how many of us have ever seen something thought that we should report it but
thought that we should report it but
thought that we should report it but decided not to and not that I need to
decided not to and not that I need to
decided not to and not that I need to see a show of hands but I’m sure this
see a show of hands but I’m sure this
see a show of hands but I’m sure this has happened to someone in this room
has happened to someone in this room
has happened to someone in this room before
before
before in fact when this question was asked to
in fact when this question was asked to
in fact when this question was asked to a group of employees 46% of them
a group of employees 46% of them
a group of employees 46% of them responded by saying that they had seen
responded by saying that they had seen
responded by saying that they had seen something and decided not to report it
something and decided not to report it
something and decided not to report it so if you raised your hand or quietly
so if you raised your hand or quietly
so if you raised your hand or quietly raised your hand don’t feel bad you’re
raised your hand don’t feel bad you’re
raised your hand don’t feel bad you’re not alone this message of if you see
not alone this message of if you see
not alone this message of if you see something to say something it’s really
something to say something it’s really
something to say something it’s really all around us even when driving down the
all around us even when driving down the
all around us even when driving down the highway you see billboards like this
highway you see billboards like this
highway you see billboards like this encouraging us to report crime without
encouraging us to report crime without
encouraging us to report crime without revealing ourselves but I still feel
revealing ourselves but I still feel
revealing ourselves but I still feel like a lot of us are really
like a lot of us are really
like a lot of us are really uncomfortable coming forward in the name
uncomfortable coming forward in the name
uncomfortable coming forward in the name of the truth I’m an accounting professor
of the truth I’m an accounting professor
of the truth I’m an accounting professor and I do fraud research and in my class
and I do fraud research and in my class
and I do fraud research and in my class I encourage my students to come forward
I encourage my students to come forward
I encourage my students to come forward with information if they see it or in
with information if they see it or in
with information if they see it or in other words encouraging my students to
other words encouraging my students to
other words encouraging my students to become whistleblowers but if I’m being
become whistleblowers but if I’m being
become whistleblowers but if I’m being completely honest with myself I am
completely honest with myself I am
completely honest with myself I am really conflicted with this message that
really conflicted with this message that
really conflicted with this message that I’m sending to my students and here’s
I’m sending to my students and here’s
I’m sending to my students and here’s why whistleblowers are under attack
why whistleblowers are under attack
why whistleblowers are under attack headline after headline shows us this
headline after headline shows us this
headline after headline shows us this many people choose not to become
many people choose not to become
many people choose not to become whistleblowers due to the fear of
whistleblowers due to the fear of
whistleblowers due to the fear of retaliation from demotions
retaliation from demotions
retaliation from demotions to death threats to job loss perpetual
to death threats to job loss perpetual
to death threats to job loss perpetual job loss choosing to become a
job loss choosing to become a
job loss choosing to become a whistleblower is an uphill battle
whistleblower is an uphill battle
whistleblower is an uphill battle their loyalty becomes into question
their loyalty becomes into question
their loyalty becomes into question their motives their trustworthiness so
their motives their trustworthiness so
their motives their trustworthiness so how can I as a professor who really
how can I as a professor who really
how can I as a professor who really cares about her students encourage them
cares about her students encourage them
cares about her students encourage them to become whistleblowers when I know how
to become whistleblowers when I know how
to become whistleblowers when I know how the world truly feels about them so one
the world truly feels about them so one
the world truly feels about them so one day I was getting ready for my annual
day I was getting ready for my annual
day I was getting ready for my annual whistleblower lecture with my students
whistleblower lecture with my students
whistleblower lecture with my students and I was working on an article for
and I was working on an article for
and I was working on an article for Forbes entitled Wells Fargo and
Forbes entitled Wells Fargo and
Forbes entitled Wells Fargo and millennial whistleblowing what do we
millennial whistleblowing what do we
millennial whistleblowing what do we tell them now I was working on this
tell them now I was working on this
tell them now I was working on this piece and reading about the case I
piece and reading about the case I
piece and reading about the case I became outraged and what made me angry
became outraged and what made me angry
became outraged and what made me angry was when I came to the fact and realized
was when I came to the fact and realized
was when I came to the fact and realized that the employees that try to whistle
that the employees that try to whistle
that the employees that try to whistle blow were actually fired
blow were actually fired
blow were actually fired now this article is right after the 5300
now this article is right after the 5300
now this article is right after the 5300 employees at Wells Fargo being being
employees at Wells Fargo being being
employees at Wells Fargo being being fired due to opening customer accounts
fired due to opening customer accounts
fired due to opening customer accounts without their knowledge but the
without their knowledge but the
without their knowledge but the employees who tried to whistle blow were
employees who tried to whistle blow were
employees who tried to whistle blow were fired and it really made me think about
fired and it really made me think about
fired and it really made me think about the message that I was sharing with my
the message that I was sharing with my
the message that I was sharing with my students and it made me think what if my
students and it made me think what if my
students and it made me think what if my students have been Wells Fargo employees
students have been Wells Fargo employees
students have been Wells Fargo employees on the one hand if they whistle blew
on the one hand if they whistle blew
on the one hand if they whistle blew they would got fired would have gotten
they would got fired would have gotten
they would got fired would have gotten fired but on the other hand if they
fired but on the other hand if they
fired but on the other hand if they didn’t report the fraud that they knew
didn’t report the fraud that they knew
didn’t report the fraud that they knew the way current regulation is written
the way current regulation is written
the way current regulation is written employees are held responsible if they
employees are held responsible if they
employees are held responsible if they knew something and didn’t report it
knew something and didn’t report it
knew something and didn’t report it so criminal prosecution is a real option
so criminal prosecution is a real option
so criminal prosecution is a real option what’s a person opposed to do with those
what’s a person opposed to do with those
what’s a person opposed to do with those type of odds as conflicted as I am in
type of odds as conflicted as I am in
type of odds as conflicted as I am in the classroom I’m also conflicted at
the classroom I’m also conflicted at
the classroom I’m also conflicted at home I hear myself talking to my son and
home I hear myself talking to my son and
home I hear myself talking to my son and my daughter and I can hear myself
my daughter and I can hear myself
my daughter and I can hear myself telling Vivian now Vivian don’t
telling Vivian now Vivian don’t
telling Vivian now Vivian don’t tattletale on Evan and I know she
tattletale on Evan and I know she
tattletale on Evan and I know she probably has valuable and probably
probably has valuable and probably
probably has valuable and probably truthful information to share with me
truthful information to share with me
truthful information to share with me but instead I shut her down I of all
but instead I shut her down I of all
but instead I shut her down I of all people know the valuable contributions
people know the valuable contributions
people know the valuable contributions that whistleblowers make in fact most
that whistleblowers make in fact most
that whistleblowers make in fact most frauds are discovered by them 42% of
frauds are discovered by them 42% of
frauds are discovered by them 42% of frauds are discovered by whistleblower
frauds are discovered by whistleblower
frauds are discovered by whistleblower in comparison to other methods like
in comparison to other methods like
in comparison to other methods like management review and external audit and
management review and external audit and
management review and external audit and when you think about some of the more
when you think about some of the more
when you think about some of the more classic or historical fraud cases it
classic or historical fraud cases it
classic or historical fraud cases it always is around a whistleblower
always is around a whistleblower
always is around a whistleblower Vinc Watergate discovered by
Vinc Watergate discovered by
Vinc Watergate discovered by whistleblower Vinc Enron discovered by
whistleblower Vinc Enron discovered by
whistleblower Vinc Enron discovered by whistleblower and who can forget about
whistleblower and who can forget about
whistleblower and who can forget about Bernard Madoff discovered by a
Bernard Madoff discovered by a
Bernard Madoff discovered by a whistleblower it takes a tremendous
whistleblower it takes a tremendous
whistleblower it takes a tremendous amount of courage to come forward in the
amount of courage to come forward in the
amount of courage to come forward in the name of the truth as Winston Churchill
name of the truth as Winston Churchill
name of the truth as Winston Churchill stated courage is what it takes to stand
stated courage is what it takes to stand
stated courage is what it takes to stand up and speak courage is also what it
up and speak courage is also what it
up and speak courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen but when we
takes to sit down and listen but when we
takes to sit down and listen but when we think about the term whistleblower we
think about the term whistleblower we
think about the term whistleblower we often think of some very descriptive
often think of some very descriptive
often think of some very descriptive words rat snake traitor tattletale
words rat snake traitor tattletale
words rat snake traitor tattletale weasel and those are the nice words the
weasel and those are the nice words the
weasel and those are the nice words the ones I can say from the stage but
ones I can say from the stage but
ones I can say from the stage but instead of punished
instead of punished
instead of punished people that choose to come forward in
people that choose to come forward in
people that choose to come forward in the name of the truth we should embrace
the name of the truth we should embrace
the name of the truth we should embrace them and the best way to embrace them is
them and the best way to embrace them is
them and the best way to embrace them is to think about what it takes to become
to think about what it takes to become
to think about what it takes to become one so I’m always looking for ways to
one so I’m always looking for ways to
one so I’m always looking for ways to develop better whistle blowers within my
develop better whistle blowers within my
develop better whistle blowers within my students and with my kids and so when
students and with my kids and so when
students and with my kids and so when I’m not in class I go around the country
I’m not in class I go around the country
I’m not in class I go around the country and I interview white collar felons
and I interview white collar felons
and I interview white collar felons whistleblowers and victims of fraud
whistleblowers and victims of fraud
whistleblowers and victims of fraud because really I’m trying to understand
because really I’m trying to understand
because really I’m trying to understand what makes them tick and to bring those
what makes them tick and to bring those
what makes them tick and to bring those experiences back into the classroom but
experiences back into the classroom but
experiences back into the classroom but it’s my interviews with whistleblowers
it’s my interviews with whistleblowers
it’s my interviews with whistleblowers that really stick with me and they stick
that really stick with me and they stick
that really stick with me and they stick with me because they make me question my
with me because they make me question my
with me because they make me question my own courage when given the opportunity
own courage when given the opportunity
own courage when given the opportunity what I actually speak up
what I actually speak up
what I actually speak up I asked this of my students I want to
I asked this of my students I want to
I asked this of my students I want to ask it of my kids but can I actually do
ask it of my kids but can I actually do
ask it of my kids but can I actually do it and there have been some
it and there have been some
it and there have been some whistleblowers that I’ve met that have
whistleblowers that I’ve met that have
whistleblowers that I’ve met that have really had an impact on my life as well
really had an impact on my life as well
really had an impact on my life as well as my students experience and so this is
as my students experience and so this is
as my students experience and so this is a couple stories that I want to share
a couple stories that I want to share
a couple stories that I want to share with you this is Mary Mary Willingham is
with you this is Mary Mary Willingham is
with you this is Mary Mary Willingham is the whistleblower from the University of
the whistleblower from the University of
the whistleblower from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill academic
North Carolina at Chapel Hill academic
North Carolina at Chapel Hill academic fraud case and Mary was a learning
fraud case and Mary was a learning
fraud case and Mary was a learning specialist at the University and she
specialist at the University and she
specialist at the University and she worked with students primarily student
worked with students primarily student
worked with students primarily student athletes and what she noticed when she
athletes and what she noticed when she
athletes and what she noticed when she was working with students is they had
was working with students is they had
was working with students is they had they were turning in term papers that
they were turning in term papers that
they were turning in term papers that seemed well beyond their reading levels
seemed well beyond their reading levels
seemed well beyond their reading levels she started to ask a couple questions
she started to ask a couple questions
she started to ask a couple questions and she found out that there was a
and she found out that there was a
and she found out that there was a database where the student athletes
database where the student athletes
database where the student athletes could retrieve papers and turn them in
could retrieve papers and turn them in
could retrieve papers and turn them in and then she found out that some of her
and then she found out that some of her
and then she found out that some of her colleagues were funneling students into
colleagues were funneling students into
colleagues were funneling students into fake classes just to keep them eligible
fake classes just to keep them eligible
fake classes just to keep them eligible to play now when Mary found this out she
to play now when Mary found this out she
to play now when Mary found this out she was outraged and so what she tried to do
was outraged and so what she tried to do
was outraged and so what she tried to do was go to her direct supervisor but they
was go to her direct supervisor but they
was go to her direct supervisor but they didn’t do anything and then Mary tried
didn’t do anything and then Mary tried
didn’t do anything and then Mary tried to go to some internal university
to go to some internal university
to go to some internal university administrators and they didn’t do
administrators and they didn’t do
administrators and they didn’t do anything so what happens when nobody
anything so what happens when nobody
anything so what happens when nobody listens you blog so mary decided to
listens you blog so mary decided to
listens you blog so mary decided to develop a blog her blog went viral
develop a blog her blog went viral
develop a blog her blog went viral within 4 to 24 hours and she was
within 4 to 24 hours and she was
within 4 to 24 hours and she was contacted by a reporter now when she was
contacted by a reporter now when she was
contacted by a reporter now when she was contacted by this reporter her identity
contacted by this reporter her identity
contacted by this reporter her identity was known she was exposed and when she
was known she was exposed and when she
was known she was exposed and when she was exposed
was exposed
was exposed she received a demotion death threats
she received a demotion death threats
she received a demotion death threats over collegiate sports Mary didn’t do
over collegiate sports Mary didn’t do
over collegiate sports Mary didn’t do anything wrong
anything wrong
anything wrong she didn’t participate in the
she didn’t participate in the
she didn’t participate in the fraud she really thought that she was
fraud she really thought that she was
fraud she really thought that she was giving voice to students that were
giving voice to students that were
giving voice to students that were voiceless
voiceless
voiceless but her loyalty was questioned her
but her loyalty was questioned her
but her loyalty was questioned her trustworthiness and her motives now
trustworthiness and her motives now
trustworthiness and her motives now whistle blowing doesn’t always have to
whistle blowing doesn’t always have to
whistle blowing doesn’t always have to end in two motions or death threats
end in two motions or death threats
end in two motions or death threats actually in 2002 this was the cover of
actually in 2002 this was the cover of
actually in 2002 this was the cover of Time magazine where we were actually
Time magazine where we were actually
Time magazine where we were actually honoring three brave whistleblowers for
honoring three brave whistleblowers for
honoring three brave whistleblowers for their decision to come forward in the
their decision to come forward in the
their decision to come forward in the name of the truth
name of the truth
name of the truth and when you look at the research 22% of
and when you look at the research 22% of
and when you look at the research 22% of whistleblowers actually report
whistleblowers actually report
whistleblowers actually report retaliation so there is a huge
retaliation so there is a huge
retaliation so there is a huge population of people that report and are
population of people that report and are
population of people that report and are not retaliated against and that gives me
not retaliated against and that gives me
not retaliated against and that gives me hope so this is Kathy Kathy Swanson is a
hope so this is Kathy Kathy Swanson is a
hope so this is Kathy Kathy Swanson is a retired city clerk from the city of
retired city clerk from the city of
retired city clerk from the city of Dickson and one day Kathy was doing her
Dickson and one day Kathy was doing her
Dickson and one day Kathy was doing her job just like she always did and she
job just like she always did and she
job just like she always did and she stumbled upon a pretty interesting case
stumbled upon a pretty interesting case
stumbled upon a pretty interesting case see Kathy was at the end of the month
see Kathy was at the end of the month
see Kathy was at the end of the month and she was doing her treasurer’s report
and she was doing her treasurer’s report
and she was doing her treasurer’s report for the city and typically her boss
for the city and typically her boss
for the city and typically her boss Rita Kronwall gave her a list of
Rita Kronwall gave her a list of
Rita Kronwall gave her a list of accounts and said Kathy called the bank
accounts and said Kathy called the bank
accounts and said Kathy called the bank and get these specific accounts and
and get these specific accounts and
and get these specific accounts and Kathy did her job but this particular
Kathy did her job but this particular
Kathy did her job but this particular day Rita was out of town and Kathy was
day Rita was out of town and Kathy was
day Rita was out of town and Kathy was busy she picks up the phone she calls
busy she picks up the phone she calls
busy she picks up the phone she calls the bank and says fax me all of the
the bank and says fax me all of the
the bank and says fax me all of the accounts and when she gets the fax she
accounts and when she gets the fax she
accounts and when she gets the fax she sees that there was an account to have
sees that there was an account to have
sees that there was an account to have some withdrawals and deposits in it that
some withdrawals and deposits in it that
some withdrawals and deposits in it that she did not know about it was an account
she did not know about it was an account
she did not know about it was an account controlled only by Rita so Kathy looked
controlled only by Rita so Kathy looked
controlled only by Rita so Kathy looked at the information she reported it to
at the information she reported it to
at the information she reported it to her direct supervisor which was then
her direct supervisor which was then
her direct supervisor which was then mayor Burke and this led into a huge
mayor Burke and this led into a huge
mayor Burke and this led into a huge investigation a six-month investigation
investigation a six-month investigation
investigation a six-month investigation come to find out Kathy’s boss Rita cron
come to find out Kathy’s boss Rita cron
come to find out Kathy’s boss Rita cron well was embezzling money Rita was
well was embezzling money Rita was
well was embezzling money Rita was embezzling fifty three million dollars
embezzling fifty three million dollars
embezzling fifty three million dollars over a 20-year period and Kathy just
over a 20-year period and Kathy just
over a 20-year period and Kathy just happened to stumble upon it Kathy is a
happened to stumble upon it Kathy is a
happened to stumble upon it Kathy is a hero and actually I had the opportunity
hero and actually I had the opportunity
hero and actually I had the opportunity of interviewing Kathy for my documentary
of interviewing Kathy for my documentary
of interviewing Kathy for my documentary all the Queen’s horses and Kathy wasn’t
all the Queen’s horses and Kathy wasn’t
all the Queen’s horses and Kathy wasn’t seeking fame in fact she really didn’t
seeking fame in fact she really didn’t
seeking fame in fact she really didn’t want to talk to me for a really long
want to talk to me for a really long
want to talk to me for a really long time but through strategic stalking she
time but through strategic stalking she
time but through strategic stalking she ended up doing the interview but she was
ended up doing the interview but she was
ended up doing the interview but she was seeking fairness not fame and if it
seeking fairness not fame and if it
seeking fairness not fame and if it wasn’t for Kathy
wasn’t for Kathy
wasn’t for Kathy who’s to say this fraud would have ever
who’s to say this fraud would have ever
who’s to say this fraud would have ever been discovered so remember that Forbes
been discovered so remember that Forbes
been discovered so remember that Forbes article I was talking about that I was
article I was talking about that I was
article I was talking about that I was working on before my lecture
working on before my lecture
working on before my lecture well I posted it and something really
well I posted it and something really
well I posted it and something really fantastic happened I started receiving
fantastic happened I started receiving
fantastic happened I started receiving emails from whistleblowers all over the
emails from whistleblowers all over the
emails from whistleblowers all over the world and as I was receiving these
world and as I was receiving these
world and as I was receiving these emails and responding back to them there
emails and responding back to them there
emails and responding back to them there was a common theme in the message that I
was a common theme in the message that I
was a common theme in the message that I received and this is what it was they
received and this is what it was they
received and this is what it was they all said this I blew the whistle people
all said this I blew the whistle people
all said this I blew the whistle people really hate me now I got fired but guess
really hate me now I got fired but guess
really hate me now I got fired but guess what I would do it all over again if I
what I would do it all over again if I
what I would do it all over again if I could and so as I kept reading this
could and so as I kept reading this
could and so as I kept reading this message these all of these messages I
message these all of these messages I
message these all of these messages I wanted to think what could I share with
wanted to think what could I share with
wanted to think what could I share with my students and so I pulled it all
my students and so I pulled it all
my students and so I pulled it all together and this is what I learned it’s
together and this is what I learned it’s
together and this is what I learned it’s important for us to cultivate hope
important for us to cultivate hope
important for us to cultivate hope whistleblowers are hopeful despite
whistleblowers are hopeful despite
whistleblowers are hopeful despite popular belief they’re not all
popular belief they’re not all
popular belief they’re not all disgruntled pool employees that have a
disgruntled pool employees that have a
disgruntled pool employees that have a beef with the company their hopefulness
beef with the company their hopefulness
beef with the company their hopefulness really is what drives them to come
really is what drives them to come
really is what drives them to come forward we also have to cultivate
forward we also have to cultivate
forward we also have to cultivate commitment whistleblowers are committed
commitment whistleblowers are committed
commitment whistleblowers are committed and it’s that passion to that
and it’s that passion to that
and it’s that passion to that organization that makes them want to
organization that makes them want to
organization that makes them want to come forward we also need to cultivate
come forward we also need to cultivate
come forward we also need to cultivate humility and the way that we live now
humility and the way that we live now
humility and the way that we live now completely on social media documenting
completely on social media documenting
completely on social media documenting every minute
every minute
every minute we actually need to cultivate humility
we actually need to cultivate humility
we actually need to cultivate humility whistleblowers are humble again they’re
whistleblowers are humble again they’re
whistleblowers are humble again they’re not seeking fame but they are seeking
not seeking fame but they are seeking
not seeking fame but they are seeking fairness and we need to continue to
fairness and we need to continue to
fairness and we need to continue to cultivate bravery whistleblowers are
cultivate bravery whistleblowers are
cultivate bravery whistleblowers are brave often they didn’t they
brave often they didn’t they
brave often they didn’t they underestimated the impact whistleblowing
underestimated the impact whistleblowing
underestimated the impact whistleblowing had on their family but what they
had on their family but what they
had on their family but what they continued to comment on is how hard it
continued to comment on is how hard it
continued to comment on is how hard it is to withhold the truth with that I
is to withhold the truth with that I
is to withhold the truth with that I want to leave you with one additional
want to leave you with one additional
want to leave you with one additional name Peter
name Peter
name Peter Buxton Peter Buxton was a 27 year old
Buxton Peter Buxton was a 27 year old
Buxton Peter Buxton was a 27 year old employee for the US Public Public Health
employee for the US Public Public Health
employee for the US Public Public Health Service and he was he was hired to
Service and he was he was hired to
Service and he was he was hired to interview people that had sexually
interview people that had sexually
interview people that had sexually transmitted diseases and through the
transmitted diseases and through the
transmitted diseases and through the course of his work he noticed a clinical
course of his work he noticed a clinical
course of his work he noticed a clinical study that was going on within the
study that was going on within the
study that was going on within the organization and it was a study that was
organization and it was a study that was
organization and it was a study that was looking at the progression of untreated
looking at the progression of untreated
looking at the progression of untreated syphilis and so there were 600 African
syphilis and so there were 600 African
syphilis and so there were 600 African American males that were in this study
American males that were in this study
American males that were in this study and they
and they
and they we didn’t know what was happening to
we didn’t know what was happening to
we didn’t know what was happening to them they were enticed into the study
them they were enticed into the study
them they were enticed into the study through being given free medical exams
through being given free medical exams
through being given free medical exams burial insurance and they just didn’t
burial insurance and they just didn’t
burial insurance and they just didn’t know what was happening and so what
know what was happening and so what
know what was happening and so what happened through the course of this
happened through the course of this
happened through the course of this study is penicillin was discovered to
study is penicillin was discovered to
study is penicillin was discovered to help treat syphilis and what Peter
help treat syphilis and what Peter
help treat syphilis and what Peter noticed was the participants in this
noticed was the participants in this
noticed was the participants in this study were not given the penicillin to
study were not given the penicillin to
study were not given the penicillin to treat their syphilis and the
treat their syphilis and the
treat their syphilis and the participants didn’t know so similar to
participants didn’t know so similar to
participants didn’t know so similar to Mary
Mary
Mary Peter tried to report and talked to his
Peter tried to report and talked to his
Peter tried to report and talked to his internal supervisors but no one listened
internal supervisors but no one listened
internal supervisors but no one listened and so Peter thought this was completely
and so Peter thought this was completely
and so Peter thought this was completely unfair and he tried to report again and
unfair and he tried to report again and
unfair and he tried to report again and finally talked to a reporter very
finally talked to a reporter very
finally talked to a reporter very similar to Mary and in 1972 this was a
similar to Mary and in 1972 this was a
similar to Mary and in 1972 this was a front page of the New York Times
front page of the New York Times
front page of the New York Times syphilis victims in us study went
syphilis victims in us study went
syphilis victims in us study went untreated for 40 years this is known to
untreated for 40 years this is known to
untreated for 40 years this is known to us today as a Tuskegee syphilis
us today as a Tuskegee syphilis
us today as a Tuskegee syphilis experiment and Peter was the
experiment and Peter was the
experiment and Peter was the whistleblower what happened to the 600
whistleblower what happened to the 600
whistleblower what happened to the 600 man you may wonder the 600 original men
man you may wonder the 600 original men
man you may wonder the 600 original men 28 men died from syphilis 100 died from
28 men died from syphilis 100 died from
28 men died from syphilis 100 died from syphilis complications 40 wives were
syphilis complications 40 wives were
syphilis complications 40 wives were infected and 10 children were born with
infected and 10 children were born with
infected and 10 children were born with congenital syphilis who’s to say what
congenital syphilis who’s to say what
congenital syphilis who’s to say what these numbers would be if it wasn’t for
these numbers would be if it wasn’t for
these numbers would be if it wasn’t for the brave courageous act of Peter we’re
the brave courageous act of Peter we’re
the brave courageous act of Peter we’re all connected to Peter actually if you
all connected to Peter actually if you
all connected to Peter actually if you know anybody that’s in a clinical trial
know anybody that’s in a clinical trial
know anybody that’s in a clinical trial the reason why we have informed consent
the reason why we have informed consent
the reason why we have informed consent today is because of Peters courageous
today is because of Peters courageous
today is because of Peters courageous act so let me ask you a question that
act so let me ask you a question that
act so let me ask you a question that original question a variation of the
original question a variation of the
original question a variation of the original question how many of us have
original question how many of us have
original question how many of us have ever used the term snitch rat tattletale
ever used the term snitch rat tattletale
ever used the term snitch rat tattletale snake weasel leak anybody before you get
snake weasel leak anybody before you get
snake weasel leak anybody before you get the urge to do that again I want you to
the urge to do that again I want you to
the urge to do that again I want you to think a little bit it might be the Mary
think a little bit it might be the Mary
think a little bit it might be the Mary the Peter the Kathy’s of the world you
the Peter the Kathy’s of the world you
the Peter the Kathy’s of the world you might be the person that could shape
might be the person that could shape
might be the person that could shape history or they could be the person that
history or they could be the person that
history or they could be the person that shapes yours thank you
shapes yours thank you
shapes yours thank you you
”
Be First to Comment