Press "Enter" to skip to content

Why and How We Should Engage in Intellectual Conversations | Leah Lam | TEDxMountainViewHighSchool


[Applause]

[Applause] what are we in last fall I went to San

what are we in last fall I went to San

what are we in last fall I went to San Francisco with a friend at the end of

Francisco with a friend at the end of

Francisco with a friend at the end of the day she turned to me instead Wow

the day she turned to me instead Wow

the day she turned to me instead Wow today has been just such a mentally

today has been just such a mentally

today has been just such a mentally engaging conversation I feel like I

engaging conversation I feel like I

engaging conversation I feel like I never talked like this with any of my

never talked like this with any of my

never talked like this with any of my other friends that day we didn’t talk

other friends that day we didn’t talk

other friends that day we didn’t talk about anything monumental no deep dark

about anything monumental no deep dark

about anything monumental no deep dark secrets were spilled we simply talked

secrets were spilled we simply talked

secrets were spilled we simply talked about life without the world around us

about life without the world around us

about life without the world around us we asked questions and more questions

we asked questions and more questions

we asked questions and more questions unrestricted by the norms that tend to

unrestricted by the norms that tend to

unrestricted by the norms that tend to dictate our social conversations our

dictate our social conversations our

dictate our social conversations our society has built a go-to box of

society has built a go-to box of

society has built a go-to box of conversation starters for small talk

conversation starters for small talk

conversation starters for small talk from the weather to our weekend plans we

from the weather to our weekend plans we

from the weather to our weekend plans we compartmentalize things and impress them

compartmentalize things and impress them

compartmentalize things and impress them off sure surface level questions

off sure surface level questions

off sure surface level questions establish compatibility the only genuine

establish compatibility the only genuine

establish compatibility the only genuine organic conversations can build trust

organic conversations can build trust

organic conversations can build trust too many times have I witnessed the

too many times have I witnessed the

too many times have I witnessed the ballin situation in class we have an

ballin situation in class we have an

ballin situation in class we have an intriguing riveting lively discussion

intriguing riveting lively discussion

intriguing riveting lively discussion people ask insightful questions and

people ask insightful questions and

people ask insightful questions and speak with passion and conviction and

speak with passion and conviction and

speak with passion and conviction and yet the moment we step out of class a

yet the moment we step out of class a

yet the moment we step out of class a switch flips and we revert to our

switch flips and we revert to our

switch flips and we revert to our everyday social jargon we are floated

everyday social jargon we are floated

everyday social jargon we are floated for our intellectual curiosity outside

for our intellectual curiosity outside

for our intellectual curiosity outside of the classroom our static calculated

of the classroom our static calculated

of the classroom our static calculated conversations consequently inhibit the

conversations consequently inhibit the

conversations consequently inhibit the growth of our personal relationships a

growth of our personal relationships a

growth of our personal relationships a study from the University of Missouri

study from the University of Missouri

study from the University of Missouri reports that we spend about 70 to 80

reports that we spend about 70 to 80

reports that we spend about 70 to 80 percent of our waking hours engaged in

percent of our waking hours engaged in

percent of our waking hours engaged in some form of communication where could

some form of communication where could

some form of communication where could that be reading writing speaking or

that be reading writing speaking or

that be reading writing speaking or listening so here you can see the

listening so here you can see the

listening so here you can see the communication by definition is

communication by definition is

communication by definition is reciprocal it’s a two-way street or at

reciprocal it’s a two-way street or at

reciprocal it’s a two-way street or at least it’s supposed to be and yet in the

least it’s supposed to be and yet in the

least it’s supposed to be and yet in the last decade America is seeing two

last decade America is seeing two

last decade America is seeing two interconnected problems as shown by the

interconnected problems as shown by the

interconnected problems as shown by the data from the Pew Research Center our

data from the Pew Research Center our

data from the Pew Research Center our society is becoming increasingly

society is becoming increasingly

society is becoming increasingly polarized as more and more Americans

polarized as more and more Americans

polarized as more and more Americans lean toward extreme ideologies and do

lean toward extreme ideologies and do

lean toward extreme ideologies and do not identify as moderates this polarity

not identify as moderates this polarity

not identify as moderates this polarity has created and divided in our political

has created and divided in our political

has created and divided in our political discourse in-person and online and it’s

discourse in-person and online and it’s

discourse in-person and online and it’s post

post

post into opposite corners of a wrestling

into opposite corners of a wrestling

into opposite corners of a wrestling match that never ends in light of such a

match that never ends in light of such a

match that never ends in light of such a contentious and divisive presidential

contentious and divisive presidential

contentious and divisive presidential election The Wall Street Journal

election The Wall Street Journal

election The Wall Street Journal published an online interactive graphic

published an online interactive graphic

published an online interactive graphic called blue feed red feet Facebook

called blue feed red feet Facebook

called blue feed red feet Facebook scientists scientists follow the

scientists scientists follow the

scientists scientists follow the activity of more than of millions of

activity of more than of millions of

activity of more than of millions of social media users and found that we

social media users and found that we

social media users and found that we almost exclusively like comment and

almost exclusively like comment and

almost exclusively like comment and share posts that align with our own

share posts that align with our own

share posts that align with our own political views this is not unexpected

political views this is not unexpected

political views this is not unexpected we like people that agree with us and

we like people that agree with us and

we like people that agree with us and the predictability of this research is

the predictability of this research is

the predictability of this research is the exact reason why changing our

the exact reason why changing our

the exact reason why changing our political discourse is necessary we

political discourse is necessary we

political discourse is necessary we cannot keep using social media or any

cannot keep using social media or any

cannot keep using social media or any public forum as a portal into a

public forum as a portal into a

public forum as a portal into a unilateral defection where ideas are

unilateral defection where ideas are

unilateral defection where ideas are simply bluer and around in a bubble so

simply bluer and around in a bubble so

simply bluer and around in a bubble so if we spend all of this time

if we spend all of this time

if we spend all of this time communicating why are they stuck in

communicating why are they stuck in

communicating why are they stuck in lackluster conversations why are we

lackluster conversations why are we

lackluster conversations why are we stuck in echo chambers understandably

stuck in echo chambers understandably

stuck in echo chambers understandably there is a natural sense of

there is a natural sense of

there is a natural sense of vulnerability and fragility that comes

vulnerability and fragility that comes

vulnerability and fragility that comes with any more personal or political

with any more personal or political

with any more personal or political conversation but perhaps one reason why

conversation but perhaps one reason why

conversation but perhaps one reason why we are hesitant to engage in

we are hesitant to engage in

we are hesitant to engage in intellectual conversations is the

intellectual conversations is the

intellectual conversations is the prevalence of censorship and a stigma of

prevalence of censorship and a stigma of

prevalence of censorship and a stigma of political correctness across our country

political correctness across our country

political correctness across our country there has been an ongoing heated debate

there has been an ongoing heated debate

there has been an ongoing heated debate about intellectual States faces trigger

about intellectual States faces trigger

about intellectual States faces trigger warnings and free speech and college

warnings and free speech and college

warnings and free speech and college campuses like the University of Chicago

campuses like the University of Chicago

campuses like the University of Chicago our own school community community

our own school community community

our own school community community recently made national news when the

recently made national news when the

recently made national news when the history teacher Frank Navarro was placed

history teacher Frank Navarro was placed

history teacher Frank Navarro was placed on administrative

on administrative

on administrative leave in the interest of the emotional

leave in the interest of the emotional

leave in the interest of the emotional safety of the students outrage social

safety of the students outrage social

safety of the students outrage social media statuses campus protests op-eds

media statuses campus protests op-eds

media statuses campus protests op-eds even our own school board meetings

even our own school board meetings

even our own school board meetings reveals an undeniable fracture in the

reveals an undeniable fracture in the

reveals an undeniable fracture in the web between administration faculty and

web between administration faculty and

web between administration faculty and students at many institutions nationwide

students at many institutions nationwide

students at many institutions nationwide so this dilemma begs another question

so this dilemma begs another question

so this dilemma begs another question how do we filter ideas and decide what

how do we filter ideas and decide what

how do we filter ideas and decide what is taboo or not how do we address

is taboo or not how do we address

is taboo or not how do we address intellectual diversity and academic

intellectual diversity and academic

intellectual diversity and academic freedom how do we define the parameters

freedom how do we define the parameters

freedom how do we define the parameters of our conversations if at all as

of our conversations if at all as

of our conversations if at all as individual speakers and thinkers it is

individual speakers and thinkers it is

individual speakers and thinkers it is important that we establish a balance

important that we establish a balance

important that we establish a balance between our personal advocacy and our

between our personal advocacy and our

between our personal advocacy and our respect for other perspectives and as

respect for other perspectives and as

respect for other perspectives and as listeners and a collective society we

listeners and a collective society we

listeners and a collective society we should refrain from stepping into the

should refrain from stepping into the

should refrain from stepping into the quicksand of political correctness and

quicksand of political correctness and

quicksand of political correctness and hyper sensitivity understanding and

hyper sensitivity understanding and

hyper sensitivity understanding and embracing this duality of intellectual

embracing this duality of intellectual

embracing this duality of intellectual communication is the catalyst for

communication is the catalyst for

communication is the catalyst for productive meaningful discourse and

productive meaningful discourse and

productive meaningful discourse and deeper mutual relationships in

deeper mutual relationships in

deeper mutual relationships in philosophy in illogical ISM is often

philosophy in illogical ISM is often

philosophy in illogical ISM is often considered synonymous to rationalism yet

considered synonymous to rationalism yet

considered synonymous to rationalism yet with the rhetoric that people employ

with the rhetoric that people employ

with the rhetoric that people employ today it is unrealistic to be is

today it is unrealistic to be is

today it is unrealistic to be is exclusively rational one way that we can

exclusively rational one way that we can

exclusively rational one way that we can incorporate emotion into our discourse

incorporate emotion into our discourse

incorporate emotion into our discourse is through empathy we are so lucky to

is through empathy we are so lucky to

is through empathy we are so lucky to live in a country where the fundamental

live in a country where the fundamental

live in a country where the fundamental laws like the First Amendment allow us

laws like the First Amendment allow us

laws like the First Amendment allow us to speak our minds and so we should take

to speak our minds and so we should take

to speak our minds and so we should take advantage of that without renouncing the

advantage of that without renouncing the

advantage of that without renouncing the rights of others so what does this look

rights of others so what does this look

rights of others so what does this look like I have a few steps toward reshaping

like I have a few steps toward reshaping

like I have a few steps toward reshaping our lens on both sides of intellectual

our lens on both sides of intellectual

our lens on both sides of intellectual communication the three e’s number one

communication the three e’s number one

communication the three e’s number one expose we need to ask questions get

expose we need to ask questions get

expose we need to ask questions get informed

informed

informed do our research visit websites authors

do our research visit websites authors

do our research visit websites authors and publications that we normally

and publications that we normally

and publications that we normally wouldn’t we can’t be afraid to put our

wouldn’t we can’t be afraid to put our

wouldn’t we can’t be afraid to put our ideas out there but when we do present

ideas out there but when we do present

ideas out there but when we do present them it is impaired

them it is impaired

them it is impaired that we do not begin with the other side

that we do not begin with the other side

that we do not begin with the other side is wrong and here’s why then what’s the

is wrong and here’s why then what’s the

is wrong and here’s why then what’s the point of even sharing by assuming that

point of even sharing by assuming that

point of even sharing by assuming that our idea or opinion is definitely

our idea or opinion is definitely

our idea or opinion is definitely superior or absolutely right we reject

superior or absolutely right we reject

superior or absolutely right we reject any prospect of collaborative open

any prospect of collaborative open

any prospect of collaborative open discussion and we inhibit actual

discussion and we inhibit actual

discussion and we inhibit actual progress and productivity number to

progress and productivity number to

progress and productivity number to engage in order to truly achieve our

engage in order to truly achieve our

engage in order to truly achieve our desired goals and objectives we need to

desired goals and objectives we need to

desired goals and objectives we need to engage and actually listen there’s a

engage and actually listen there’s a

engage and actually listen there’s a common phrase that goes something like

common phrase that goes something like

common phrase that goes something like listening is not just waiting for your

listening is not just waiting for your

listening is not just waiting for your turn to speak

turn to speak

turn to speak this completely rings true in any type

this completely rings true in any type

this completely rings true in any type of conversation social intellectual

of conversation social intellectual

of conversation social intellectual political engagement requires respect

political engagement requires respect

political engagement requires respect and when it comes to language there is a

and when it comes to language there is a

and when it comes to language there is a fine line between consciousness of

fine line between consciousness of

fine line between consciousness of vocabulary and nitpicking rhetoric for

vocabulary and nitpicking rhetoric for

vocabulary and nitpicking rhetoric for every possible offense shutting down

every possible offense shutting down

every possible offense shutting down scolding or slandering someone forum is

scolding or slandering someone forum is

scolding or slandering someone forum is speaking with the broad blanket

speaking with the broad blanket

speaking with the broad blanket reasoning of political correctness often

reasoning of political correctness often

reasoning of political correctness often implies a superiority complex rather we

implies a superiority complex rather we

implies a superiority complex rather we should ask for clarification and then

should ask for clarification and then

should ask for clarification and then transition into an open composed

transition into an open composed

transition into an open composed explanation of our viewpoints but there

explanation of our viewpoints but there

explanation of our viewpoints but there is also a fine line between feeling

is also a fine line between feeling

is also a fine line between feeling uncomfortable and unsafe which brings me

uncomfortable and unsafe which brings me

uncomfortable and unsafe which brings me to my final point and because honestly

to my final point and because honestly

to my final point and because honestly up until this past election I never

up until this past election I never

up until this past election I never fully understood sectionalism we have

fully understood sectionalism we have

fully understood sectionalism we have learned about it in history class but my

learned about it in history class but my

learned about it in history class but my naive mind was always lost at the idea

naive mind was always lost at the idea

naive mind was always lost at the idea that people would not want to be unified

that people would not want to be unified

that people would not want to be unified as what nation it was only until a

as what nation it was only until a

as what nation it was only until a recent spontaneous trip through rural

recent spontaneous trip through rural

recent spontaneous trip through rural California would I begin to witness how

California would I begin to witness how

California would I begin to witness how shockingly different the lifestyles and

shockingly different the lifestyles and

shockingly different the lifestyles and values are in each pocket of our nation

values are in each pocket of our nation

values are in each pocket of our nation and then I could empathize with other to

and then I could empathize with other to

and then I could empathize with other to his daily lives and see how that shapes

his daily lives and see how that shapes

his daily lives and see how that shapes their political views and social norms

their political views and social norms

their political views and social norms it was slightly uncomfortable but it was

it was slightly uncomfortable but it was

it was slightly uncomfortable but it was also I open it by empathizing

also I open it by empathizing

also I open it by empathizing others we can understand why certain

others we can understand why certain

others we can understand why certain words might make them feel unsafe where

words might make them feel unsafe where

words might make them feel unsafe where is the caring serious weight and tragic

is the caring serious weight and tragic

is the caring serious weight and tragic history to truly create an effective

history to truly create an effective

history to truly create an effective solution or to build a deeper

solution or to build a deeper

solution or to build a deeper relationship or to simply gain a greater

relationship or to simply gain a greater

relationship or to simply gain a greater understanding we have to put ourselves

understanding we have to put ourselves

understanding we have to put ourselves in other people’s positions I don’t have

in other people’s positions I don’t have

in other people’s positions I don’t have all of the answers toward healing the

all of the answers toward healing the

all of the answers toward healing the greater divide that separates our

greater divide that separates our

greater divide that separates our country our ideological differences are

country our ideological differences are

country our ideological differences are often intertwined along threads like

often intertwined along threads like

often intertwined along threads like race and socioeconomic and I acknowledge

race and socioeconomic and I acknowledge

race and socioeconomic and I acknowledge that this is not a perfect formula for

that this is not a perfect formula for

that this is not a perfect formula for revitalizing our relationships but I do

revitalizing our relationships but I do

revitalizing our relationships but I do know that the way we are going to reach

know that the way we are going to reach

know that the way we are going to reach progress depth and unity is through

progress depth and unity is through

progress depth and unity is through discourse even if we cannot or it is

discourse even if we cannot or it is

discourse even if we cannot or it is difficult to combat the

difficult to combat the

difficult to combat the institutionalized oppression and voices

institutionalized oppression and voices

institutionalized oppression and voices we can start with ourselves on the

we can start with ourselves on the

we can start with ourselves on the smaller scale of our everyday lives

smaller scale of our everyday lives

smaller scale of our everyday lives our eternal willingness to listen is a

our eternal willingness to listen is a

our eternal willingness to listen is a crucial stepping-stone in the right

crucial stepping-stone in the right

crucial stepping-stone in the right direction it is our responsibility as

direction it is our responsibility as

direction it is our responsibility as constructors of the future to boldly do’

constructors of the future to boldly do’

constructors of the future to boldly do’ to foster an environment the conduct

to foster an environment the conduct

to foster an environment the conduct ideas rather than influenza one of my

ideas rather than influenza one of my

ideas rather than influenza one of my favorite authors James Baldwin wrote in

favorite authors James Baldwin wrote in

favorite authors James Baldwin wrote in his book notes of a native son it is

his book notes of a native son it is

his book notes of a native son it is really quite impossible to be

really quite impossible to be

really quite impossible to be affirmative about anything one refused

affirmative about anything one refused

affirmative about anything one refused to question so I challenge you to

to question so I challenge you to

to question so I challenge you to question and to be genuinely open to

question and to be genuinely open to

question and to be genuinely open to hearing and answer thank you

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *