
it’s the sex tape that shook the media the sensational trial pitting the former
the sensational trial pitting the former
the sensational trial pitting the former WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker
WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker
WWE star against Gawker and left Gawker on the ropes we make clear editorial
on the ropes we make clear editorial
on the ropes we make clear editorial judgments about what is worth publishing
judgments about what is worth publishing
judgments about what is worth publishing know what’s legal but what’s worth
know what’s legal but what’s worth
know what’s legal but what’s worth publishing and what’s not welcome to
publishing and what’s not welcome to
publishing and what’s not welcome to watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you
watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you
watchmojo.com down 10 crucial facts you should know about the legal battle
should know about the legal battle
should know about the legal battle between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s
between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s
between Hulk Hogan and Gawker Hogan’s lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s
lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s
lawyers arguing this isn’t about Hogan’s morals but Gawker’s putting its very
morals but Gawker’s putting its very
morals but Gawker’s putting its very culture on trial number 10
culture on trial number 10
culture on trial number 10 why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October
why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October
why did Hulk Hogan sue Gawker in October 2012 the media website Gawker published
2012 the media website Gawker published
2012 the media website Gawker published a montage clip taken from a sex tape
a montage clip taken from a sex tape
a montage clip taken from a sex tape involving the professional wrestler Hulk
involving the professional wrestler Hulk
involving the professional wrestler Hulk Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with
Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with
Hogan in the clip Hogan is seen with Heather Klem the then girlfriend of
Heather Klem the then girlfriend of
Heather Klem the then girlfriend of Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love
Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love
Hogan’s best friend Bubba the Love Sponge Clem the encounter in question
Sponge Clem the encounter in question
Sponge Clem the encounter in question reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan
reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan
reportedly happened in 2006 when Hogan was still married to the mother of his
was still married to the mother of his
was still married to the mother of his two children Hogan who claimed he was
two children Hogan who claimed he was
two children Hogan who claimed he was unaware that he was being filmed settled
unaware that he was being filmed settled
unaware that he was being filmed settled with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker
with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker
with Bubba for $5,000 but took on Gawker in a multi-million dollar high-profile
in a multi-million dollar high-profile
in a multi-million dollar high-profile court case saying that the published
court case saying that the published
court case saying that the published clip was not newsworthy and was posted
clip was not newsworthy and was posted
clip was not newsworthy and was posted only for financial gain
only for financial gain
only for financial gain causing Hogan emotional distress
causing Hogan emotional distress
causing Hogan emotional distress Burswood did to me as a person but he
Burswood did to me as a person but he
Burswood did to me as a person but he was it was even embarrassing as number 9
was it was even embarrassing as number 9
was it was even embarrassing as number 9 who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real
who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real
who is Hulk Hogan Hulk Hogan whose real name is Terry Bollea is an American
name is Terry Bollea is an American
name is Terry Bollea is an American professional wrestler and reality TV
professional wrestler and reality TV
professional wrestler and reality TV star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed
star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed
star the WWE Hall of Famer enjoyed massive popularity during the 80s and
massive popularity during the 80s and
massive popularity during the 80s and 90s featuring on the rosters for both
90s featuring on the rosters for both
90s featuring on the rosters for both the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a
the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a
the WWE formerly WWF and the WCW he’s a 12-time world champion and a
12-time world champion and a
12-time world champion and a back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well
back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well
back-to-back Royal Rumble winner well known for his running leg drop finishing
known for his running leg drop finishing
known for his running leg drop finishing move ripping his way out of his shirt
move ripping his way out of his shirt
move ripping his way out of his shirt and for exaggeratedly playing to the
and for exaggeratedly playing to the
and for exaggeratedly playing to the audience Hulk’s crossover popularity
audience Hulk’s crossover popularity
audience Hulk’s crossover popularity also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood
also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood
also enabled him to pursue a Hollywood acting career
and established him as a TV personality
and established him as a TV personality with shows such as Hogan knows best
with shows such as Hogan knows best
with shows such as Hogan knows best ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan
ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan
ah not as long as my name is Hulk Hogan no she’s not going out and American
no she’s not going out and American
no she’s not going out and American Gladiators number eight what is gar
Gladiators number eight what is gar
Gladiators number eight what is gar first launched in 2003 and founded by
first launched in 2003 and founded by
first launched in 2003 and founded by Nick Denton Gawker is an online media
Nick Denton Gawker is an online media
Nick Denton Gawker is an online media company consisting of seven main
company consisting of seven main
company consisting of seven main lifestyle blogs including the gadget
lifestyle blogs including the gadget
lifestyle blogs including the gadget oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin
oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin
oriented Gizmodo sports centric Deadspin and women targeted site Jezebel Business
and women targeted site Jezebel Business
and women targeted site Jezebel Business Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million
Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million
Insider has valued Gawker at 250 million dollars with it’s worth steadily
dollars with it’s worth steadily
dollars with it’s worth steadily increasing every year in 2013 judge
increasing every year in 2013 judge
increasing every year in 2013 judge pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take
pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take
pamela campbell ordered Gawker to take down the clip of Hogan but it refused
down the clip of Hogan but it refused
down the clip of Hogan but it refused the case against the company has since
the case against the company has since
the case against the company has since become a case in point for journalism in
become a case in point for journalism in
become a case in point for journalism in general with many high-profile
general with many high-profile
general with many high-profile supporters including eBay co-founder
supporters including eBay co-founder
supporters including eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter
Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter
Pierre Omidyar number seven who is Peter Thiel a German American entrepreneur
Thiel a German American entrepreneur
Thiel a German American entrepreneur co-founder of PayPal and the first
co-founder of PayPal and the first
co-founder of PayPal and the first outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel
outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel
outside investor in facebook Peter Thiel is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest
is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest
is one of Silicon Valley’s greatest success stories in May 2016
success stories in May 2016
success stories in May 2016 teal revealed during an interview with
teal revealed during an interview with
teal revealed during an interview with the New York Times that he had given ten
the New York Times that he had given ten
the New York Times that he had given ten million dollars to finance several
million dollars to finance several
million dollars to finance several lawsuits against Gawker Media including
lawsuits against Gawker Media including
lawsuits against Gawker Media including Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker
Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker
Hogan’s sex tape scandal though Gawker published an article in 2007 discussing
published an article in 2007 discussing
published an article in 2007 discussing teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he
teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he
teal sexuality Hulk’s backer says he isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but
isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but
isn’t mainly motivated by revenge but rather by a desire to fight back against
rather by a desire to fight back against
rather by a desire to fight back against privacy violations by the press
privacy violations by the press
privacy violations by the press according to teal Gawker has quote
according to teal Gawker has quote
according to teal Gawker has quote ruined people’s lives for no reason
ruined people’s lives for no reason
ruined people’s lives for no reason number 6 what was garz argument for
number 6 what was garz argument for
number 6 what was garz argument for publishing the article the entire
publishing the article the entire
publishing the article the entire lawsuit is built around the idea of news
lawsuit is built around the idea of news
lawsuit is built around the idea of news and what legally counts as newsworthy
and what legally counts as newsworthy
and what legally counts as newsworthy while Hogan claims that the sex tape
while Hogan claims that the sex tape
while Hogan claims that the sex tape isn’t appropriate for the public domain
isn’t appropriate for the public domain
isn’t appropriate for the public domain and equates to commercial exploitation
and equates to commercial exploitation
and equates to commercial exploitation Gawker claims protection by the First
Gawker claims protection by the First
Gawker claims protection by the First Amendment arguing that the tape is a
Amendment arguing that the tape is a
Amendment arguing that the tape is a matter of legitimate public concern
matter of legitimate public concern
matter of legitimate public concern given Hogan’s huge public profile and
given Hogan’s huge public profile and
given Hogan’s huge public profile and the fact that he has openly discussed
the fact that he has openly discussed
the fact that he has openly discussed his sex life in the past most of the
his sex life in the past most of the
his sex life in the past most of the stories that we publish I’m not just
stories that we publish I’m not just
stories that we publish I’m not just happy to defend I’m delighted to defend
happy to defend I’m delighted to defend
happy to defend I’m delighted to defend because
because
because I think that they are essential to free
I think that they are essential to free
I think that they are essential to free expression and the free press
expression and the free press
expression and the free press Gawker also argued that the clip was
Gawker also argued that the clip was
Gawker also argued that the clip was presented in a newsworthy manner as it
presented in a newsworthy manner as it
presented in a newsworthy manner as it was accompanied by a 1,400 word article
was accompanied by a 1,400 word article
was accompanied by a 1,400 word article and had been edited down from 30 minutes
and had been edited down from 30 minutes
and had been edited down from 30 minutes to just a couple number five what was
to just a couple number five what was
to just a couple number five what was the final verdict a verdict was
the final verdict a verdict was
the final verdict a verdict was delivered on March 18th 2016 when the
delivered on March 18th 2016 when the
delivered on March 18th 2016 when the six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan
six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan
six-person jury ruled in favor of Hogan and found Gawker Media libel for 115
and found Gawker Media libel for 115
and found Gawker Media libel for 115 million dollars in compensatory damages
million dollars in compensatory damages
million dollars in compensatory damages and 25 million dollars in punitive
and 25 million dollars in punitive
and 25 million dollars in punitive damages
damages
damages Gawker mounted an appeal but was
Gawker mounted an appeal but was
Gawker mounted an appeal but was unsuccessful in overturning the decision
unsuccessful in overturning the decision
unsuccessful in overturning the decision as of early June 2016
as of early June 2016
as of early June 2016 Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a
Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a
Hogan’s lawyer David Houston said in a released statement quote Gawker has
released statement quote Gawker has
released statement quote Gawker has failed and continues to fail in
failed and continues to fail in
failed and continues to fail in recognizing their obligation to Belaya
recognizing their obligation to Belaya
recognizing their obligation to Belaya for their reprehensible behavior and
for their reprehensible behavior and
for their reprehensible behavior and method of doing what they call
method of doing what they call
method of doing what they call journalism number four could this
journalism number four could this
journalism number four could this lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine
lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine
lawsuit bankrupt Gawker Hogan’s nine figure award is a huge sum in a trial of
figure award is a huge sum in a trial of
figure award is a huge sum in a trial of this type far exceeding average payouts
this type far exceeding average payouts
this type far exceeding average payouts for major physical injuries and even
for major physical injuries and even
for major physical injuries and even wrongful death in America and for Gawker
wrongful death in America and for Gawker
wrongful death in America and for Gawker it could prove to be impossible to
it could prove to be impossible to
it could prove to be impossible to recover from such a financial hit if the
recover from such a financial hit if the
recover from such a financial hit if the judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond
judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond
judge imposes a 50 million dollar bond then the company is likely to collapse
then the company is likely to collapse
then the company is likely to collapse under figures that are simply too
under figures that are simply too
under figures that are simply too massive to manage in the wake of Nick
massive to manage in the wake of Nick
massive to manage in the wake of Nick Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s
Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s
Denton stubborn defense of Gawker’s right to publish the video The Guardian
right to publish the video The Guardian
right to publish the video The Guardian reports that he could go down as quote
reports that he could go down as quote
reports that he could go down as quote both creator and destroyer of the web
both creator and destroyer of the web
both creator and destroyer of the web blog business number three has Gawker
blog business number three has Gawker
blog business number three has Gawker been sued before he only has himself to
been sued before he only has himself to
been sued before he only has himself to blame for the predicament that he’s in
blame for the predicament that he’s in
blame for the predicament that he’s in though it has never been involved in a
though it has never been involved in a
though it has never been involved in a trial as high-profile or as damaging as
trial as high-profile or as damaging as
trial as high-profile or as damaging as this one Gawker is no stranger to the
this one Gawker is no stranger to the
this one Gawker is no stranger to the courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood
courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood
courtroom in January 2014 Hollywood director Quentin Tarantino filed a
director Quentin Tarantino filed a
director Quentin Tarantino filed a copyright lawsuit against the company
copyright lawsuit against the company
copyright lawsuit against the company after it published links to the 146 page
after it published links to the 146 page
after it published links to the 146 page screenplay for the hateful eight got me
screenplay for the hateful eight got me
screenplay for the hateful eight got me one more quote Gawker Media has made a
one more quote Gawker Media has made a
one more quote Gawker Media has made a business of predatory journalism
business of predatory journalism
business of predatory journalism violating people’s rights to make a buck
violating people’s rights to make a buck
violating people’s rights to make a buck set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf
set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf
set a statement on Tarantino’s behalf Gawker has also been sued from within as
Gawker has also been sued from within as
Gawker has also been sued from within as in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed
in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed
in 2013 a group of unpaid interns pushed for minimum wage payment for their
for minimum wage payment for their
for minimum wage payment for their roles in the company in this instance
roles in the company in this instance
roles in the company in this instance the court ruled in favor of Gawker
the court ruled in favor of Gawker
the court ruled in favor of Gawker number two could this effect journalism
number two could this effect journalism
number two could this effect journalism while many will have cheered Hogan’s
while many will have cheered Hogan’s
while many will have cheered Hogan’s potential knockout blow to Gawker in
potential knockout blow to Gawker in
potential knockout blow to Gawker in court the ruling against the media
court the ruling against the media
court the ruling against the media company may have harsh implications for
company may have harsh implications for
company may have harsh implications for journalism in general the 140 million
journalism in general the 140 million
journalism in general the 140 million dollar total damages set a new precedent
dollar total damages set a new precedent
dollar total damages set a new precedent for cases of this type and indicates a
for cases of this type and indicates a
for cases of this type and indicates a significant shift in power other firms
significant shift in power other firms
significant shift in power other firms that have watched gawkers punishment
that have watched gawkers punishment
that have watched gawkers punishment unfold may vow to never find themselves
unfold may vow to never find themselves
unfold may vow to never find themselves in a similar position which could result
in a similar position which could result
in a similar position which could result in increasingly safe journalism in the
in increasingly safe journalism in the
in increasingly safe journalism in the future regardless of whether the Hogan
future regardless of whether the Hogan
future regardless of whether the Hogan sex tape should have been published or
sex tape should have been published or
sex tape should have been published or not the trial has forced the media to
not the trial has forced the media to
not the trial has forced the media to rethink its practices because one bad
rethink its practices because one bad
rethink its practices because one bad decision could place your company at the
decision could place your company at the
decision could place your company at the brink of bankruptcy number one what is
brink of bankruptcy number one what is
brink of bankruptcy number one what is goes next step I think in many people’s
goes next step I think in many people’s
goes next step I think in many people’s eyes you know just trying to draw the
eyes you know just trying to draw the
eyes you know just trying to draw the line between privacy and the Free Press
line between privacy and the Free Press
line between privacy and the Free Press Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to
Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to
Nick Denton and Gawker have vowed to continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to
continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to
continue the fight against Hulk Hogan to clear the company’s name and escape the
clear the company’s name and escape the
clear the company’s name and escape the payment of damages we do put the story
payment of damages we do put the story
payment of damages we do put the story first and I am unapologetic about that
first and I am unapologetic about that
first and I am unapologetic about that in response to Peter Thiel’s
in response to Peter Thiel’s
in response to Peter Thiel’s confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer
confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer
confirmation as Hogan’s financial backer Gawker now has a Silicon Valley
Gawker now has a Silicon Valley
Gawker now has a Silicon Valley billionaire in its own corner eBay
billionaire in its own corner eBay
billionaire in its own corner eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and
co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and
co-founder Pierre Omidyar Omidyar and teal are previously linked as eBay
teal are previously linked as eBay
teal are previously linked as eBay bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal
bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal
bought PayPal in 2002 after which teal eventually left the company along with
eventually left the company along with
eventually left the company along with other former PayPal executives as of May
other former PayPal executives as of May
other former PayPal executives as of May 2016 Denton was reportedly considering a
2016 Denton was reportedly considering a
2016 Denton was reportedly considering a potential sale of Gawker after the
potential sale of Gawker after the
potential sale of Gawker after the company’s motion for a new trial was
company’s motion for a new trial was
company’s motion for a new trial was denied it’s a serious case so while
denied it’s a serious case so while
denied it’s a serious case so while Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal
Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal
Hogan was able to celebrate with a royal win for the time being that doesn’t mean
win for the time being that doesn’t mean
win for the time being that doesn’t mean the story isn’t set to rumble on for
the story isn’t set to rumble on for
the story isn’t set to rumble on for some time
did these facts get you thinking to vote
did these facts get you thinking to vote for which new story is covered next
for which new story is covered next
for which new story is covered next head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest
head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest
head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest and be sure to hit that subscribe button
and be sure to hit that subscribe button
and be sure to hit that subscribe button for more newsworthy top 10s published
for more newsworthy top 10s published
for more newsworthy top 10s published every week tonight marks the turning
every week tonight marks the turning
every week tonight marks the turning point of my career
”
Be First to Comment