Press "Enter" to skip to content

Your Culture Is Not Better Than Mine | Angela Zhou | TEDxUSC


why do Americans think they are better

why do Americans think they are better than everyone else this is a question

than everyone else this is a question

than everyone else this is a question I’ve been confronted with many times

I’ve been confronted with many times

I’ve been confronted with many times over the past four years well the answer

over the past four years well the answer

over the past four years well the answer is obvious isn’t it america is the land

is obvious isn’t it america is the land

is obvious isn’t it america is the land of the free America is the leader of the

of the free America is the leader of the

of the free America is the leader of the free world our values are superior

free world our values are superior

free world our values are superior therefore you must prescribe your

therefore you must prescribe your

therefore you must prescribe your actions with what we believe are ethical

actions with what we believe are ethical

actions with what we believe are ethical or not at least that’s what we grew up

or not at least that’s what we grew up

or not at least that’s what we grew up hearing believing and repeating here’s

hearing believing and repeating here’s

hearing believing and repeating here’s what I’ve learned about our

what I’ve learned about our

what I’ve learned about our self-described

self-described

self-described freedom it perpetuates a sense of

freedom it perpetuates a sense of

freedom it perpetuates a sense of patriotism that often unfortunately

patriotism that often unfortunately

patriotism that often unfortunately mutates into ignorance even intolerance

mutates into ignorance even intolerance

mutates into ignorance even intolerance towards outsiders and their values

towards outsiders and their values

towards outsiders and their values I myself have fallen victim to this

I myself have fallen victim to this

I myself have fallen victim to this indisposition jumping to the homegrown

indisposition jumping to the homegrown

indisposition jumping to the homegrown conclusion that everyone wants to be an

conclusion that everyone wants to be an

conclusion that everyone wants to be an American or at least live and work here

American or at least live and work here

American or at least live and work here without regards for the merits of being

without regards for the merits of being

without regards for the merits of being naturalized somewhere else but I’ve been

naturalized somewhere else but I’ve been

naturalized somewhere else but I’ve been humbled by the opportunity USC has

humbled by the opportunity USC has

humbled by the opportunity USC has afforded me to spend my precarious

afforded me to spend my precarious

afforded me to spend my precarious collegiate years studying and traveling

collegiate years studying and traveling

collegiate years studying and traveling the globe with 40 other scholars from

the globe with 40 other scholars from

the globe with 40 other scholars from Asia Europe and the Americas the world

Asia Europe and the Americas the world

Asia Europe and the Americas the world bachelor and business program at USC was

bachelor and business program at USC was

bachelor and business program at USC was formed in partnership with the Hong Kong

formed in partnership with the Hong Kong

formed in partnership with the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and

University of Science and Technology and

University of Science and Technology and Bocconi University and Milan allowing

Bocconi University and Milan allowing

Bocconi University and Milan allowing students to spend freshman year in Los

students to spend freshman year in Los

students to spend freshman year in Los Angeles sophomore year in Hong Kong and

Angeles sophomore year in Hong Kong and

Angeles sophomore year in Hong Kong and junior year and LAN Italy as a

junior year and LAN Italy as a

junior year and LAN Italy as a graduating senior in the first program I

graduating senior in the first program I

graduating senior in the first program I returned home with the retrospective

returned home with the retrospective

returned home with the retrospective lens on the way my education in the u.s.

lens on the way my education in the u.s.

lens on the way my education in the u.s. both positively and negatively impacted

both positively and negatively impacted

both positively and negatively impacted my perceptions towards the world in

my perceptions towards the world in

my perceptions towards the world in navigating the challenges of my classes

navigating the challenges of my classes

navigating the challenges of my classes diverse dynamic I also realized how

diverse dynamic I also realized how

diverse dynamic I also realized how strongly cultural values impact personal

strongly cultural values impact personal

strongly cultural values impact personal ethics and decision making

ethics and decision making

ethics and decision making so as my program’s tagline would suggest

so as my program’s tagline would suggest

so as my program’s tagline would suggest over the course of three years and three

over the course of three years and three

over the course of three years and three universities on three different

universities on three different

universities on three different continents I realized that I was able to

continents I realized that I was able to

continents I realized that I was able to learn more about other people’s cultures

learn more about other people’s cultures

learn more about other people’s cultures and share my stories but today I just

and share my stories but today I just

and share my stories but today I just want to share one story from each year

want to share one story from each year

want to share one story from each year so first during my freshman year I

so first during my freshman year I

so first during my freshman year I invited two of my non-american class

invited two of my non-american class

invited two of my non-american class from Italy and Germany to a California

from Italy and Germany to a California

from Italy and Germany to a California GOP dinner in Orange County hosted by

GOP dinner in Orange County hosted by

GOP dinner in Orange County hosted by the then governor of Texas and as many

the then governor of Texas and as many

the then governor of Texas and as many of you might know Orange County is one

of you might know Orange County is one

of you might know Orange County is one of the few red regions in this very blue

of the few red regions in this very blue

of the few red regions in this very blue state of California and over the course

state of California and over the course

state of California and over the course of the event a common theme began to

of the event a common theme began to

of the event a common theme began to emerge speakers were investing state

emerge speakers were investing state

emerge speakers were investing state politicians for driving out business

politicians for driving out business

politicians for driving out business from California probably due to tax

from California probably due to tax

from California probably due to tax reasons I mean after all representatives

reasons I mean after all representatives

reasons I mean after all representatives making remarks on both ends of our

making remarks on both ends of our

making remarks on both ends of our political spectrum is not rare in this

political spectrum is not rare in this

political spectrum is not rare in this country but at the end of the night my

country but at the end of the night my

country but at the end of the night my roommate from Germany one of the girls I

roommate from Germany one of the girls I

roommate from Germany one of the girls I had invited approached me and asked me

had invited approached me and asked me

had invited approached me and asked me if personal attacks in politics was

if personal attacks in politics was

if personal attacks in politics was common in the u.s. because apparently it

common in the u.s. because apparently it

common in the u.s. because apparently it was much less though in Germany I

was much less though in Germany I

was much less though in Germany I realized that we’re Americans based

realized that we’re Americans based

realized that we’re Americans based elections around the candidate it seemed

elections around the candidate it seemed

elections around the candidate it seemed that Europeans typically center public

that Europeans typically center public

that Europeans typically center public light around the party name probably to

light around the party name probably to

light around the party name probably to avoid individual name-calling

avoid individual name-calling

avoid individual name-calling for obvious reasons what’s more studies

for obvious reasons what’s more studies

for obvious reasons what’s more studies have also shown that Americans are more

have also shown that Americans are more

have also shown that Americans are more tolerant than Europeans of comparative

tolerant than Europeans of comparative

tolerant than Europeans of comparative politics in general during my next year

politics in general during my next year

politics in general during my next year in Hong Kong I faced the distressful

in Hong Kong I faced the distressful

in Hong Kong I faced the distressful balancing act of overcoming curves and

balancing act of overcoming curves and

balancing act of overcoming curves and classes infiltrated with academic

classes infiltrated with academic

classes infiltrated with academic integrity issues amongst Westerners and

integrity issues amongst Westerners and

integrity issues amongst Westerners and non-westerners alike but the attitudes

non-westerners alike but the attitudes

non-westerners alike but the attitudes towards cheating were different

towards cheating were different

towards cheating were different first the definitions of cheating varied

first the definitions of cheating varied

first the definitions of cheating varied across culture second the motivations

across culture second the motivations

across culture second the motivations and purpose outcomes were different for

and purpose outcomes were different for

and purpose outcomes were different for Americans for example cheating range

Americans for example cheating range

Americans for example cheating range from plagiarism and co-working to

from plagiarism and co-working to

from plagiarism and co-working to copying and letting others copy

copying and letting others copy

copying and letting others copy meanwhile cheating in Asia seemed to be

meanwhile cheating in Asia seemed to be

meanwhile cheating in Asia seemed to be a normal component of their culture

a normal component of their culture

a normal component of their culture where cheating in the u.s. is an

where cheating in the u.s. is an

where cheating in the u.s. is an individualistic tendency to achieve an

individualistic tendency to achieve an

individualistic tendency to achieve an outcome better than another cheating in

outcome better than another cheating in

outcome better than another cheating in Asia seemed to be a way to maintain

Asia seemed to be a way to maintain

Asia seemed to be a way to maintain fairness across an organization where

fairness across an organization where

fairness across an organization where cheating already occurs it’s almost self

cheating already occurs it’s almost self

cheating already occurs it’s almost self reinforcing in this way but when

reinforcing in this way but when

reinforcing in this way but when speaking with classmates from Italy and

speaking with classmates from Italy and

speaking with classmates from Italy and Spain on the other hand I realized that

Spain on the other hand I realized that

Spain on the other hand I realized that cheating for them was a way to mutually

cheating for them was a way to mutually

cheating for them was a way to mutually succeed motivated by collectivist

succeed motivated by collectivist

succeed motivated by collectivist tendencies they saw as themselves

tendencies they saw as themselves

tendencies they saw as themselves against assist

against assist

against assist so through my examples you can see that

so through my examples you can see that

so through my examples you can see that practical applications of cheating can

practical applications of cheating can

practical applications of cheating can occur throughout all cultures but the

occur throughout all cultures but the

occur throughout all cultures but the underlying reason is very different

underlying reason is very different

underlying reason is very different during my programs third year at the

during my programs third year at the

during my programs third year at the cony many Americans faced and awkward

cony many Americans faced and awkward

cony many Americans faced and awkward awakening being inaccurately categorized

awakening being inaccurately categorized

awakening being inaccurately categorized by our European counterparts in one of

by our European counterparts in one of

by our European counterparts in one of my classes in Milan a brazen faculty

my classes in Milan a brazen faculty

my classes in Milan a brazen faculty member frequently associated agen

member frequently associated agen

member frequently associated agen Americans with incorrect nationalities

Americans with incorrect nationalities

Americans with incorrect nationalities all Asians were suddenly Chinese and all

all Asians were suddenly Chinese and all

all Asians were suddenly Chinese and all mixed races were met with a look of

mixed races were met with a look of

mixed races were met with a look of confusion this was the antithesis of the

confusion this was the antithesis of the

confusion this was the antithesis of the political correctness the Americans in

political correctness the Americans in

political correctness the Americans in my program grew up championing I even

my program grew up championing I even

my program grew up championing I even oftentimes found myself at the center of

oftentimes found myself at the center of

oftentimes found myself at the center of conversations with non Americans

conversations with non Americans

conversations with non Americans comically pointing out how PC Americans

comically pointing out how PC Americans

comically pointing out how PC Americans are and I wondered why but then I came

are and I wondered why but then I came

are and I wondered why but then I came to realize that the homogeneity of

to realize that the homogeneity of

to realize that the homogeneity of European nationalities and both

European nationalities and both

European nationalities and both appearance and language was the

appearance and language was the

appearance and language was the underlying reason for their lack of me

underlying reason for their lack of me

underlying reason for their lack of me to filter remarks towards one another

to filter remarks towards one another

to filter remarks towards one another indeed Americans vary so much in

indeed Americans vary so much in

indeed Americans vary so much in physical features and language that

physical features and language that

physical features and language that there is probably no way of knowing one

there is probably no way of knowing one

there is probably no way of knowing one is American without hearing him or her

is American without hearing him or her

is American without hearing him or her speak fluent English first so to kind of

speak fluent English first so to kind of

speak fluent English first so to kind of explore the different value sets in my

explore the different value sets in my

explore the different value sets in my program I decided to conduct a survey

program I decided to conduct a survey

program I decided to conduct a survey for the members of the world Bachelor in

for the members of the world Bachelor in

for the members of the world Bachelor in business and received responses from 140

business and received responses from 140

business and received responses from 140 students out of the total 172 students I

students out of the total 172 students I

students out of the total 172 students I asked 14 questions based off of the

asked 14 questions based off of the

asked 14 questions based off of the Hofstede typology and then 27 questions

Hofstede typology and then 27 questions

Hofstede typology and then 27 questions of my own to kind of identify more how

of my own to kind of identify more how

of my own to kind of identify more how non-american cultures in my program

non-american cultures in my program

non-american cultures in my program deferred from American culture in my

deferred from American culture in my

deferred from American culture in my program there was a wide variety and

program there was a wide variety and

program there was a wide variety and diversity of nationalities and cultures

diversity of nationalities and cultures

diversity of nationalities and cultures represented but admittedly

represented but admittedly

represented but admittedly most of most of the respondents came

most of most of the respondents came

most of most of the respondents came from countries where the three

from countries where the three

from countries where the three universities of wbb are also based so

universities of wbb are also based so

universities of wbb are also based so first I asked how hypocritical

first I asked how hypocritical

first I asked how hypocritical respondents found American culture to be

respondents found American culture to be

respondents found American culture to be non Americans were more likely than

non Americans were more likely than

non Americans were more likely than Americans to state that American culture

Americans to state that American culture

Americans to state that American culture was hypocritical so what this might

was hypocritical so what this might

was hypocritical so what this might suggest to us is that Americans do not

suggest to us is that Americans do not

suggest to us is that Americans do not hold ourselves to the same ethical

hold ourselves to the same ethical

hold ourselves to the same ethical principles that we expect from other

principles that we expect from other

principles that we expect from other cultures

cultures

cultures non-americans were also more likely than

non-americans were also more likely than

non-americans were also more likely than Americans to believe that American

Americans to believe that American

Americans to believe that American politics was combative which given our

politics was combative which given our

politics was combative which given our recent election is not that surprising

recent election is not that surprising

recent election is not that surprising and then I started asking questions

and then I started asking questions

and then I started asking questions about attitudes towards cheating so as

about attitudes towards cheating so as

about attitudes towards cheating so as you can see I was trying to test my

you can see I was trying to test my

you can see I was trying to test my observations from each year where I

observations from each year where I

observations from each year where I learned through experiences and I found

learned through experiences and I found

learned through experiences and I found out that 82% of Americans found cheating

out that 82% of Americans found cheating

out that 82% of Americans found cheating to be moderately – very bad

to be moderately – very bad

to be moderately – very bad but a lesser 64% of non Americans agreed

but a lesser 64% of non Americans agreed

but a lesser 64% of non Americans agreed and then in case I left out some

and then in case I left out some

and then in case I left out some potential outliers I further partitioned

potential outliers I further partitioned

potential outliers I further partitioned this data and I found that 72% of

this data and I found that 72% of

this data and I found that 72% of Chinese respondents found cheating to be

Chinese respondents found cheating to be

Chinese respondents found cheating to be moderately – very bad but less than half

moderately – very bad but less than half

moderately – very bad but less than half of Italian respondents found cheating to

of Italian respondents found cheating to

of Italian respondents found cheating to be that bad at all I also found that the

be that bad at all I also found that the

be that bad at all I also found that the general attitude was that plagiarism was

general attitude was that plagiarism was

general attitude was that plagiarism was worse than cheating on an exam and the

worse than cheating on an exam and the

worse than cheating on an exam and the majority of respondents also stated that

majority of respondents also stated that

majority of respondents also stated that they would be unlikely to report a

they would be unlikely to report a

they would be unlikely to report a cheater at that cheater was their friend

cheater at that cheater was their friend

cheater at that cheater was their friend and then lastly in relation to my year

and then lastly in relation to my year

and then lastly in relation to my year in Italy I asked questions about

in Italy I asked questions about

in Italy I asked questions about attitudes towards political correctness

attitudes towards political correctness

attitudes towards political correctness in the u.s. non-americans rated this

in the u.s. non-americans rated this

in the u.s. non-americans rated this level higher than Americans did which

level higher than Americans did which

level higher than Americans did which reaffirm my observations that indeed

reaffirm my observations that indeed

reaffirm my observations that indeed Americans are more relatively sensitive

Americans are more relatively sensitive

Americans are more relatively sensitive to political correctness but what was

to political correctness but what was

to political correctness but what was most surprising and interesting of my

most surprising and interesting of my

most surprising and interesting of my study through this short period of time

study through this short period of time

study through this short period of time was seeing that two-thirds of non

was seeing that two-thirds of non

was seeing that two-thirds of non Americans and Americans stated that they

Americans and Americans stated that they

Americans and Americans stated that they believed Americans were ignorant to a

believed Americans were ignorant to a

believed Americans were ignorant to a certain extent even though all non

certain extent even though all non

certain extent even though all non Americans stated that they felt

Americans stated that they felt

Americans stated that they felt America’s sense of ethics was higher

America’s sense of ethics was higher

America’s sense of ethics was higher than their own so why is it that

than their own so why is it that

than their own so why is it that Americans come off as ignorant if we

Americans come off as ignorant if we

Americans come off as ignorant if we supposedly have seemingly high standards

supposedly have seemingly high standards

supposedly have seemingly high standards of ethics well it turns out that while

of ethics well it turns out that while

of ethics well it turns out that while third of Americans believe that

third of Americans believe that

third of Americans believe that countries should not impose their own

countries should not impose their own

countries should not impose their own ethical values upon others a hundred

ethical values upon others a hundred

ethical values upon others a hundred percent of the non-american stated that

percent of the non-american stated that

percent of the non-american stated that they felt the US does impose its culture

they felt the US does impose its culture

they felt the US does impose its culture upon other countries to a certain extent

upon other countries to a certain extent

upon other countries to a certain extent and so what this told me was that

and so what this told me was that

and so what this told me was that despite the fact that the u.s. places a

despite the fact that the u.s. places a

despite the fact that the u.s. places a high esteem on ethics it still appears

high esteem on ethics it still appears

high esteem on ethics it still appears intrusive towards other cultures

intrusive towards other cultures

intrusive towards other cultures and ultimately every respondents stated

and ultimately every respondents stated

and ultimately every respondents stated that they felt ethics was influenced by

that they felt ethics was influenced by

that they felt ethics was influenced by culture so when my examples aim to

culture so when my examples aim to

culture so when my examples aim to illustrate are not the generalizations

illustrate are not the generalizations

illustrate are not the generalizations of the cultures represented in my

of the cultures represented in my

of the cultures represented in my program but rather the idea that culture

program but rather the idea that culture

program but rather the idea that culture gives rise to different sets of ethical

gives rise to different sets of ethical

gives rise to different sets of ethical values but if not one culture is better

values but if not one culture is better

values but if not one culture is better or worse or more right or wrong as

or worse or more right or wrong as

or worse or more right or wrong as cultural relativists would infer then a

cultural relativists would infer then a

cultural relativists would infer then a debate is warranted on whether this

debate is warranted on whether this

debate is warranted on whether this relativism should prohibit any attempt

relativism should prohibit any attempt

relativism should prohibit any attempt at universality or commonality at all

at universality or commonality at all

at universality or commonality at all Universal codes of ethics such as in

Universal codes of ethics such as in

Universal codes of ethics such as in human rights will undoubtedly come into

human rights will undoubtedly come into

human rights will undoubtedly come into conflict with cultural and religious

conflict with cultural and religious

conflict with cultural and religious practices but the risk of applying

practices but the risk of applying

practices but the risk of applying cultural relativism to other people’s

cultural relativism to other people’s

cultural relativism to other people’s practices is the corrosion of moral

practices is the corrosion of moral

practices is the corrosion of moral reason that allows so many Americans to

reason that allows so many Americans to

reason that allows so many Americans to look into the world and decry violations

look into the world and decry violations

look into the world and decry violations and human rights under cultural

and human rights under cultural

and human rights under cultural relativism we can’t judge other people’s

relativism we can’t judge other people’s

relativism we can’t judge other people’s acts it’s considered futile which

acts it’s considered futile which

acts it’s considered futile which perhaps defeats the purpose of ethics

perhaps defeats the purpose of ethics

perhaps defeats the purpose of ethics altogether the shaky harmony of

altogether the shaky harmony of

altogether the shaky harmony of internationally accepted standards of

internationally accepted standards of

internationally accepted standards of ethics and cultural sovereignty can best

ethics and cultural sovereignty can best

ethics and cultural sovereignty can best be seen through applications of the

be seen through applications of the

be seen through applications of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Universal Declaration of Human Rights it might seem indisputable that human

it might seem indisputable that human

it might seem indisputable that human rights should be universal but there are

rights should be universal but there are

rights should be universal but there are still many countries today that exercise

still many countries today that exercise

still many countries today that exercise cultural practices that Westerners

cultural practices that Westerners

cultural practices that Westerners consider extreme or barbaric so of

consider extreme or barbaric so of

consider extreme or barbaric so of interest to me has been the role of

interest to me has been the role of

interest to me has been the role of women’s rights plays in the argument

women’s rights plays in the argument

women’s rights plays in the argument between cultural relativism and

between cultural relativism and

between cultural relativism and universalism because the dichotomy of

universalism because the dichotomy of

universalism because the dichotomy of male and female roles in societies forms

male and female roles in societies forms

male and female roles in societies forms the basis of many different arguments

the basis of many different arguments

the basis of many different arguments and cultural issues growing up is

and cultural issues growing up is

and cultural issues growing up is spousal gender equality through my

spousal gender equality through my

spousal gender equality through my nonprofit involvement with the United

nonprofit involvement with the United

nonprofit involvement with the United Nations Foundation and the

Nations Foundation and the

Nations Foundation and the anti-trafficking organization

anti-trafficking organization

anti-trafficking organization International Princess Project I’ve come

International Princess Project I’ve come

International Princess Project I’ve come across many instances where a version of

across many instances where a version of

across many instances where a version of women’s rights is defended on cultural

women’s rights is defended on cultural

women’s rights is defended on cultural and religious grounds

and religious grounds

and religious grounds social issues like female circumcision

social issues like female circumcision

social issues like female circumcision female infanticide child brides and

female infanticide child brides and

female infanticide child brides and honor killings are generally agreed upon

honor killings are generally agreed upon

honor killings are generally agreed upon women’s rights violations that are still

women’s rights violations that are still

women’s rights violations that are still existent in societies that have deeply

existent in societies that have deeply

existent in societies that have deeply ingrained patriarchal cultures but if

ingrained patriarchal cultures but if

ingrained patriarchal cultures but if culture prescribes what is considered

culture prescribes what is considered

culture prescribes what is considered ethical or not in a row

ethical or not in a row

ethical or not in a row native context then these would be

native context then these would be

native context then these would be violations would then be acceptable

violations would then be acceptable

violations would then be acceptable because who are we to judge but it is my

because who are we to judge but it is my

because who are we to judge but it is my belief that women possess intrinsic

belief that women possess intrinsic

belief that women possess intrinsic rights and identities independent of

rights and identities independent of

rights and identities independent of their cultural peripheries and this

their cultural peripheries and this

their cultural peripheries and this creates a compelling need for universal

creates a compelling need for universal

creates a compelling need for universal codes of ethics but while there are

codes of ethics but while there are

codes of ethics but while there are indeed many universal compacts presented

indeed many universal compacts presented

indeed many universal compacts presented by the United Nations that are also

by the United Nations that are also

by the United Nations that are also signed by multiple countries around the

signed by multiple countries around the

signed by multiple countries around the world unfortunately many countries still

world unfortunately many countries still

world unfortunately many countries still criticize universal human rights as a

criticize universal human rights as a

criticize universal human rights as a tool for cultural imperialism and

tool for cultural imperialism and

tool for cultural imperialism and politics by the west of which the US

politics by the west of which the US

politics by the west of which the US belongs to and this undermines the

belongs to and this undermines the

belongs to and this undermines the merits and agreements for universalism

merits and agreements for universalism

merits and agreements for universalism the process of incorporating

the process of incorporating

the process of incorporating universality ultimately depends on

universality ultimately depends on

universality ultimately depends on understanding human rights and

understanding human rights and

understanding human rights and cross-cultural differences of injustice

cross-cultural differences of injustice

cross-cultural differences of injustice is committed from a community level to a

is committed from a community level to a

is committed from a community level to a national level so where do I stand on

national level so where do I stand on

national level so where do I stand on this edge between these two ethical

this edge between these two ethical

this edge between these two ethical divides the u.s. sees world bachelor and

divides the u.s. sees world bachelor and

divides the u.s. sees world bachelor and business program I’ve been able to

business program I’ve been able to

business program I’ve been able to reconcile both ideas between cultural

reconcile both ideas between cultural

reconcile both ideas between cultural relativism and universalism first by

relativism and universalism first by

relativism and universalism first by understanding cultural context we can

understanding cultural context we can

understanding cultural context we can accept that our own cultures worldview

accept that our own cultures worldview

accept that our own cultures worldview is not necessarily universal truth and

is not necessarily universal truth and

is not necessarily universal truth and secondly being aware of other people’s

secondly being aware of other people’s

secondly being aware of other people’s cultures allows for more informed

cultures allows for more informed

cultures allows for more informed questioning of local practices that seem

questioning of local practices that seem

questioning of local practices that seem problematic and the formation of more

problematic and the formation of more

problematic and the formation of more inclusive universal agreements on ethics

inclusive universal agreements on ethics

inclusive universal agreements on ethics it is my belief that the introspective

it is my belief that the introspective

it is my belief that the introspective lessons I’ve learned as an American need

lessons I’ve learned as an American need

lessons I’ve learned as an American need not be accompanied by a travel intensive

not be accompanied by a travel intensive

not be accompanied by a travel intensive 4-year program like the world bachelor

4-year program like the world bachelor

4-year program like the world bachelor in business with USC being one of the

in business with USC being one of the

in business with USC being one of the most diverse campuses consisting of

most diverse campuses consisting of

most diverse campuses consisting of international students in the nation

international students in the nation

international students in the nation it’s possible to learn more about our

it’s possible to learn more about our

it’s possible to learn more about our own and others notions of ethics through

own and others notions of ethics through

own and others notions of ethics through simple interactions with the global

simple interactions with the global

simple interactions with the global student body we should not only seek out

student body we should not only seek out

student body we should not only seek out disagreements through difficult

disagreements through difficult

disagreements through difficult conversations but also aim to understand

conversations but also aim to understand

conversations but also aim to understand the underlying wide that founds our

the underlying wide that founds our

the underlying wide that founds our cultural differences in doing so and in

cultural differences in doing so and in

cultural differences in doing so and in challenging what seems accepted as our

challenging what seems accepted as our

challenging what seems accepted as our standard status quo of ethics we will

standard status quo of ethics we will

standard status quo of ethics we will become more informed individuals and

become more informed individuals and

become more informed individuals and activists in our communities

activists in our communities

activists in our communities [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *