Press "Enter" to skip to content

Rex Murphy on Climategate


Climategate is the most recent scandal

Climategate is the most recent scandal in the environmental debates

in the environmental debates

in the environmental debates hi I’m Alex and welcome to watchmojo.com

hi I’m Alex and welcome to watchmojo.com

hi I’m Alex and welcome to watchmojo.com we sat down with political commentator

we sat down with political commentator

we sat down with political commentator Rex Murphy to get his take on its

Rex Murphy to get his take on its

Rex Murphy to get his take on its relevance so to give our viewers some

relevance so to give our viewers some

relevance so to give our viewers some context can you explain what exactly is

context can you explain what exactly is

context can you explain what exactly is Climategate

Climategate

Climategate well what Climategate is the most recent

well what Climategate is the most recent

well what Climategate is the most recent coinage or neologism refers to either

coinage or neologism refers to either

coinage or neologism refers to either the hacking or whistleblowing leaked

the hacking or whistleblowing leaked

the hacking or whistleblowing leaked from the CR u Institute of East Anglia

from the CR u Institute of East Anglia

from the CR u Institute of East Anglia which is one of the most prestigious

which is one of the most prestigious

which is one of the most prestigious feeding institutions to the UN’s IPCC

feeding institutions to the UN’s IPCC

feeding institutions to the UN’s IPCC panel the international panel on climate

panel the international panel on climate

panel the international panel on climate change

change

change Climategate right now crashing down and

Climategate right now crashing down and

Climategate right now crashing down and now claiming its first victims in the

now claiming its first victims in the

now claiming its first victims in the United Kingdom a top scientist caught up

United Kingdom a top scientist caught up

United Kingdom a top scientist caught up in the scandal stepping down and then we

in the scandal stepping down and then we

in the scandal stepping down and then we learned that the original raw data the

learned that the original raw data the

learned that the original raw data the temperature readings that they collected

temperature readings that they collected

temperature readings that they collected over the last hundred and fifty years it

over the last hundred and fifty years it

over the last hundred and fifty years it was simply announced very very recently

was simply announced very very recently

was simply announced very very recently that they had been lost

that they had been lost

that they had been lost the British Meteorological Office has

the British Meteorological Office has

the British Meteorological Office has announced that it will now set out an

announced that it will now set out an

announced that it will now set out an effort to reconstitute the raw data on

effort to reconstitute the raw data on

effort to reconstitute the raw data on which all of these projections are even

which all of these projections are even

which all of these projections are even though it’s going to be a three-year

though it’s going to be a three-year

though it’s going to be a three-year enterprise and I’ll draw from that two

enterprise and I’ll draw from that two

enterprise and I’ll draw from that two points one is that it doesn’t invalidate

points one is that it doesn’t invalidate

points one is that it doesn’t invalidate at all the possible scenarios that are

at all the possible scenarios that are

at all the possible scenarios that are being painted about global warming over

being painted about global warming over

being painted about global warming over the next century but it certainly tells

the next century but it certainly tells

the next century but it certainly tells you that the atmosphere of science which

you that the atmosphere of science which

you that the atmosphere of science which we would assume to be antiseptic

we would assume to be antiseptic

we would assume to be antiseptic disinterested neutralized and humble

disinterested neutralized and humble

disinterested neutralized and humble before the facts that that’s a kind of

before the facts that that’s a kind of

before the facts that that’s a kind of romantic image of science that will not

romantic image of science that will not

romantic image of science that will not stand up and secondly that I’m but I

stand up and secondly that I’m but I

stand up and secondly that I’m but I think it’s conceivably the largest issue

think it’s conceivably the largest issue

think it’s conceivably the largest issue that is facing the entire world the next

that is facing the entire world the next

that is facing the entire world the next hundred years and how we get our energy

hundred years and how we get our energy

hundred years and how we get our energy that it has become a kind of strange

that it has become a kind of strange

that it has become a kind of strange marriage between what we used to call

marriage between what we used to call

marriage between what we used to call pure science and advocacy and when

pure science and advocacy and when

pure science and advocacy and when advocacy goes to bed with science the

advocacy goes to bed with science the

advocacy goes to bed with science the product is not too attractive so what

product is not too attractive so what

product is not too attractive so what are these emails represent to you

are these emails represent to you

are these emails represent to you contents of these emails produce at

contents of these emails produce at

contents of these emails produce at least from the sea are you the east

least from the sea are you the east

least from the sea are you the east anglia institution is attempts to kind

anglia institution is attempts to kind

anglia institution is attempts to kind of bully opinions that are offside

of bully opinions that are offside

of bully opinions that are offside attempts to police the peer-reviewed

attempts to police the peer-reviewed

attempts to police the peer-reviewed journals would they shelve it bury it

journals would they shelve it bury it

journals would they shelve it bury it hide it lie about it what they tried

hide it lie about it what they tried

hide it lie about it what they tried they tried to make sure it never saw the

they tried to make sure it never saw the

they tried to make sure it never saw the light of day does it justify climate

light of day does it justify climate

light of day does it justify climate change scepticism I

change scepticism I

change scepticism I think in journalism and in science if

think in journalism and in science if

think in journalism and in science if you abandon skepticism you’ve abandoned

you abandon skepticism you’ve abandoned

you abandon skepticism you’ve abandoned the principles of both professions the

the principles of both professions the

the principles of both professions the only thing that maintained science is

only thing that maintained science is

only thing that maintained science is the clash of honest and I stress honest

the clash of honest and I stress honest

the clash of honest and I stress honest honest and disinterested the scientist

honest and disinterested the scientist

honest and disinterested the scientist is not going out to establish a policy

is not going out to establish a policy

is not going out to establish a policy he’s not going out to kind of give us a

he’s not going out to kind of give us a

he’s not going out to kind of give us a new reading of how we should organize

new reading of how we should organize

new reading of how we should organize the world but on the political edge of

the world but on the political edge of

the world but on the political edge of it you’ll have people like mr. Gore who

it you’ll have people like mr. Gore who

it you’ll have people like mr. Gore who is a politician who is prescribing

is a politician who is prescribing

is a politician who is prescribing policies and he’s attempting to finesse

policies and he’s attempting to finesse

policies and he’s attempting to finesse the policies under the umbrella of

the policies under the umbrella of

the policies under the umbrella of science that’s a bad mix

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *