Press "Enter" to skip to content

Democracy 2.0 | Simra Ahmed | TEDxYouth@Dayton


who are we what were we thinking how did

who are we what were we thinking how did we get here why did we get here these

we get here why did we get here these

we get here why did we get here these are all questions we need to ask

are all questions we need to ask

are all questions we need to ask ourselves as a country as a community

ourselves as a country as a community

ourselves as a country as a community and as individuals this election cycle

and as individuals this election cycle

and as individuals this election cycle was not a normal one regardless of who

was not a normal one regardless of who

was not a normal one regardless of who you voted for or what political

you voted for or what political

you voted for or what political ideologies you hold we were all duped by

ideologies you hold we were all duped by

ideologies you hold we were all duped by the system that gave us the president

the system that gave us the president

the system that gave us the president with the lowest approval ratings in 40

with the lowest approval ratings in 40

with the lowest approval ratings in 40 years based on this election cycle there

years based on this election cycle there

years based on this election cycle there are serious philosophical and political

are serious philosophical and political

are serious philosophical and political problems that need to be addressed such

problems that need to be addressed such

problems that need to be addressed such as unfounded political polarization the

as unfounded political polarization the

as unfounded political polarization the lack of voter turnout and the spread of

lack of voter turnout and the spread of

lack of voter turnout and the spread of misinformation the first problem we will

misinformation the first problem we will

misinformation the first problem we will analyze will stem from unfounded

analyze will stem from unfounded

analyze will stem from unfounded political polarization or polarization

political polarization or polarization

political polarization or polarization that has no basis and does not come from

that has no basis and does not come from

that has no basis and does not come from reliable educated sources in article

reliable educated sources in article

reliable educated sources in article titled causes and consequences of

titled causes and consequences of

titled causes and consequences of polarization study that party

polarization study that party

polarization study that party polarization has the tendency to

polarization has the tendency to

polarization has the tendency to represent extreme policy views which

represent extreme policy views which

represent extreme policy views which leads to biased and unequal

leads to biased and unequal

leads to biased and unequal representation more so this current

representation more so this current

representation more so this current democratic process alienates those who

democratic process alienates those who

democratic process alienates those who do not identify with either end of the

do not identify with either end of the

do not identify with either end of the political spectrum an article by Pew

political spectrum an article by Pew

political spectrum an article by Pew Research in 2016 found that about 58% of

Research in 2016 found that about 58% of

Research in 2016 found that about 58% of Republicans had extremely unfavorable

Republicans had extremely unfavorable

Republicans had extremely unfavorable impressions of the Democratic Party

impressions of the Democratic Party

impressions of the Democratic Party while about 55% of Democrats had highly

while about 55% of Democrats had highly

while about 55% of Democrats had highly negative views of the GOP it is in my

negative views of the GOP it is in my

negative views of the GOP it is in my opinion that political polarization that

opinion that political polarization that

opinion that political polarization that originates from hate and Prejudice is

originates from hate and Prejudice is

originates from hate and Prejudice is unhealthy

unhealthy

unhealthy however polarization occurs because of

however polarization occurs because of

however polarization occurs because of informed debate and the critical

informed debate and the critical

informed debate and the critical analysis of policy then that is a sign

analysis of policy then that is a sign

analysis of policy then that is a sign of a healthy and functioning democracy

of a healthy and functioning democracy

of a healthy and functioning democracy and it is important to have a

and it is important to have a

and it is important to have a functioning democracy because the very

functioning democracy because the very

functioning democracy because the very nature of American values arrest upon a

nature of American values arrest upon a

nature of American values arrest upon a strong democracy back institution to

strong democracy back institution to

strong democracy back institution to dispute that is dispute the Constitution

dispute that is dispute the Constitution

dispute that is dispute the Constitution voter turnout played a large role in the

voter turnout played a large role in the

voter turnout played a large role in the 2016 election

2016 election

2016 election according to political there are about

according to political there are about

according to political there are about 200 million people registered to vote by

200 million people registered to vote by

200 million people registered to vote by October of 2016

October of 2016

October of 2016 around 129 million people voted the

around 129 million people voted the

around 129 million people voted the United States election project reported

United States election project reported

United States election project reported that about 58.9% of eligible voters had

that about 58.9% of eligible voters had

that about 58.9% of eligible voters had voted this past election which was

voted this past election which was

voted this past election which was higher than President Barack Obama’s

higher than President Barack Obama’s

higher than President Barack Obama’s re-election in 2012 where about 58

re-election in 2012 where about 58

re-election in 2012 where about 58 percent of eligible voters had voted the

percent of eligible voters had voted the

percent of eligible voters had voted the 2016 election results weren’t incredibly

2016 election results weren’t incredibly

2016 election results weren’t incredibly high or low but in general the US has

high or low but in general the US has

high or low but in general the US has very low voter turnout according to Pew

very low voter turnout according to Pew

very low voter turnout according to Pew Research the US has one of the least

Research the US has one of the least

Research the US has one of the least active voting populations among

active voting populations among

active voting populations among developed countries with the u.s. placed

developed countries with the u.s. placed

developed countries with the u.s. placed at thirty one out of thirty five

at thirty one out of thirty five

at thirty one out of thirty five countries in regards to highest voter

countries in regards to highest voter

countries in regards to highest voter turnout with places like Belgium with 87

turnout with places like Belgium with 87

turnout with places like Belgium with 87 percent and turkey with 84 percent the

percent and turkey with 84 percent the

percent and turkey with 84 percent the u.s. is lagging behind when you have 40

u.s. is lagging behind when you have 40

u.s. is lagging behind when you have 40 percent of a country around 95 million

percent of a country around 95 million

percent of a country around 95 million people not showing up for a presidential

people not showing up for a presidential

people not showing up for a presidential election there are serious consequences

election there are serious consequences

election there are serious consequences if we don’t care about who’s in the Oval

if we don’t care about who’s in the Oval

if we don’t care about who’s in the Oval Office or in Congress then the issues we

Office or in Congress then the issues we

Office or in Congress then the issues we care about will never be addressed the

care about will never be addressed the

care about will never be addressed the spread of misinformation played a large

spread of misinformation played a large

spread of misinformation played a large role in the 2016 election from incorrect

role in the 2016 election from incorrect

role in the 2016 election from incorrect statements in the debates – you’re crazy

statements in the debates – you’re crazy

statements in the debates – you’re crazy on Facebook page there was no shortage

on Facebook page there was no shortage

on Facebook page there was no shortage of the obfuscation of the truth these

of the obfuscation of the truth these

of the obfuscation of the truth these fake news articles support the idea of

fake news articles support the idea of

fake news articles support the idea of opinion follows truth where the opinion

opinion follows truth where the opinion

opinion follows truth where the opinion of one individual becomes the truth for

of one individual becomes the truth for

of one individual becomes the truth for thousands of people for example one of

thousands of people for example one of

thousands of people for example one of Donald Trump’s many famous quotes

Donald Trump’s many famous quotes

Donald Trump’s many famous quotes include if I were to run I’d run as a

include if I were to run I’d run as a

include if I were to run I’d run as a Republican they’re the dumbest group of

Republican they’re the dumbest group of

Republican they’re the dumbest group of voters in the country they believe

voters in the country they believe

voters in the country they believe anything on Fox News I could lie and

anything on Fox News I could lie and

anything on Fox News I could lie and they’d still eat it up I bet my numbers

they’d still eat it up I bet my numbers

they’d still eat it up I bet my numbers would be terrific this quote was

would be terrific this quote was

would be terrific this quote was supposedly said in a 1998 interview with

supposedly said in a 1998 interview with

supposedly said in a 1998 interview with People magazine but according to Snopes

People magazine but according to Snopes

People magazine but according to Snopes a fact-checking website who thoroughly

a fact-checking website who thoroughly

a fact-checking website who thoroughly examined the interview found that Donald

examined the interview found that Donald

examined the interview found that Donald Trump had never said that so how did

Trump had never said that so how did

Trump had never said that so how did this completely false quote get around

this completely false quote get around

this completely false quote get around Phil Mentzer a professor Indiana

Phil Mentzer a professor Indiana

Phil Mentzer a professor Indiana University who studies the spread and

University who studies the spread and

University who studies the spread and misinformation sums up these sort of

misinformation sums up these sort of

misinformation sums up these sort of situation situations easily

situation situations easily

situation situations easily he said suppose if you if you like

he said suppose if you if you like

he said suppose if you if you like Donald Trump and hate Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump and hate Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump and hate Hillary Clinton then it’s easy for you to believe a fake

then it’s easy for you to believe a fake

then it’s easy for you to believe a fake piece of news about something terrible

piece of news about something terrible

piece of news about something terrible Hillary is done and that these fake news

Hillary is done and that these fake news

Hillary is done and that these fake news websites often generate the same news

websites often generate the same news

websites often generate the same news just changing the names to get people on

just changing the names to get people on

just changing the names to get people on either side to be outraged up according

either side to be outraged up according

either side to be outraged up according to Men’s Research there’s about 13 hours

to Men’s Research there’s about 13 hours

to Men’s Research there’s about 13 hours between the publishing of a false news

between the publishing of a false news

between the publishing of a false news report and the invalidation of it

report and the invalidation of it

report and the invalidation of it 13 hours is plenty of time for that

13 hours is plenty of time for that

13 hours is plenty of time for that article to be read by hundreds of

article to be read by hundreds of

article to be read by hundreds of thousands of people this is from a

thousands of people this is from a

thousands of people this is from a nonpartisan fact-checking website called

nonpartisan fact-checking website called

nonpartisan fact-checking website called PolitiFact

PolitiFact

PolitiFact politifact took singing is made by

politifact took singing is made by

politifact took singing is made by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and rated them as some category of true or

rated them as some category of true or

rated them as some category of true or false and this is done by extensive

false and this is done by extensive

false and this is done by extensive research into the validity of the claims

research into the validity of the claims

research into the validity of the claims made and the important aspect I want to

made and the important aspect I want to

made and the important aspect I want to tear up to derive from this website is

tear up to derive from this website is

tear up to derive from this website is that about 70% of Donald’s statements

that about 70% of Donald’s statements

that about 70% of Donald’s statements were in some shape or form false now

were in some shape or form false now

were in some shape or form false now about 26% of Hillary’s Clinton

about 26% of Hillary’s Clinton

about 26% of Hillary’s Clinton statements are in some shape or form

statements are in some shape or form

statements are in some shape or form false when we allow lies to become the

false when we allow lies to become the

false when we allow lies to become the norm at what point do the citizens know

norm at what point do the citizens know

norm at what point do the citizens know the truth and how do we know that the

the truth and how do we know that the

the truth and how do we know that the president has our best interests in mind

president has our best interests in mind

president has our best interests in mind unless we can reassess our past

unless we can reassess our past

unless we can reassess our past decisions and continue to follow this

decisions and continue to follow this

decisions and continue to follow this dangerous path our next election will be

dangerous path our next election will be

dangerous path our next election will be as consequential as this one we need to

as consequential as this one we need to

as consequential as this one we need to revamp and rebrand our democracy I

revamp and rebrand our democracy I

revamp and rebrand our democracy I present to you my vision of democracy

present to you my vision of democracy

present to you my vision of democracy 2.0 this is a bipartisan solution for

2.0 this is a bipartisan solution for

2.0 this is a bipartisan solution for improving our democracy by making it

improving our democracy by making it

improving our democracy by making it more effective and capable for example

more effective and capable for example

more effective and capable for example new stations they have incredible impact

new stations they have incredible impact

new stations they have incredible impact on our listeners beliefs as most liberal

on our listeners beliefs as most liberal

on our listeners beliefs as most liberal listeners tend to tune in to liberal

listeners tend to tune in to liberal

listeners tend to tune in to liberal news outlets while most conservative

news outlets while most conservative

news outlets while most conservative listeners tend to

listeners tend to

listeners tend to sent to conservative outlets these new

sent to conservative outlets these new

sent to conservative outlets these new stations and outlets tend to have biases

stations and outlets tend to have biases

stations and outlets tend to have biases and will present information in that

and will present information in that

and will present information in that biased way the goal of new stations

biased way the goal of new stations

biased way the goal of new stations should be just to inform and if opinions

should be just to inform and if opinions

should be just to inform and if opinions are discussed opinions from both sides

are discussed opinions from both sides

are discussed opinions from both sides of the political spectrum must be

of the political spectrum must be

of the political spectrum must be brought in and discussed because it will

brought in and discussed because it will

brought in and discussed because it will allow the listeners and Watchers to

allow the listeners and Watchers to

allow the listeners and Watchers to widen those perspectives and understand

widen those perspectives and understand

widen those perspectives and understand the opposing views the president the

the opposing views the president the

the opposing views the president the president is supposed to be credible and

president is supposed to be credible and

president is supposed to be credible and correct as a source of information for

correct as a source of information for

correct as a source of information for thousands of Americans so it is crucial

thousands of Americans so it is crucial

thousands of Americans so it is crucial that every word he or she says is true

that every word he or she says is true

that every word he or she says is true from press conferences to interviews the

from press conferences to interviews the

from press conferences to interviews the president must be fact checked and in if

president must be fact checked and in if

president must be fact checked and in if there is an incorrect statement made it

there is an incorrect statement made it

there is an incorrect statement made it is imperative that the White House have

is imperative that the White House have

is imperative that the White House have a response team to immediately correct

a response team to immediately correct

a response team to immediately correct the mistake before the information

the mistake before the information

the mistake before the information spreads one of the most important things

spreads one of the most important things

spreads one of the most important things that needs to be emphasized must be done

that needs to be emphasized must be done

that needs to be emphasized must be done within the education system government

within the education system government

within the education system government voting political efficacy all these

voting political efficacy all these

voting political efficacy all these things should be stressed in schools

things should be stressed in schools

things should be stressed in schools because children need to know that their

because children need to know that their

because children need to know that their vote and their dedication will be

vote and their dedication will be

vote and their dedication will be incredibly impactful in the future but

incredibly impactful in the future but

incredibly impactful in the future but more importantly we need to teach

more importantly we need to teach

more importantly we need to teach children about morals and character they

children about morals and character they

children about morals and character they need to know about basic human rights

need to know about basic human rights

need to know about basic human rights and previous in justices that have

and previous in justices that have

and previous in justices that have occurred within our country they need to

occurred within our country they need to

occurred within our country they need to know about respect respecting people of

know about respect respecting people of

know about respect respecting people of a different gender respecting people of

a different gender respecting people of

a different gender respecting people of a different religion respecting people

a different religion respecting people

a different religion respecting people from a different background respecting

from a different background respecting

from a different background respecting people of a different color because this

people of a different color because this

people of a different color because this will carry out with them throughout

will carry out with them throughout

will carry out with them throughout their lives and it will change the way

their lives and it will change the way

their lives and it will change the way we think act govern despite all these

we think act govern despite all these

we think act govern despite all these problems the power to democracy lies

problems the power to democracy lies

problems the power to democracy lies within the people you next time we face

within the people you next time we face

within the people you next time we face a cusp of making a huge decision I want

a cusp of making a huge decision I want

a cusp of making a huge decision I want you to ask yourself Who am i what am i

you to ask yourself Who am i what am i

you to ask yourself Who am i what am i thinking how did I get here

thinking how did I get here

thinking how did I get here why did I get here thank you

why did I get here thank you

why did I get here thank you [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *