malaria is one of the diseases
what else kills people around the world
they are already more than 400 million and millions
of millions of people contaminated
every year and of these more than one million
dies 80 percent in the countries
poorest in Africa or in some
experts find a very way
efficient to prevent malaria
which are the so-called mosquito nets
these mosquito nets are
chemically treated so that
keeps the mosquito
away from families of children can
sleep or rest in peace
however what these experts do not
they anticipated is that this is causing
some other unforeseen consequences
large international organizations
foundations governments have a view this
solution that costs less than five
dollars each network are distributing
millions of trees for free
to families who can not pay for
they
however, fishing is one of the
ways that these networks are being
most successful did not even happen
account that the need is the mother of
inventiveness and countries and the
families where it is most needed
Galactic hunger of the mosquito not in those
short that ends up being very resistant
has many more little ones are very
strong and serves very well for fishing
those networks costs $ 250 in those
countries and these families does not earn more
that one dollar per day
besides what he what these
fishermen you know do not have in mind is
that these networks are clinically
treated and these toxins reach the water
to the fish and to the families themselves
another way that his men are
being used in the middle market
they are marketed very cheap way
because they are distributed so
free
after it is marketed das and good are
excellent fast heart wedding
for parties for coffee and felling more
popular town and it’s not all too
these networks are being used
distributed not around the world and it’s
killing the production and distribution
local network so yes tomorrow
these foundations organizations decide
interrupt the free distribution of
those networks
you do not have to produce and distribute in
our own countries
I’m sure this was not the
intention of any of the
organizations that resolved
distribute these networks
but then how to guarantee that
really those resources that are
being used they solve these
problems today such as malaria
costs 12,000 million dollars
if we think about international aid
as a whole we are talking about more than
12 trillion 2 million dollars in
five decades be the performance is not
the lack of money like this is not
being used to really change
the life of people
and well there is an instrument that was
developed jointly for that
image in I know if instead of these
organizations paid for network is a lot
more than they were paying for
decrease pollution of the
malaria
the social impact bonds were
created for that I tell you a little bit of
what is it all started in 2010 in
England
there the government and some
investors realize and
separately the situation of
prison recidivism where 63
hundred of the men who came out of the
prison that weighs less than a year in
average each of these inmates
they had committed 43 crimes and there were
I was seven months in prison before
Of course this is worrying for
these resources for society for the
government then investors and the
central government in an agreement on everything
government would reward the
private investors and they
funded the intervention was successful
in preventing prison recidivism and
with the savings obtained from this
this forecast the government would pay
these investors your refund and more
no financial return and well this was
very successful
after the case of the england
there are more than 100 social impact bonds
in development and around the world
mainly in united states canada
europe australia but they believe in where
more we need that are the countries in
process of development
we are all struggling to
develop instruments like this one but
I have good news
Colombia in Jalisco will have the first
social impact bonds of america
latina
here in Jalisco
this started a couple of years ago with the
situation of women heads of
family I tell you quickly these
women are more than 52 thousand families and
jalisco led by women mothers
single women who receive less than 200 pesos
a day to keep all his family
besides the low income these
families also suffers a lot
labor discrimination plus 90 for
cent have not been able to get a job
because of their social and economic situation
educationally even 77 percent of those
of those women have not finished
Baccalaureate also has no security
social and more than 50 percent has been
reported having suffered depression
well this is a growing situation
today these families represent one of
every four homes in Jalisco and in
2030 should be one every three that
we can do to prevent this
situation gets worse
there is not really a problem every
bigger time for these families and
for society as a whole
good in jalisco as well as in many
from the government there are many others
countries there are public programs for
be able to avoid that those families are in
a situation of vulnerability
criticism one of the most programs
known are the programs of
monetary transfer that guarantee
that their families can afford and basic
of your bills and be able to eat every day
but this is not enough for
these families can leave the
poverty
that’s why a study of
feasibility where they are investigated
where we are
the evidences of problems that yes
they are working for you
families walk out of the
a model that poverty was found
develop initially in Bangladesh
it was already tested applied different
countries went through evaluations of
impact and they are having
positive results
this program composed of a series of
interventions that include and education
financial education a culture of
saving technical training
training for soft skills
home mentoring in the house of
each of their families link
with active transfer market
productive and the results of its
impact assessment were very
significant and rural areas
here the adaptation would be to transfer
this intervention for the first time to a
urban zone
in addition to chemicals and we found a
organization that alone can run
or this intervention is more urban
that’s why he also scored risk that is
can organize a series of
civil associations that can combine
your resources your abilities not your
experiences to be able to be this
complete problem
well those risks are very serious when
we talk about public resources and not the
government was created to innovate and
risk public resource is a great
responsibility
that’s why there are among investors
private and that is completely funded
the intervention until it is tested in
that the results were already achieved
that their families are walking towards
above the poverty line and a
once your results are achieved
there if the government can
disburse resource
thanks to evidence of the impact
sustained in time
we are not talking about an impact
immediate or a result
immediately after the
intervention but an observation
over the years
[Music]
good for this to happen here
in Jalisco
many organizations many people
they have been collaborating
it is a huge team many people
they are even here there are organisms
international foundations
foreigners do nothing of
investors different governments
levels
expert consultants among many people
because we are interested in all
this scheme first because it is
orienting results we are not
talking about mosquito nets
it’s about seeing how much really
is changing the lives of people
second because they are public alliances
private those problems do not matter to
each and every one has a way of
participate and finally it’s a way to
validate public innovations that
they can become policies and
public programs and of course every
each of his interventions have
challenges not that we have to overcome
one of them is to achieve empathy put
investors governments associations
civil family of the same table to
be able to speak the same language
the great challenge is not there of course
have intermediaries mechanisms so that
this can serve in the best way
another challenge is the time we are talking
of medium and long term impact and that
means provenance between
government administrations
It also identifies mechanisms that
they can work
in this way another challenge is the
commitment on a technical level as well as
political level
you have to mean champions in the
different organizations and actors that
they are really committed to carrying
out on this subject like that
and finally the theme of the scale for
that remit the social impact bonds
be successful you need to think with
a market perspective that we can
do so there are in ten
the bonds of social impact america
Latin and it is common to create funds for
payment for results for example not
then those pilots are fundamental
for the creation of this market and every
one of us can support this type
of initiatives in some way like
citizens demand and collect from our
governments that develop programs and
policies focusing on results not
only to processes like organizations of
civil society and develop a
monitoring and evaluation culture for
that we can test and measure the change that
we are causing half of the
business can have their own
impact indicators that the
investors that invests in this type
of schemes then all that for
contribute so that we go much more
beyond good intentions and with
our resources our time and
our vocation or not really generate
positive and concrete changes
[Applause]
the
”
Be First to Comment