Good Morning
yes on different phones open the
whatsapp application and let’s look at the
contact list
you will see that under each name
a little phrase appears, this is what
all life has come to be called the
Guasave state well the other day I
I was bored and I started to look at the states
of watts from my contacts and I found
some like these happened to us very fast
are many children in the latter to the
top is not reached by overtaking others
but surpassing itself a phrase
truth is that it is quite powerful
if we stop to analyze the we are going to
do the second to the top you do not get to
surpass others but surpass
itself is very deep and a great
transcendence
and is that in this sentence this person
what he has done is to summarize a way of
see life a way of understanding that of
face your own life
this is not a simple sentence this is
a true ideal and we do
this same
many times we forget day to
talk to our family with our
companions
we say great ideals and what happens
after we forget them we leave them
pass as if we had not said
we come to form these great
ideals in simple cheap moralisms
well continue looking into networks
social that are currently the mirror
of our society
let’s look at this photo, sorry for the
resolution but you can not see three
cupcakes that are perfect placed
in a neat white plate on top of
table that is usually mahogany whatever
fantastic no stone instagram what peta
it’s fantastic that it happens that yes
we are only setting ourselves
in this part the image in appearance
we are forgetting the deep part what
that really makes sense to us
forgetting the kid who cries because he does not
they pay attention
this happens currently and occurs every
time more commonly we look
only in what is visual and
we forget the transcendental part of
things and we can say good this here
it is unimportant not
I mean only instagram only
Water things are not great they are not
great actions not good this that
we can currently call postureo is
the tip of the iceberg of a serious
disease that threatens our society
the incoherence well those that have me
quite easy place with the previous
video the incoherence is a great
problem in our society if not
let’s think about corruption cases we
We rushed quickly to judge
all the people who are involved in
cases of corruption and we do not believe that
we are hiring ourselves
assistants in black we rushed to
blame that there is nobody to do anything
to end hunger in the world and
we throw dinner tonight the garbage
we rushed to say momente to that
look at our own society
let’s see the refugees as we have seen
formerly europe
the association is the great defender
not of human rights has always been
wanted to erect like it and currently
has millions of people stuck
in the country with the biggest debt in europe
Inconsistency is a big problem in
our society
ical generates greater damage to
people
My name is Fernando Arce Peña I
I intend to see what virtue and
coherence and how it is present or not in
our society
let’s start by defining it is cohesion
or relationship between one thing and another
I prefer to define it as acting as such and
as we say or what should be
the same act as we think
well we already know that it is the
coherence because it is important to be
coherent because because if coherence
we can not get to improve as
people
let’s think about it if I am incapable
to fulfill my goals of doing
what I think is really
well how am I going to improve how I’m going to
become the best version of me
same is impossible
only the coherence allows us
do that and we already know what we want to be
coherent but what is involved
involved big things the cohesion and
the cohesion justice that is to do
what our ideal implies
although
and that a sacrifice in this way in a
example of daily life
if we believe that we have to protect
environment
cohesion invites us to separate the
garbage in different types of waste and
Give each waste to the right container
although it is a roll although we are up
nose to do because it’s not
ideal is worth the sacrifice the
second virtue is the justice that is
I could see how to judge others
just as we judge ourselves
same and vice versa
in this way in the same example if
we see that the neighbor in front does not
recycle
we do not have any right to
say how bad he is doing it because
we are not recycling and
it would be incoherent and it would be unfair
come at some point to consider
what can we be above him
because really the finger that is
accusing accuses us too
We have already seen what that involves
coherence but you have to be consistent
always coherence is silly alone
obsession of the mean minds we
said emerson that he was a philosopher and
american poet
for example if my favorite color is the
green
I have some green garment is not
inconsistent is possible but it does not deserve
I’m sorry that I’m doing it because
because I did not avoid any evil or get
no good is better than spend my
energies in coherence really
important and inconsistencies that are not
We have already seen that he is the one who is
be coherent
we see people who have come to
be coherent heroically
the first ricardo galli by ricardo
goñi a professor of computer science at
who in a university spain that
he collaborated on his university’s blog
and one day he decided to make an entry
about a web page on which
they were trying to sell that website as
an expert place about topics
academics
however when pinched in the
links that redirected to pages of
tourist tourism companies ricardo
decided to make an entry denouncing
this practice but it turned out that the
head of the website that coincidentally
the owner of the travel agency had
contacts in college and that he did
that caused this that prevented him from
ricardo upload your entry that made him
decided to open a new blog losing
this way dozens or even hundreds of
daily readers and for someone who has
made a blog
he will know that that is much much
work but I decided to do it and it
he remained faithful to his ideals of freedom
of expression and honesty
the second case the two worlds a
American that the second war era
world had two very clear things
the first one if everyone was
killing he had to try to save
lives
the second if I have to save lives not
he was able to fire a weapon that he made decided
enter the army as an assistant
sanitary
nevertheless his companions of his
platoon mates their high commands
they made life impossible so that they
will go to the army because
they thought he was a coward because
they believed that it was going to be a burden a
focused on combat despite this
of the world overcame all the
difficulties that you levy psoe that you
came and ended involved the
okinawa battle where without firing a
only weapon saved almost a hundred
people
the truth that these two are true
heroes have managed to live their ideals
in a coherent way and I wonder
worth and we can do up
where can we get by our
ideals
the most a human being his life does not
and if we give our lives for the ideals
good is that there are people who do that
happens now
they are called jihadist jihadists have a
ideal that is your point of view Islam
and they are capable of sacrificing themselves for it
they are heroes, not because see if we put ourselves
to think what freedom a person
ends where the freedom of the
person opposite our ability to
give us for our ideals ends in
the moment in which we attacked the
person opposite
they are no longer consistent people are
true fans and well we
we can think fanaticism
that is far away, not soccer
it would be that it remains in the Middle East not
It has nothing to do with me
let’s see what it is to be a fanatic
three characteristics based on a
series of ideas that are unquestionable
in your case it is clear
move Islam even if another one arrives
imminent Muslim debate through the
Koran
he has no idea and I have the
absolute truth
desire to impose their own ideas and if
I need you I kill you for it despise
who are different and cocoa not
dividing people among those who
they agree with you that they are
true portents humanity and
who disagree that they are
fixed monsters that the first one prevents
that we are treading rationally
critics well we’ve already seen this
a fanatic and a jihadist
is
We are not fans, not me
this does not happen to me
good and if I tell you about the fans
sports of the ultras has a series
from here your team is unquestionable
is the best and dependently if
wins or loses is your team and is the
best of all
desire to impose their own ideas
if it’s needed, I’m not going to kill you for what
better you gets a bottle withdrew a
river and died of special hypothermia
to those who are different
what has been said by my team members who are
with me are the best and those of
opposite they have no idea of the people
there are fans in our society and the
problem is that this does not stay
only in the big teams but
that we have heard news
a few months ago in matches
youth among different schools
the parents who hit each other
attacked they were also fanatics
this is happening to us on the day
day and well we have already seen that our
society there are incoherent people and there
fans we can make see this
not only does he respond to the virtue
it is the midpoint between two extremes
vicious
in this case the default end that
is the incoherence and the extreme by
excess that is fanaticism
we have to find the middle point the
coherence since we now know what it is
what it means and what it is that
implies we have seen what can be done
because we have the examples of two
worlds and of ricardo galli and now that
we know what coherence is
If it’s my turn to leave this room, you live
this ideal of coherence is not going to be
that is finished transforming simply
in a cheap moralism
thank you very much
[Applause]
na
”
Be First to Comment