2
well I present my name maximiliano
advanced international relations
when he thought a bit about the talk
there are two areas as well they said boy
that I’m really passionate about
national security and issues
related environment
I think both are areas that are
in many careers are present that
many issues are linked
everyday our daily life so
it occurred to me because he did not find the
way that I can link to more 2
I started to find out let’s say if there was
some point where national security
and issues related to the environment
environment is to link to start badly
because I think that for that first the
name in stupid security let
at the end of charlie say why that
name to start briefly from that
I will speak as structural master
talks about talking about threats while
define what type threats are
threats to what is road safety
is specifically first the
threats are built I want part
with this phrase here I mean with a
example that is probably the best
this person for example let’s imagine not
Saturday three in the morning downtown
from Córdoba walking alone and I from this
oled type since it ‘s happening because
my perception what to steal
probably now we change context
changed the place
if this person crossed me I do not know in
the wood is that ‘I will not think no
you saw when it got cold he got gatwick
and ready
my perception
totally according to place and time and
space where he was
let’s see another example to see what I
I mean this bear such a yogi
walking through a forest suddenly I
crossed this bear quietly what
first thing you’re going to do is that the photo ap
nfl
If someone is going to want to see what is going to
do every hour that passes and the same
forest
I found a bear encounter
this way the first thing I’m going to do
well and I’m afraid that they are in danger of
run out
then my first point of this the
threats are built not all
things
we send in different contexts
different fears and make different
Danger situation because
quietly something that is a danger
at a certain moment it is not in another
then point number 2
just like people the states
with three of his threats
the states with their respective
governments are going to define what is a
threat to that state
what do I mean Argentina for
define has a threat to Argentina
chile to define what a threat to
Chile
I give you an example second war
world russia germany are put
agreement
they said they would share poland an agreement
secret obviously because they had not
done to any of the other states
so if one analyzes that first
moment quietly russia and germany
could be considered two countries
allies that will decide how to split
Poland
however, going from war to
Germany invades Russia plus Germany-
neighborhood what germany want for de
Russia
at that moment the perception changed
totally
for russia germany was no longer an ally
it was a real threat real threat that
he was in russia invading another example
to see Japan and the United States
Second World War also japan
until the java base and the
U.S
this leads to united states of
intervene in the war and obviously
good to the North American country to go out
glorious and japan surrenders and you
They get to see after a war
global usa and japan it
transformed then the allies more
important
that is, it is not maintained first as the
cow perception less according to the mother
that we are clearly building the
perception of united states japan and
vice versa
during the second war it was very
different to this perception is my
second point then like the
people the states are going to build their
threats
the third high point schools with
a difference in the classification
between the threats
obviously good according to the different
authors give many differences but I
I want to raise this the old threats
verses the new old threats
threats as I tell you first war
World War II World
all the wars that were given at the level
state level out there between two
countries among several involved
generally let’s say a lot
development in military terms
they can be considered as old
where traditional threats threats
puts into play in the territory of a
state and puts security at risk
state level and only what was in
game new threats of terrorism
terrorism is a phenomenon let’s say
that comes from many many years ago
much earlier than what happened to the
twin towers in 2001
however the milestone that marked the 2001
It was a new way to develop the
terrorism
the new way of thinking action of the
terrorist cells corresponds something
that many authors consider as
new threats
another new threat can also be the
drug trafficking more let’s say traffic
of illicit drugs comes from long ago
weather
at present the importance that
Acquire even get to influence
many countries because of the power that it has
Such is the case, for example, of Mexico and
other countries of the Middle East the
drug trafficking is considered a new
threat
well not for my point then the
first is that the threats are with
noises the second is that the states
they build their own threats
the third is the difference between old
threats and new threats and
fourth point representative
the threats are not just type
military
out there whenever you think about
what time a country is in danger
last moment let’s say your risk runs
security
the first thing we think is an invasion
from one country to another a war was waged
an armed conflict
However, the new threats
allow us to understand and interpret
the conflicts are not only about
military type
for example the case of refugees
we all knew the importance that
is buying this for europe
mainly because of the Syrian crisis
crisis and another African country
and good many people looking for a
better life my big europe mother for the
fire that sounds for many governments
Europeans
refugees are a threat because
they involve large populations that
they move to other places and that
implies the need for resources in
social terms resources for
health education work heap of
things that if a state is not
prepared to face to deal with
they can mean a threat since
you that many the European country is
they argue or fight in what
point for example wants to receive so many
refugees where so many others go
some said I’m not going to receive another
patient receipt but up here just
to see that refugees can
be considered a threat
so my question is the following if
we know that the threats are not
only the military type
we can calmly think that the
global warming is a threat but
you can see the long- term increase in
the temperature of the earth
water scarcity and shortages
certain resources could be threatened
for the conflicts that can generate
future
today before clear that all the wars
ministry humanity have been for
resources has always been neither to expand
territories look for oil
find us
erales but here what changes is that of
soon it is not an attempt at greed and the
ambition but opposite the need not
is that I go out looking but I
I’m left without us too what
he pointed
then we see if we raise this idea
that probably warming
global can be a threat
this brings me to my next point of
environmental security is thinking what
definition could put in respect to
environmental study
But the academy especially
international relations
this is an open debate is not
closed because there are many discussions
respect if there really is something
It called my security as if
it exists that is then when one
asks what environmental security
I think it will depend a lot on the
position that we take there are others
they consider that there is not something that
it’s called road safety is but
just try to expand the agenda
security of different countries and of
mother include interest issues
own
however other voices that raise that
yes there are environmental issues that
as a consequence they have a link with
security problems of the country
let’s clarify a bit more this the
case river parana as everyone knows the
parana river through so much what
is Brazil Paraguay and Argentina
then I guess Paraguay was saying
the morels on the banks of the river
parana establish this type of
industries as was the problem of the
cakes with uruguay
that implies that if the effluents to the river
with finishing the same and the river is not
that the border with Paraguay be stopped
happens in Argentina is the river continues its
travel to Argentina
then there we have we are seeing
with two things on the one hand the problem
environmental pollution of the river
but on the other hand a problem of
security because Argentina is not
contaminating and paraguay is
polluting to see how we do
us to stop
hawaii 169 explaining another traffic case
illegally to finance the
purchase of weapons
is proven even let’s say the
nation some studies that many
guerrilla groups present in africa
have found a very good way to
financing
what is this we kill elephants that
are in danger of extinction with the
ivory traffic that many countries and
the vast majority is illegal but in
many places are still buying
we acquire large amounts of money
and with this money that we put together we can
finance the purchase of weapons
then again we are presented with these
two problems on the one hand a problem
environmental that kill elephants and that
access the extinction of the species
but simultaneously we have problem
of security because because the goal
it is not to eliminate the elephant but
get money in the black market
to finance the purchase of weapons is a
second example about a little bit the
conclusions that we can say first
South and environmental side is complicated
but ambiguous concept like I said there
many discussions about let’s say and the
term truly represents something
how true or not it is
then there are authors who are in
against because they think that you
discovered environmental can produce the
militarization of the development agent
that for example suppose
United States say good the Amazon is
a very important source of resources and
we are all an idol we want
protect because we care about the environment
environment that does not ensure that actually
It is a justification for the day
tomorrow the united states can
intervene in brazil because he needs
resources then there are let’s see what
problems run if suddenly I’m
set to fight against change
climatic and a lot of other
issues arise from a point of
military view what we will be doing
is to expand the security agenda search
to militarize new situations and
that gives you the go the power increase
in many countries mainly the
powers
another problem the difficulty of
establish a security classification
environment here to say with that
the case for example of others
of ivory that is a problem of
security to an environmental problem because
On the one hand, we are exterminating
elephants but simultaneously by the
another side we have a problem that there
terrorist groups and manage to buy
weapons
then it is very complicated to want
separate we would like to define these
environmentalist security
there are many points of convergence where
they meet and then the distinction
the last conclusion is not very clear
is to compose the objectives
what is my goal to protect the environment
ambient
achieve sustainable development
objective is a safety objective in
the case for example of traffic of
ivory again objective do save
the elephants goal is to prevent the
terrorist groups in buy weapons for
who commit terrorist attacks
later
so it ‘s complicated from my position
I think we say the term yes
it exists that I really already did
I made sure environmental
however these are some of the
risks that we run now because the
name of chat in security
stupid of the bill clinton campaign
to be president of the united states
the fight with George Bush Father George
bush father had a very image
positive mainly in matters of
foreign policy
the clinton campaign adviser told him
then what phrase will they use that
it was a phrase that this year all the
world after that was precisely the
economy stupid because every time
I had to answer something to justify
that side is the stupid economy
then and someone will ask me if
all this idea of intervening in pursuit of
environment to protect him from fighting it
and it’s simply a matter of me
I want to protect the environment
I am a person let’s say morally
correct I have good intentions
I am a person I would answer and the
stupid security
thank you very much
after the
”
Be First to Comment