Press "Enter" to skip to content

Capitalism Needs a Reboot | Andrew Brady | TEDxAllendaleColumbiaSchool


it is not from the benevolence of the

it is not from the benevolence of the butcher the brewer or the Baker that we

butcher the brewer or the Baker that we

butcher the brewer or the Baker that we expect our dinner but from their regard

expect our dinner but from their regard

expect our dinner but from their regard to their own self-interest now if you’ve

to their own self-interest now if you’ve

to their own self-interest now if you’ve ever taken economics 101 you’ve probably

ever taken economics 101 you’ve probably

ever taken economics 101 you’ve probably heard this quote from Adam Smith in his

heard this quote from Adam Smith in his

heard this quote from Adam Smith in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations even if

1776 book The Wealth of Nations even if

1776 book The Wealth of Nations even if you haven’t taken econ 101 you’ve

you haven’t taken econ 101 you’ve

you haven’t taken econ 101 you’ve probably heard about the invisible hand

probably heard about the invisible hand

probably heard about the invisible hand that results when everyone in the

that results when everyone in the

that results when everyone in the economy is following their own

economy is following their own

economy is following their own self-interest so where has this taken us

self-interest so where has this taken us

self-interest so where has this taken us well Adam Smith is regarded as the

well Adam Smith is regarded as the

well Adam Smith is regarded as the father of modern capitalism because this

father of modern capitalism because this

father of modern capitalism because this is really underlying much of our economy

is really underlying much of our economy

is really underlying much of our economy today and in 1820 85 % of the world

today and in 1820 85 % of the world

today and in 1820 85 % of the world lived on less than a dollar a day today

lived on less than a dollar a day today

lived on less than a dollar a day today that figure is down to 17 percent the

that figure is down to 17 percent the

that figure is down to 17 percent the average person today is better off than

average person today is better off than

average person today is better off than kings of centuries past by certain

kings of centuries past by certain

kings of centuries past by certain measures if you think about their

measures if you think about their

measures if you think about their lifespan or their access to information

lifespan or their access to information

lifespan or their access to information Milton Friedman said that the only

Milton Friedman said that the only

Milton Friedman said that the only corporate social responsibility a

corporate social responsibility a

corporate social responsibility a company has is to maximize his profits

company has is to maximize his profits

company has is to maximize his profits or as Gordon Gekko summed up nicely in

or as Gordon Gekko summed up nicely in

or as Gordon Gekko summed up nicely in the movie Wall Street greed is good

the movie Wall Street greed is good

the movie Wall Street greed is good so while capitalism has brought us

so while capitalism has brought us

so while capitalism has brought us incredible prosperity it’s also led to

incredible prosperity it’s also led to

incredible prosperity it’s also led to massive inequality right now we’re at

massive inequality right now we’re at

massive inequality right now we’re at the point where the top point one

the point where the top point one

the point where the top point one percent controls more wealth than the

percent controls more wealth than the

percent controls more wealth than the bottom 90% combined it’s no wonder that

bottom 90% combined it’s no wonder that

bottom 90% combined it’s no wonder that 51% of Millennials in a recent Harvard

51% of Millennials in a recent Harvard

51% of Millennials in a recent Harvard University survey actually said that

University survey actually said that

University survey actually said that they no longer believe that capitalism

they no longer believe that capitalism

they no longer believe that capitalism is the best form of organization for our

is the best form of organization for our

is the best form of organization for our economy now there’s an alternate view of

economy now there’s an alternate view of

economy now there’s an alternate view of capitalism and that is called conscious

capitalism and that is called conscious

capitalism and that is called conscious capitalism now in conscious capitalism

capitalism now in conscious capitalism

capitalism now in conscious capitalism there is a higher purpose beyond just

there is a higher purpose beyond just

there is a higher purpose beyond just making profits they have a stakeholder

making profits they have a stakeholder

making profits they have a stakeholder orientation that rather than prioritize

orientation that rather than prioritize

orientation that rather than prioritize the needs of the stockholders balances

the needs of the stockholders balances

the needs of the stockholders balances the customers the community the

the customers the community the

the customers the community the employees in the environment they have a

employees in the environment they have a

employees in the environment they have a leadership that rather than being

leadership that rather than being

leadership that rather than being command and control actually prioritizes

command and control actually prioritizes

command and control actually prioritizes how can we

how can we

how can we unleash the potential of all our

unleash the potential of all our

unleash the potential of all our employees and they have a culture that

employees and they have a culture that

employees and they have a culture that focuses on the well-being of all those

focuses on the well-being of all those

focuses on the well-being of all those employees and in a 2007 book called

employees and in a 2007 book called

employees and in a 2007 book called firms of endearment that started this

firms of endearment that started this

firms of endearment that started this conscious capitalism movement it

conscious capitalism movement it

conscious capitalism movement it actually showed that ironically by not

actually showed that ironically by not

actually showed that ironically by not focusing just on bottom-line profits

focusing just on bottom-line profits

focusing just on bottom-line profits these companies actually made more money

these companies actually made more money

these companies actually made more money and were far more successful companies

and were far more successful companies

and were far more successful companies that were included in this study

that were included in this study

that were included in this study actually were Wegmans and Southwest

actually were Wegmans and Southwest

actually were Wegmans and Southwest Airlines in Google so how can we rectify

Airlines in Google so how can we rectify

Airlines in Google so how can we rectify these two different views of capitalism

these two different views of capitalism

these two different views of capitalism well I want to invite you to think about

well I want to invite you to think about

well I want to invite you to think about the peacock now why is it that the

the peacock now why is it that the

the peacock now why is it that the peacock has such a large tail well it’s

peacock has such a large tail well it’s

peacock has such a large tail well it’s to attract a mate now a peacocks tail is

to attract a mate now a peacocks tail is

to attract a mate now a peacocks tail is generally a pretty good approximation

generally a pretty good approximation

generally a pretty good approximation for the overall health of the peacock

for the overall health of the peacock

for the overall health of the peacock it’s been well fed so the peahens

it’s been well fed so the peahens

it’s been well fed so the peahens without being able to take all the

without being able to take all the

without being able to take all the Peacocks to the doctor for a full

Peacocks to the doctor for a full

Peacocks to the doctor for a full checkup they can just look at the most

checkup they can just look at the most

checkup they can just look at the most visible sign of their health which was

visible sign of their health which was

visible sign of their health which was the tail but over successive generations

the tail but over successive generations

the tail but over successive generations as those tails grew larger and larger

as those tails grew larger and larger

as those tails grew larger and larger the Peacocks were actually incentivized

the Peacocks were actually incentivized

the Peacocks were actually incentivized to shift more and more of their

to shift more and more of their

to shift more and more of their metabolic energy into the tail and away

metabolic energy into the tail and away

metabolic energy into the tail and away from other aspects of their health and

from other aspects of their health and

from other aspects of their health and so by focusing on just the most visible

so by focusing on just the most visible

so by focusing on just the most visible measure of success they actually led to

measure of success they actually led to

measure of success they actually led to less success and less overall health now

less success and less overall health now

less success and less overall health now how do we do this in our companies well

how do we do this in our companies well

how do we do this in our companies well think about profits yes profits can be a

think about profits yes profits can be a

think about profits yes profits can be a very effective way to show how

very effective way to show how

very effective way to show how successful a company is or the stock

successful a company is or the stock

successful a company is or the stock price as it grows can show that a

price as it grows can show that a

price as it grows can show that a company too is growing and yet because

company too is growing and yet because

company too is growing and yet because it’s the most easy to measure does not

it’s the most easy to measure does not

it’s the most easy to measure does not mean that it’s the best way to measure

mean that it’s the best way to measure

mean that it’s the best way to measure the success of the or the health of the

the success of the or the health of the

the success of the or the health of the company think about other ways that you

company think about other ways that you

company think about other ways that you can do it yes you can increase your

can do it yes you can increase your

can do it yes you can increase your stock price by increasing sales but you

stock price by increasing sales but you

stock price by increasing sales but you can also do it by announcing layoffs now

can also do it by announcing layoffs now

can also do it by announcing layoffs now at the national level think about the

at the national level think about the

at the national level think about the way that we measure GDP you can increase

way that we measure GDP you can increase

way that we measure GDP you can increase your GDP by selling tobacco or you can

your GDP by selling tobacco or you can

your GDP by selling tobacco or you can increase it by selling vegetables and

increase it by selling vegetables and

increase it by selling vegetables and yep if you’re thinking about the

yep if you’re thinking about the

yep if you’re thinking about the well-being of the nation it’s pretty

well-being of the nation it’s pretty

well-being of the nation it’s pretty clear which is correlated with the

clear which is correlated with the

clear which is correlated with the overall well-being of the nation Simon

overall well-being of the nation Simon

overall well-being of the nation Simon Kuznets who actually created the measure

Kuznets who actually created the measure

Kuznets who actually created the measure of GDP actually warned us that the

of GDP actually warned us that the

of GDP actually warned us that the well being of a nation cannot be

well being of a nation cannot be

well being of a nation cannot be measured by GDP alone and yet this piece

measured by GDP alone and yet this piece

measured by GDP alone and yet this piece of his wisdom is often lost to history

of his wisdom is often lost to history

of his wisdom is often lost to history now when we think about unrestrained

now when we think about unrestrained

now when we think about unrestrained growth of a part that loses sight of the

growth of a part that loses sight of the

growth of a part that loses sight of the health of the whole at the cellular

health of the whole at the cellular

health of the whole at the cellular level we actually call that cancer think

level we actually call that cancer think

level we actually call that cancer think about it a few cells continue to grow

about it a few cells continue to grow

about it a few cells continue to grow and multiply grow into a tumor and their

and multiply grow into a tumor and their

and multiply grow into a tumor and their self interest actually ends up damaging

self interest actually ends up damaging

self interest actually ends up damaging the health of the whole now how do we do

the health of the whole now how do we do

the health of the whole now how do we do this sometimes in our companies you know

this sometimes in our companies you know

this sometimes in our companies you know if you actually recognize that there are

if you actually recognize that there are

if you actually recognize that there are cancerous mutations that go on in our

cancerous mutations that go on in our

cancerous mutations that go on in our cells every single day and yet we’ve

cells every single day and yet we’ve

cells every single day and yet we’ve evolved a mechanism for dealing with

evolved a mechanism for dealing with

evolved a mechanism for dealing with many of these otherwise unrestrained

many of these otherwise unrestrained

many of these otherwise unrestrained cancers our immune system evolved to

cancers our immune system evolved to

cancers our immune system evolved to take care of that unrestrained growth

take care of that unrestrained growth

take care of that unrestrained growth Adam Smith actually recognized this he

Adam Smith actually recognized this he

Adam Smith actually recognized this he actually said in a less red book called

actually said in a less red book called

actually said in a less red book called the Theory of Moral Sentiments he said

the Theory of Moral Sentiments he said

the Theory of Moral Sentiments he said that to restrain our selfish and to

that to restrain our selfish and to

that to restrain our selfish and to indulge our benevolent affections

indulge our benevolent affections

indulge our benevolent affections constitutes the perfection of human

constitutes the perfection of human

constitutes the perfection of human nature many of us probably haven’t heard

nature many of us probably haven’t heard

nature many of us probably haven’t heard that quote from Adam Smith so how can we

that quote from Adam Smith so how can we

that quote from Adam Smith so how can we create the kind of cultural immune

create the kind of cultural immune

create the kind of cultural immune system that can take advantage of the

system that can take advantage of the

system that can take advantage of the self-interest that brings us prosperity

self-interest that brings us prosperity

self-interest that brings us prosperity from the butcher the brewer and the

from the butcher the brewer and the

from the butcher the brewer and the baker following their own self-interest

baker following their own self-interest

baker following their own self-interest but also balance that with a benevolent

but also balance that with a benevolent

but also balance that with a benevolent love of our neighbor and caring with the

love of our neighbor and caring with the

love of our neighbor and caring with the belonging of our entire planet and the

belonging of our entire planet and the

belonging of our entire planet and the sense of shared fate that that creates

sense of shared fate that that creates

sense of shared fate that that creates now what would you do if you are trying

now what would you do if you are trying

now what would you do if you are trying to evolve the most successful company

to evolve the most successful company

to evolve the most successful company well survival of the fittest competition

well survival of the fittest competition

well survival of the fittest competition right maybe it’s select for the most

right maybe it’s select for the most

right maybe it’s select for the most productive employees and and try to

productive employees and and try to

productive employees and and try to create more and more of those in your

create more and more of those in your

create more and more of those in your company well in an experiment by

company well in an experiment by

company well in an experiment by evolutionary biologist William Muir he

evolutionary biologist William Muir he

evolutionary biologist William Muir he actually did this with chickens he was

actually did this with chickens he was

actually did this with chickens he was trying to build a super flock of

trying to build a super flock of

trying to build a super flock of chickens and so what he did was from

chickens and so what he did was from

chickens and so what he did was from each coop of chickens he took the most

each coop of chickens he took the most

each coop of chickens he took the most productive chicken from each coop and

productive chicken from each coop and

productive chicken from each coop and bred them over successive generations

bred them over successive generations

bred them over successive generations now do

now do

now do I end up with the most productive flock

I end up with the most productive flock

I end up with the most productive flock he didn’t end up with the most

he didn’t end up with the most

he didn’t end up with the most productive flock of chickens because

productive flock of chickens because

productive flock of chickens because actually what happened was that there

actually what happened was that there

actually what happened was that there were very few of them that were still

were very few of them that were still

were very few of them that were still alive after six generations because by

alive after six generations because by

alive after six generations because by incentivizing that individual

incentivizing that individual

incentivizing that individual productivity he unknowingly actually

productivity he unknowingly actually

productivity he unknowingly actually incentivized for aggression the chickens

incentivized for aggression the chickens

incentivized for aggression the chickens that were the most productive were

that were the most productive were

that were the most productive were actually the ones that were pecking away

actually the ones that were pecking away

actually the ones that were pecking away at their neighbors and maybe even

at their neighbors and maybe even

at their neighbors and maybe even stealing their food how often do we do

stealing their food how often do we do

stealing their food how often do we do this in our companies we incentivize

this in our companies we incentivize

this in our companies we incentivize individual behavior believing that it’ll

individual behavior believing that it’ll

individual behavior believing that it’ll bring the most productive overall

bring the most productive overall

bring the most productive overall company now in an alternative view of

company now in an alternative view of

company now in an alternative view of this experiment what Mir actually did

this experiment what Mir actually did

this experiment what Mir actually did was rather than incentivize the most

was rather than incentivize the most

was rather than incentivize the most productive chickens he actually bred the

productive chickens he actually bred the

productive chickens he actually bred the most productive coops he took each coop

most productive coops he took each coop

most productive coops he took each coop and after each generation whichever was

and after each generation whichever was

and after each generation whichever was the most productive with the largest and

the most productive with the largest and

the most productive with the largest and most eggs he bred those and over

most eggs he bred those and over

most eggs he bred those and over successive generations was actually able

successive generations was actually able

successive generations was actually able to improve their productivity so let’s

to improve their productivity so let’s

to improve their productivity so let’s get back to conscious capitalism because

get back to conscious capitalism because

get back to conscious capitalism because there’s a little bit confusing right

there’s a little bit confusing right

there’s a little bit confusing right should capitalism follow this greed is

should capitalism follow this greed is

should capitalism follow this greed is good

good

good what about evolution so these conscious

what about evolution so these conscious

what about evolution so these conscious capitalism companies they have a purpose

capitalism companies they have a purpose

capitalism companies they have a purpose beyond just making profits when you

beyond just making profits when you

beyond just making profits when you think of when you ask someone why a

think of when you ask someone why a

think of when you ask someone why a company exists they’ll often say to make

company exists they’ll often say to make

company exists they’ll often say to make money and yet if you ask them about why

money and yet if you ask them about why

money and yet if you ask them about why a doctor exists it’s to save lives or an

a doctor exists it’s to save lives or an

a doctor exists it’s to save lives or an architect exists to build beautiful

architect exists to build beautiful

architect exists to build beautiful buildings that will last for generations

buildings that will last for generations

buildings that will last for generations why have we allowed businesses to purely

why have we allowed businesses to purely

why have we allowed businesses to purely just have a purpose of making profits

just have a purpose of making profits

just have a purpose of making profits similarly when you think about the

similarly when you think about the

similarly when you think about the stakeholder orientation of a conscious

stakeholder orientation of a conscious

stakeholder orientation of a conscious capitalism company rather than just

capitalism company rather than just

capitalism company rather than just focusing on the stockholders rather than

focusing on the stockholders rather than

focusing on the stockholders rather than just focusing on profits and stock price

just focusing on profits and stock price

just focusing on profits and stock price to grow the largest tale because that’s

to grow the largest tale because that’s

to grow the largest tale because that’s the most visible what if we instead

the most visible what if we instead

the most visible what if we instead measured what matters what if we

measured what matters what if we

measured what matters what if we balanced the needs of the customers the

balanced the needs of the customers the

balanced the needs of the customers the community the employees the environment

community the employees the environment

community the employees the environment this whole system that surrounds and

this whole system that surrounds and

this whole system that surrounds and supports the company additionally these

supports the company additionally these

supports the company additionally these conscious capitalism companies use the

conscious capitalism companies use the

conscious capitalism companies use the evolutionary wisdom of those chickens so

evolutionary wisdom of those chickens so

evolutionary wisdom of those chickens so they have a leadership that create

they have a leadership that create

they have a leadership that create a culture that takes care of an immune

a culture that takes care of an immune

a culture that takes care of an immune system that takes care of those

system that takes care of those

system that takes care of those unrestrained self-interests before they

unrestrained self-interests before they

unrestrained self-interests before they become cancerous these conscious

become cancerous these conscious

become cancerous these conscious capitalism companies have created over

capitalism companies have created over

capitalism companies have created over the long term the way to survive

the long term the way to survive

the long term the way to survive evolution is the longest-running

evolution is the longest-running

evolution is the longest-running experiment in history and over such a

experiment in history and over such a

experiment in history and over such a long longitudinal study can reveal some

long longitudinal study can reveal some

long longitudinal study can reveal some great truths now should we throw out

great truths now should we throw out

great truths now should we throw out this survival of the fittest competition

this survival of the fittest competition

this survival of the fittest competition view of evolution well not so fast

view of evolution well not so fast

view of evolution well not so fast because the Latin root of the word

because the Latin root of the word

because the Latin root of the word competition is comb patear patear means

competition is comb patear patear means

competition is comb patear patear means to aim at to seek or to strive for and

to aim at to seek or to strive for and

to aim at to seek or to strive for and comb means together so to compete is

comb means together so to compete is

comb means together so to compete is actually to strive together for our

actually to strive together for our

actually to strive together for our shared success and nobody ever said that

shared success and nobody ever said that

shared success and nobody ever said that survival of the fittest meant to peck

survival of the fittest meant to peck

survival of the fittest meant to peck away at your neighbors what if instead

away at your neighbors what if instead

away at your neighbors what if instead of survival of the fittest being

of survival of the fittest being

of survival of the fittest being survival of the winner what if it was

survival of the winner what if it was

survival of the winner what if it was actually survival of the most

actually survival of the most

actually survival of the most cooperative now as we’re thinking about

cooperative now as we’re thinking about

cooperative now as we’re thinking about how we can evolve business what if we

how we can evolve business what if we

how we can evolve business what if we evolved business to take advantage of

evolved business to take advantage of

evolved business to take advantage of the self-interest of the butcher the

the self-interest of the butcher the

the self-interest of the butcher the brewer and the baker to bring us

brewer and the baker to bring us

brewer and the baker to bring us prosperity but we also had a love for

prosperity but we also had a love for

prosperity but we also had a love for one another and a sense of shared

one another and a sense of shared

one another and a sense of shared purpose and shared prosperity that could

purpose and shared prosperity that could

purpose and shared prosperity that could reboot capitalism through the evolution

reboot capitalism through the evolution

reboot capitalism through the evolution of business thank you

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *