Press "Enter" to skip to content

El peso de la Historia | Alejandro Rosas | TEDxCalzadaDeLosHéroes


ashley

to

to

I am Alejandro roses and I am a popularizer of

the story and I recognize it well I do not

I am ashamed because my mission and I have

said for 27 years has been to be a

medium

I talk to the dead there are people who

he thinks he really talks to the dead

but it was not obvious I’m a medium because

What I do is sit down and listen to everyone

these characters that preceded us

they tell me their stories tell me their

romances

they tell me their account anecdotes what

who lived the context and I with certain

journalistic and gossip

I feel like trying to interpret what

they say to bring it to the present with

the idea of ​​building the future from

then we are here with this idea

of past and future

I am also very pleased with

being here I had not been able to touch

some other occasion

I am very happy and thank you very much for

be here with us

we have and I have seen it

let’s say through these 27 years that

I’ve been spreading the story there

much difference between disclosure

of history and in being a month and

academic historian disclosure

basically it is put within reach of the

as many people as possible

history

let’s forget the theories

let’s forget the great trials but

rather try to land the

story so we can talk with

her and with the characters because it seems

a no-brainer but our characters from

the story were human beings and they

sick they called and hated

ambition much power of course the

they watered horribly as they followed

arriving today but they were beings

humans

that is the disclosure of history

but in Mexico we live today in

day I could and I have a theory a

little crazy after that and develop and

we suffer four riders from

Mexican apocalypse would be the first

the authoritarianism

the second is the simulation

the third is corruption and the fourth

it is impunity

those are the four horsemen of the

Mexican apocalypse forget about the ps

hunger and death and war from

then they are universal so that in

Mexico are very good

riding by

the republic these four the

authoritarianism impunity

the simulation and corruption but

us in this difficult moment

that we go through in Mexico, of course

it’s not comforting is that there were other

worse times we were invaded by

the Americans and the French

and the French once before we

They also wanted to remove territory with

the war of the pies and spain

tried to reconquer 12,829 each epoch

it has been difficult for mexico in many

senses

we have two said in the bicentennial

200 years under construction

I wonder if my master builder

he says hear me I’m going to finish his house

in 200 years

I would have thought before launching myself

hire that master builder and it’s a

misfortune for a country so rich and so

full of vitality like the one we have

today that we continue in construction

and tell us what we are still

construction but from the idea

of history

I believe that one of the great

obstacles that we are going through today

in day is the weight of history that

we carry on the shoulder

that is one of the obstacles that I see

as fundamental that we have to

take away that weight but we will not be able to

build is not the same to have the

reference story to have it as

the pipila that by the way did not exist

it was one of the myths of history

official and then the story as

social science is not is not the problem

the problem is the narrative of the

story that they told us and the problem

is that we almost all who

we are here in fact I think very

few will have been born in the 21st century

but all of us who were born in the century

twenty

more or less let’s say 1900 late

the 30s until the early sixties

until about 1985 we suffered a

narrative of the story that we

distorted it ripped us off and we

totally confused the cables and that

is what is known as history

official today the unofficial already

disappeared and we do not have to

tear our clothes for thinking of

that there is official history and then

they are going to manipulate us in the head and everything

that not all countries have history

official the problem in mexico

or is that for a long time in that

period that I tell you between 1900 and ships

from the 30 until 1985 87

we had an official story that did not

we could confront with absolutely

nothing was the only thing we have for

learn history we could not go today

like today famous to buy my books that

they are indeed extraordinary are

out there could not use the

historical novel more than when one

put some old bookstores

we could not even have a way of seeing

if villa was like the story told us

official or as some others told us

historians

we are totally biased as

we learned history through us

of the anniversary on Monday where

surely many of you

or disguise squad shot them

hidalgo of hidalgo in the ceremonies to

the flag we already knew by sa

through that burris and sima history

that was counted in the national time that

it was terrible it was like Soviet all to

10

hearing the same damn program and

starting with the national anthem and

ending with the national anthem I

it ended as well as if you must obey

if you must obey yes we must obey and

the other the free textbook

out there we did not have any kind

of more element to know the

story and then suddenly that

history that he left us is history

maniquea good against bad

this story not taught not how

History is taught

pondering the questioning

analyzing it by launching theories always

questioning so they taught us not to

they taught us how a catechism of

homeland history indoctrinated us here

in mexico has obtained us in the

history did not teach us history and

then suddenly we had dogmas of

faith of history

the matter of oil that so long

has been discussed and discussed and that

finally ended with a reform of

which we do not know its scope until

time after

the fact is that you could not even

touch the oil issue with the

a rose petal why because

who wanted to talk about privatization oo

put it in the hands of investors

foreigners or Mexicans was treason

the homeland became a dogma of

faith we could not even enter

talk about the possibility of it being

I could discuss only want

figures that we take away from them

names was no longer francisco i

Madero was the apostle of democracy

it was no longer pancho villa was the centaur

North was no longer the benito

meritorious of the americas and then

we build a network of good against

bad heroes against villains

for me the heroes are the captain

america iron man thor hulk

but not hidalgo nor allende nor wood

they are big players because

they dared to break their moment and their

epoch because they took a step that nobody

more would have dared to give in that

moment and that defined us if they are

different but at the moment one

he elevates them to the altar of a heroism that

it is practically legend or mythical

we lost contact with these

characters and next to these characters

we certainly have the villains

terrible traitors villains always to

the homeland of course as courts as

iturbide like porfirio díaz

of course also as santana not

may be missing and many more that

they drag victorian orchard that maybe

the only one that could fit by the

betrayal but that’s another story

the fact is that suddenly we have good

and bad guys and history taught us

when our the school going

attentively new players with their

reed flute

damn you never played a flute

reed because they put me a bassoon or a

saxophone and I tell them with knowledge of

juárez causes hamas or a

reed flute because he tells it

in a little book called

memories for my children never says hear

I was very poor and then I played the

reed flute next to the lagoon

charm is not or was the typical little stamp

that they sold us in the stationery but

as they told us the official story

there was always the possibility that

will be beings were predestined and

then practically from that

night of passion in which it was conceived

play is for an egg and a

sperm a juarez ovule not a

Juarez would be the Pope a sperm

Juarez and an ovule

from that moment I already brought the chip

that he was going to be a meritorious

homeland and then we could imagine

under the logic of official history to

Benito Juarez sitting like that

in a bucolic scene not the lagoon of

charm in san pablo guelatao a great

stone the sunset that is here in

Whisper of the wind that moves

saw trees and the touching his

damn reed flute but

practicing at 12 years old what

I would have to say in posterity was

basically and so I practiced was not

tempted ay in the lagoon of charm

then turn to see the sheep that

certainly not I of the town because you

they lost sheep and the uncle was going to hit him

that’s also not true that I because

poverty the courage there and he what

account

then we have to Benito Juarez

predestined sitting next to his sheep

and suddenly he turns towards the camera

as they were always the heroes of the

motherland turning to did it to the horizon

to the camera to give a sentence the

posterity and at that time coined the

famous phrase among the sheep as between

other species

respect for the rights of others is peace and

So together with Juanes, we could imagine

hidalgo playing with his companions

class that freed them from oppression

of the teachers or for example we

they also told stories one that

it seems to me that cookies maria

to cut the veins olite that is

tell them the scene is the state of

Morelos more or less would be like 1880

Emiliano Zapata plays there among the

cornfields with a wand chasing

a lizard and suddenly among the

cornfields today the crying of a person and

then it approaches where is the

crying leaves the wand if everything goes

opening the cornfields and see your dad

prostrate next to a tree

at 9 years emiliano zapata see his

dad crying and then dad says

that he has is dad and then he flips the

dad too although he did not close the

motherland turns towards the camera and says

wipes the tears said is that the

landowners have taken away the land and

then child shoe hits also to

the papa clique at nine years old

I swear to you that when you grow up, you have to

the face back and I at nine

years was played in babia

little runs covered with the little stamps

bellamar school

– playboy who came to school

lasallista and clandestinely

I was not thinking about releasing the

motherland is not thinking about making a

social revolution

but that is the mexico who donated us

drew the official story and that

official story left us several

sequels to start a society

polarized the polarization that we live

Today is not only in politics not

only if the grooming dog is

bread does or if the pri or yes brown if not

comes from being taught to think about

black and white and not in chiaroscuros

Mexico is a country almost predestined if

it’s worth the expression not to be

agreement never

the only time they put on

agreement was when the consummation of the

independence and already in all the rest

moments wars and revolutions

then he made us for nobody

polarized number 2

made us prejudiced until the wall of

in front

how many times have you not heard

that today our corruption

we practically owe it to the

Spaniards arrived in the 16th century to

mexico and that all calamities

had and have

they arrived then they made us

prejudices we already forget that it is

absurd to keep thinking that we

we are determined today in the middle of the century

twenty-one

because the Spaniards conquered us

please we have to leave all

these visions or other which

gringos are to blame for everything if they are

miserable and they are cursed being abused

at times but there is also a

historical responsibility is not of

our ruling class and that of the

own society in which you have allowed everything

then those prejudices and are extremely

prejudiced let’s forget that if the

gringos took away the territory if

it was a disgrace it was a vile dispossession and

miserable but they are 170 years ago

we can not continue to carry the story

like the pottery of the pípila

another important element that left us

the official story the victimization

Mexican poor people all want to see

face

ernesto canto I do not remember which one

marchista and in Moscow entering by the

tunnel if they remember in the stadium already

to enter the march and suddenly

he does not come out and disqualify him and not to the pits

slogan against mexico

the ghost of machala I do not remember in

that world soccer championship that

I played the cup america I think in

Ecuador or in some

place some countries of South America and

then at a certain moment the

light turns on we get a goal and we lose

the famous criminal and robyn that was that

It was not that we threw and threw it

everything that happened around a

penal

the official story taught us to

victimize us and worst of all we

He taught us to be defeatist

our mentality has certainly

changed and I think we live the best

moment of the civil society of all the

Mexican history and next to that better

civil society of the whole Mexican island

we have the worst political class of

the whole Mexican history and that

we have had worse political classes

but this one in particular has been careful

in showing us that you can always

be worse but fortunately we have

a society that should no longer live on

those prejudices that you should no longer live on

this victimization and that we do not

we can continue thinking that we live

although we are the green mice in the

football or that we always do badly or that

we have a dangerous sign on mexico

because he conquered the Spanish

if our mothers were raped and

everything was violated of course it was a

process hard but not like to say that

today to five almost five centuries of the

conquest of mexico

we are determined by that all that is

product of the 20th century and all that stuff

absolutely has built in the

20th century by the official history does not

mentalized for that you do not have to look

in the 16th and 17th century and in the 18th

there we can find several things but

obviously our problems

current come from the last 50

years where all this

official story where they taught us and

they indoctrinated us a story that did not

that corresponded to him for that and when

soon we intend to demystify the

history caused a shock for a lot

people have told me that I am in the

poisoner of children and

Mexican youth because it occurred to me

say that Juarez stopped being a

indigenous to become a

citizen because he’s never there’s a

Juarez’s only speech where he says

hear consent in a little bit is that

I am a Zapotec Indian

and why they do not respect and their uses and

customs and then you will see

hamas there is not a single line of juárez

saying that

Juarez greatness seems to me if it is the

that if there is something that exists in Juarez it is

that he was always conceived equal before

others

just like the Creole that the mestizo

that the gringo that he the Austrian that

by the way

fortunately, we shot in the hill

the bells in 1867 deserved it but

there was never an act or a combination of

its part then I insist I think that

we should leave the story on the side

load it as if it were a book and not

carry it on my back and I think our

society today is very dynamic

we still have a lot to do, I think

sometimes we seem like a pack of

wild animals that suddenly

unite and do very good things and from

soon they scatter again but I

I insist that the best version of the

society of the Mexican island in which

we are living by how is it

moving but we need to remove that

obstacle

let’s leave the official story now

forgotten and we learned it and had to

machete to two dates and we had to

learn them on August 8 , 1879

zapata nation or that July 20,

1923 killed pancho villa or that 30

On October 1873 Francis was born

or that September 16 began

independence and 27 was the

consummation or that on May 5 the

national weapons were covered in glory

or that on May 21, 1920, they murdered

carranza

that was just a parenthesis for

demonstrate my extraordinary memory

as for the story, it is not relevant

the ephemeris I never liked

but nothing more to finish because

it is also about to explode this

not come already and I’m afraid

I insist that I think how is the

better version of the society that

they exist in mexico so difficult and

convulsed

what we need is to get rid of that

damn them to put aside and that the

history becomes only a

concerning

let’s stop using history for

political flags because now we’re going to

see in 18 surely that all the

world is going to say juarez is from me

party and ways of my party and not me

I believe that they are to overturn their

graves because they had a lot in their

epochs to history must be understood

in its time and in its context

the characters have to be understood and

understand them in those moments and

we try to understand a pancho

villa

in today’s light is going to be a failure

I insist that what we have for

in front is let’s take it back

the page of history let’s remove

that slab that we do not leave behind the

prejudices

let’s do an intellectual striptease of

prejudices and let’s build and that

the story only makes the referent or

the reference of all those principles and

all those ideas that have not been able

translate and set in Mexico

I do believe despite how difficult it is

we are and despite all that is

He is living today and despite

that we have to ask many accounts to

the entire political class

I think there’s always hope for

country and I do see that we can go out

forward but now it’s like he dreamed

at some time responsibility

and in competition of citizens

thank you very much and read a lot of history

[Applause]

the loas

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *