10s published

for more newsworthy top 10s published every week tonight marks the turning

every week tonight marks the turning

every week tonight marks the turning point of my career

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *