Press "Enter" to skip to content

Breaking Down Misconceptions About Poverty | Sam Magavern | TEDxUniversityatBuffalo


thank you very much my name is Sam and

thank you very much my name is Sam and I’m a procrastinator I’m well-acquainted

I’m a procrastinator I’m well-acquainted

I’m a procrastinator I’m well-acquainted with the instant gratification monkey

with the instant gratification monkey

with the instant gratification monkey and when dr. Raja was presenting and

and when dr. Raja was presenting and

and when dr. Raja was presenting and showed the cookie I had an immediate

showed the cookie I had an immediate

showed the cookie I had an immediate very strong desire to go get a cookie

very strong desire to go get a cookie

very strong desire to go get a cookie right now and I had no desire whatsoever

right now and I had no desire whatsoever

right now and I had no desire whatsoever to get a carrot so my talk today is

to get a carrot so my talk today is

to get a carrot so my talk today is called poverty in the United States

called poverty in the United States

called poverty in the United States whose poor why and what we can do about

whose poor why and what we can do about

whose poor why and what we can do about it and there we go here in Buffalo New

it and there we go here in Buffalo New

it and there we go here in Buffalo New York a city is being reborn

York a city is being reborn

York a city is being reborn we’re rediscovering our downtown and our

we’re rediscovering our downtown and our

we’re rediscovering our downtown and our waterfront developers are rushing to

waterfront developers are rushing to

waterfront developers are rushing to build luxury apartments and yet over

build luxury apartments and yet over

build luxury apartments and yet over half the stilled Rijn in the city are

half the stilled Rijn in the city are

half the stilled Rijn in the city are living in poverty you can find similar

living in poverty you can find similar

living in poverty you can find similar stories in cities across the United

stories in cities across the United

stories in cities across the United States which is both the wealthiest

States which is both the wealthiest

States which is both the wealthiest nation in the world and also a place in

nation in the world and also a place in

nation in the world and also a place in which one out of every five children is

which one out of every five children is

which one out of every five children is living in poverty can you have a

living in poverty can you have a

living in poverty can you have a renaissance if it leaves so many people

renaissance if it leaves so many people

renaissance if it leaves so many people behind can a nation be great when it is

behind can a nation be great when it is

behind can a nation be great when it is so unequal today we’re going to talk

so unequal today we’re going to talk

so unequal today we’re going to talk about who’s poor why and what we can do

about who’s poor why and what we can do

about who’s poor why and what we can do about it so let’s start by asking who is

about it so let’s start by asking who is

about it so let’s start by asking who is living in poverty imagine that you are a

living in poverty imagine that you are a

living in poverty imagine that you are a photographer for Time magazine the

photographer for Time magazine the

photographer for Time magazine the editor calls you because she wants to do

editor calls you because she wants to do

editor calls you because she wants to do a cover story based on the latest census

a cover story based on the latest census

a cover story based on the latest census figures which show that over 40 million

figures which show that over 40 million

figures which show that over 40 million people are living in poverty in the

people are living in poverty in the

people are living in poverty in the United States finally in the most

United States finally in the most

United States finally in the most typical poor family that you can she

typical poor family that you can she

typical poor family that you can she says and will put them under cover so

says and will put them under cover so

says and will put them under cover so our job now is to find that typical

our job now is to find that typical

our job now is to find that typical family where should we go to look for

family where should we go to look for

family where should we go to look for them a city a suburb or a rural area if

them a city a suburb or a rural area if

them a city a suburb or a rural area if you entered a city or rural area you’re

you entered a city or rural area you’re

you entered a city or rural area you’re wrong there are more people in poverty

wrong there are more people in poverty

wrong there are more people in poverty that live in the suburbs should the

that live in the suburbs should the

that live in the suburbs should the typical impoverished family for our

typical impoverished family for our

typical impoverished family for our cover story be white black or Hispanic

cover story be white black or Hispanic

cover story be white black or Hispanic according to census figures the most

according to census figures the most

according to census figures the most typical race

typical race

typical race would be what should we be looking for a

would be what should we be looking for a

would be what should we be looking for a large family or a small one average

large family or a small one average

large family or a small one average family living in poverty has only one or

family living in poverty has only one or

family living in poverty has only one or two children how much education will

two children how much education will

two children how much education will that typical parent in poverty have

that typical parent in poverty have

that typical parent in poverty have should we be looking for a high school

should we be looking for a high school

should we be looking for a high school dropout or someone with a diploma turns

dropout or someone with a diploma turns

dropout or someone with a diploma turns out that most people living in poverty

out that most people living in poverty

out that most people living in poverty have at least a college high school

have at least a college high school

have at least a college high school diploma and many have at least some

diploma and many have at least some

diploma and many have at least some college all right now we’ve got our Time

college all right now we’ve got our Time

college all right now we’ve got our Time magazine cover

magazine cover

magazine cover it’s a white mom with one or two kids

it’s a white mom with one or two kids

it’s a white mom with one or two kids living in the suburbs with a high school

living in the suburbs with a high school

living in the suburbs with a high school diploma hanging on her wall now imagine

diploma hanging on her wall now imagine

diploma hanging on her wall now imagine that we ask all Americans to close their

that we ask all Americans to close their

that we ask all Americans to close their eyes and picture a family living in

eyes and picture a family living in

eyes and picture a family living in poverty are they seeing the same picture

poverty are they seeing the same picture

poverty are they seeing the same picture that we are why do we have such

that we are why do we have such

that we are why do we have such erroneous views about poverty one reason

erroneous views about poverty one reason

erroneous views about poverty one reason is stereotyping but another reason is

is stereotyping but another reason is

is stereotyping but another reason is that when we think about poverty we tend

that when we think about poverty we tend

that when we think about poverty we tend to think about the places and groups

to think about the places and groups

to think about the places and groups where the poverty rate is highest in

where the poverty rate is highest in

where the poverty rate is highest in other words we confuse what is

other words we confuse what is

other words we confuse what is disproportionate with what is typical

disproportionate with what is typical

disproportionate with what is typical because it is true that poverty rates

because it is true that poverty rates

because it is true that poverty rates are higher among people in cities than

are higher among people in cities than

are higher among people in cities than people in the suburbs it’s just that

people in the suburbs it’s just that

people in the suburbs it’s just that today many more people live in the

today many more people live in the

today many more people live in the suburbs than in the cities so even

suburbs than in the cities so even

suburbs than in the cities so even though the poverty rate is lower in the

though the poverty rate is lower in the

though the poverty rate is lower in the suburbs the total number of impoverished

suburbs the total number of impoverished

suburbs the total number of impoverished people is high so let’s take a

people is high so let’s take a

people is high so let’s take a metropolitan area with a million people

metropolitan area with a million people

metropolitan area with a million people in it

in it

in it of whom 300,000 live in the city and

of whom 300,000 live in the city and

of whom 300,000 live in the city and 700,000 in the suburbs even if the

700,000 in the suburbs even if the

700,000 in the suburbs even if the poverty rate in the suburbs is only 10%

poverty rate in the suburbs is only 10%

poverty rate in the suburbs is only 10% while the rate in the city is 20% there

while the rate in the city is 20% there

while the rate in the city is 20% there will still be 70,000 poor people in the

will still be 70,000 poor people in the

will still be 70,000 poor people in the suburbs compared to 60,000 in the city

similarly it is true that the poverty

similarly it is true that the poverty rate among African Americans is

rate among African Americans is

rate among African Americans is two-and-a-half times higher than that of

two-and-a-half times higher than that of

two-and-a-half times higher than that of white 26% compared to 10% but there are

white 26% compared to 10% but there are

white 26% compared to 10% but there are 200 million whites in the United States

200 million whites in the United States

200 million whites in the United States and only about 41 million blacks so

and only about 41 million blacks so

and only about 41 million blacks so there are still almost twice as many

there are still almost twice as many

there are still almost twice as many whites living in poverty as blacks

whites living in poverty as blacks

whites living in poverty as blacks which helps to explain why our typical

which helps to explain why our typical

which helps to explain why our typical person living in poverty might look

person living in poverty might look

person living in poverty might look something like this

something like this

something like this when we think about poverty and how to

when we think about poverty and how to

when we think about poverty and how to reduce it we need to keep both things in

reduce it we need to keep both things in

reduce it we need to keep both things in mind what is typical along with what is

mind what is typical along with what is

mind what is typical along with what is disproportionate

disproportionate

disproportionate if you were designing a program to serve

if you were designing a program to serve

if you were designing a program to serve people in need it would be important to

people in need it would be important to

people in need it would be important to realize that most of your clients live

realize that most of your clients live

realize that most of your clients live in the suburbs at the same time you

in the suburbs at the same time you

in the suburbs at the same time you would also want to realize that the city

would also want to realize that the city

would also want to realize that the city was suffering from a much higher poverty

was suffering from a much higher poverty

was suffering from a much higher poverty rate than any individual suburb was now

rate than any individual suburb was now

rate than any individual suburb was now let’s ask why are people living in

let’s ask why are people living in

let’s ask why are people living in poverty when we asked a question of why

poverty when we asked a question of why

poverty when we asked a question of why it matters a great deal whether we’re

it matters a great deal whether we’re

it matters a great deal whether we’re talking about individuals groups or

talking about individuals groups or

talking about individuals groups or societies to understand why let’s do a

societies to understand why let’s do a

societies to understand why let’s do a quick thought experiment imagine that

quick thought experiment imagine that

quick thought experiment imagine that there are 100 of you in the classroom

there are 100 of you in the classroom

there are 100 of you in the classroom today and that none of you had breakfast

today and that none of you had breakfast

today and that none of you had breakfast or lunch you are very very hungry made

or lunch you are very very hungry made

or lunch you are very very hungry made only hungrier by dr. Rajas presentation

only hungrier by dr. Rajas presentation

only hungrier by dr. Rajas presentation but it so happens that I brought with me

but it so happens that I brought with me

but it so happens that I brought with me a bushel of 90 apples 100 of you 90

a bushel of 90 apples 100 of you 90

a bushel of 90 apples 100 of you 90 apples I empty the bushel on the floor

apples I empty the bushel on the floor

apples I empty the bushel on the floor and you and an explosion of hunger games

and you and an explosion of hunger games

and you and an explosion of hunger games like activity grabbed the apples

like activity grabbed the apples

like activity grabbed the apples sadly you ten in the back row did not

sadly you ten in the back row did not

sadly you ten in the back row did not get any apples you’re suffering from

get any apples you’re suffering from

get any apples you’re suffering from Apple poverty now examine each of you as

Apple poverty now examine each of you as

Apple poverty now examine each of you as individuals to learn why you did not get

individuals to learn why you did not get

individuals to learn why you did not get an apple just to make you feel what

an apple just to make you feel what

an apple just to make you feel what you’re missing

and try and figure out what I can do to

and try and figure out what I can do to help it turns out that one of you has a

help it turns out that one of you has a

help it turns out that one of you has a sprained ankle so for you I provide a

sprained ankle so for you I provide a

sprained ankle so for you I provide a nice bandage and physical therapy

nice bandage and physical therapy

nice bandage and physical therapy one of you suffers from narcolepsy you

one of you suffers from narcolepsy you

one of you suffers from narcolepsy you were actually asleep during my talk so

were actually asleep during my talk so

were actually asleep during my talk so for you I prescribe a powerful medicine

for you I prescribe a powerful medicine

for you I prescribe a powerful medicine well you over there you have some

well you over there you have some

well you over there you have some motivational issues you were just not

motivational issues you were just not

motivational issues you were just not feeling the Apple challenge for you I’m

feeling the Apple challenge for you I’m

feeling the Apple challenge for you I’m assigning a life coach now let’s agree

assigning a life coach now let’s agree

assigning a life coach now let’s agree that each one of these interventions is

that each one of these interventions is

that each one of these interventions is successful and the next time I empty out

successful and the next time I empty out

successful and the next time I empty out the 90 apples each of the ten folks in

the 90 apples each of the ten folks in

the 90 apples each of the ten folks in back muscles through the scrum and gets

back muscles through the scrum and gets

back muscles through the scrum and gets an apple have I solved our Apple poverty

an apple have I solved our Apple poverty

an apple have I solved our Apple poverty problem no ten people still did not get

problem no ten people still did not get

problem no ten people still did not get an apple so I go back to the drawing

an apple so I go back to the drawing

an apple so I go back to the drawing board and it occurs to me that maybe

board and it occurs to me that maybe

board and it occurs to me that maybe there was something about those ten

there was something about those ten

there was something about those ten people as a group that explained why

people as a group that explained why

people as a group that explained why they didn’t get apples yes the group of

they didn’t get apples yes the group of

they didn’t get apples yes the group of ten back there was seated farthest away

ten back there was seated farthest away

ten back there was seated farthest away from the apples there was a structural

from the apples there was a structural

from the apples there was a structural disadvantage that they had so next time

disadvantage that they had so next time

disadvantage that they had so next time I dumped out the ninety apples I put you

I dumped out the ninety apples I put you

I dumped out the ninety apples I put you all in a circle and I dropped the apples

all in a circle and I dropped the apples

all in a circle and I dropped the apples they the exact center so you all have a

they the exact center so you all have a

they the exact center so you all have a precisely equal chance but do we still

precisely equal chance but do we still

precisely equal chance but do we still have a problem that’s right we still

have a problem that’s right we still

have a problem that’s right we still have only 90 apples for a hundred people

have only 90 apples for a hundred people

have only 90 apples for a hundred people so ten people will still go hungry our

so ten people will still go hungry our

so ten people will still go hungry our first two approaches turned out to have

first two approaches turned out to have

first two approaches turned out to have more to do with which people got the

more to do with which people got the

more to do with which people got the apples than with how many people got the

apples than with how many people got the

apples than with how many people got the apples beyond any individual factors

apples beyond any individual factors

apples beyond any individual factors keeping people from getting the apples

keeping people from getting the apples

keeping people from getting the apples beyond the group inequalities we need to

beyond the group inequalities we need to

beyond the group inequalities we need to solve a systemic problem a macro problem

solve a systemic problem a macro problem

solve a systemic problem a macro problem more people than apples one solution has

more people than apples one solution has

more people than apples one solution has to do with distribution I can cut all

to do with distribution I can cut all

to do with distribution I can cut all the apples into sections and give

the apples into sections and give

the apples into sections and give everybody nine-tenths of an apple or I

everybody nine-tenths of an apple or I

everybody nine-tenths of an apple or I could make applesauce and ladle it out

could make applesauce and ladle it out

could make applesauce and ladle it out in equal bowls that way no one will get

in equal bowls that way no one will get

in equal bowls that way no one will get a whole Apple but no one will go hungry

a whole Apple but no one will go hungry

a whole Apple but no one will go hungry either

either

either another type of solution is about

another type of solution is about

another type of solution is about growing the pie in this case the apple

growing the pie in this case the apple

growing the pie in this case the apple pie I could find a way to bring 100

pie I could find a way to bring 100

pie I could find a way to bring 100 apples instead of 90 now let’s pause

apples instead of 90 now let’s pause

apples instead of 90 now let’s pause here

here

here for a moment and translate our Apple

for a moment and translate our Apple

for a moment and translate our Apple game back into the world of public

game back into the world of public

game back into the world of public policy let’s use it to frame our answers

policy let’s use it to frame our answers

policy let’s use it to frame our answers to the question why are people living in

to the question why are people living in

to the question why are people living in poverty one way to answer that question

poverty one way to answer that question

poverty one way to answer that question is to look at individuals as we did when

is to look at individuals as we did when

is to look at individuals as we did when we asked about the ten people in the

we asked about the ten people in the

we asked about the ten people in the back row this lens can be helpful for

back row this lens can be helpful for

back row this lens can be helpful for example when we are asking why did two

example when we are asking why did two

example when we are asking why did two brothers who grew up in exactly the same

brothers who grew up in exactly the same

brothers who grew up in exactly the same circumstances but one ended up in

circumstances but one ended up in

circumstances but one ended up in poverty and one did not maybe one worked

poverty and one did not maybe one worked

poverty and one did not maybe one worked harder maybe wanted more talent maybe

harder maybe wanted more talent maybe

harder maybe wanted more talent maybe one just had better luck they differed

one just had better luck they differed

one just had better luck they differed as individuals this individual lense is

as individuals this individual lense is

as individuals this individual lense is also helpful if we’re trying to help a

also helpful if we’re trying to help a

also helpful if we’re trying to help a person get out of poverty or avoid it in

person get out of poverty or avoid it in

person get out of poverty or avoid it in the first place what advice would you

the first place what advice would you

the first place what advice would you give your teenage child about how to

give your teenage child about how to

give your teenage child about how to avoid poverty stay in school and get as

avoid poverty stay in school and get as

avoid poverty stay in school and get as much education as you can that radically

much education as you can that radically

much education as you can that radically reduces your chances of living in

reduces your chances of living in

reduces your chances of living in poverty stay out of trouble with the law

poverty stay out of trouble with the law

poverty stay out of trouble with the law don’t take out too much debt this is all

don’t take out too much debt this is all

don’t take out too much debt this is all very good advice but it doesn’t address

very good advice but it doesn’t address

very good advice but it doesn’t address the problem of some groups having unfair

the problem of some groups having unfair

the problem of some groups having unfair advantages let’s imagine two young

advantages let’s imagine two young

advantages let’s imagine two young people who follow all our advice and now

people who follow all our advice and now

people who follow all our advice and now they’re out applying for jobs except

they’re out applying for jobs except

they’re out applying for jobs except that one is black and one is white well

that one is black and one is white well

that one is black and one is white well study after study has shown that when

study after study has shown that when

study after study has shown that when researchers send out identical resumes

researchers send out identical resumes

researchers send out identical resumes except that half have white sounding

except that half have white sounding

except that half have white sounding names and half have black sounding names

names and half have black sounding names

names and half have black sounding names the white names get call backs and far

the white names get call backs and far

the white names get call backs and far higher rates than the blacks this kind

higher rates than the blacks this kind

higher rates than the blacks this kind of discrimination which remains

of discrimination which remains

of discrimination which remains prevalent in employment but also in

prevalent in employment but also in

prevalent in employment but also in education housing healthcare criminal

education housing healthcare criminal

education housing healthcare criminal justice and every other facet of our

justice and every other facet of our

justice and every other facet of our social life helps to explain why

social life helps to explain why

social life helps to explain why african-americans have twice the poverty

african-americans have twice the poverty

african-americans have twice the poverty rate of whites but remember even when we

rate of whites but remember even when we

rate of whites but remember even when we move from the individual to the group we

move from the individual to the group we

move from the individual to the group we are still talking about which people not

are still talking about which people not

are still talking about which people not about how many people are living in

about how many people are living in

about how many people are living in poverty to zero in on this distinction

poverty to zero in on this distinction

poverty to zero in on this distinction let’s talk about education education is

let’s talk about education education is

let’s talk about education education is the single best way for an individual to

the single best way for an individual to

the single best way for an individual to avoid being poor but when it comes to

avoid being poor but when it comes to

avoid being poor but when it comes to the macro level

the macro level

the macro level education is a surprisingly weak factor

education is a surprisingly weak factor

education is a surprisingly weak factor why think about the job market here in

why think about the job market here in

why think about the job market here in western New York about one-third of the

western New York about one-third of the

western New York about one-third of the jobs that we have are low wage jobs in

jobs that we have are low wage jobs in

jobs that we have are low wage jobs in the service sector with a median income

the service sector with a median income

the service sector with a median income of less than $26,000 a year these are

of less than $26,000 a year these are

of less than $26,000 a year these are people working as cashiers food servers

people working as cashiers food servers

people working as cashiers food servers daycare workers nursing home aides

daycare workers nursing home aides

daycare workers nursing home aides they’re all doing important work vital

they’re all doing important work vital

they’re all doing important work vital to our economy but many of them are not

to our economy but many of them are not

to our economy but many of them are not earning enough to keep a family out of

earning enough to keep a family out of

earning enough to keep a family out of poverty now let’s say that every single

poverty now let’s say that every single

poverty now let’s say that every single one of those workers earned a PhD well

one of those workers earned a PhD well

one of those workers earned a PhD well we have eliminated poverty No

we have eliminated poverty No

we have eliminated poverty No somebody still needs to do all those

somebody still needs to do all those

somebody still needs to do all those jobs and if the jobs paid poverty level

jobs and if the jobs paid poverty level

jobs and if the jobs paid poverty level wages then the people who work them will

wages then the people who work them will

wages then the people who work them will be living in poverty 7-eleven will not

be living in poverty 7-eleven will not

be living in poverty 7-eleven will not pay a cashier more because she has a PhD

pay a cashier more because she has a PhD

pay a cashier more because she has a PhD in economics it’s as simple as that

in economics it’s as simple as that

in economics it’s as simple as that education is better at predicting which

education is better at predicting which

education is better at predicting which people live in poverty than how many to

people live in poverty than how many to

people live in poverty than how many to understand our Apple example at the

understand our Apple example at the

understand our Apple example at the macro level we have to look at how many

macro level we have to look at how many

macro level we have to look at how many apples are being brought and how they’re

apples are being brought and how they’re

apples are being brought and how they’re being shared to understand poverty at

being shared to understand poverty at

being shared to understand poverty at the macro level we need to look at how

the macro level we need to look at how

the macro level we need to look at how many living wage jobs there are and how

many living wage jobs there are and how

many living wage jobs there are and how the wealth that they create is being

the wealth that they create is being

the wealth that they create is being shared it’s this society-wide lens that

shared it’s this society-wide lens that

shared it’s this society-wide lens that helps us to understand why the poverty

helps us to understand why the poverty

helps us to understand why the poverty rate goes up and down how did we cut

rate goes up and down how did we cut

rate goes up and down how did we cut poverty among senior citizens

poverty among senior citizens

poverty among senior citizens dramatically in the 1960s it wasn’t that

dramatically in the 1960s it wasn’t that

dramatically in the 1960s it wasn’t that senior citizens as individuals made

senior citizens as individuals made

senior citizens as individuals made better choices it was that we changed

better choices it was that we changed

better choices it was that we changed national policy to raise their incomes

national policy to raise their incomes

national policy to raise their incomes with programs like Social Security and

with programs like Social Security and

with programs like Social Security and cut their expenses with programs like

cut their expenses with programs like

cut their expenses with programs like Medicare it’s also this policy level

Medicare it’s also this policy level

Medicare it’s also this policy level that helps us to understand why

that helps us to understand why

that helps us to understand why countries with similar economies can

countries with similar economies can

countries with similar economies can have vastly different poverty rates why

have vastly different poverty rates why

have vastly different poverty rates why is it that the child poverty rate in

is it that the child poverty rate in

is it that the child poverty rate in Denmark is less than 3% while in the

Denmark is less than 3% while in the

Denmark is less than 3% while in the United States it’s over 20% Denmark in

United States it’s over 20% Denmark in

United States it’s over 20% Denmark in the US have made different policy

the US have made different policy

the US have made different policy choices about how to share their apples

choices about how to share their apples

choices about how to share their apples now let’s talk about solving poverty the

now let’s talk about solving poverty the

now let’s talk about solving poverty the good news is when it comes to

good news is when it comes to

good news is when it comes to understanding poverty at the macro level

understanding poverty at the macro level

understanding poverty at the macro level it’s surprisingly simple

it’s surprisingly simple

it’s surprisingly simple solving poverty is not like curing

solving poverty is not like curing

solving poverty is not like curing cancer or sending people to Mars because

cancer or sending people to Mars because

cancer or sending people to Mars because poverty is in many ways a

poverty is in many ways a

poverty is in many ways a straightforward problem means that your

straightforward problem means that your

straightforward problem means that your income is too low and your expenses are

income is too low and your expenses are

income is too low and your expenses are too high and so reducing poverty means

too high and so reducing poverty means

too high and so reducing poverty means choosing public policies that raise

choosing public policies that raise

choosing public policies that raise people’s incomes and lower their

people’s incomes and lower their

people’s incomes and lower their expenses let’s talk first about raising

expenses let’s talk first about raising

expenses let’s talk first about raising incomes the key to income for most

incomes the key to income for most

incomes the key to income for most people is wages and there’s some tried

people is wages and there’s some tried

people is wages and there’s some tried and true ways to raise wages one is to

and true ways to raise wages one is to

and true ways to raise wages one is to raise the minimum wage the current

raise the minimum wage the current

raise the minimum wage the current federal minimum wage is 725 an hour

federal minimum wage is 725 an hour

federal minimum wage is 725 an hour that’s very low in the late 1960s the

that’s very low in the late 1960s the

that’s very low in the late 1960s the minimum wage was worth over $10 an hour

minimum wage was worth over $10 an hour

minimum wage was worth over $10 an hour in today’s dollars since then it has

in today’s dollars since then it has

in today’s dollars since then it has been eroded by inflation if we recovered

been eroded by inflation if we recovered

been eroded by inflation if we recovered those losses by raising it back to where

those losses by raising it back to where

those losses by raising it back to where it was we would bring thousands of

it was we would bring thousands of

it was we would bring thousands of families out of poverty but when we

families out of poverty but when we

families out of poverty but when we think about raising incomes remember

think about raising incomes remember

think about raising incomes remember that not everyone can work many people

that not everyone can work many people

that not everyone can work many people are temporarily or permanently disabled

are temporarily or permanently disabled

are temporarily or permanently disabled and whether they live in poverty will

and whether they live in poverty will

and whether they live in poverty will depend in large part on how much public

depend in large part on how much public

depend in large part on how much public assistance we provide to them the

assistance we provide to them the

assistance we provide to them the federal program we have for people who

federal program we have for people who

federal program we have for people who are permanently disabled is SSI

are permanently disabled is SSI

are permanently disabled is SSI Supplemental Security income in 2015 the

Supplemental Security income in 2015 the

Supplemental Security income in 2015 the annual SSI payment for a single person

annual SSI payment for a single person

annual SSI payment for a single person was eight thousand eight hundred dollars

was eight thousand eight hundred dollars

was eight thousand eight hundred dollars the federal poverty line was eleven

the federal poverty line was eleven

the federal poverty line was eleven thousand seven hundred dollars in other

thousand seven hundred dollars in other

thousand seven hundred dollars in other words our public policy is that people

words our public policy is that people

words our public policy is that people are permanently disabled should live in

are permanently disabled should live in

are permanently disabled should live in poverty that is not a fact of nature or

poverty that is not a fact of nature or

poverty that is not a fact of nature or a fact of life it’s a decision that we

a fact of life it’s a decision that we

a fact of life it’s a decision that we as a society have made but poverty is

as a society have made but poverty is

as a society have made but poverty is not just a question of income it’s also

not just a question of income it’s also

not just a question of income it’s also a question of expenses think for a

a question of expenses think for a

a question of expenses think for a minute about the biggest items in your

minute about the biggest items in your

minute about the biggest items in your household budget things like housing

household budget things like housing

household budget things like housing utilities food transportation and

utilities food transportation and

utilities food transportation and childcare the cost of these items is

childcare the cost of these items is

childcare the cost of these items is affected not just by the private market

affected not just by the private market

affected not just by the private market but also by public policies so if we

but also by public policies so if we

but also by public policies so if we want to lower people’s expenses we can

want to lower people’s expenses we can

want to lower people’s expenses we can lower their expenses for the things that

lower their expenses for the things that

lower their expenses for the things that come out of their basic household budget

come out of their basic household budget

come out of their basic household budget an easy one is taxes by lowering the

an easy one is taxes by lowering the

an easy one is taxes by lowering the amount that low income people pay in

amount that low income people pay in

amount that low income people pay in their income

their income

their income taxes we can boost people out of poverty

taxes we can boost people out of poverty

taxes we can boost people out of poverty the program that does that is called the

the program that does that is called the

the program that does that is called the Earned Income Tax Credit it lifts 10

Earned Income Tax Credit it lifts 10

Earned Income Tax Credit it lifts 10 million people out of poverty each year

million people out of poverty each year

million people out of poverty each year other programs like food stamps lower

other programs like food stamps lower

other programs like food stamps lower the cost of food affordable housing

the cost of food affordable housing

the cost of food affordable housing programs lower the cost of rent but it

programs lower the cost of rent but it

programs lower the cost of rent but it turns out that the United States spends

turns out that the United States spends

turns out that the United States spends much less on these programs than other

much less on these programs than other

much less on these programs than other countries and that’s why we have such

countries and that’s why we have such

countries and that’s why we have such high poverty rates compared to those

high poverty rates compared to those

high poverty rates compared to those other countries alright let’s wrap up

other countries alright let’s wrap up

other countries alright let’s wrap up with what we’ve learned about poverty

with what we’ve learned about poverty

with what we’ve learned about poverty the first is that the typical family

the first is that the typical family

the first is that the typical family living in poverty in the United States

living in poverty in the United States

living in poverty in the United States is not who many of us thought it was

is not who many of us thought it was

is not who many of us thought it was it’s a white mom with a high school

it’s a white mom with a high school

it’s a white mom with a high school diploma and one or two kids living in

diploma and one or two kids living in

diploma and one or two kids living in the suburbs the second is that certain

the suburbs the second is that certain

the suburbs the second is that certain groups suffer disproportionately from

groups suffer disproportionately from

groups suffer disproportionately from poverty and that that fact comes from

poverty and that that fact comes from

poverty and that that fact comes from discrimination today in a long history

discrimination today in a long history

discrimination today in a long history of discrimination in the past and

of discrimination in the past and

of discrimination in the past and finally we learned that when it comes to

finally we learned that when it comes to

finally we learned that when it comes to the causes of poverty it matters whether

the causes of poverty it matters whether

the causes of poverty it matters whether we focus on individuals groups or

we focus on individuals groups or

we focus on individuals groups or societies to determine whether we’re

societies to determine whether we’re

societies to determine whether we’re talking about which people live in

talking about which people live in

talking about which people live in poverty or how many and when it comes to

poverty or how many and when it comes to

poverty or how many and when it comes to that big question how many people are

that big question how many people are

that big question how many people are living in poverty why are there over 40

living in poverty why are there over 40

living in poverty why are there over 40 million people living in poverty in the

million people living in poverty in the

million people living in poverty in the United States today it’s a matter of

United States today it’s a matter of

United States today it’s a matter of public policy choices it’s not that we

public policy choices it’s not that we

public policy choices it’s not that we don’t know how to solve poverty it’s

don’t know how to solve poverty it’s

don’t know how to solve poverty it’s that we’ve chosen not to we lack the

that we’ve chosen not to we lack the

that we’ve chosen not to we lack the political will and that means that it’s

political will and that means that it’s

political will and that means that it’s up to all of us to help generate that

up to all of us to help generate that

up to all of us to help generate that political will and demand that our

political will and demand that our

political will and demand that our elected leaders make reducing poverty a

elected leaders make reducing poverty a

elected leaders make reducing poverty a top priority after all

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *