good evening, really, I will
talk about critical thinking and start
from the history of his life in fact
a fairly repetitive story i
argued with his son
I really love the occupation I think its very
important and
the more mature my children become
it is more interesting not to talk to them
argue to exchange opinions and here
the whole said you know dad I can not
refute what you say but I’m with
you do not agree with me my opinion I
I think differently and I seriously thought about how
do not treat this
this position of my son on the one hand
this is very cool, it means that the school
well, probably
and parents also managed to instill a child
critical thinking in general is an important thing
I am now talking a lot about this
really consider her serious and
necessary mental thinking is
the desire to think independently
the desire to generate ideas
form one’s own opinion
focusing on their personal
representation and rejecting imposed
values principles of ideas and so on
coming from the outside and holy man
who thinks so
difficult to manipulate and indeed
just such a person can be hammered
significant results
Academician Skulachev put his time
cast doubt on the generally accepted truth about
that a person must grow old and die
intellectual courage
and achieved as we heard very serious
results on the question of whether
this intellectual courage
willingness to think independently
enough to achieve
such results, for example, topics
biology for each of us is not
who is a specialist in this field
is it enough to simply not take
ready solutions
common ideas or need something
from my point of view, it is necessary and
so critical thinking has
the opposite side, she often denies
the experience of knowledge accumulated by mankind
skills without which to form
qualified opinion and wait
really valuable ideas unfortunately not
my children are getting
typical representatives of what is called
generation of z oranges ration or
digital natives that is, they are people
which grow in a new environment
digital environment they since the childhood are
part of a large digital world they
almost directly connected
a huge information repository
can apply at any time and
this generation has
feeling that they are very fast and easy
can find any necessary information
so there is no need to accumulate and
and inside there is no need to form
own knowledge base set
representations of the value of principles on
which can be further
orient themselves in essence are people with
open-minded, they open the brain
simply absorb directly from this
world information environment that in
it is contained
this is very dangerous as Americans say
open brain is dangerous because everyone in the
principle, anything can be put there
in other words they do not have the necessary
filters in order to separate
a truly valuable and important
information from information garbage
which is very much there so with my
critical thinking
orientation to one’s own ideas
own ideas own opinion
a piece on one side is very useful and
it is important and on the other side and that’s dangerous
its internal contradictions paradoxes I
really want to pat the part now just a little
more the matter is that for a large
critical thinking she holds
on three whales the first whale is confidence
Without self-confidence without trust
to your own thinking abilities
skills own intuition own
logic to make a decision in full
it is impossible but it is
means that a person becomes alive
an illustration to the famous paradox
diving Kruger great many of them
heard a thing that says
[music]
the most confident person is this
the average person is the most ignorant
on the contrary, more people know what
better understand its subject
field of
The more he begins the more he starts
to doubt first of all in itself and in
their knowledge of their views
there is a well-known dictum of Archimedes all
heard
office to Socrates
and I heard I know that I do not know anything.
few people think about the fact that he
actually had in mind
and Socrates actually meant very much
a simple thing he drew this kind of circle
like the one I’m currently standing on
bearing in mind that inside this circle
is all that he knows all that
that he knows and, accordingly,
circle outer part of the circle is
area of contact
His knowledge with what he does not know and when
This more than this circle becomes than
The more his knowledge the more points
contact with the unknown for what
more people know the more he
understands how much is left out of bounds
his knowledge and his views is important
understand 2 whales on which rests
critical thinking is not a willingness
accept anything without convincing
evidence and on the one hand this
absolutely correct statement of the question
it interferes with not polishing it
impose some speculative
Unproven points of view but let’s
think about whether or not everyone in the
this life everything in this world can be
prove
Unfortunately this is not so generally speaking
can be rigorously mathematically proven
very few things
most modern scientific theories
by and large, these are just hypotheses
selected from a variety of other hypotheses
as most accurately reflecting the realities
peace or what is the same in the smallest
degree contradictory to the fact that we are in the
This world is therefore observed unfortunately
life is arranged so that in many cases
You need to take something without strict
evidence
3 whales derived from the large of 2
is that the opinion of experts
I do not have authorities for any reason
also proof is not on
one can not be guided by one
The parties again are right and
it is logical on the other side for
several centuries
non -professional amateurs
mathematicians
tried to prove the great theorem of the farm
The known assertions are quite simple
formulated
and in this regard, causing people to
feeling that elementary knowledge in
arithmetic enough to
to prove the regret of who did not work
Although many have spent a lifetime on this
but it turned out at Andrew Wiles
outstanding modern English
mathematics
one of the best mathematicians of his
generation and he had to
spend about eight years and at the same time
use the numerous works of his
outstanding predecessors are also very
serious on topics and most often
it turns out that there are many different
funny stories about outstanding discoveries
which were committed as if by accident
people who did not engage in a specific
area not showing not had
special education at the nearest
almost always
it turns out that these people either had not
with education had
significant practical experience in this
have either excellent education
in a related topic
which is what enabled them to
Serious achievements so here coming back
proof of the theorem of a truss
Unfortunately it turned out to be very voluminous
and very complex and understand it
to the end to comprehend among modern
mathematicians can only a few
nevertheless, no one has special
doubts that it is true
rely on the expert opinion of those
people who still could
In it to understand and other way here to
Unfortunately, not even then, when
there is strong evidence always
are willing to put them under
doubt is possible
”
Be First to Comment