Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Power of Imagination | Felipe De Brigard | TEDxDuke


so my friend Bertrand met his wife in

so my friend Bertrand met his wife in the most unusual of circumstances a

the most unusual of circumstances a

the most unusual of circumstances a co-worker of his asked him one day if he

co-worker of his asked him one day if he

co-worker of his asked him one day if he could go in his stead

could go in his stead

could go in his stead to this small town in Germany so

to this small town in Germany so

to this small town in Germany so Bertrand agreed to go while he was there

Bertrand agreed to go while he was there

Bertrand agreed to go while he was there he also learned that at acquaintance of

he also learned that at acquaintance of

he also learned that at acquaintance of his that he hasn’t healed in a long long

his that he hasn’t healed in a long long

his that he hasn’t healed in a long long time was also in town and they decided

time was also in town and they decided

time was also in town and they decided to get together in a bar that night the

to get together in a bar that night the

to get together in a bar that night the bar was crowded so they had to wait

bar was crowded so they had to wait

bar was crowded so they had to wait outside in line it was cold so at some

outside in line it was cold so at some

outside in line it was cold so at some point Bertrand turned around cup his

point Bertrand turned around cup his

point Bertrand turned around cup his hands and he started to blow hot air

hands and he started to blow hot air

hands and he started to blow hot air into them at that very point a woman

into them at that very point a woman

into them at that very point a woman sitting standing right next to him also

sitting standing right next to him also

sitting standing right next to him also turn around cup her hands and blew hot

turn around cup her hands and blew hot

turn around cup her hands and blew hot air into them they both look at each

air into them they both look at each

air into them they both look at each other and chuckled and started chatting

other and chuckled and started chatting

other and chuckled and started chatting at that point the taxi came back and

at that point the taxi came back and

at that point the taxi came back and this woman Laura left the bar but she

this woman Laura left the bar but she

this woman Laura left the bar but she did not left

did not left

did not left Bertrand mind the next day Bertram was

Bertrand mind the next day Bertram was

Bertrand mind the next day Bertram was waiting in a bench for the bus that

waiting in a bench for the bus that

waiting in a bench for the bus that would take him to the train station the

would take him to the train station the

would take him to the train station the bus was running late and at that point

bus was running late and at that point

bus was running late and at that point he saw a bicycle sharply stopping by

he saw a bicycle sharply stopping by

he saw a bicycle sharply stopping by right in front of him took him about a

right in front of him took him about a

right in front of him took him about a second to recognize that it was Laura in

second to recognize that it was Laura in

second to recognize that it was Laura in that bike so he approached her they

that bike so he approached her they

that bike so he approached her they exchanged phone numbers as of now they

exchanged phone numbers as of now they

exchanged phone numbers as of now they have been married for 10 years and I

have been married for 10 years and I

have been married for 10 years and I recently learned that they’re respecting

recently learned that they’re respecting

recently learned that they’re respecting their second child for Bertrand tells

their second child for Bertrand tells

their second child for Bertrand tells his story it is impossible not to

his story it is impossible not to

his story it is impossible not to imagine the many ways in which he could

imagine the many ways in which he could

imagine the many ways in which he could have failed to meet his wife what if his

have failed to meet his wife what if his

have failed to meet his wife what if his coworker hadn’t asked him to go to this

coworker hadn’t asked him to go to this

coworker hadn’t asked him to go to this small town what if his acquaintance

small town what if his acquaintance

small town what if his acquaintance wasn’t there or hadn’t planned to go to

wasn’t there or hadn’t planned to go to

wasn’t there or hadn’t planned to go to the park or if the bar wasn’t crowded or

the park or if the bar wasn’t crowded or

the park or if the bar wasn’t crowded or if he wasn’t called or what if the light

if he wasn’t called or what if the light

if he wasn’t called or what if the light had actually been green

had actually been green

had actually been green and such Lara didn’t have to stop by in

and such Lara didn’t have to stop by in

and such Lara didn’t have to stop by in front of the bench when we let our

front of the bench when we let our

front of the bench when we let our imagination wandering the mysterious

imagination wandering the mysterious

imagination wandering the mysterious realms of the what-ifs when we imagined

realms of the what-ifs when we imagined

realms of the what-ifs when we imagined alternative ways in which past events

alternative ways in which past events

alternative ways in which past events could have happened we engage in what

could have happened we engage in what

could have happened we engage in what psychologists known as counterfactual

psychologists known as counterfactual

psychologists known as counterfactual thinking thoughts that are contrary to

thinking thoughts that are contrary to

thinking thoughts that are contrary to fact but what if counterfactual thoughts

fact but what if counterfactual thoughts

fact but what if counterfactual thoughts Hasnat are not as mysterious as we think

Hasnat are not as mysterious as we think

Hasnat are not as mysterious as we think they could be after all when we think

they could be after all when we think

they could be after all when we think about the many ways in which Bertrand

about the many ways in which Bertrand

about the many ways in which Bertrand could have failed to meet his wife we

could have failed to meet his wife we

could have failed to meet his wife we think of some predictable ways in which

think of some predictable ways in which

think of some predictable ways in which events could have changed for instance

events could have changed for instance

events could have changed for instance we tend to think what if for instance

we tend to think what if for instance

we tend to think what if for instance the bus was on time rather than late or

the bus was on time rather than late or

the bus was on time rather than late or what if the light was green rather than

what if the light was green rather than

what if the light was green rather than red sometimes we also can engage in

red sometimes we also can engage in

red sometimes we also can engage in other kinds of contractual thinking

other kinds of contractual thinking

other kinds of contractual thinking reminding imagine far-fetched

reminding imagine far-fetched

reminding imagine far-fetched possibilities for instance we might

possibilities for instance we might

possibilities for instance we might imagine what happens if the next day

imagine what happens if the next day

imagine what happens if the next day Laura had forgotten all about the night

Laura had forgotten all about the night

Laura had forgotten all about the night before or what if all of a sudden

before or what if all of a sudden

before or what if all of a sudden gravity changed in this unusual way such

gravity changed in this unusual way such

gravity changed in this unusual way such that the bike right in front of

that the bike right in front of

that the bike right in front of Bertrand’s bench was rocketed up to the

Bertrand’s bench was rocketed up to the

Bertrand’s bench was rocketed up to the sky preventing Bertrand for ever meeting

sky preventing Bertrand for ever meeting

sky preventing Bertrand for ever meeting Laura and marrying her why don’t we

Laura and marrying her why don’t we

Laura and marrying her why don’t we engage in those more far-fetched

engage in those more far-fetched

engage in those more far-fetched possibilities in 1980 cognitive

possibilities in 1980 cognitive

possibilities in 1980 cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter suggested

scientist Douglas Hofstadter suggested

scientist Douglas Hofstadter suggested that maybe the reason why that happened

that maybe the reason why that happened

that maybe the reason why that happened is because our mind have some natural

is because our mind have some natural

is because our mind have some natural fault lines systematic ways in which we

fault lines systematic ways in which we

fault lines systematic ways in which we alter reality in our imagination ever

alter reality in our imagination ever

alter reality in our imagination ever since many cognitive psychologists have

since many cognitive psychologists have

since many cognitive psychologists have engaged in what I call cognitive

engaged in what I call cognitive

engaged in what I call cognitive seismology it’s our scientific attempt

seismology it’s our scientific attempt

seismology it’s our scientific attempt to map the mental fault lines of our

to map the mental fault lines of our

to map the mental fault lines of our imagination one of the most influential

imagination one of the most influential

imagination one of the most influential cognitive seismologists is Nobel Prize

cognitive seismologists is Nobel Prize

cognitive seismologists is Nobel Prize winner

winner

winner dan Kahneman in a series of pioneering

dan Kahneman in a series of pioneering

dan Kahneman in a series of pioneering studies conducted in the 1980s Kahneman

studies conducted in the 1980s Kahneman

studies conducted in the 1980s Kahneman and collaborators presented participants

and collaborators presented participants

and collaborators presented participants with a number of vignettes

with a number of vignettes

with a number of vignettes that included what they call junctures

that included what they call junctures

that included what they call junctures causally relevant events that even done

causally relevant events that even done

causally relevant events that even done would prevent a certain outcome to occur

would prevent a certain outcome to occur

would prevent a certain outcome to occur so for instance one of such vignettes

so for instance one of such vignettes

so for instance one of such vignettes depicts the story of this young

depicts the story of this young

depicts the story of this young gentleman who driving under the

gentleman who driving under the

gentleman who driving under the influence driving under the influence

influence driving under the influence

influence driving under the influence just fails to notice a red light and

just fails to notice a red light and

just fails to notice a red light and crashes into an another car that is

crashes into an another car that is

crashes into an another car that is coming in the opposite direction and

coming in the opposite direction and

coming in the opposite direction and kills the driver immediately when you

kills the driver immediately when you

kills the driver immediately when you asked about the ways in which those

asked about the ways in which those

asked about the ways in which those events could have happened differently

events could have happened differently

events could have happened differently people tend to normally undo the same

people tend to normally undo the same

people tend to normally undo the same events in fact people seem to undo

events in fact people seem to undo

events in fact people seem to undo events that are abnormal or unusual

events that are abnormal or unusual

events that are abnormal or unusual think about again the case of Bertrand

think about again the case of Bertrand

think about again the case of Bertrand we tend to think for instance what would

we tend to think for instance what would

we tend to think for instance what would have happened if the bus had actually

have happened if the bus had actually

have happened if the bus had actually been on time because being late is a

been on time because being late is a

been on time because being late is a rather unusual event in Germany where

rather unusual event in Germany where

rather unusual event in Germany where buses are so beautiful right

buses are so beautiful right

buses are so beautiful right another possibility is for us to think

another possibility is for us to think

another possibility is for us to think what would have happened if the light

what would have happened if the light

what would have happened if the light hadn’t turned red but we don’t think

hadn’t turned red but we don’t think

hadn’t turned red but we don’t think about this unusual event of gravity

about this unusual event of gravity

about this unusual event of gravity changing drastically driving gravity

changing drastically driving gravity

changing drastically driving gravity usually never changes so this view which

usually never changes so this view which

usually never changes so this view which is sometimes home as the norm theory had

is sometimes home as the norm theory had

is sometimes home as the norm theory had led an enormous amount of research in

led an enormous amount of research in

led an enormous amount of research in trying to understand what kinds of

trying to understand what kinds of

trying to understand what kinds of thoughts we think counterfactual

thoughts we think counterfactual

thoughts we think counterfactual alternatives to but in addition to that

alternatives to but in addition to that

alternatives to but in addition to that psychologists can also wonder why we

psychologists can also wonder why we

psychologists can also wonder why we engage in contractual thinking so

engage in contractual thinking so

engage in contractual thinking so frequently and so often and the key to

frequently and so often and the key to

frequently and so often and the key to understand why is also to understand

understand why is also to understand

understand why is also to understand when if you’re like me you normally

when if you’re like me you normally

when if you’re like me you normally engage in contractual thinking when you

engage in contractual thinking when you

engage in contractual thinking when you are planning to do a certain action and

are planning to do a certain action and

are planning to do a certain action and you fail if only I had gone to bed

you fail if only I had gone to bed

you fail if only I had gone to bed earlier I would have been able to be

earlier I would have been able to be

earlier I would have been able to be more relaxed and do better in this exam

more relaxed and do better in this exam

more relaxed and do better in this exam or if only I had to stop at that gas

or if only I had to stop at that gas

or if only I had to stop at that gas station I wouldn’t have run out of gas

station I wouldn’t have run out of gas

station I wouldn’t have run out of gas now these kinds of thoughts there are

now these kinds of thoughts there are

now these kinds of thoughts there are usually better alternative to bad

usually better alternative to bad

usually better alternative to bad outcomes are known as upward

outcomes are known as upward

outcomes are known as upward counterfactual thoughts and in general

counterfactual thoughts and in general

counterfactual thoughts and in general when we

when we

when we engaging upward counterfactual thinking

engaging upward counterfactual thinking

engaging upward counterfactual thinking we feel some kind of regret now less

we feel some kind of regret now less

we feel some kind of regret now less often but sometimes it does occur we

often but sometimes it does occur we

often but sometimes it does occur we engage in another kind of contractual

engage in another kind of contractual

engage in another kind of contractual thinking in which we imagine how good

thinking in which we imagine how good

thinking in which we imagine how good events could have been worse how

events could have been worse how

events could have been worse how diamines that penalty kick we would have

diamines that penalty kick we would have

diamines that penalty kick we would have lost the game or had I been in that line

lost the game or had I been in that line

lost the game or had I been in that line right next to me I wouldn’t have been

right next to me I wouldn’t have been

right next to me I wouldn’t have been able to get ticket to come to this TED

able to get ticket to come to this TED

able to get ticket to come to this TED talk this downward contractions are also

talk this downward contractions are also

talk this downward contractions are also usually associated with feelings but

usually associated with feelings but

usually associated with feelings but these times these feelings are feelings

these times these feelings are feelings

these times these feelings are feelings of relief almost twenty years ago

of relief almost twenty years ago

of relief almost twenty years ago psychologist Neil Rose and Jose Olsen

psychologist Neil Rose and Jose Olsen

psychologist Neil Rose and Jose Olsen generated what they call the

generated what they call the

generated what they call the counterfactual the functional theory of

counterfactual the functional theory of

counterfactual the functional theory of counterfactual thinking according to

counterfactual thinking according to

counterfactual thinking according to this theory we engage in upper

this theory we engage in upper

this theory we engage in upper contractual thinking because we are

contractual thinking because we are

contractual thinking because we are preparing to do better in the future

preparing to do better in the future

preparing to do better in the future we rehearse alternative ways in which

we rehearse alternative ways in which

we rehearse alternative ways in which past events could have occurred in order

past events could have occurred in order

past events could have occurred in order to improve our future performance

to improve our future performance

to improve our future performance likewise when we engage in downward

likewise when we engage in downward

likewise when we engage in downward contractual when we imagine worse ways

contractual when we imagine worse ways

contractual when we imagine worse ways in which an event could have happened

in which an event could have happened

in which an event could have happened we’re actually doing that to make to

we’re actually doing that to make to

we’re actually doing that to make to feel better about what we achieved or

feel better about what we achieved or

feel better about what we achieved or what we attained the problem with this

what we attained the problem with this

what we attained the problem with this view is that this is not always the case

view is that this is not always the case

view is that this is not always the case consider the case of Kim Kim was a

consider the case of Kim Kim was a

consider the case of Kim Kim was a flight attendant that was scheduled to

flight attendant that was scheduled to

flight attendant that was scheduled to fly in the United Airlines flight 93 the

fly in the United Airlines flight 93 the

fly in the United Airlines flight 93 the time before and this is in 2011

time before and this is in 2011

time before and this is in 2011 September 11 2001 the night before she

September 11 2001 the night before she

September 11 2001 the night before she called the calling and asking if she

called the calling and asking if she

called the calling and asking if she could switch the turn with her that

could switch the turn with her that

could switch the turn with her that prevent her from dying in the crash of

prevent her from dying in the crash of

prevent her from dying in the crash of the airplane in Pennsylvania you would

the airplane in Pennsylvania you would

the airplane in Pennsylvania you would think that the fact that she constantly

think that the fact that she constantly

think that the fact that she constantly engages in counterfactual thoughts about

engages in counterfactual thoughts about

engages in counterfactual thoughts about what would have happened had he not

what would have happened had he not

what would have happened had he not changed the turn the night before would

changed the turn the night before would

changed the turn the night before would give her his feelings of relief he will

give her his feelings of relief he will

give her his feelings of relief he will be wrong she’s haunted by these

be wrong she’s haunted by these

be wrong she’s haunted by these counterfactual thoughts over and over

counterfactual thoughts over and over

counterfactual thoughts over and over again and make him feel incredibly sad

again and make him feel incredibly sad

again and make him feel incredibly sad and regretful or think about this other

and regretful or think about this other

and regretful or think about this other case in which we engage in contractual

case in which we engage in contractual

case in which we engage in contractual thoughts about events that we know are

thoughts about events that we know are

thoughts about events that we know are never

never

never to be repeated I’m thinking about the

to be repeated I’m thinking about the

to be repeated I’m thinking about the case of Anastasia Anastasia is a young

case of Anastasia Anastasia is a young

case of Anastasia Anastasia is a young gymnast who can’t help but repeat over

gymnast who can’t help but repeat over

gymnast who can’t help but repeat over and over again in her mind this one

and over again in her mind this one

and over again in her mind this one mistake she made and that left her

mistake she made and that left her

mistake she made and that left her paraplegic

paraplegic

paraplegic why is she constantly ruminating over

why is she constantly ruminating over

why is she constantly ruminating over and over again this contractual thought

and over again this contractual thought

and over again this contractual thought she won’t be able to walk again much

she won’t be able to walk again much

she won’t be able to walk again much less to do in gymnastics

less to do in gymnastics

less to do in gymnastics what kind of future event is she trying

what kind of future event is she trying

what kind of future event is she trying to improve upon our thoughts in our lab

to improve upon our thoughts in our lab

to improve upon our thoughts in our lab with my collaborators is that the reason

with my collaborators is that the reason

with my collaborators is that the reason why these cases appear challenging is

why these cases appear challenging is

why these cases appear challenging is because we’re getting the function of

because we’re getting the function of

because we’re getting the function of these counterfactual thoughts wrong not

these counterfactual thoughts wrong not

these counterfactual thoughts wrong not all contractual thinking allows us to

all contractual thinking allows us to

all contractual thinking allows us to plan for the future or make us feel

plan for the future or make us feel

plan for the future or make us feel better about the present sometimes

better about the present sometimes

better about the present sometimes counterfactual thinking has a different

counterfactual thinking has a different

counterfactual thinking has a different function it helps us change our past but

function it helps us change our past but

function it helps us change our past but to tell you how that is possible I need

to tell you how that is possible I need

to tell you how that is possible I need to tell you a little bit about memory

to tell you a little bit about memory

to tell you a little bit about memory according to the traditional view in

according to the traditional view in

according to the traditional view in memory when you engage in certain

memory when you engage in certain

memory when you engage in certain experience and you have a certain and

experience and you have a certain and

experience and you have a certain and you experience a certain event the

you experience a certain event the

you experience a certain event the information tends to be consolidated

information tends to be consolidated

information tends to be consolidated stored unchanged until next time that

stored unchanged until next time that

stored unchanged until next time that you retrieve it however in the last

you retrieve it however in the last

you retrieve it however in the last three or four decades it has become

three or four decades it has become

three or four decades it has become pretty evident that every time that you

pretty evident that every time that you

pretty evident that every time that you remember a memory that memory becomes

remember a memory that memory becomes

remember a memory that memory becomes liable and prone to modification you can

liable and prone to modification you can

liable and prone to modification you can actually change a little bit the content

actually change a little bit the content

actually change a little bit the content of the memory at the time of retrieval

of the memory at the time of retrieval

of the memory at the time of retrieval in fact evidence suggests that every

in fact evidence suggests that every

in fact evidence suggests that every time that you remember a memory you

time that you remember a memory you

time that you remember a memory you update it and you edit it a little bit

update it and you edit it a little bit

update it and you edit it a little bit but so what if engaging in contractual

but so what if engaging in contractual

but so what if engaging in contractual thinking is a good strategy for us to

thinking is a good strategy for us to

thinking is a good strategy for us to change the content of our out of our

change the content of our out of our

change the content of our out of our graphical memories at the time of

graphical memories at the time of

graphical memories at the time of retrieval to test that possibility my

retrieval to test that possibility my

retrieval to test that possibility my collaborators and I asked participants

collaborators and I asked participants

collaborators and I asked participants to come to the lab and we asked them to

to come to the lab and we asked them to

to come to the lab and we asked them to think and remember a specific

think and remember a specific

think and remember a specific autobiographical event that happened to

autobiographical event that happened to

autobiographical event that happened to them in the past a week later they came

them in the past a week later they came

them in the past a week later they came back to the

back to the

back to the and we asked them to engage in

and we asked them to engage in

and we asked them to engage in contractual thinking half of those

contractual thinking half of those

contractual thinking half of those memories they thought alternatives to

memories they thought alternatives to

memories they thought alternatives to several times as if they were ruminating

several times as if they were ruminating

several times as if they were ruminating and the other half the only thought

and the other half the only thought

and the other half the only thought about an alternative an alternative way

about an alternative an alternative way

about an alternative an alternative way in which it could have occurred only

in which it could have occurred only

in which it could have occurred only once and then we compared those that

once and then we compared those that

once and then we compared those that were repeatedly singulated

were repeatedly singulated

were repeatedly singulated versus those that were only simulated

versus those that were only simulated

versus those that were only simulated ones and what our results suggest is

ones and what our results suggest is

ones and what our results suggest is that the more you think about how

that the more you think about how

that the more you think about how another – how certain event could have

another – how certain event could have

another – how certain event could have occurred the less likely you think is

occurred the less likely you think is

occurred the less likely you think is that your memory could have occurred

that your memory could have occurred

that your memory could have occurred differently we suggest that this effect

differently we suggest that this effect

differently we suggest that this effect is our memory helping us to come to

is our memory helping us to come to

is our memory helping us to come to grips with the past by taking away our

grips with the past by taking away our

grips with the past by taking away our attention from possibilities that are

attention from possibilities that are

attention from possibilities that are very unlikely to have happened but not

very unlikely to have happened but not

very unlikely to have happened but not everyone is in the same boat as Bertrand

everyone is in the same boat as Bertrand

everyone is in the same boat as Bertrand Bertrand was very happy every time that

Bertrand was very happy every time that

Bertrand was very happy every time that he remembered a specific episodes that

he remembered a specific episodes that

he remembered a specific episodes that happen in his past and imagining

happen in his past and imagining

happen in his past and imagining alternative ways in which those events

alternative ways in which those events

alternative ways in which those events could have occurred sometimes

could have occurred sometimes

could have occurred sometimes unfortunately people are haunted by

unfortunately people are haunted by

unfortunately people are haunted by memories that they would rather not

memories that they would rather not

memories that they would rather not remember sometimes people are haunted by

remember sometimes people are haunted by

remember sometimes people are haunted by contractual thoughts that they would

contractual thoughts that they would

contractual thoughts that they would rather not have so the question now is

rather not have so the question now is

rather not have so the question now is can we harness the power of

can we harness the power of

can we harness the power of counterfactual thinking to change the

counterfactual thinking to change the

counterfactual thinking to change the emotion and the valence of

emotion and the valence of

emotion and the valence of autobiographical memories that we rather

autobiographical memories that we rather

autobiographical memories that we rather not have autobiographical memories that

not have autobiographical memories that

not have autobiographical memories that are debilitating and incapacitating that

are debilitating and incapacitating that

are debilitating and incapacitating that has been the leading question of our

has been the leading question of our

has been the leading question of our research in the lab for the past year a

research in the lab for the past year a

research in the lab for the past year a pilot study conducted in the lab invited

pilot study conducted in the lab invited

pilot study conducted in the lab invited participants to come to the lab and

participants to come to the lab and

participants to come to the lab and produce a number of out the biographical

produce a number of out the biographical

produce a number of out the biographical memories of regretful events in their

memories of regretful events in their

memories of regretful events in their life and we asked them to give us some

life and we asked them to give us some

life and we asked them to give us some measures of valence and some measures of

measures of valence and some measures of

measures of valence and some measures of intensity of emotion a week later they

intensity of emotion a week later they

intensity of emotion a week later they asked them to come back to the lab to

asked them to come back to the lab to

asked them to come back to the lab to either engage in contractual thinking or

either engage in contractual thinking or

either engage in contractual thinking or just simply we remember those event and

just simply we remember those event and

just simply we remember those event and a day later they come back and we asked

a day later they come back and we asked

a day later they come back and we asked them to remember the events once again

them to remember the events once again

them to remember the events once again and we measure the valence and the

and we measure the valence and the

and we measure the valence and the intensity of the

intensity of the

intensity of the memories that allows us to compare the

memories that allows us to compare the

memories that allows us to compare the memories once reactivated to the

memories once reactivated to the

memories once reactivated to the original memories all the preliminary

original memories all the preliminary

original memories all the preliminary our results suggest that engaging in

our results suggest that engaging in

our results suggest that engaging in counterfactual thinking about negative

counterfactual thinking about negative

counterfactual thinking about negative events that could have been better

events that could have been better

events that could have been better changes a little bit the valence of

changes a little bit the valence of

changes a little bit the valence of those memories in a way that is

those memories in a way that is

those memories in a way that is different from just merely reactivating

different from just merely reactivating

different from just merely reactivating them in memory

them in memory

them in memory conversely engaging into a

conversely engaging into a

conversely engaging into a counterfactual thinking about positive

counterfactual thinking about positive

counterfactual thinking about positive memories changes the intensity with

memories changes the intensity with

memories changes the intensity with which we feel those emotions our hope is

which we feel those emotions our hope is

which we feel those emotions our hope is to harness what we learn from the

to harness what we learn from the

to harness what we learn from the mechanisms about contractual thinking in

mechanisms about contractual thinking in

mechanisms about contractual thinking in the context of memory reactivating to

the context of memory reactivating to

the context of memory reactivating to see we can use that knowledge to change

see we can use that knowledge to change

see we can use that knowledge to change people’s memories in a clinical context

people’s memories in a clinical context

people’s memories in a clinical context the idea is an imagination is a very

the idea is an imagination is a very

the idea is an imagination is a very powerful tool that helps us not only

powerful tool that helps us not only

powerful tool that helps us not only plan for the future and makes us feel

plan for the future and makes us feel

plan for the future and makes us feel better about the present but also can

better about the present but also can

better about the present but also can help us change our memories about the

help us change our memories about the

help us change our memories about the past thank you

past thank you

past thank you [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *