[Music] today in the palm of her hand you have
today in the palm of her hand you have
today in the palm of her hand you have access to world of information you can
access to world of information you can
access to world of information you can reach a multitude of news sources and
reach a multitude of news sources and
reach a multitude of news sources and exchange your views the wide range of
exchange your views the wide range of
exchange your views the wide range of people all over the world this new
people all over the world this new
people all over the world this new reality should allow us to share our
reality should allow us to share our
reality should allow us to share our wisdom to communicate to understand each
wisdom to communicate to understand each
wisdom to communicate to understand each other and to become more understanding
other and to become more understanding
other and to become more understanding of our differences more tolerant of our
of our differences more tolerant of our
of our differences more tolerant of our differences but 2016 seems to have
differences but 2016 seems to have
differences but 2016 seems to have replaced the information age for the
replaced the information age for the
replaced the information age for the post truth era with Briggs it and the
post truth era with Briggs it and the
post truth era with Briggs it and the Trump election we are found we’ve
Trump election we are found we’ve
Trump election we are found we’ve discovered that more communication
discovered that more communication
discovered that more communication doesn’t mean more information let me
doesn’t mean more information let me
doesn’t mean more information let me show you what I mean here is a picture
show you what I mean here is a picture
show you what I mean here is a picture of the Trump inauguration ceremony 2017
of the Trump inauguration ceremony 2017
of the Trump inauguration ceremony 2017 and the same picture of the Obama
and the same picture of the Obama
and the same picture of the Obama inauguration ceremony in 2009 the White
inauguration ceremony in 2009 the White
inauguration ceremony in 2009 the White House declared that the Trump ceremony
House declared that the Trump ceremony
House declared that the Trump ceremony had been the largest in history did you
had been the largest in history did you
had been the largest in history did you know that 28% of Trump supporters said
know that 28% of Trump supporters said
know that 28% of Trump supporters said they believed that there were as many
they believed that there were as many
they believed that there were as many people if not more at the Trump ceremony
people if not more at the Trump ceremony
people if not more at the Trump ceremony 30 percent said they didn’t know they
30 percent said they didn’t know they
30 percent said they didn’t know they were not sure and 41 percent that is
were not sure and 41 percent that is
were not sure and 41 percent that is only less than half said that they
only less than half said that they
only less than half said that they disagreed with the White House statement
disagreed with the White House statement
disagreed with the White House statement when you see these pictures these use
when you see these pictures these use
when you see these pictures these use may seem crazy so how is it that people
may seem crazy so how is it that people
may seem crazy so how is it that people can believe something so clearly and
can believe something so clearly and
can believe something so clearly and sure but wait a minute
sure but wait a minute
sure but wait a minute are you sure that you would never
are you sure that you would never
are you sure that you would never believe something so clearly untrue
believe something so clearly untrue
believe something so clearly untrue think about it these pictures are not
think about it these pictures are not
think about it these pictures are not proof they could have been photoshopped
proof they could have been photoshopped
proof they could have been photoshopped they could have been swapped so when
they could have been swapped so when
they could have been swapped so when somebody raises these doubts to you you
somebody raises these doubts to you you
somebody raises these doubts to you you will have to use your own judgement to
will have to use your own judgement to
will have to use your own judgement to weigh the evidence and make up your mind
weigh the evidence and make up your mind
weigh the evidence and make up your mind so now suppose that you wear a trump
so now suppose that you wear a trump
so now suppose that you wear a trump supporter
supporter
supporter are you sure that you would not give any
are you sure that you would not give any
are you sure that you would not give any credence to somebody raising these
credence to somebody raising these
credence to somebody raising these doubts are you sure that you would never
doubts are you sure that you would never
doubts are you sure that you would never entertain that perhaps they were more
entertain that perhaps they were more
entertain that perhaps they were more people at the trim ceremony and that
people at the trim ceremony and that
people at the trim ceremony and that these pictures are not a proof today I
these pictures are not a proof today I
these pictures are not a proof today I want to put to you that the cause of the
want to put to you that the cause of the
want to put to you that the cause of the fake new success lies primarily with us
fake new success lies primarily with us
fake new success lies primarily with us thank news work because we are willing
thank news work because we are willing
thank news work because we are willing to believe them and because we are
to believe them and because we are
to believe them and because we are willing to believe them we lie to
willing to believe them we lie to
willing to believe them we lie to ourselves if we want a sound public
ourselves if we want a sound public
ourselves if we want a sound public debate we need to stop lying to
debate we need to stop lying to
debate we need to stop lying to ourselves when we engage with the news
ourselves when we engage with the news
ourselves when we engage with the news let’s consider an ideal public debate
let’s consider an ideal public debate
let’s consider an ideal public debate and think about it as a battle of ideas
and think about it as a battle of ideas
and think about it as a battle of ideas all ideas are voiced and debated a good
all ideas are voiced and debated a good
all ideas are voiced and debated a good idea is convincing and it wins over less
idea is convincing and it wins over less
idea is convincing and it wins over less convincing ideas the philosopher Karl
convincing ideas the philosopher Karl
convincing ideas the philosopher Karl Popper said that this process should
Popper said that this process should
Popper said that this process should lead public debate to select the best
lead public debate to select the best
lead public debate to select the best ideas unconvincing ideas
ideas unconvincing ideas
ideas unconvincing ideas disappear and only the good one survived
disappear and only the good one survived
disappear and only the good one survived and science seems like a perfect example
and science seems like a perfect example
and science seems like a perfect example where public debate leads to selection
where public debate leads to selection
where public debate leads to selection of the best ideas with this view in mind
of the best ideas with this view in mind
of the best ideas with this view in mind the Internet should have a positive
the Internet should have a positive
the Internet should have a positive effect on public debate on the Internet
effect on public debate on the Internet
effect on public debate on the Internet IDs are free to be voiced and criticized
IDs are free to be voiced and criticized
IDs are free to be voiced and criticized good ideas should be able to convince
good ideas should be able to convince
good ideas should be able to convince more people and spread around or bad IDs
more people and spread around or bad IDs
more people and spread around or bad IDs abandoned but when you look it doesn’t
abandoned but when you look it doesn’t
abandoned but when you look it doesn’t look necessarily what’s happening on the
look necessarily what’s happening on the
look necessarily what’s happening on the Internet at the moment so why is that
Internet at the moment so why is that
Internet at the moment so why is that well perhaps this view of the public
well perhaps this view of the public
well perhaps this view of the public debate is a bit unrealistic in 1949 Max
debate is a bit unrealistic in 1949 Max
debate is a bit unrealistic in 1949 Max Planck famously joked about this vision
Planck famously joked about this vision
Planck famously joked about this vision from popper Max Planck was a theoretical
from popper Max Planck was a theoretical
from popper Max Planck was a theoretical physicist who eventually won a Nobel
physicist who eventually won a Nobel
physicist who eventually won a Nobel Prize he said a new scientific truth
Prize he said a new scientific truth
Prize he said a new scientific truth doesn’t triumph because it convinces its
doesn’t triumph because it convinces its
doesn’t triumph because it convinces its opponents rather these opponents get old
opponents rather these opponents get old
opponents rather these opponents get old and eventually they die and they
and eventually they die and they
and eventually they die and they replaced by a new generation of
replaced by a new generation of
replaced by a new generation of scientists and what Max Planck was
scientists and what Max Planck was
scientists and what Max Planck was alluding to with our
alluding to with our
alluding to with our was to the reality of debates with
was to the reality of debates with
was to the reality of debates with humans us as humans we are not designed
humans us as humans we are not designed
humans us as humans we are not designed as perfect rational thinkers only
as perfect rational thinkers only
as perfect rational thinkers only looking for the truth the fact is that
looking for the truth the fact is that
looking for the truth the fact is that often we are attached to our ideas we
often we are attached to our ideas we
often we are attached to our ideas we can be attached to ideas because
can be attached to ideas because
can be attached to ideas because somebody’s maybe convenient to us for
somebody’s maybe convenient to us for
somebody’s maybe convenient to us for interest so going to the example of the
interest so going to the example of the
interest so going to the example of the scientist for max planck these
scientist for max planck these
scientist for max planck these scientists may have become famous
scientists may have become famous
scientists may have become famous because of the ideas that they proposed
because of the ideas that they proposed
because of the ideas that they proposed in the past and which are now old ideas
in the past and which are now old ideas
in the past and which are now old ideas abandoning these ideas would be losing
abandoning these ideas would be losing
abandoning these ideas would be losing part of the credit they got for
part of the credit they got for
part of the credit they got for proposing these ideas in the first place
proposing these ideas in the first place
proposing these ideas in the first place but it’s not just in science if you
but it’s not just in science if you
but it’s not just in science if you think in politics if a government
think in politics if a government
think in politics if a government proposed to extend social welfare those
proposed to extend social welfare those
proposed to extend social welfare those who would receive social welfare have an
who would receive social welfare have an
who would receive social welfare have an interest to believe it’s good for the
interest to believe it’s good for the
interest to believe it’s good for the country and those would have to pay for
country and those would have to pay for
country and those would have to pay for the social welfare have an interest to
the social welfare have an interest to
the social welfare have an interest to think it’s bad for the country it’s bad
think it’s bad for the country it’s bad
think it’s bad for the country it’s bad policy for the country but we are not
policy for the country but we are not
policy for the country but we are not just attached to ideas for material
just attached to ideas for material
just attached to ideas for material interest it’s much more complex often we
interest it’s much more complex often we
interest it’s much more complex often we can be emotionally attached on to IDs
can be emotionally attached on to IDs
can be emotionally attached on to IDs there may be part of identity so if I’m
there may be part of identity so if I’m
there may be part of identity so if I’m a Christian conservative or left-wing
a Christian conservative or left-wing
a Christian conservative or left-wing liberal these ID may be part of who I am
liberal these ID may be part of who I am
liberal these ID may be part of who I am abandoning these ideas could be losing
abandoning these ideas could be losing
abandoning these ideas could be losing part of my identity as a consequence we
part of my identity as a consequence we
part of my identity as a consequence we are attached to IDs so we are not
are attached to IDs so we are not
are attached to IDs so we are not neutral judges when we are considering
neutral judges when we are considering
neutral judges when we are considering the evidence for against them
the evidence for against them
the evidence for against them on the contrary science shows or sense
on the contrary science shows or sense
on the contrary science shows or sense of behavior show that we typically
of behavior show that we typically
of behavior show that we typically engage in self deception which is that
engage in self deception which is that
engage in self deception which is that we are building beliefs which are
we are building beliefs which are
we are building beliefs which are compatible with our interests and with
compatible with our interests and with
compatible with our interests and with all the Beeb’s self-deception is subtle
all the Beeb’s self-deception is subtle
all the Beeb’s self-deception is subtle it takes place all the time in your
it takes place all the time in your
it takes place all the time in your everyday life so I’m going to give you
everyday life so I’m going to give you
everyday life so I’m going to give you two ways into self-deceptions can change
two ways into self-deceptions can change
two ways into self-deceptions can change the way we believe in and produce
the way we believe in and produce
the way we believe in and produce convenient views for self first when you
convenient views for self first when you
convenient views for self first when you receive a news you have some flexibility
receive a news you have some flexibility
receive a news you have some flexibility into how you consider it
into how you consider it
into how you consider it if it’s a positive news which is
if it’s a positive news which is
if it’s a positive news which is compatible with your beliefs you can
compatible with your beliefs you can
compatible with your beliefs you can accept it as positive positive evidence
accept it as positive positive evidence
accept it as positive positive evidence and if it’s a negative news you can on
and if it’s a negative news you can on
and if it’s a negative news you can on on the contrary choose to discount it
on the contrary choose to discount it
on the contrary choose to discount it and not just to consider it let me tell
and not just to consider it let me tell
and not just to consider it let me tell you about a study a group of people were
you about a study a group of people were
you about a study a group of people were asked about beliefs political beliefs
asked about beliefs political beliefs
asked about beliefs political beliefs and non political beliefs political
and non political beliefs political
and non political beliefs political believes they had to say whether they
believes they had to say whether they
believes they had to say whether they believed in statements such as abortion
believed in statements such as abortion
believed in statements such as abortion should be legal very loaded statement
should be legal very loaded statement
should be legal very loaded statement typical of political statements and non
typical of political statements and non
typical of political statements and non political beliefs where statements such
political beliefs where statements such
political beliefs where statements such as smoking second-hand smoking is
as smoking second-hand smoking is
as smoking second-hand smoking is dangerous for your health what happened
dangerous for your health what happened
dangerous for your health what happened so what happened is that these people
so what happened is that these people
so what happened is that these people were confronted with contradictions to
were confronted with contradictions to
were confronted with contradictions to these beliefs what do you think people
these beliefs what do you think people
these beliefs what do you think people did how did they react when they were
did how did they react when they were
did how did they react when they were confronted with these contradictions
confronted with these contradictions
confronted with these contradictions well here’s how people reacted with
well here’s how people reacted with
well here’s how people reacted with their non political beliefs so you have
their non political beliefs so you have
their non political beliefs so you have the strength of their beliefs before the
the strength of their beliefs before the
the strength of their beliefs before the contradiction and after the
contradiction and after the
contradiction and after the contradiction so when faced with a
contradiction so when faced with a
contradiction so when faced with a series of contradiction they updated the
series of contradiction they updated the
series of contradiction they updated the beliefs and the strength of the ability
beliefs and the strength of the ability
beliefs and the strength of the ability is lower after facing contradictions but
is lower after facing contradictions but
is lower after facing contradictions but now look at what happens when they were
now look at what happens when they were
now look at what happens when they were faced with contradictions to their
faced with contradictions to their
faced with contradictions to their political beliefs here you can see that
political beliefs here you can see that
political beliefs here you can see that people resisted much more the
people resisted much more the
people resisted much more the contradiction and hold a hell to their
contradiction and hold a hell to their
contradiction and hold a hell to their political beliefs that’s one way we
political beliefs that’s one way we
political beliefs that’s one way we selectively interpret the news but there
selectively interpret the news but there
selectively interpret the news but there is another way we are not just receiving
is another way we are not just receiving
is another way we are not just receiving the news we are looking out for them
the news we are looking out for them
the news we are looking out for them with selecting where we want to look for
with selecting where we want to look for
with selecting where we want to look for information and typically we look for
information and typically we look for
information and typically we look for confirming information if you are
confirming information if you are
confirming information if you are conservative you are more likely to read
conservative you are more likely to read
conservative you are more likely to read a conservative newspaper to watch a
a conservative newspaper to watch a
a conservative newspaper to watch a conservative news channel and perhaps
conservative news channel and perhaps
conservative news channel and perhaps even to turn off the TV or the radio
even to turn off the TV or the radio
even to turn off the TV or the radio when a left-wing politician is being
when a left-wing politician is being
when a left-wing politician is being interviewed let me show you a
interviewed let me show you a
interviewed let me show you a hypothetical scenario let’s say that you
hypothetical scenario let’s say that you
hypothetical scenario let’s say that you wake up in the morning and you open your
wake up in the morning and you open your
wake up in the morning and you open your newspaper and you once in iou you’ve got
newspaper and you once in iou you’ve got
newspaper and you once in iou you’ve got a news which is not good the
a news which is not good the
a news which is not good the contradiction tío believes let’s say
contradiction tío believes let’s say
contradiction tío believes let’s say that this new success that your favorite
that this new success that your favorite
that this new success that your favorite politician is involved in a political
politician is involved in a political
politician is involved in a political handle and consider the other situation
handle and consider the other situation
handle and consider the other situation one of the contrary the news in the
one of the contrary the news in the
one of the contrary the news in the newspaper is positive it goes with your
newspaper is positive it goes with your
newspaper is positive it goes with your usual beliefs perhaps it’s another
usual beliefs perhaps it’s another
usual beliefs perhaps it’s another politician a politician that you do not
politician a politician that you do not
politician a politician that you do not like who is involved in a political
like who is involved in a political
like who is involved in a political scandal do you think do you feel that
scandal do you think do you feel that
scandal do you think do you feel that you would react in the same way to these
you would react in the same way to these
you would react in the same way to these two situations well research show that
two situations well research show that
two situations well research show that you would not most likely what happens
you would not most likely what happens
you would not most likely what happens is then if you find a contradiction you
is then if you find a contradiction you
is then if you find a contradiction you tend to look for all the new sources you
tend to look for all the new sources you
tend to look for all the new sources you give yourself a chance to find something
give yourself a chance to find something
give yourself a chance to find something which will contradict this negative news
which will contradict this negative news
which will contradict this negative news there’s another newspaper perhaps you’ll
there’s another newspaper perhaps you’ll
there’s another newspaper perhaps you’ll read the fine prints of the newspaper to
read the fine prints of the newspaper to
read the fine prints of the newspaper to make sure that the title was really
make sure that the title was really
make sure that the title was really reflecting here inflicted in the
reflecting here inflicted in the
reflecting here inflicted in the information on the contrary if you have
information on the contrary if you have
information on the contrary if you have the positive news you are more likely to
the positive news you are more likely to
the positive news you are more likely to stop there
stop there
stop there your monarchy to be happy to consider
your monarchy to be happy to consider
your monarchy to be happy to consider that this piece of evidence is enough
that this piece of evidence is enough
that this piece of evidence is enough for you to make your mind on this issue
for you to make your mind on this issue
for you to make your mind on this issue so as much as we would like to think of
so as much as we would like to think of
so as much as we would like to think of ourselves as rational thinkers it is the
ourselves as rational thinkers it is the
ourselves as rational thinkers it is the fact that this tendency to look for
fact that this tendency to look for
fact that this tendency to look for confirming news and to reject negative
confirming news and to reject negative
confirming news and to reject negative information is inbuilt in us so now
information is inbuilt in us so now
information is inbuilt in us so now before you panic and you think that
before you panic and you think that
before you panic and you think that irrationality is making public debate
irrationality is making public debate
irrationality is making public debate impossible you can relax
impossible you can relax
impossible you can relax these bars existed forever and way
these bars existed forever and way
these bars existed forever and way before so social media so what’s
before so social media so what’s
before so social media so what’s happening on the social media is that
happening on the social media is that
happening on the social media is that they are exacerbating some of the
they are exacerbating some of the
they are exacerbating some of the effects of this balance let me give you
effects of this balance let me give you
effects of this balance let me give you two ways in which start doing so first
two ways in which start doing so first
two ways in which start doing so first on the internet you have a much more
on the internet you have a much more
on the internet you have a much more freedom to look for the information
freedom to look for the information
freedom to look for the information which is convenient to whatever beliefs
which is convenient to whatever beliefs
which is convenient to whatever beliefs you have then then is like a giant
you have then then is like a giant
you have then then is like a giant supermarket for any kind of ID you will
supermarket for any kind of ID you will
supermarket for any kind of ID you will be able to find arguments for and
be able to find arguments for and
be able to find arguments for and supporting society let’s consider a
supporting society let’s consider a
supporting society let’s consider a crazy idea as an example let’s continue
crazy idea as an example let’s continue
crazy idea as an example let’s continue that you believe that the earth is flat
that you believe that the earth is flat
that you believe that the earth is flat well 30 years ago you would have been a
well 30 years ago you would have been a
well 30 years ago you would have been a bit alone and maybe struggling to find
bit alone and maybe struggling to find
bit alone and maybe struggling to find people to find you evidence for it today
people to find you evidence for it today
people to find you evidence for it today you can just connect on the Internet
you can just connect on the Internet
you can just connect on the Internet contact the flag of society and this
contact the flag of society and this
contact the flag of society and this society is going to provide you element
society is going to provide you element
society is going to provide you element of evidence arguments in favor of your
of evidence arguments in favor of your
of evidence arguments in favor of your belief there’s another way in which the
belief there’s another way in which the
belief there’s another way in which the internet helps you engage in
internet helps you engage in
internet helps you engage in self-deception that you can do it
self-deception that you can do it
self-deception that you can do it collectively you have now a multitude of
collectively you have now a multitude of
collectively you have now a multitude of communities on the internet who have
communities on the internet who have
communities on the internet who have created informational bubbles on their
created informational bubbles on their
created informational bubbles on their own in these bubbles people select
own in these bubbles people select
own in these bubbles people select information interpret information and
information interpret information and
information interpret information and repackage it in a way which is
repackage it in a way which is
repackage it in a way which is compatible with the communities view
compatible with the communities view
compatible with the communities view when a new fact is discussed in this
when a new fact is discussed in this
when a new fact is discussed in this community the elements which are
community the elements which are
community the elements which are positive for the community’s views are
positive for the community’s views are
positive for the community’s views are reinforced and the elements which are
reinforced and the elements which are
reinforced and the elements which are not are dropped and the nuances are are
not are dropped and the nuances are are
not are dropped and the nuances are are lost this community is built simple
lost this community is built simple
lost this community is built simple views compatible with the beliefs of the
views compatible with the beliefs of the
views compatible with the beliefs of the community so the social media have not
community so the social media have not
community so the social media have not created unified Toolik space web ideas
created unified Toolik space web ideas
created unified Toolik space web ideas are debated instead they have social
are debated instead they have social
are debated instead they have social media have increased our ability to
media have increased our ability to
media have increased our ability to connect specifically with the people
connect specifically with the people
connect specifically with the people whose use mostly match or own and
whose use mostly match or own and
whose use mostly match or own and whatever your views you can find a
whatever your views you can find a
whatever your views you can find a community of like-minded people with
community of like-minded people with
community of like-minded people with whom you can share arguments supporting
whom you can share arguments supporting
whom you can share arguments supporting your existing beliefs and not
your existing beliefs and not
your existing beliefs and not challenging them but what do you want do
challenging them but what do you want do
challenging them but what do you want do you want a unified public space when
you want a unified public space when
you want a unified public space when ideas where ideas are debated discussed
ideas where ideas are debated discussed
ideas where ideas are debated discussed and maybe the best ideas can win or a
and maybe the best ideas can win or a
and maybe the best ideas can win or a compartment a public space where
compartment a public space where
compartment a public space where different visions of the world can
different visions of the world can
different visions of the world can coexist unchallenged well if we want to
coexist unchallenged well if we want to
coexist unchallenged well if we want to define and support and the existence of
define and support and the existence of
define and support and the existence of an open public space we need to realize
an open public space we need to realize
an open public space we need to realize that the problem starts with us with how
that the problem starts with us with how
that the problem starts with us with how we form our opinions and how we share
we form our opinions and how we share
we form our opinions and how we share them on the social media so perhaps in
them on the social media so perhaps in
them on the social media so perhaps in the post truth era we need some
the post truth era we need some
the post truth era we need some guidelines about how to interact on the
guidelines about how to interact on the
guidelines about how to interact on the social media here are three steps step 1
social media here are three steps step 1
social media here are three steps step 1 avoid the narrow selection of
avoid the narrow selection of
avoid the narrow selection of information which closely match your
information which closely match your
information which closely match your views make sure that in your timeline
views make sure that in your timeline
views make sure that in your timeline you’ve got
you’ve got
you’ve got new sources which challenge your view
new sources which challenge your view
new sources which challenge your view try to find out what people we really
try to find out what people we really
try to find out what people we really disagree and exchange with them listen
disagree and exchange with them listen
disagree and exchange with them listen to what they have to say try to
to what they have to say try to
to what they have to say try to appreciate the points that they may have
appreciate the points that they may have
appreciate the points that they may have give them a chance to change your mind
point to question your views the more
point to question your views the more you’d like an idea to be true the more
you’d like an idea to be true the more
you’d like an idea to be true the more you need to distrust the way you made
you need to distrust the way you made
you need to distrust the way you made your mind about it are you sure that you
your mind about it are you sure that you
your mind about it are you sure that you considered all the best control argument
considered all the best control argument
considered all the best control argument to the views you have that you’ve
to the views you have that you’ve
to the views you have that you’ve considered possibly the existence of
considered possibly the existence of
considered possibly the existence of weak points in your reasoning try to
weak points in your reasoning try to
weak points in your reasoning try to find them whenever you really want an
find them whenever you really want an
find them whenever you really want an idea to be true you you may remember
idea to be true you you may remember
idea to be true you you may remember that at some point in your life we all
that at some point in your life we all
that at some point in your life we all like to believe in Santa and even though
like to believe in Santa and even though
like to believe in Santa and even though we really wanted Santa to be true it
we really wanted Santa to be true it
we really wanted Santa to be true it didn’t make him more real in the end so
didn’t make him more real in the end so
didn’t make him more real in the end so the more you’d like an idea to be true
the more you’d like an idea to be true
the more you’d like an idea to be true you need to be wondering is it too good
you need to be wondering is it too good
you need to be wondering is it too good to be true do I believe this because I
to be true do I believe this because I
to be true do I believe this because I want to believe it or because of the
want to believe it or because of the
want to believe it or because of the evidence could it be another Center for
evidence could it be another Center for
evidence could it be another Center for me step 3
me step 3
me step 3 avoid contributing to the distortion of
avoid contributing to the distortion of
avoid contributing to the distortion of facts when you want to forward
facts when you want to forward
facts when you want to forward information in the social media make
information in the social media make
information in the social media make sure you’ve read it you understand it
sure you’ve read it you understand it
sure you’ve read it you understand it and avoid to simplify it in a way which
and avoid to simplify it in a way which
and avoid to simplify it in a way which is going to be conformed to the views of
is going to be conformed to the views of
is going to be conformed to the views of the community try not to contribute to
the community try not to contribute to
the community try not to contribute to an echo chamber effect within the
an echo chamber effect within the
an echo chamber effect within the community of views you are participating
community of views you are participating
community of views you are participating in if you follow these guidelines you
in if you follow these guidelines you
in if you follow these guidelines you are going to make yourself a favor
are going to make yourself a favor
are going to make yourself a favor you’re going to stop building a
you’re going to stop building a
you’re going to stop building a convenient alternative reality you are
convenient alternative reality you are
convenient alternative reality you are going to avoid spreading half-truths and
going to avoid spreading half-truths and
going to avoid spreading half-truths and distorted facts and you will limit the
distorted facts and you will limit the
distorted facts and you will limit the self-enforcing loops of confirming
self-enforcing loops of confirming
self-enforcing loops of confirming exchanges which are pushing people in
exchanges which are pushing people in
exchanges which are pushing people in different informational bubbles you will
different informational bubbles you will
different informational bubbles you will help ideas to be questioned and
help ideas to be questioned and
help ideas to be questioned and challenged and you will contribute to
challenged and you will contribute to
challenged and you will contribute to making the public space an open space
making the public space an open space
making the public space an open space where the best ideas can win will you
where the best ideas can win will you
where the best ideas can win will you allow yourself to change your views and
allow yourself to change your views and
allow yourself to change your views and to abandon all ones
to abandon all ones
to abandon all ones smart people change their mind choose to
smart people change their mind choose to
smart people change their mind choose to be one
be one
be one [Applause]
[Applause]
[Applause] you
”
Be First to Comment