we all have moral beliefs
we have values we have moral principles
only always have the crimes
we all believe in the hand given in the
impartiality in justice, we are
mind cheating 50 why and
How do we know what is right?
or morally wrong and how it is
this we know influences fact
our our actions and decisions
moral is what I wanted it to be
think a little more
Think about it when you leave here.
when he meets on the street
and if they happen to encounter a person in the
street need help to the institution
lima jensen and I could see that you would
would not help.
this person maybe most of you
is that while I should because not
They say many have under the
behavioral sciences intend to
to study this is what is the
behavior of people in
when they encounter people with other
people in pulses what they do
these disputes the purpose of these
experience is not whether the
people are good or bad they help
not realize that factors that can
decisively influence this
action and very simple artifacts can
influence this decision as per
example in a hurry but is with
pressure influences the decision will help in
another fact one of the experiences shows
that people who are in a hurry
are six times less available
to help a standing person is
need help
a curious fact of this experience that
she was made 1 to 1 at the seminar
technology compensating for this were not
in a hurry because it was between a
task and they had to write a
parable about the good Samaritan
therefore for students
in the seminary of theology that ignore
man on the ground because I’m with
hurry to write a word about
your maritânia but there are still things
more superfluous that can influence
our decisions
things like finding a coin if
find a coin one of these
experience has also shown that
people heading to bed
to make a hat yesterday to
make one to make a call
that find what they are going to
be a currency these people
in this experience show the 22 times
more available to help someone
which is later found in an instrument in
resource in emergency situations
so that tells us tells us that
difference between a conduct that we
we consider it to be ethically long
conduct we consider ethically
irreproachable is less in the values
the principles of what people
constantly believe and more in
situation
and notice how factors can be
completely random of factors such as
somewhat nouns because to
find a coin on the floor is not a
reconciliation with ourselves account
it’s not a reason we
will be valid to justify the
not helping each other but the fact is
which has one role and another
famous experience and perhaps only
Have you ever heard of the team?
which also tries to show which can be
the weight of context in people’s action
We think you’re not even on my blog.
to study the weight of authority
about moral beliefs and I have a
experience something
something problematic from the point of view
ethical initiative to do and that so
we have the experimenter the scientist
we have in the same room the participant of the
study in this case fulfills the role of the
teacher and we have a room adjoining the
student who is to blame for his or her experience
although the participant does not know the student
is an accomplice of experience and what
teacher has to do is simple and it is
told you that you are in a study on
the effects of punishment on
learning and that the teacher has to
have to ask the student questions and
whenever the student misses
the teacher has to manage a
electric shock
electrical shock in one of a
progressively higher voltage
could reach up to 400 volts or
is a dangerous electric shock and
too slow
now no shock has been administered so much
use a bit but not so much any
shock was administered only that the student
pretended so whenever the teacher and
ran I thought was a
electric shock to the student pretends where
was the pain and asked that the study
it seems that the teacher is the
study in this case fulfills the role of
teacher
despite manifesting some discomfort
ethan planter and dishes ordered product
in time for the experience for the
what is certain is that before the
authority to and before the
experimenter who existed because the south
continue because it is important to
people is that 65% of people have
until the end this study therefore 65 cent
the people who applied what they thought
be 400 volt shox
in the other person despite the pleas
despite the new UN sanctions
What I mean by this is for a
On the other hand, we have to say what
think that we are talking about people
common
we tried to talk about people who were
were summoned with better registration in the
time to talk with our mora’s
talked people like us people like
You people like me who it shows
on the one hand it is also that
there are many things that can influence
our decisions and although we
we think that we always have two
good reasons to be human
we always have praxe justifications
for the positions we have taken many
Sometimes what happens is something that
faces whether we have a series of
[Music]
ready-made answers ready-made answers
for situations with which in the plans
many times what we do is very
simple is to consult the emotions
consult consult emissions and
we like and having more empty with
feelings of depression feeling of
repulsion and what it seems like when what
happens in these cases and there is also a
vast literature and psychology in knox
I explained this is that we operate a
substitution of a question that is
we want to know why x is
morally wrong and that like us
we respond is the feeling that I wanted
to say is that it triggers in me again
for cleaning for example in this example
because sururu sex is consenting between
brothers at the wrong time
seems quite wrong obviously
wrong
obviously it is morally wrong but
because we have those reasons that
seem obvious rich should be
reasons for considering that there is a
hand thing
but talking about sex forum sex
allowed because who is wrong
what do the people who answered these
questions were that they seemed to be in a
constant condition since they make a mural
that is, they had a conviction
background that was a very wrong thing
but could not find one
rational argument a justification
rational to explain it passes
so there seems to be a
category that calls a sensation a
conviction and instinct that some
thing is wrong there and that is why
we consider a wrong moment and
not because we have an argument because
we have a very strong national principle
behind and the same happens in the same
in another dilemma that is called
oil slurry in a kind of
thought was never made
but I thought they were in the place of
I did not have any of that
save that person who has an ex
governed nothing do you nothing do me
It’s going to kill five people.
can do is sign the knob to do
the troller drive so as to give only
a person close to the people before
This motto that answered makes a
reasoning that is purely
utilitarian we have five people in a
line one person or another but I will speak
100 people than saving a certain time
and if the scenario changes a little bit
so what happens in this case and we have
even the troller confirmed
same five people in line sir
can do is take away assuming we have to
from this assumption that will serve
from his little bow up the river and
Stop the electric is going to die but
will prevent the death of five others
people
happens in this case is that the pattern of
answers completely reverses and only
10% of people consider it right
take your pride up the line
looks exactly the same right
we have simpsons a salvato person 5 in
instead of saving one because mubarak mubarak
is that we have a subject by the
own hands
we have a sexual relationship in a version
personal morality and this triggers a
negative feeling much stronger and
This is why the juveniles moment
wrong so much because I think it seems
that all this is important for one side
it seems that it is important that we
We need to eat with people, live real.
works because we want apparel
influencing people’s behavior
much more than importing or exporting
code of conduct
we have to realize how the
agent operates in action in
situation that is here and say no
It is that we are not a few days and Moraes
We do not have moral principles.
values we have the question is when
ending their may be in hassan and the
what you are saying is that it is
which is calling into question the
predominance of this rational process
liberatti many times there are many
other things that went into negotiation
and many other things have moral weight and
kempes in the election
like the position before the other
emissions and all this
matters because we are agents
national officials are agents with a
very determined type
in the time when automatisms never
the emissions are never silent and
therefore if our decisions do not
are pure flex of our beliefs and
our moral beliefs very much
It can go wrong and it can go wrong
because of who we are and why
than we believe but despite the
that we think that despite what we
we believe and therefore all these
truths about how we
we act morally always tense with the
time for so many ethical consequences
because it says that we are vulnerable
we are imperfect we can easily
escape to cruelty easy – to go to
injustice and we can also
very easily be manipulated in this
sense and therefore have knowledge
said he in the blood to be aware of
that only ours we believe not
is enough is often a
powerful tool that matter that
people have because they have notion at all
of which is not in absolute domain
is to have a little more of the domain
[Applause]
”
Be First to Comment