so everyone’s talking happiness these days and if you run a
happiness these days and if you run a
happiness these days and if you run a simple Google search on on the internet
simple Google search on on the internet
simple Google search on on the internet you will find that there have been about
you will find that there have been about
you will find that there have been about six hundred and forty books written on
six hundred and forty books written on
six hundred and forty books written on the topics of happiness in the past five
the topics of happiness in the past five
the topics of happiness in the past five years now as social beings this might
years now as social beings this might
years now as social beings this might not come as a big surprise for us since
not come as a big surprise for us since
not come as a big surprise for us since we want to see everyone happy doing so
we want to see everyone happy doing so
we want to see everyone happy doing so is actually a very difficult task Daniel
is actually a very difficult task Daniel
is actually a very difficult task Daniel Kahneman the visionary behind the field
Kahneman the visionary behind the field
Kahneman the visionary behind the field of behavioral economics explains that
of behavioral economics explains that
of behavioral economics explains that there are two broad ways in which we
there are two broad ways in which we
there are two broad ways in which we perceive happiness in everyday lives
perceive happiness in everyday lives
perceive happiness in everyday lives the first being happy in your life and
the first being happy in your life and
the first being happy in your life and the second being happy about your life
the second being happy about your life
the second being happy about your life now what are the two distinctions and
now what are the two distinctions and
now what are the two distinctions and how are they different from each other
how are they different from each other
how are they different from each other being happy in your life deals with the
being happy in your life deals with the
being happy in your life deals with the short-term momentary happiness that
short-term momentary happiness that
short-term momentary happiness that humans feel on a daily basis the second
humans feel on a daily basis the second
humans feel on a daily basis the second experience real happiness deals with the
experience real happiness deals with the
experience real happiness deals with the long-term happiness that that builds up
long-term happiness that that builds up
long-term happiness that that builds up over a period of time now let me but let
over a period of time now let me but let
over a period of time now let me but let me illustrate myself better with the
me illustrate myself better with the
me illustrate myself better with the help of an example
help of an example
help of an example let us suppose there is this individual
let us suppose there is this individual
let us suppose there is this individual who lives in Coventry and he thinks that
who lives in Coventry and he thinks that
who lives in Coventry and he thinks that people in lamington are much happier
people in lamington are much happier
people in lamington are much happier than people in Coventry and let us
than people in Coventry and let us
than people in Coventry and let us suppose that is suppose for the sake of
suppose that is suppose for the sake of
suppose that is suppose for the sake of his argument that it is true on an
his argument that it is true on an
his argument that it is true on an average so he decides to move to
average so he decides to move to
average so he decides to move to Coventry he decides to move to lamington
Coventry he decides to move to lamington
Coventry he decides to move to lamington from Coventry and when he does that he
from Coventry and when he does that he
from Coventry and when he does that he starts becoming happy in his life but it
starts becoming happy in his life but it
starts becoming happy in his life but it shall take a while before he starts
shall take a while before he starts
shall take a while before he starts becoming happy about his life – because
becoming happy about his life – because
becoming happy about his life – because his past experiences have been shaped by
his past experiences have been shaped by
his past experiences have been shaped by the fact that he has spent most of his
the fact that he has spent most of his
the fact that he has spent most of his past in Coventry so these are the two
past in Coventry so these are the two
past in Coventry so these are the two broad distinctions of how we perceive
broad distinctions of how we perceive
broad distinctions of how we perceive happiness on a daily basis now before I
happiness on a daily basis now before I
happiness on a daily basis now before I proceed with this talk any further it is
proceed with this talk any further it is
proceed with this talk any further it is somewhat important to give a direction
somewhat important to give a direction
somewhat important to give a direction as to what I mean by happiness when the
as to what I mean by happiness when the
as to what I mean by happiness when the famous German poet Goethe was once asked
famous German poet Goethe was once asked
famous German poet Goethe was once asked whether he was happy with his life or
whether he was happy with his life or
whether he was happy with his life or he said I’ve had a very very happy life
he said I’ve had a very very happy life
he said I’ve had a very very happy life but he immediately added I do not
but he immediately added I do not
but he immediately added I do not remember a single happy week what God
remember a single happy week what God
remember a single happy week what God was implying was that his happiness and
was implying was that his happiness and
was implying was that his happiness and many of his peers happiness was based on
many of his peers happiness was based on
many of his peers happiness was based on the fact that they had to overcome their
the fact that they had to overcome their
the fact that they had to overcome their daily troubles overcome unhappiness he
daily troubles overcome unhappiness he
daily troubles overcome unhappiness he also mentioned in one of his very famous
also mentioned in one of his very famous
also mentioned in one of his very famous poems that his worst nightmare
poems that his worst nightmare
poems that his worst nightmare was a long long row of sunny days the
was a long long row of sunny days the
was a long long row of sunny days the alternative of which is not happiness
alternative of which is not happiness
alternative of which is not happiness but but boredom and lack of excitement
but but boredom and lack of excitement
but but boredom and lack of excitement and lack of an aim to pursue and so on
and lack of an aim to pursue and so on
and lack of an aim to pursue and so on and so forth these are the two graphs of
and so forth these are the two graphs of
and so forth these are the two graphs of happiness as the first one is how Goethe
happiness as the first one is how Goethe
happiness as the first one is how Goethe imagined his happiness to be it was a
imagined his happiness to be it was a
imagined his happiness to be it was a series of ups and downs and they had to
series of ups and downs and they had to
series of ups and downs and they had to overcome unhappiness on a daily basis to
overcome unhappiness on a daily basis to
overcome unhappiness on a daily basis to reach the upward trend that you could
reach the upward trend that you could
reach the upward trend that you could see that the definitions of happiness
see that the definitions of happiness
see that the definitions of happiness has much changed since then
has much changed since then
has much changed since then we are now living in an age where we
we are now living in an age where we
we are now living in an age where we have been brought up by advertisement in
have been brought up by advertisement in
have been brought up by advertisement in marketing and this has lent that is this
marketing and this has lent that is this
marketing and this has lent that is this has got us to believe that we are
has got us to believe that we are
has got us to believe that we are supposed to derive pleasure from all the
supposed to derive pleasure from all the
supposed to derive pleasure from all the products that we are buying things that
products that we are buying things that
products that we are buying things that we own end up owning us some of us have
we own end up owning us some of us have
we own end up owning us some of us have started looking at happiness
started looking at happiness
started looking at happiness as a summation of all the pleasurable
as a summation of all the pleasurable
as a summation of all the pleasurable gifts that we pick up from this
gifts that we pick up from this
gifts that we pick up from this unlimited box of pleasurable items and
unlimited box of pleasurable items and
unlimited box of pleasurable items and this is what the depiction of the
this is what the depiction of the
this is what the depiction of the contemporary happiness is like we go
contemporary happiness is like we go
contemporary happiness is like we go from one point one level of happiness to
from one point one level of happiness to
from one point one level of happiness to another level of happiness on the basis
another level of happiness on the basis
another level of happiness on the basis of the pleasurable items that we keep on
of the pleasurable items that we keep on
of the pleasurable items that we keep on getting and the flaw that the flaw that
getting and the flaw that the flaw that
getting and the flaw that the flaw that Goethe would say lies in this perception
Goethe would say lies in this perception
Goethe would say lies in this perception of happiness is that when we
of happiness is that when we
of happiness is that when we a saturation level in Accords to the
a saturation level in Accords to the
a saturation level in Accords to the intercourse to the quality of product
intercourse to the quality of product
intercourse to the quality of product can not be bettered that that is where
can not be bettered that that is where
can not be bettered that that is where we fail as a society now Zigman Bauman
we fail as a society now Zigman Bauman
we fail as a society now Zigman Bauman a contemporary philosopher who was a
a contemporary philosopher who was a
a contemporary philosopher who was a believer in the ideas of God’s idea of
believer in the ideas of God’s idea of
believer in the ideas of God’s idea of happiness being overcoming unhappiness
happiness being overcoming unhappiness
happiness being overcoming unhappiness and troubles on a daily basis
and troubles on a daily basis
and troubles on a daily basis daily basis so he started questioning
daily basis so he started questioning
daily basis so he started questioning this herd mentality he started
this herd mentality he started
this herd mentality he started questioning this crowd behavior and it
questioning this crowd behavior and it
questioning this crowd behavior and it led him to address one of the most
led him to address one of the most
led him to address one of the most important questions that humans have
important questions that humans have
important questions that humans have been trying to eternally answer that is
been trying to eternally answer that is
been trying to eternally answer that is how much is enough or in Leo Tolstoy’s
how much is enough or in Leo Tolstoy’s
how much is enough or in Leo Tolstoy’s words how much land does a man require
words how much land does a man require
words how much land does a man require how much money is needed on a daily
how much money is needed on a daily
how much money is needed on a daily basis to make sure that a human is happy
fortunately after years of research in
fortunately after years of research in the field of economics of happiness we
the field of economics of happiness we
the field of economics of happiness we are moving closer to answering that
are moving closer to answering that
are moving closer to answering that question research definitely shows that
question research definitely shows that
question research definitely shows that there is a positive relationship between
there is a positive relationship between
there is a positive relationship between income and happiness but here’s the
income and happiness but here’s the
income and happiness but here’s the breaking point beyond a point of sixty
breaking point beyond a point of sixty
breaking point beyond a point of sixty thousand dollars of annual income
the happiness line becomes absolutely
the happiness line becomes absolutely flat implying that beyond the 60,000
flat implying that beyond the 60,000
flat implying that beyond the 60,000 mark money doesn’t buy any amount of
mark money doesn’t buy any amount of
mark money doesn’t buy any amount of marginal happiness what really matters
marginal happiness what really matters
marginal happiness what really matters is the age of the individual the
is the age of the individual the
is the age of the individual the education levels of the individual how
education levels of the individual how
education levels of the individual how how the culture perceives their identity
how the culture perceives their identity
how the culture perceives their identity whether they own a house or not they
whether they own a house or not they
whether they own a house or not they might earn the maternal status their
might earn the maternal status their
might earn the maternal status their marital status and so on and so forth
marital status and so on and so forth
marital status and so on and so forth which I would say and and as the
which I would say and and as the
which I would say and and as the research says is more important than
research says is more important than
research says is more important than money after the level of $60,000 of
money after the level of $60,000 of
money after the level of $60,000 of course that number does vary from time
course that number does vary from time
course that number does vary from time to time and country to country but
to time and country to country but
to time and country to country but $60,000
$60,000
$60,000 it definitely provides a benchmark for
it definitely provides a benchmark for
it definitely provides a benchmark for how much happiness money can buy
how much happiness money can buy
how much happiness money can buy how revelatory is that in a sense that’s
how revelatory is that in a sense that’s
how revelatory is that in a sense that’s all the money we need to be happy now
all the money we need to be happy now
all the money we need to be happy now the research between income and
the research between income and
the research between income and happiness goes well beyond the bounds of
happiness goes well beyond the bounds of
happiness goes well beyond the bounds of just that the monetization of happiness
just that the monetization of happiness
just that the monetization of happiness has been helping us to perceive how
has been helping us to perceive how
has been helping us to perceive how different human beings value other non
different human beings value other non
different human beings value other non tangible assets on a daily basis for
tangible assets on a daily basis for
tangible assets on a daily basis for example losing losing a job amounts to
example losing losing a job amounts to
example losing losing a job amounts to losing as much happiness as losing 180
losing as much happiness as losing 180
losing as much happiness as losing 180 thousand dollars on an average people
thousand dollars on an average people
thousand dollars on an average people would say that spending time with
would say that spending time with
would say that spending time with friends on most days would be giving
friends on most days would be giving
friends on most days would be giving them as much happiness as 106 thousand
them as much happiness as 106 thousand
them as much happiness as 106 thousand five hundred dollars an annum you can
five hundred dollars an annum you can
five hundred dollars an annum you can see the implications of the broader
see the implications of the broader
see the implications of the broader implications of this research it goes on
implications of this research it goes on
implications of this research it goes on it goes on to the different fields where
it goes on to the different fields where
it goes on to the different fields where we can try and submerge ourselves in in
we can try and submerge ourselves in in
we can try and submerge ourselves in in different connotations as well so one of
different connotations as well so one of
different connotations as well so one of the broader implications of this
the broader implications of this
the broader implications of this research we have already established
research we have already established
research we have already established that there is a positive relationship
that there is a positive relationship
that there is a positive relationship between income and happiness which must
between income and happiness which must
between income and happiness which must be assumed by this particular conjecture
be assumed by this particular conjecture
be assumed by this particular conjecture that the richest nation in the world is
that the richest nation in the world is
that the richest nation in the world is also the happiest let’s take for example
also the happiest let’s take for example
also the happiest let’s take for example the United States of America it is
the United States of America it is
the United States of America it is arguably the richest nation for the past
arguably the richest nation for the past
arguably the richest nation for the past thirty years it has seen its income
thirty years it has seen its income
thirty years it has seen its income double from 1970 to 2000 how many of
double from 1970 to 2000 how many of
double from 1970 to 2000 how many of y’all think that it is the happiest
y’all think that it is the happiest
y’all think that it is the happiest nation in the world
nation in the world
nation in the world could you please show me with the raise
could you please show me with the raise
could you please show me with the raise of hands how many of y’all think it’s
of hands how many of y’all think it’s
of hands how many of y’all think it’s not the happiest nation in the world
not the happiest nation in the world
not the happiest nation in the world that’s true it is not it is not the
that’s true it is not it is not the
that’s true it is not it is not the happiest nation in the world and this
happiest nation in the world and this
happiest nation in the world and this brings us to another aspect
brings us to another aspect
brings us to another aspect of the economics of happiness which is
of the economics of happiness which is
of the economics of happiness which is the Easterlin paradox the Easterlin
the Easterlin paradox the Easterlin
the Easterlin paradox the Easterlin paradox explains that beyond the point
paradox explains that beyond the point
paradox explains that beyond the point of $60,000 dollars where the happiness
of $60,000 dollars where the happiness
of $60,000 dollars where the happiness line become becomes absolutely flat the
line become becomes absolutely flat the
line become becomes absolutely flat the broader implications are that people
broader implications are that people
broader implications are that people start perceiving happiness in a very
start perceiving happiness in a very
start perceiving happiness in a very relative basis happiness starts becoming
relative basis happiness starts becoming
relative basis happiness starts becoming a very relative concept so if I am
a very relative concept so if I am
a very relative concept so if I am trying to evaluate my own level of
trying to evaluate my own level of
trying to evaluate my own level of happiness I will start looking at how
happiness I will start looking at how
happiness I will start looking at how I’m faring in with respect to the
I’m faring in with respect to the
I’m faring in with respect to the society and that goes on to prove why
society and that goes on to prove why
society and that goes on to prove why people in one or two Islands are much
people in one or two Islands are much
people in one or two Islands are much happier than people in New York or
happier than people in New York or
happier than people in New York or London or Tokyo even though one what the
London or Tokyo even though one what the
London or Tokyo even though one what the people in one or two islands are
people in one or two islands are
people in one or two islands are probably one of the poorest in the world
now when I came across this field of
now when I came across this field of research in the first year when I was
research in the first year when I was
research in the first year when I was studying happiness and economics it
studying happiness and economics it
studying happiness and economics it definitely did help me define my
definitely did help me define my
definitely did help me define my personal definitions of experiential
personal definitions of experiential
personal definitions of experiential happiness but turns out I was only
happiness but turns out I was only
happiness but turns out I was only recognizing a trend which was which
recognizing a trend which was which
recognizing a trend which was which already existed at the macro levels
let’s take so let me tell you a story
let’s take so let me tell you a story about this king who was once traveling
about this king who was once traveling
about this king who was once traveling through Bhutan and he was asked what are
through Bhutan and he was asked what are
through Bhutan and he was asked what are your plans of increasing the GDP of the
your plans of increasing the GDP of the
your plans of increasing the GDP of the nation and he said why are we so
nation and he said why are we so
nation and he said why are we so obsessed with gross domestic product let
obsessed with gross domestic product let
obsessed with gross domestic product let us concentrate on gross national
us concentrate on gross national
us concentrate on gross national happiness instead gross national
happiness instead gross national
happiness instead gross national happiness so what happened at that time
happiness so what happened at that time
happiness so what happened at that time was that not a lot of people not a lot
was that not a lot of people not a lot
was that not a lot of people not a lot of politicians gave much heed to the
of politicians gave much heed to the
of politicians gave much heed to the Buddhist economics that he was preaching
Buddhist economics that he was preaching
Buddhist economics that he was preaching but slowly and steadily as times
but slowly and steadily as times
but slowly and steadily as times progress we are moving to a much modern
progress we are moving to a much modern
progress we are moving to a much modern era but it is actually making it it has
era but it is actually making it it has
era but it is actually making it it has a lot of relevance
a lot of relevance
a lot of relevance in a lot of policymakers tables now
in a lot of policymakers tables now
in a lot of policymakers tables now let’s take Bhutan for example the King
let’s take Bhutan for example the King
let’s take Bhutan for example the King was later asked in a future interview
was later asked in a future interview
was later asked in a future interview how do you measure something that is so
how do you measure something that is so
how do you measure something that is so fluidic something that evaporates and
fluidic something that evaporates and
fluidic something that evaporates and condenses how do you how do you create
condenses how do you how do you create
condenses how do you how do you create happiness the wise man the wise wise
happiness the wise man the wise wise
happiness the wise man the wise wise King rather said that Putin’s goal was
King rather said that Putin’s goal was
King rather said that Putin’s goal was not to create happiness it was simply to
not to create happiness it was simply to
not to create happiness it was simply to create a habitat an environment that is
create a habitat an environment that is
create a habitat an environment that is conducive to happiness the way they
conducive to happiness the way they
conducive to happiness the way they measure happiness is around a science
measure happiness is around a science
measure happiness is around a science which has four central pillars nine key
which has four central pillars nine key
which has four central pillars nine key indicators and 72 metrics one of the
indicators and 72 metrics one of the
indicators and 72 metrics one of the very crucial questions that they asked
very crucial questions that they asked
very crucial questions that they asked in in in in dub in the index that
in in in in dub in the index that
in in in in dub in the index that measures the gross national happiness in
measures the gross national happiness in
measures the gross national happiness in Bhutan is how do you feel about the time
Bhutan is how do you feel about the time
Bhutan is how do you feel about the time that you spend each day that is a very
that you spend each day that is a very
that you spend each day that is a very crucial question according to me that
crucial question according to me that
crucial question according to me that the GDP completely fails to encompass
well another point worth considering
well another point worth considering when we’re talking about this contrast
when we’re talking about this contrast
when we’re talking about this contrast between GDP and GNH is that when Simon
between GDP and GNH is that when Simon
between GDP and GNH is that when Simon Kuznets the creator of GDP came up with
Kuznets the creator of GDP came up with
Kuznets the creator of GDP came up with this indicator he acknowledged that
this indicator he acknowledged that
this indicator he acknowledged that there were many fallacies behind it he
there were many fallacies behind it he
there were many fallacies behind it he said that it is in no way a measure that
said that it is in no way a measure that
said that it is in no way a measure that can be that can be holistic about that
can be that can be holistic about that
can be that can be holistic about that can holistically measure the welfare of
can holistically measure the welfare of
can holistically measure the welfare of a nation so maybe it is time that now
a nation so maybe it is time that now
a nation so maybe it is time that now that we’ve moved on 60 years it in in
that we’ve moved on 60 years it in in
that we’ve moved on 60 years it in in future after the GDP was first used to
future after the GDP was first used to
future after the GDP was first used to start using a measure which is more
start using a measure which is more
start using a measure which is more holistic that that is not just
holistic that that is not just
holistic that that is not just constricted to consumption investment
constricted to consumption investment
constricted to consumption investment government expenditure etc etc when GDP
government expenditure etc etc when GDP
government expenditure etc etc when GDP is spit against when GDP spit against
is spit against when GDP spit against
is spit against when GDP spit against GNH the most fundamental flaws start
GNH the most fundamental flaws start
GNH the most fundamental flaws start becoming glaringly evident our friends
becoming glaringly evident our friends
becoming glaringly evident our friends matter our family matters our job
matter our family matters our job
matter our family matters our job satisfaction levels inside and outside
satisfaction levels inside and outside
satisfaction levels inside and outside the job matters I’d make a conjecture
the job matters I’d make a conjecture
the job matters I’d make a conjecture that there’s so many other aspects of
that there’s so many other aspects of
that there’s so many other aspects of our lives which matter which are not
our lives which matter which are not
our lives which matter which are not covered by GDP and what my unflinching
covered by GDP and what my unflinching
covered by GDP and what my unflinching hope for for for the power of happiness
hope for for for the power of happiness
hope for for for the power of happiness makes me believe that the environment
makes me believe that the environment
makes me believe that the environment will start mattering too and all the
will start mattering too and all the
will start mattering too and all the other individuals who believe that this
other individuals who believe that this
other individuals who believe that this the in that the climate change is a
the in that the climate change is a
the in that the climate change is a Chinese hoax and that it is it is it is
Chinese hoax and that it is it is it is
Chinese hoax and that it is it is it is just just the unbarring of An
just just the unbarring of An
just just the unbarring of An Inconvenient Truth we’ll start taking it
Inconvenient Truth we’ll start taking it
Inconvenient Truth we’ll start taking it more seriously and they will try to
more seriously and they will try to
more seriously and they will try to create a habitat which is conducive to
create a habitat which is conducive to
create a habitat which is conducive to happiness rather than cooperating with
happiness rather than cooperating with
happiness rather than cooperating with the corporate lobbies racial tolerance
the corporate lobbies racial tolerance
the corporate lobbies racial tolerance equality among sexes and just the
equality among sexes and just the
equality among sexes and just the respect for the physically
respect for the physically
respect for the physically stabled will start mattering – and this
stabled will start mattering – and this
stabled will start mattering – and this will make us hopeful about a future
will make us hopeful about a future
will make us hopeful about a future which about a future about a political
which about a future about a political
which about a future about a political future where we do not see ourselves
future where we do not see ourselves
future where we do not see ourselves lump into the same habits that we are
lump into the same habits that we are
lump into the same habits that we are seeing ourselves in right now it changes
seeing ourselves in right now it changes
seeing ourselves in right now it changes everything
everything
everything everything imagine a workplace where
everything imagine a workplace where
everything imagine a workplace where once you are tired your boss comes up to
once you are tired your boss comes up to
once you are tired your boss comes up to you and tells you that you know you’d
you and tells you that you know you’d
you and tells you that you know you’d rather go home and spend some time with
rather go home and spend some time with
rather go home and spend some time with your family and do the country a favor
your family and do the country a favor
your family and do the country a favor in that because it’s adding to the gross
in that because it’s adding to the gross
in that because it’s adding to the gross national happiness instead of
national happiness instead of
national happiness instead of overworking and this is quite
overworking and this is quite
overworking and this is quite significant because it also changes the
significant because it also changes the
significant because it also changes the culture around happiness and what the
culture around happiness and what the
culture around happiness and what the pursuit of the material gains imagine
pursuit of the material gains imagine
pursuit of the material gains imagine all the people sharing all the world you
all the people sharing all the world you
all the people sharing all the world you may say I’m a dreamer but I’m not the
may say I’m a dreamer but I’m not the
may say I’m a dreamer but I’m not the only one the next time someone is asked
only one the next time someone is asked
only one the next time someone is asked the next time a first grader is asked
the next time a first grader is asked
the next time a first grader is asked what they want to be when they grow up
what they want to be when they grow up
what they want to be when they grow up happy will be an accepted answer and the
happy will be an accepted answer and the
happy will be an accepted answer and the most the most daring thought about
most the most daring thought about
most the most daring thought about happiness is that it is not a selfish
happiness is that it is not a selfish
happiness is that it is not a selfish pursuit a lot of people are of the
pursuit a lot of people are of the
pursuit a lot of people are of the opinion that it is a selfish pursuit but
opinion that it is a selfish pursuit but
opinion that it is a selfish pursuit but according to me happiness is not a
according to me happiness is not a
according to me happiness is not a selfish pursuit directly and indirectly
selfish pursuit directly and indirectly
selfish pursuit directly and indirectly happy people are infectious they get to
happy people are infectious they get to
happy people are infectious they get to people and when you’re doing a job that
people and when you’re doing a job that
people and when you’re doing a job that you love when you’re living a life that
you love when you’re living a life that
you love when you’re living a life that you love there aren’t a lot of other
you love there aren’t a lot of other
you love there aren’t a lot of other people who can do the job better than
people who can do the job better than
people who can do the job better than you or live the life better than you
you or live the life better than you
you or live the life better than you just because of the virtue of the fact
just because of the virtue of the fact
just because of the virtue of the fact that you’d strive to be the best at what
that you’d strive to be the best at what
that you’d strive to be the best at what you love and just because of the
you love and just because of the
you love and just because of the interconnectedness of our life there’s
interconnectedness of our life there’s
interconnectedness of our life there’s definitely a societal impact of what we
definitely a societal impact of what we
definitely a societal impact of what we see on a daily basis and you know why
see on a daily basis and you know why
see on a daily basis and you know why GNH would definitely work because
GNH would definitely work because
GNH would definitely work because happiness unlike money is infinite it’s
happiness unlike money is infinite it’s
happiness unlike money is infinite it’s not the allocation of a scarce resource
not the allocation of a scarce resource
not the allocation of a scarce resource this is me Manon Mehta and that is my
this is me Manon Mehta and that is my
this is me Manon Mehta and that is my idea what spreading hope you have happy
idea what spreading hope you have happy
idea what spreading hope you have happy [Applause]
”
Be First to Comment