Press "Enter" to skip to content

Un Hogar Propio para Tod@s | Sergio Nasarre | TEDxGracia


[Music]

[Music]

it is possible that all of us can

get to have a home of their own

accessible and flexible sustainable way

the crisis of 2007 has caused

hundreds of thousands of people were

victims of evictions and many of

as we have seen they have ended up in the

homeless millennials generation

he has very badly to access the

living place

it is becoming more affordable every time the

rentals are more expensive every time they last

less every time the houses are more

precarious they have the need every time

to rent rooms instead of

whole floors

barcelona is a great example of that the

generation x mine did not have either

so easy in my case for example I had

to be with my girlfriend that today is

my wife of 30 years of boyfriend

there are nine years of boyfriends are also

many but they are less than 30

what I do want 30 years was the

mortgage the mortgage that we had to

do

it was 30 years and now we are paying

when we started thinking about

access to housing and how

facilitate the people who could

do we said is necessary there is no other

option that people have to

get into debt for 30 years or have to

end up in a rent that every three

years have to pass that test with the

home that is becoming shorter

increasingly precarious time is more expensive

we thought that that could not be we think

that we had to go further by

said place to go beyond see you

More here

in fact so much that we end up in the

sixth century out in the 6th century with

the justinian emperor who was the

inventor of the mortgage and one can

think good eh

mortgage is good or is bad has led

to the town hall to many families

but of course it is an invention that has lasted

one thousand 400 years

I do not know what other inventions if they are

really bad they could have lasted those

1,400 years the mortgage of a large

virtue that is what has made her

survive that is that someone who does not

know of nothing suddenly lend you

200,000 euros 300,000 euros without

need to darren and possession nor the

property of the house

Of course that is fine in principle but

you know what happened to Napoleon and

to the nineteenth century let’s have a jump and

a t-shirt a person man had a

character all or nothing or you were with

the ono estadi and in the case of

property I had it very clear that if

you want to be an owner you do not have

that be all right

if we put that mortgage together with that

property forever

we have that there are a series of families

that have been out of the game that are

over indebted and that we have given

change from Napoleon these 200 years

Well, as we said a way of

holding the rent that 80% of the

current tenants do not like it and that

also if they stop it to think well it’s

a form of tenure that has just

pay never

you will be 40 years old 70 years old 90 years old

and will continue to pay rent and you

they can think and there is very good but here

our only problem in the

other countries is not resolved because no

it’s exactly like that

Germany for example always we take

of example for many things like what

they make the Germans final 55 by

hundred of citizens living on

rent props like rent not

necessarily what we have discovered

is that let’s say its mechanism excludes

excludes vulnerable people with

less income from accessing property

for example you are required to john

to be granted a loan

mortgage have to put their

pocket 40% of the value of the property

you imagine a family that

you can opt for a house of 100,000

euros for saying something that could have

has had never ever get 40,000

euros saved to be able to give and not

fundables

this is very difficult , that’s where that comes from

result that there is so much population there

who lives from rent but that does not want

say that they are helpless but that

basically what they do is make a

rental system by time

undefined

so you do not have to renew every

three years with the landlord and at the same

have a reference income from the

rent is not free but there are some

tables that control that income but not

we are we are not in that

situation we do not have a state

social so strong and we have a

property in which many families have

caught our fingers and we have a rent

of very short duration very expensive

in this scenario really where

we put our hope where you can

put our job

Well give you a first idea I

I believe in the democratization of

property is to say a property for

all and at the same time also in the

German style rentals but let’s

the first ones will receive that change so

important that we have to do from

Napoleon and for that we have to

fix and look for families when

is looking for a home

he’s basically looking for three things

people seek stability seek

flexibility and seek affordability in

your home stability so that this

ability to have security

people we need a roof to be able to

develop as people develop

freely our personality to be

completely free to be

completely equal is very difficult

develop fundamental rights

without a ceiling flexibility so that

flexibility so that when I have the

need for example to sublease

part of my house so that another person

help me for rent can do it

or that there is a market where I can

living the house increased increased a

job in another city and

affordability so that for

finally we can get the

families dedicate only

30% of your income to the expense of the

living place

well he presented the trends

intermediate the intermediate differences

they intend to do that pretend to mix

These three ingredients form

we could call masterly in

sense that people are about

your home as stable as possible

flexible is possible and affordable is

possible

and these are two shared property

and the season property that is the

property shared property

shared gives the possibility of being

fully in owner buying

only a small piece of the house does not

misunderstand not just one to one

room for example not but a

percentage for example buy 20% the

10% 38 percent what one has

really saved what the bank

want to lend so that it can be

owner for all purposes of

sustainable way and without over debt

with that right to be able to acquire the

The rest of the house is one hundred

one hundred for the rest pays a rent of

way that the seller is happy to

get into that business because he received

one part in cash and the other in

rent

imagine therefore being able to be

homeowners who in

absolute property would be 200,000

euros paying only 40,000 euros or

instead of giving an entry of 20 thousand

euros can give an entry of 8,000 and

which is the temporal and temporal itself

It is a house full of clocks or combined

with watches but the own

temporary the possibility of being able to be

owner for a number of years

between 10 and 99 years the number of years

that one wants

there are many circumstances why

a person has to buy a house

forever but can cover their

needs for a number of years

in this context the very temporary

It allows to overcome traditional figures

as the usufruct nancy teus is the census

the surface that between us more

that housing tenure efe

ages exceeded this point one

one can think good eh

this is a reality for them commented

I firmly believe in the possibility that

everyone has the right to be able to be

owner in a sustainable way and by

so without over- indebtedness and a state

social as we have a state

relatively weak social in our

European context I believe in the possibility

that the new 2014 directive 17 that is

about to be implemented now that says

that vulnerable people

they can practically never be

owners through the property

shared and of the temporary itself what

can be I think that couple of

young people who do not want to have children

example can buy a house for the

number of years that you think you are going to

live being very optimistic because now

is now 30 years old 60

I believe in the possibility that the mother

who has three children and who only has

a house the house where he lives and is

worried to who is going to leave her in

good inheritance as there is no problem

in giving 10 years the first child

ten years the second son and ten others

years later to the third child

I believe in the possibility of an authentic

social mixture in our cities in

our neighborhoods in our communities

with shared and temporary property

it is possible that these people

combine and live plant in it

ladder people who are property

absolute that has one hundred percent but

people also that have 20% that

have the 10% they have bought for three

years for 10 years that they have bought for

15 years

I believe in the possibility that one’s own

share the temporary itself help the

public administration to do housing

social housing very stable and very

linked by its beneficiaries

I also believe in progressive housing

in housing by modules

the architects and they have long since

designed homes that allow to expand

if reduced architectural

architecturally as the

family grows or decreases with one ‘s own

shared also that is possible or

even for second in resides

and that does not buy the second residence

in the mountains it turns out that the child

it grows it is 15 years old it never comes back

more there by the can opt for 15

years that the child is going to

endure going there

well let’s stop believing blindly

this is already a reality in Catalonia with

the law 19 2015 for two years now

it is possible to do shared ownership and

temporary property can quietly

now if any of you also

a floor go internet that offer that

they had and tell the truth he heard me and

I do not have the 250,000 euros that you

He is asking me but I have saved 30

thousand and the bank leaves me another 20,000 what

it seems if you bought him 20 percent

that you think if I buy 30% and

I’m paying an income until I can

get that 100%

well silvia silvia did it is a

young person to a young woman of tarragona e

Spanish teacher who had to

move for work reasons to

London a few years ago housing

London

it is terrible problematic housing in

london is terrible much more than

barcelona even contact with the cause

association because I saw no option in

the market and said what possibilities

I have the feeling that it is an entity

social housing manager said look

you can buy this house for 30%

street did not know what it was then no

this law was in force and then

bought that 30% of the house could turn it off

and now you have that 40 percent and

also that floor has it very well

located near the mouth of metro

easy access to your job and

the center of london had done what

what have they done

180,000 English families from the

80 and other 180 thousand are

waiting to be able to access property

shared to that dwelling so

sustainable is waiting for the

they build because in england and a

housing construction program

my message is that you are welcome to a

democratic property be you

Welcome to a property with a future

thank you very much

[Applause]

[Music]

[Music]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *