Press "Enter" to skip to content

10 Net Neutrality Facts – WMNews Ep. 17


as the internet continues to grow new

as the internet continues to grow new regulations are necessary welcome to

regulations are necessary welcome to

regulations are necessary welcome to watchmojo.com n’t we’re counting down

watchmojo.com n’t we’re counting down

watchmojo.com n’t we’re counting down ten crucial facts you should know about

ten crucial facts you should know about

ten crucial facts you should know about net neutrality in the United States

net neutrality in the United States

net neutrality in the United States number ten what is net neutrality the

number ten what is net neutrality the

number ten what is net neutrality the term net neutrality refers to the

term net neutrality refers to the

term net neutrality refers to the concept where put into practice Internet

concept where put into practice Internet

concept where put into practice Internet service providers would treat all data

service providers would treat all data

service providers would treat all data equally and would not discriminate

equally and would not discriminate

equally and would not discriminate against virtual activity like

against virtual activity like

against virtual activity like peer-to-peer communications providing

peer-to-peer communications providing

peer-to-peer communications providing less than perfect internet speeds at

less than perfect internet speeds at

less than perfect internet speeds at potentially higher costs net neutrality

potentially higher costs net neutrality

potentially higher costs net neutrality is often associated with the idea of an

is often associated with the idea of an

is often associated with the idea of an open Internet which is a theoretical

open Internet which is a theoretical

open Internet which is a theoretical internet that everyone in the world

internet that everyone in the world

internet that everyone in the world would easily be able to access the

would easily be able to access the

would easily be able to access the debate on the merits of net neutrality

debate on the merits of net neutrality

debate on the merits of net neutrality can be summed up with the simple

can be summed up with the simple

can be summed up with the simple question is internet access

question is internet access

question is internet access similar to access to electricity or

similar to access to electricity or

similar to access to electricity or cable TV and the core principle there is

cable TV and the core principle there is

cable TV and the core principle there is the same as elsewhere the internet must

the same as elsewhere the internet must

the same as elsewhere the internet must remain open we will protect the values

remain open we will protect the values

remain open we will protect the values of an open Internet On February 26th

of an open Internet On February 26th

of an open Internet On February 26th 2015 the United States Federal

2015 the United States Federal

2015 the United States Federal Communications Commission or FCC

Communications Commission or FCC

Communications Commission or FCC answered that question with a milestone

answered that question with a milestone

answered that question with a milestone ruling that categorized the internet as

ruling that categorized the internet as

ruling that categorized the internet as a public utility instead of a loosely

a public utility instead of a loosely

a public utility instead of a loosely regulated information service number

regulated information service number

regulated information service number nine why is net neutrality important on

nine why is net neutrality important on

nine why is net neutrality important on a grand scale the 2015 FCC ruling is

a grand scale the 2015 FCC ruling is

a grand scale the 2015 FCC ruling is extremely important to the growing

extremely important to the growing

extremely important to the growing e-commerce industry as that business

e-commerce industry as that business

e-commerce industry as that business relies heavily on Internet access and

relies heavily on Internet access and

relies heavily on Internet access and more importantly on page loading times

more importantly on page loading times

more importantly on page loading times according to a report by emarketer

according to a report by emarketer

according to a report by emarketer global retail e-commerce sales accounted

global retail e-commerce sales accounted

global retail e-commerce sales accounted for 5.9 percent of the total retail

for 5.9 percent of the total retail

for 5.9 percent of the total retail market in 2014 or nearly one point three

market in 2014 or nearly one point three

market in 2014 or nearly one point three one six trillion dollars in sales retail

one six trillion dollars in sales retail

one six trillion dollars in sales retail is changing

is changing

is changing we’re gonna see over the next 5 10 20

we’re gonna see over the next 5 10 20

we’re gonna see over the next 5 10 20 years as most of retail is gonna go

years as most of retail is gonna go

years as most of retail is gonna go online studies have shown that page

online studies have shown that page

online studies have shown that page loading times invariably affect sales so

loading times invariably affect sales so

loading times invariably affect sales so if service providers or ISPs were

if service providers or ISPs were

if service providers or ISPs were allowed to sell higher and lower speed

allowed to sell higher and lower speed

allowed to sell higher and lower speed access to the Internet

access to the Internet

access to the Internet this would favor companies that are

this would favor companies that are

this would favor companies that are already larger and more financially

already larger and more financially

already larger and more financially stable and would be a distinct

stable and would be a distinct

stable and would be a distinct disadvantage for smaller ecommerce

disadvantage for smaller ecommerce

disadvantage for smaller ecommerce businesses net neutrality aims to make

businesses net neutrality aims to make

businesses net neutrality aims to make sure that no website or online activity

sure that no website or online activity

sure that no website or online activity is treated as more important than

is treated as more important than

is treated as more important than another number 8 who supports net

another number 8 who supports net

another number 8 who supports net neutrality I’m laying out a plan to keep

neutrality I’m laying out a plan to keep

neutrality I’m laying out a plan to keep the internet free and open and that’s

the internet free and open and that’s

the internet free and open and that’s why I’m urging the Federal

why I’m urging the Federal

why I’m urging the Federal Communications Commission to do

Communications Commission to do

Communications Commission to do everything they can to protect net

everything they can to protect net

everything they can to protect net neutrality for everyone the main

neutrality for everyone the main

neutrality for everyone the main proponents of net neutrality are

proponents of net neutrality are

proponents of net neutrality are consumers

consumers

consumers and large internet companies like Amazon

and large internet companies like Amazon

and large internet companies like Amazon eBay Facebook Google Microsoft Netflix

eBay Facebook Google Microsoft Netflix

eBay Facebook Google Microsoft Netflix Twitter Yahoo and more the main claim is

Twitter Yahoo and more the main claim is

Twitter Yahoo and more the main claim is that without net neutrality ISPs would

that without net neutrality ISPs would

that without net neutrality ISPs would force a tiered service model thereby

force a tiered service model thereby

force a tiered service model thereby leading to reduced competition in the

leading to reduced competition in the

leading to reduced competition in the industry and therefore to higher prices

industry and therefore to higher prices

industry and therefore to higher prices for consumers on September 10th 2014

for consumers on September 10th 2014

for consumers on September 10th 2014 supporters of net neutrality aimed to

supporters of net neutrality aimed to

supporters of net neutrality aimed to further their cause by staging an

further their cause by staging an

further their cause by staging an internet slow down day businesses like

internet slow down day businesses like

internet slow down day businesses like Kickstarter Netflix reddit tumblr and

Kickstarter Netflix reddit tumblr and

Kickstarter Netflix reddit tumblr and Vimeo all placed a loading symbol on

Vimeo all placed a loading symbol on

Vimeo all placed a loading symbol on their web sites to simulate the slow

their web sites to simulate the slow

their web sites to simulate the slow downs that would happen to the internet

downs that would happen to the internet

downs that would happen to the internet if net neutrality were not enforced

if net neutrality were not enforced

if net neutrality were not enforced number 7 who is against net neutrality

number 7 who is against net neutrality

number 7 who is against net neutrality opponents of net neutrality include

opponents of net neutrality include

opponents of net neutrality include cable companies telephone companies and

cable companies telephone companies and

cable companies telephone companies and conservative political advocacy

conservative political advocacy

conservative political advocacy organizations like Americans for

organizations like Americans for

organizations like Americans for Prosperity their main claims are that

Prosperity their main claims are that

Prosperity their main claims are that net neutrality will limit the Internet’s

net neutrality will limit the Internet’s

net neutrality will limit the Internet’s usefulness that it sets a precedent for

usefulness that it sets a precedent for

usefulness that it sets a precedent for more governmental regulation and that it

more governmental regulation and that it

more governmental regulation and that it will severely limit investment and

will severely limit investment and

will severely limit investment and innovation in broadband network services

innovation in broadband network services

innovation in broadband network services even as far back as 2006 challengers of

even as far back as 2006 challengers of

even as far back as 2006 challengers of this concept including

this concept including

this concept including telecommunications giant AT&T created a

telecommunications giant AT&T created a

telecommunications giant AT&T created a now-defunct website called hands off the

now-defunct website called hands off the

now-defunct website called hands off the internet in order to promote arguments

internet in order to promote arguments

internet in order to promote arguments against internet regulation

against internet regulation

against internet regulation number six have other countries come out

number six have other countries come out

number six have other countries come out in favor of net neutrality a handful of

in favor of net neutrality a handful of

in favor of net neutrality a handful of countries like Chile the Netherlands and

countries like Chile the Netherlands and

countries like Chile the Netherlands and Brazil have all adopted net neutrality

Brazil have all adopted net neutrality

Brazil have all adopted net neutrality legislation these nations have amended

legislation these nations have amended

legislation these nations have amended the concept to fit their telecom

the concept to fit their telecom

the concept to fit their telecom infrastructure and industry standards

infrastructure and industry standards

infrastructure and industry standards for example the Netherlands became the

for example the Netherlands became the

for example the Netherlands became the first European country to support net

first European country to support net

first European country to support net neutrality through a national law which

neutrality through a national law which

neutrality through a national law which prevents ISPs from slowing or otherwise

prevents ISPs from slowing or otherwise

prevents ISPs from slowing or otherwise deterring access to any kind of content

deterring access to any kind of content

deterring access to any kind of content with certain exceptions however this has

with certain exceptions however this has

with certain exceptions however this has led to raised rates the entire European

led to raised rates the entire European

led to raised rates the entire European Union followed suit on April 3rd 2014

Union followed suit on April 3rd 2014

Union followed suit on April 3rd 2014 when the European Parliament adopted a

when the European Parliament adopted a

when the European Parliament adopted a net neutrality amendment to further

net neutrality amendment to further

net neutrality amendment to further consolidate member states

consolidate member states

consolidate member states telecommunications policies and protect

telecommunications policies and protect

telecommunications policies and protect net neutrality number 5 had there been

net neutrality number 5 had there been

net neutrality number 5 had there been previous rulings on net neutrality the

previous rulings on net neutrality the

previous rulings on net neutrality the first change to u.s. telecommunications

first change to u.s. telecommunications

first change to u.s. telecommunications law since the Communications Act of 1934

law since the Communications Act of 1934

law since the Communications Act of 1934 which created the FCC came in 1996 with

which created the FCC came in 1996 with

which created the FCC came in 1996 with the goal of making it easier for anyone

the goal of making it easier for anyone

the goal of making it easier for anyone to get into the comms biz more

to get into the comms biz more

to get into the comms biz more importantly it was the first time the

importantly it was the first time the

importantly it was the first time the internet was included in such legal

internet was included in such legal

internet was included in such legal discussions number 4 what was the

discussions number 4 what was the

discussions number 4 what was the official ruling regarding net neutrality

official ruling regarding net neutrality

official ruling regarding net neutrality this afternoon FCC Chairman Tom wheeler

this afternoon FCC Chairman Tom wheeler

this afternoon FCC Chairman Tom wheeler drew applause when he announced that the

drew applause when he announced that the

drew applause when he announced that the internet would remain neutral On

internet would remain neutral On

internet would remain neutral On February 26th 2015 the US Federal

February 26th 2015 the US Federal

February 26th 2015 the US Federal Communications Commission ruled in favor

Communications Commission ruled in favor

Communications Commission ruled in favor of net neutrality in a landmark vote of

of net neutrality in a landmark vote of

of net neutrality in a landmark vote of three to two this means that broadband

three to two this means that broadband

three to two this means that broadband internet is now classified under title 2

internet is now classified under title 2

internet is now classified under title 2 of the Communications Act of 1934 and

of the Communications Act of 1934 and

of the Communications Act of 1934 and legally treated as a public utility this

legally treated as a public utility this

legally treated as a public utility this ruling bans ISPs from offering paid

ruling bans ISPs from offering paid

ruling bans ISPs from offering paid prioritization or Fast and Slow lanes

prioritization or Fast and Slow lanes

prioritization or Fast and Slow lanes which means customers will never have to

which means customers will never have to

which means customers will never have to pay for faster connections for certain

pay for faster connections for certain

pay for faster connections for certain content furthermore ISPs will no longer

content furthermore ISPs will no longer

content furthermore ISPs will no longer be able to block access to or throttle

be able to block access to or throttle

be able to block access to or throttle online activity that uses a lot of

online activity that uses a lot of

online activity that uses a lot of bandwidth and slows service down

bandwidth and slows service down

bandwidth and slows service down number three what does this ruling mean

number three what does this ruling mean

number three what does this ruling mean for you there won’t be any big changes

for you there won’t be any big changes

for you there won’t be any big changes initially for the consumer as different

initially for the consumer as different

initially for the consumer as different providers are expected to file legal

providers are expected to file legal

providers are expected to file legal challenges against the FCC ruling

challenges against the FCC ruling

challenges against the FCC ruling however the new classification under

however the new classification under

however the new classification under which the internet now Falls will

which the internet now Falls will

which the internet now Falls will prevent providers from charging extra in

prevent providers from charging extra in

prevent providers from charging extra in exchange for faster speeds providers

exchange for faster speeds providers

exchange for faster speeds providers will not be able to block or slow

will not be able to block or slow

will not be able to block or slow service down regardless of what type of

service down regardless of what type of

service down regardless of what type of online activity you’re engaging in

online activity you’re engaging in

online activity you’re engaging in meaning streaming video or reading a

meaning streaming video or reading a

meaning streaming video or reading a blog will run on the same connection the

blog will run on the same connection the

blog will run on the same connection the FCC has stated that there will be no

FCC has stated that there will be no

FCC has stated that there will be no additional taxes or fees under the new

additional taxes or fees under the new

additional taxes or fees under the new ruling but providers anticipate that new

ruling but providers anticipate that new

ruling but providers anticipate that new taxes are inevitable and warn that the

taxes are inevitable and warn that the

taxes are inevitable and warn that the cost of broadband might be more

cost of broadband might be more

cost of broadband might be more expensive in the future as a result

expensive in the future as a result

expensive in the future as a result number two what does this mean for

number two what does this mean for

number two what does this mean for Internet service providers telecom giant

Internet service providers telecom giant

Internet service providers telecom giant AT&T says it’ll pause investments to

AT&T says it’ll pause investments to

AT&T says it’ll pause investments to bring fiber connections to 100 cities

bring fiber connections to 100 cities

bring fiber connections to 100 cities until the US government finalizes its

until the US government finalizes its

until the US government finalizes its rules ISPs claim that this new law will

rules ISPs claim that this new law will

rules ISPs claim that this new law will require more regulation which will lead

require more regulation which will lead

require more regulation which will lead to fewer incentives to invest and

to fewer incentives to invest and

to fewer incentives to invest and innovate in broadband if true this would

innovate in broadband if true this would

innovate in broadband if true this would be bad news as certain cities in the

be bad news as certain cities in the

be bad news as certain cities in the United States had some of the slowest

United States had some of the slowest

United States had some of the slowest and priciest broadband access in the

and priciest broadband access in the

and priciest broadband access in the world according to an October 2014

world according to an October 2014

world according to an October 2014 report by the open Technology Institute

report by the open Technology Institute

report by the open Technology Institute the new regulation should also ensure

the new regulation should also ensure

the new regulation should also ensure that dominant broadband suppliers will

that dominant broadband suppliers will

that dominant broadband suppliers will not be able to abuse their market power

not be able to abuse their market power

not be able to abuse their market power providing space for new entrants into

providing space for new entrants into

providing space for new entrants into the segments in the form of municipal

the segments in the form of municipal

the segments in the form of municipal broadband providers for smaller cities

broadband providers for smaller cities

broadband providers for smaller cities number one is this the end of the debate

number one is this the end of the debate

number one is this the end of the debate the debate about net neutrality is not

the debate about net neutrality is not

the debate about net neutrality is not over as ISPs are expected to file a

over as ISPs are expected to file a

over as ISPs are expected to file a legal claim against the FCC and its

legal claim against the FCC and its

legal claim against the FCC and its decision Republicans in the House and

decision Republicans in the House and

decision Republicans in the House and Senate have also proposed a new set of

Senate have also proposed a new set of

Senate have also proposed a new set of bills that would strip the FCC of its

bills that would strip the FCC of its

bills that would strip the FCC of its power especially with regards to

power especially with regards to

power especially with regards to internet regulation

this runs in direct opposition to the

this runs in direct opposition to the will of the White House as President

will of the White House as President

will of the White House as President Barack Obama made clear in a written

Barack Obama made clear in a written

Barack Obama made clear in a written statement that quote we cannot allow

statement that quote we cannot allow

statement that quote we cannot allow Internet service providers to restrict

Internet service providers to restrict

Internet service providers to restrict the best access or to pick winners and

the best access or to pick winners and

the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for

losers in the online marketplace for

losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas and quote did these

services and ideas and quote did these

services and ideas and quote did these facts surprise you to vote for which

facts surprise you to vote for which

facts surprise you to vote for which news story is covered next

news story is covered next

news story is covered next head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest

head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest

head over to watchmojo.com slash suggest and be sure to hit that subscribe button

and be sure to hit that subscribe button

and be sure to hit that subscribe button for more newsworthy top 10s published

for more newsworthy top 10s published

for more newsworthy top 10s published every week

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *