Press "Enter" to skip to content

L’art et les maths | Léa Rinino | TEDxINSA


so hello to everyone as you want

to see him today I would like you

talk about art but I think my style

is important that I explain to you a

little what happens to me is actually to

think about it so I write you

a little context

I was at home I was alone and for

some reason I was

terribly angry at that moment

I was that talent and I had a lot

a real need to be able to express his

anger can externalize it is the

one and only potential victim to

the layout and it’s a poor

blank sheet that is deposited on the

heavy so I decided to seize man

and I expressed all my rage all the way

anger that I could feel at this

moment there so I granted you this

worship a massacre this summer the but

it’s doing me a lot of good and I

you go back and mclane the occupations

and do something else but a little bit more

late in the day I was coming back to

the highest I revisit the sheet and I

watched him for a moment I spend he’s

without knowing why a small doubt

announcements and arm grabbed a doubt

who deprived making more importance

until it becomes quite unbearable

without knowing why I was repeating myself and

if just see the will I had

to be able to externalize express my

anger and if I went products dollars

but how to be sure

how to know it because ultimately

what is art

I did not know what

it was and the answer needed a

reliable answer and solid answers and

like anyone looking for

reliable and solid answers

I call on my best friend

wikipedia and multimedia the word pipe

for word art is a human activity

the product of this activity the idea

actually deliberately addressing the

sense to emotions to intuitions and to

TV I admit that after such

critical answer and n was no longer

a lot my friend and that I decided

to get my answer she is

so I decide to go meet

people who before me it was

she is also interested in art

interested in its definition

I went back to the last century and I

met flat indeed and we learned

that there we move away from the bo so I

perfectly agree with him there

away from the good milk however the

bo is a concept too a bit too

subjective for my taste for example good

tray

the bo is the truth and the street

testify of the jar with a

false representation and the world that

surrounds us

I was looking for another definition

which suits me best I advanced

in time and I meet and when

and when you tell me there is original loch

is innate genius guided by the

nature

I confess I was extremely

flattered by this definition but

again jeanne’s father

imagine because it means that only one

minority of people could be

considered as real artists

no I still disagreed he

we needed something else

I go there a little bit in time

and I confess this time

nietzsche who with his optimism

usual took only life was

perfectly meaningless thank you said

‘I ‘m always happy here studies

have to try desperately to

make sense of the city ​​by the word

by ideas and not rare though

my eye I think we convinces

green did not really make sense

or she certainly has

all me and for you who know a

little context

his creation is a large number

of works of art despite this could

think some specialists so no

really meaningful there is some

stop to search please

and no sense

okay okay so if she had to in the

bar it’s certainly different

for every person who would face

this artwork so again

the definition did not suit me this

once I had to meet

still someone I have a new

definition is rather than

to talk to philosophers who was going

think about distance so she

will meet someone who practice

the art I meet daily is

so one by the google painter who tells me

no for mullahs with an attraction

that’s the way to monteverdi by doing

that our divine master creates then

I was pretty much in agreement

that the decree on abstraction

however when I proved it

that she absolutely did not want to

mount their god I am very good

driven and I tell myself more than we

let’s go like a lot of things that god

would be better creators time than

me because they could otherwise we would have

was not very functional at the station

Saint-Charles

this is so I had the ubs met

philosophers froze to meet

all types etienne it was yet

the most reliable source

I met painter and yet

I was better than a departure they

still did not have that summer there is

the question persists and what is the

crate because I had to think about it

at all costs in the eu everything was

really unbearable and I say to myself

just why could not I

not propose my own definition of

Art and finishes that would cause

more to the personal idea is

subjective enough I can do myself

dollar and this definition here it is

art is an intention to create and

only an intention to create but

be careful in this definition the word

created is important and equity of

production produce a minimal object

that unity why not but what

is really important in this

definition it’s the word intentions by

example if we take a worker who

will produce to the chain in a factory

objects but in the simple more

to be able to support oneself

materials

it’s one to produce and something

but does not know by the artist but it’s

really small blow place it’s even

isolated in this same company this

same factory

timetrine and passion in this

what would he do if he considers the object

created as an end more than as a

means that would be used to provide

his needs and to the elder a blow

of money had to be considered

as the artist is set a real

intention a real passion in his

production

however I can not afford

just to impose this

proposal this new definition

like any philosophical definition

it must be demonstrated and

what’s more effective more beautiful of

more reminded when looking at

demonstrate something that the

mathematics

yes it’s the little sentence ition and

neck however since the beginning of the most

in one of the philosophies of art and

I now try to move to a

mathematical demonstration so he

I have to make the link between

spinners

and mathematics is this the

here is a proposition on which

will base more or less the jacket of

motorcycle I’m going to consider that the concept

philosophical is akin to a whole

mathematics and I immediately

explain to you most clearly

possible why a whole the

thematic is simply a

collection of objects see the corner as

a big 7 would contain a given number

of objects and the concept of an object in

philosophy and just emptiness and who

is going to be the human spirit of an object

and suddenly this idea we will you

to make an object based on the whole

similar objects we

already met in the past

it may sound a bit confusing

that so I let’s take the example the

more concrete let’s take the concept of the pen

so the concept of the pen object

actually concerned all objects

named pen that you met

until today and when you

will encounter a new object in life

every day you take this object

you compare it to all of

objects that make up your pen concept

and you conclude yes no this object is

he a pen is not it I hope

that it’s a little more than the cobra to

present the link between the finds and

the whole is managed in all the doors

attention it’s not log

mathematics it is precisely to whom

introduces him to simplify a word

the scriptures when I speak to you

of a concept I ‘m done between

parentheses so remember luc well I

the used subsequently in the

demonstration

that’s it for us can go back to the

composition that interests us

the definition we are going to try to

demonstrate today the is a

intention to create very quickly one

meets that this definition

involves something very

important

Caesar is a buffet intention that

necessarily implies that no matter

the object must be able to belong to the

art concept it’s logical enough

we are therefore entitled to ask is

this truth that any object can

belong to the concept of art or rather

ask ourselves the question what is the

art concept let’s be able to

define a set for the concept

of art that would contain a given number

of objects because after all when there

thought

s is different depending on the country where

is different according to the times

art is different depending on the context

social economic policy

in truth the decree different art

is different the art will be different and

therefore one will be able to try

it will be completely impossible to

define and delimit what the

concept bar without true explained

simply canton to delimit the

concept of art at day 0 just

between the day 0 and 20 days a a

artist a little an engineer a little

origin created something that

is called rare and renews a little

the definition we could have this

object there it is done in the concept

of arval enlarge and therefore the

Air concept will be bigger at

players they were at day 0

in the same way between day 1a and

day 2 in the same way between the

player was born the week +1 and by

therefore we will try the beautiful

concept of with a concept that can

always contain more objects and a

such diversity of objects that we had

quite quickly to the conclusion that the

concept

make a concept that it contains and he

can potentially contain a

infinity of objects is at that point

we’re pretty happy because a concept that

contains an infinity of objects can

contain any object and since

this concept that contains any

object and the concept of art is that

any object can belong to the

art concept go to this point I

leave you a few moments for you

recover from the emotional shock

you can cry for joy

you can consider rather

Please existence was wrong

if it is simply I am

sorry to disappoint you but what

we just prove here is actually

absolutely not what we wanted

to prove at the beginning, that is to say, my

definition there is an intention to

create because look well at the meaning of

the implication it is very important in

mathematics

sylla and jim the intention of keys this

necessarily implies that no matter

which object should be able to belong to

art but with this sense of involvement he

is absolutely not enough that

any object can belong

in bacon for more retirement a

intention to create otherwise we

have just proved something that

was not precise enough we just

to prove that any object can

belong dollar but that’s that I

wanted to prove at the outset and that

any object produced with a

intention to create and then belong to

dollars so get to that point there

we demonstrated something

very interesting

any object can have like

iras dollar is however we did not

still failed to prove my

definition there is an intention to

to create but after all I have to

you admit something from the beginning

I lied to you I’m sorry my

goal was not really imposed

tyrannically to demonstrate that they

by the force of mathematics this

definition art is an intention of

create my goal was rather to be able

you propose to have an audience

would be ready to listen to him who would

ready to discuss it with me because in

truth in philosophy the goal is

never find a single answer to

a given question

the goal is simply to take a

concept to discuss doing it

evolve and therefore no matter

if we managed to get a

unique result in the end the concept has

evolved we participated

today to evolve the definition

from there and it’s already a lot

see you today at our scale

we were a little philosopher

therefore in the official journal we

have been a little mathematician

to our little idea

today we all had together

will you create these moments this

exchange moment and by asking when

today at our scale we have

been a few artists

thank you very much

[Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *