do you believe in science oh hey that was pretty affirmative I don’t think I
was pretty affirmative I don’t think I
was pretty affirmative I don’t think I got everybody though how about this the
got everybody though how about this the
got everybody though how about this the ones I missed do you believe in science
ones I missed do you believe in science
ones I missed do you believe in science okay now how about this have you entered
okay now how about this have you entered
okay now how about this have you entered into a personal relationship with
into a personal relationship with
into a personal relationship with empirical data
empirical data
empirical data okay good yes I’m we’re still nodding
okay good yes I’m we’re still nodding
okay good yes I’m we’re still nodding right so we’re like yes I know my data
right so we’re like yes I know my data
right so we’re like yes I know my data and my data knows me all right good okay
and my data knows me all right good okay
and my data knows me all right good okay now back to my original question let’s
now back to my original question let’s
now back to my original question let’s see everybody do you believe in science
see everybody do you believe in science
see everybody do you believe in science good okay well this question this
good okay well this question this
good okay well this question this question about whether or not we believe
question about whether or not we believe
question about whether or not we believe in science has become one of the most
in science has become one of the most
in science has become one of the most divisive topics of conversation today
divisive topics of conversation today
divisive topics of conversation today it’s causing horrible political divides
it’s causing horrible political divides
it’s causing horrible political divides devastating social divides and worse
devastating social divides and worse
devastating social divides and worse it’s causing divides and families and
it’s causing divides and families and
it’s causing divides and families and communities we in academia tend to point
communities we in academia tend to point
communities we in academia tend to point our fingers at others we call them anti
our fingers at others we call them anti
our fingers at others we call them anti intellectual voluntarily ignorant the
intellectual voluntarily ignorant the
intellectual voluntarily ignorant the enemies of evidence and then when they
enemies of evidence and then when they
enemies of evidence and then when they turn around and call us elitists we take
turn around and call us elitists we take
turn around and call us elitists we take it as a compliment not a compliment in
it as a compliment not a compliment in
it as a compliment not a compliment in 16 days April 22nd belief in science
16 days April 22nd belief in science
16 days April 22nd belief in science will take center stage as scientists and
will take center stage as scientists and
will take center stage as scientists and science enthusiasts across the nation
science enthusiasts across the nation
science enthusiasts across the nation march in a great Earth Day demonstration
march in a great Earth Day demonstration
march in a great Earth Day demonstration I’ll be there I’ve recruited an
I’ll be there I’ve recruited an
I’ll be there I’ve recruited an extroverted friend to sign me up for
extroverted friend to sign me up for
extroverted friend to sign me up for scooping potato salad I figure I can
scooping potato salad I figure I can
scooping potato salad I figure I can hide social anxiety behind starch and
hide social anxiety behind starch and
hide social anxiety behind starch and mayonnaise
mayonnaise
mayonnaise I’ll be there even though I don’t
I’ll be there even though I don’t
I’ll be there even though I don’t believe in science and even though I’m
believe in science and even though I’m
believe in science and even though I’m asking you not to believe in it either
asking you not to believe in it either
asking you not to believe in it either oh I know wrong crowd right we don’t
oh I know wrong crowd right we don’t
oh I know wrong crowd right we don’t worry it’ll be okay I will be there
worry it’ll be okay I will be there
worry it’ll be okay I will be there because I think that science literacy is
because I think that science literacy is
because I think that science literacy is a matter of life and death and I support
a matter of life and death and I support
a matter of life and death and I support anybody who wants to make that easier to
anybody who wants to make that easier to
anybody who wants to make that easier to attain I am he
attain I am he
attain I am he because science literacy needs to start
because science literacy needs to start
because science literacy needs to start here with us the science communicators
here with us the science communicators
here with us the science communicators we need to think about how we
we need to think about how we
we need to think about how we communicate before we go marching down
communicate before we go marching down
communicate before we go marching down Main Street and try to come up with
Main Street and try to come up with
Main Street and try to come up with witty chants that will win hearts and
witty chants that will win hearts and
witty chants that will win hearts and minds I don’t think we’ve been doing a
minds I don’t think we’ve been doing a
minds I don’t think we’ve been doing a very good job of winning hearts and
very good job of winning hearts and
very good job of winning hearts and minds lately in fact the opposite I
minds lately in fact the opposite I
minds lately in fact the opposite I think we’ve been losing hearts and minds
think we’ve been losing hearts and minds
think we’ve been losing hearts and minds it happened pretty big ly in November
it happened pretty big ly in November
it happened pretty big ly in November during the 2016 Democratic National
during the 2016 Democratic National
during the 2016 Democratic National Convention I believe in science became a
Convention I believe in science became a
Convention I believe in science became a major rallying cry speaking on her
major rallying cry speaking on her
major rallying cry speaking on her commitment to fight global warming
commitment to fight global warming
commitment to fight global warming Hillary Clinton declared I believe in
Hillary Clinton declared I believe in
Hillary Clinton declared I believe in science an echo of what former Maryland
science an echo of what former Maryland
science an echo of what former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley had said about
Governor Martin O’Malley had said about
Governor Martin O’Malley had said about her in his speech Hillary Clinton like
her in his speech Hillary Clinton like
her in his speech Hillary Clinton like you and me believes in science it was
you and me believes in science it was
you and me believes in science it was O’Malley in fact who said that Donald
O’Malley in fact who said that Donald
O’Malley in fact who said that Donald Trump doesn’t believe in the science
Trump doesn’t believe in the science
Trump doesn’t believe in the science well to his credit Donald Trump had
well to his credit Donald Trump had
well to his credit Donald Trump had never said that he didn’t believe in
never said that he didn’t believe in
never said that he didn’t believe in science in a conversation with a
science in a conversation with a
science in a conversation with a Washington Post’s Fred Hiatt he had said
Washington Post’s Fred Hiatt he had said
Washington Post’s Fred Hiatt he had said a nota great believer in manmade climate
a nota great believer in manmade climate
a nota great believer in manmade climate change and he’d even gone as far as to
change and he’d even gone as far as to
change and he’d even gone as far as to say that global warming was a hoax
say that global warming was a hoax
say that global warming was a hoax perpetuated by China these claims were
perpetuated by China these claims were
perpetuated by China these claims were mislead possibly mendacious to be sure
mislead possibly mendacious to be sure
mislead possibly mendacious to be sure but what made them particularly
but what made them particularly
but what made them particularly troubling is that they were just
troubling is that they were just
troubling is that they were just borrowing language that the Democrats
borrowing language that the Democrats
borrowing language that the Democrats were already using to talk about science
were already using to talk about science
were already using to talk about science the language of belief which allows us
the language of belief which allows us
the language of belief which allows us to ignore that science is a social
to ignore that science is a social
to ignore that science is a social process of testing ideas interpreting
process of testing ideas interpreting
process of testing ideas interpreting data and then coming up with new ideas
data and then coming up with new ideas
data and then coming up with new ideas to test not this this thing this entity
to test not this this thing this entity
to test not this this thing this entity that tells us what to think and how to
that tells us what to think and how to
that tells us what to think and how to behave because we all know how much the
behave because we all know how much the
behave because we all know how much the human species likes to be told what to
human species likes to be told what to
human species likes to be told what to think and how to behave the language of
think and how to behave the language of
think and how to behave the language of belief suggests that evidence based
belief suggests that evidence based
belief suggests that evidence based conclusions are matters of faith
conclusions are matters of faith
conclusions are matters of faith essentially it turns science into a god
essentially it turns science into a god
essentially it turns science into a god and don’t get me wrong
and don’t get me wrong
and don’t get me wrong science is usually benevolent
science is usually benevolent
science is usually benevolent offering advice that even I and my
offering advice that even I and my
offering advice that even I and my colleagues and the humanities can get
colleagues and the humanities can get
colleagues and the humanities can get behind as in elite Daily’s science says
behind as in elite Daily’s science says
behind as in elite Daily’s science says reading books may actually make you live
reading books may actually make you live
reading books may actually make you live longer but the problem is that lately
longer but the problem is that lately
longer but the problem is that lately science has come to dictate things about
science has come to dictate things about
science has come to dictate things about our private sacred spaces spaces which
our private sacred spaces spaces which
our private sacred spaces spaces which need to be known intuitively as well as
need to be known intuitively as well as
need to be known intuitively as well as cognitively spaces that have
cognitively spaces that have
cognitively spaces that have traditionally been the domain of
traditionally been the domain of
traditionally been the domain of religion science has come to dictate
religion science has come to dictate
religion science has come to dictate everything from how children should be
everything from how children should be
everything from how children should be raised as in NPR’s how to raise
raised as in NPR’s how to raise
raised as in NPR’s how to raise brilliant children according to science
brilliant children according to science
brilliant children according to science to how much sex an individual should
to how much sex an individual should
to how much sex an individual should have as in medical expresses why science
have as in medical expresses why science
have as in medical expresses why science says you should have more sex it is even
says you should have more sex it is even
says you should have more sex it is even claimed to determine matters of love and
claimed to determine matters of love and
claimed to determine matters of love and eternity as in the Atlantic’s there’s no
eternity as in the Atlantic’s there’s no
eternity as in the Atlantic’s there’s no such thing as everlasting love according
such thing as everlasting love according
such thing as everlasting love according to science well that’s inspiring we
to science well that’s inspiring we
to science well that’s inspiring we might think that this is harmless
might think that this is harmless
might think that this is harmless rhetorical flair clickbait right but the
rhetorical flair clickbait right but the
rhetorical flair clickbait right but the problem is that when we turn science
problem is that when we turn science
problem is that when we turn science into a god science is going to encounter
into a god science is going to encounter
into a god science is going to encounter the same challenge faced by any deity
the same challenge faced by any deity
the same challenge faced by any deity why do you do when people stop believing
why do you do when people stop believing
why do you do when people stop believing but you can’t choose not to believe in
but you can’t choose not to believe in
but you can’t choose not to believe in science we say science is factual and
science we say science is factual and
science we say science is factual and evidence-based no actually that’s where
evidence-based no actually that’s where
evidence-based no actually that’s where we’ve been wrong and this I think is
we’ve been wrong and this I think is
we’ve been wrong and this I think is where our conversation is breaking down
where our conversation is breaking down
where our conversation is breaking down science here is personification it gives
science here is personification it gives
science here is personification it gives a name a voice and an intelligence to
a name a voice and an intelligence to
a name a voice and an intelligence to data or to the natural forces governing
data or to the natural forces governing
data or to the natural forces governing those data but actually data doesn’t
those data but actually data doesn’t
those data but actually data doesn’t speak it can’t interpret itself it
speak it can’t interpret itself it
speak it can’t interpret itself it requires people researchers
requires people researchers
requires people researchers communicators to interpret it and so
communicators to interpret it and so
communicators to interpret it and so when you say science says actually you
when you say science says actually you
when you say science says actually you probably mean that a researcher has
probably mean that a researcher has
probably mean that a researcher has interpreted his or her data to mean
interpreted his or her data to mean
interpreted his or her data to mean whatever it is you’re about to tell me
whatever it is you’re about to tell me
whatever it is you’re about to tell me and that a peer review board has
and that a peer review board has
and that a peer review board has accepted that conclude
accepted that conclude
accepted that conclude as plausible so when we personify
as plausible so when we personify
as plausible so when we personify science then we’re allowed to forget
science then we’re allowed to forget
science then we’re allowed to forget that actually we’re talking about human
that actually we’re talking about human
that actually we’re talking about human beings here men and women who are
beings here men and women who are
beings here men and women who are involved in rich vibrant conversations
involved in rich vibrant conversations
involved in rich vibrant conversations and we’re allowed to imagine instead
and we’re allowed to imagine instead
and we’re allowed to imagine instead that this great ethereal entity has
that this great ethereal entity has
that this great ethereal entity has spoken from the realm of natural law to
spoken from the realm of natural law to
spoken from the realm of natural law to tell us things like cockroach milk is
tell us things like cockroach milk is
tell us things like cockroach milk is the next superfood or that the secret to
the next superfood or that the secret to
the next superfood or that the secret to a happy marriage is drinking together or
a happy marriage is drinking together or
a happy marriage is drinking together or that liberals not conservatives are
that liberals not conservatives are
that liberals not conservatives are psychotic or that a childhood vaccine
psychotic or that a childhood vaccine
psychotic or that a childhood vaccine has been linked to autism okay but look
has been linked to autism okay but look
has been linked to autism okay but look I’m not here to metaphor shame anybody
I’m not here to metaphor shame anybody
I’m not here to metaphor shame anybody we need metaphor in order to communicate
we need metaphor in order to communicate
we need metaphor in order to communicate science from time to time researchers
science from time to time researchers
science from time to time researchers will have a need for language that
will have a need for language that
will have a need for language that signifies things that are too vast or
signifies things that are too vast or
signifies things that are too vast or too complex to be expressed fully Albert
too complex to be expressed fully Albert
too complex to be expressed fully Albert Einstein called that experience and
Einstein called that experience and
Einstein called that experience and encounter with the mysterious he said
encounter with the mysterious he said
encounter with the mysterious he said the most beautiful experience we can
the most beautiful experience we can
the most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious and that he was
have is the mysterious and that he was
have is the mysterious and that he was satisfied with the humble attempt to
satisfied with the humble attempt to
satisfied with the humble attempt to understand even a tiny portion of the
understand even a tiny portion of the
understand even a tiny portion of the reason that manifests itself in nature
reason that manifests itself in nature
reason that manifests itself in nature because scientific inquiry takes for
because scientific inquiry takes for
because scientific inquiry takes for granted that the universe and its
granted that the universe and its
granted that the universe and its processes are intelligible interaction
processes are intelligible interaction
processes are intelligible interaction with mysterious feels like interaction
with mysterious feels like interaction
with mysterious feels like interaction with an intelligent entity so it’s
with an intelligent entity so it’s
with an intelligent entity so it’s natural for us to personify that entity
natural for us to personify that entity
natural for us to personify that entity and to give it names like science or as
and to give it names like science or as
and to give it names like science or as Einstein has done in his essay nature so
Einstein has done in his essay nature so
Einstein has done in his essay nature so this science says problem is mostly a
this science says problem is mostly a
this science says problem is mostly a problem for popular journalism memes and
problem for popular journalism memes and
problem for popular journalism memes and phrases tossed around in conversation or
phrases tossed around in conversation or
phrases tossed around in conversation or on bumper stickers most scientists are
on bumper stickers most scientists are
on bumper stickers most scientists are not going to use science says or
not going to use science says or
not going to use science says or according to science in scholarly
according to science in scholarly
according to science in scholarly articles I think that’s because
articles I think that’s because
articles I think that’s because researchers are keenly aware of their
researchers are keenly aware of their
researchers are keenly aware of their place within a sometimes contentious
place within a sometimes contentious
place within a sometimes contentious conversation and there’s also this
conversation and there’s also this
conversation and there’s also this lovely thing called impostor syndrome
lovely thing called impostor syndrome
lovely thing called impostor syndrome scientists will however personify
scientists will however personify
scientists will however personify nature all the dang time think about it
nature all the dang time think about it
nature all the dang time think about it think about this phrase natural
think about this phrase natural
think about this phrase natural selection
selection
selection what is selection but the act of
what is selection but the act of
what is selection but the act of carefully choosing someone or something
carefully choosing someone or something
carefully choosing someone or something over another that’s a human act in order
over another that’s a human act in order
over another that’s a human act in order to select something I need to have some
to select something I need to have some
to select something I need to have some intelligence and free will and yes
intelligence and free will and yes
intelligence and free will and yes evolutionary biologists have given the
evolutionary biologists have given the
evolutionary biologists have given the phrase natural selection a new
phrase natural selection a new
phrase natural selection a new definition that includes things like
definition that includes things like
definition that includes things like environmental and genetic influences and
environmental and genetic influences and
environmental and genetic influences and something about the thriving of
something about the thriving of
something about the thriving of organisms but that doesn’t change the
organisms but that doesn’t change the
organisms but that doesn’t change the fact that this phrase is and has always
fact that this phrase is and has always
fact that this phrase is and has always been personification not convinced all
been personification not convinced all
been personification not convinced all right how about this in February of 2016
right how about this in February of 2016
right how about this in February of 2016 the open access Medical Journal plus-1
the open access Medical Journal plus-1
the open access Medical Journal plus-1 published an article by a team of
published an article by a team of
published an article by a team of Italian researchers led by Simona
Italian researchers led by Simona
Italian researchers led by Simona giardini called on nature’s strategy for
giardini called on nature’s strategy for
giardini called on nature’s strategy for assigning genetic code multiplicity in
assigning genetic code multiplicity in
assigning genetic code multiplicity in this article the author’s personify
this article the author’s personify
this article the author’s personify nature as an intelligent agent that
nature as an intelligent agent that
nature as an intelligent agent that strategizes makes decisions and even
strategizes makes decisions and even
strategizes makes decisions and even leaves hidden messages for the
leaves hidden messages for the
leaves hidden messages for the researchers to interpret the researchers
researchers to interpret the researchers
researchers to interpret the researchers said that their purpose was to find the
said that their purpose was to find the
said that their purpose was to find the origins of standard genetic code biased
origins of standard genetic code biased
origins of standard genetic code biased code on assignment for incorporating all
code on assignment for incorporating all
code on assignment for incorporating all the amino acids that have survived
the amino acids that have survived
the amino acids that have survived nature’s selection notice by the way the
nature’s selection notice by the way the
nature’s selection notice by the way the capital letter indicating the proper
capital letter indicating the proper
capital letter indicating the proper noun alright I am I’m not going to ask
noun alright I am I’m not going to ask
noun alright I am I’m not going to ask you not to believe in nature I don’t
you not to believe in nature I don’t
you not to believe in nature I don’t think that nature is as dangerous as
think that nature is as dangerous as
think that nature is as dangerous as science because it doesn’t give the
science because it doesn’t give the
science because it doesn’t give the impression that the claims of a single
impression that the claims of a single
impression that the claims of a single researcher or research team are somehow
researcher or research team are somehow
researcher or research team are somehow the words of them an omniscient deity
the words of them an omniscient deity
the words of them an omniscient deity but I will ask you to consider that when
but I will ask you to consider that when
but I will ask you to consider that when you reference nature you are actually
you reference nature you are actually
you reference nature you are actually gesturing towards something supernatural
gesturing towards something supernatural
gesturing towards something supernatural nature is the physical force regarded as
nature is the physical force regarded as
nature is the physical force regarded as causing and regulating the phenomena of
causing and regulating the phenomena of
causing and regulating the phenomena of the world if we follow that through the
the world if we follow that through the
the world if we follow that through the nature must have existed before the
nature must have existed before the
nature must have existed before the phenomena of the world in order to cause
phenomena of the world in order to cause
phenomena of the world in order to cause it and it
it and it
it and it exist beyond the phenomena of the world
exist beyond the phenomena of the world
exist beyond the phenomena of the world in order to regulate it so therefore it
in order to regulate it so therefore it
in order to regulate it so therefore it is supernatural okay so maybe I should
is supernatural okay so maybe I should
is supernatural okay so maybe I should ask you do you believe in nature oh now
ask you do you believe in nature oh now
ask you do you believe in nature oh now we start to get into a bit of a tangle
we start to get into a bit of a tangle
we start to get into a bit of a tangle don’twe right because although I’ve
don’twe right because although I’ve
don’twe right because although I’ve asked you not to talk about science like
asked you not to talk about science like
asked you not to talk about science like it’s a god but nature for centuries
it’s a god but nature for centuries
it’s a god but nature for centuries we’ve toyed with the idea of nature as
we’ve toyed with the idea of nature as
we’ve toyed with the idea of nature as divinity we can call that pantheism 17th
divinity we can call that pantheism 17th
divinity we can call that pantheism 17th century philosopher Baruch Spinoza was a
century philosopher Baruch Spinoza was a
century philosopher Baruch Spinoza was a major proponent of this idea and
major proponent of this idea and
major proponent of this idea and Einstein was a fan of Spinoza
Einstein was a fan of Spinoza
Einstein was a fan of Spinoza so yeah when you’re referencing nature
so yeah when you’re referencing nature
so yeah when you’re referencing nature you are actually gesturing towards
you are actually gesturing towards
you are actually gesturing towards something supernatural and some
something supernatural and some
something supernatural and some philosophies you’re gesturing toward a
philosophies you’re gesturing toward a
philosophies you’re gesturing toward a kind of divinity okay but what if we say
kind of divinity okay but what if we say
kind of divinity okay but what if we say it in another language what if we say it
it in another language what if we say it
it in another language what if we say it in Chinese what if instead of nature we
in Chinese what if instead of nature we
in Chinese what if instead of nature we say Jew and what if when we translate
say Jew and what if when we translate
say Jew and what if when we translate Jew back into English it becomes creator
Jew back into English it becomes creator
Jew back into English it becomes creator oh no absolutely not whack job
oh no absolutely not whack job
oh no absolutely not whack job humanities professor on the stage who
humanities professor on the stage who
humanities professor on the stage who let her in here no no there with me on
let her in here no no there with me on
let her in here no no there with me on this please because last year something
this please because last year something
this please because last year something happens that I’m afraid is going to rock
happens that I’m afraid is going to rock
happens that I’m afraid is going to rock the relationship between science
the relationship between science
the relationship between science communicators and their audience for a
communicators and their audience for a
communicators and their audience for a long time if we don’t decide here
long time if we don’t decide here
long time if we don’t decide here together today that we reject this event
together today that we reject this event
together today that we reject this event and its outcome one month before the
and its outcome one month before the
and its outcome one month before the publication of on nature strategy plus
publication of on nature strategy plus
publication of on nature strategy plus one published an article by team of
one published an article by team of
one published an article by team of researchers led by Ming Jin lu of
researchers led by Ming Jin lu of
researchers led by Ming Jin lu of china’s was on university of science and
china’s was on university of science and
china’s was on university of science and technology it was just a small study
technology it was just a small study
technology it was just a small study about the link between the hand
about the link between the hand
about the link between the hand structure and its function for two
structure and its function for two
structure and its function for two months nothing happened then in early
months nothing happened then in early
months nothing happened then in early March the paper started to go viral plus
March the paper started to go viral plus
March the paper started to go viral plus one began receiving complaints about
one began receiving complaints about
one began receiving complaints about language in the article the complaints
language in the article the complaints
language in the article the complaints focused
focused
focused three separate sentences which were
three separate sentences which were
three separate sentences which were scattered throughout the 16 page report
scattered throughout the 16 page report
scattered throughout the 16 page report each of which made reference to a
each of which made reference to a
each of which made reference to a creator the term appeared in the papers
creator the term appeared in the papers
creator the term appeared in the papers abstract introduction and conclusion and
abstract introduction and conclusion and
abstract introduction and conclusion and it was used similarly each time the
it was used similarly each time the
it was used similarly each time the author’s felt that their study indicated
author’s felt that their study indicated
author’s felt that their study indicated that the hands mechanical architecture
that the hands mechanical architecture
that the hands mechanical architecture is the proper design by the creator for
is the proper design by the creator for
is the proper design by the creator for dexterous performance okay so the first
dexterous performance okay so the first
dexterous performance okay so the first comment was posted to the article on
comment was posted to the article on
comment was posted to the article on plus-ones website on the 2nd of March by
plus-ones website on the 2nd of March by
plus-ones website on the 2nd of March by a reader who identified himself as dr.
a reader who identified himself as dr.
a reader who identified himself as dr. Lynn H Snyder cell biologists turned
Lynn H Snyder cell biologists turned
Lynn H Snyder cell biologists turned science journalist should I – wrote that
science journalist should I – wrote that
science journalist should I – wrote that even if you should not be able to
even if you should not be able to
even if you should not be able to convince the authors editors and fear of
convince the authors editors and fear of
convince the authors editors and fear of yours of the study of the non-existence
yours of the study of the non-existence
yours of the study of the non-existence of a divine creator he wish that they
of a divine creator he wish that they
of a divine creator he wish that they would consider that humans occasionally
would consider that humans occasionally
would consider that humans occasionally use their hand as a tool of masturbation
use their hand as a tool of masturbation
use their hand as a tool of masturbation one of a multitude of daily tasks
one of a multitude of daily tasks
one of a multitude of daily tasks performed in a comfortable way
performed in a comfortable way
performed in a comfortable way masturbation is a sinful activity
masturbation is a sinful activity
masturbation is a sinful activity according to most religions thus the
according to most religions thus the
according to most religions thus the hands must not have been to Baia created
hands must not have been to Baia created
hands must not have been to Baia created by a divine creator but in fact possibly
by a divine creator but in fact possibly
by a divine creator but in fact possibly by the devil himself to lead the
by the devil himself to lead the
by the devil himself to lead the humanity and other eights into
humanity and other eights into
humanity and other eights into temptation yeah within seventy was
temptation yeah within seventy was
temptation yeah within seventy was intuitive within a few hours about 70
intuitive within a few hours about 70
intuitive within a few hours about 70 comments had been posted to the article
comments had been posted to the article
comments had been posted to the article most of which were nasty disparaging
most of which were nasty disparaging
most of which were nasty disparaging insulting and downright rude yes folks
insulting and downright rude yes folks
insulting and downright rude yes folks trolls wear lab coats to the controversy
trolls wear lab coats to the controversy
trolls wear lab coats to the controversy spread to sew it to social media with
spread to sew it to social media with
spread to sew it to social media with the creation of two new hashtags hashtag
the creation of two new hashtags hashtag
the creation of two new hashtags hashtag creator gate and hashtag hand of God Lou
creator gate and hashtag hand of God Lou
creator gate and hashtag hand of God Lou try to explain that the word in his head
try to explain that the word in his head
try to explain that the word in his head was actually Jo which can be translated
was actually Jo which can be translated
was actually Jo which can be translated as either nature or creator but by the
as either nature or creator but by the
as either nature or creator but by the fourth of March two days after the first
fourth of March two days after the first
fourth of March two days after the first complaints had been posted online +1 had
complaints had been posted online +1 had
complaints had been posted online +1 had received such a barrage of criticisms
received such a barrage of criticisms
received such a barrage of criticisms that the journal issued a retraction of
that the journal issued a retraction of
that the journal issued a retraction of the article this was a problem this was
the article this was a problem this was
the article this was a problem this was a bad thing
a bad thing
a bad thing because it was a double standard because
because it was a double standard because
because it was a double standard because although it’s true that science can’t
although it’s true that science can’t
although it’s true that science can’t prove the existence of a divine
prove the existence of a divine
prove the existence of a divine intelligent creator it’s also true that
intelligent creator it’s also true that
intelligent creator it’s also true that science can’t prove the existence of an
science can’t prove the existence of an
science can’t prove the existence of an intelligent nature but nobody bats an
intelligent nature but nobody bats an
intelligent nature but nobody bats an eye at the use of the term nature and
eye at the use of the term nature and
eye at the use of the term nature and scientific discourse and that’s
scientific discourse and that’s
scientific discourse and that’s hypocritical and frankly I’m afraid that
hypocritical and frankly I’m afraid that
hypocritical and frankly I’m afraid that if we allow this one perspective to
if we allow this one perspective to
if we allow this one perspective to dominate the conversation then it’s that
dominate the conversation then it’s that
dominate the conversation then it’s that kind of hypocrisy which is going to
kind of hypocrisy which is going to
kind of hypocrisy which is going to further isolate us from our audience who
further isolate us from our audience who
further isolate us from our audience who overwhelmingly and increasingly do
overwhelmingly and increasingly do
overwhelmingly and increasingly do believe in a divine intelligent creator
believe in a divine intelligent creator
believe in a divine intelligent creator you may have heard that religious nuns
you may have heard that religious nuns
you may have heard that religious nuns that is people who are not affiliated
that is people who are not affiliated
that is people who are not affiliated with any particular religion are on the
with any particular religion are on the
with any particular religion are on the rise in America but you may be surprised
rise in America but you may be surprised
rise in America but you may be surprised to hear that they are on the decline
to hear that they are on the decline
to hear that they are on the decline globally by 2050 religious nuns are
globally by 2050 religious nuns are
globally by 2050 religious nuns are expected to decline from 16% of the
expected to decline from 16% of the
expected to decline from 16% of the population to 13% of the world’s
population to 13% of the world’s
population to 13% of the world’s population and even then religious nuns
population and even then religious nuns
population and even then religious nuns does not mean atheists in fact a Pew
does not mean atheists in fact a Pew
does not mean atheists in fact a Pew study of religious nuns in America found
study of religious nuns in America found
study of religious nuns in America found that over two-thirds of religious nuns
that over two-thirds of religious nuns
that over two-thirds of religious nuns said that they believe in God
said that they believe in God
said that they believe in God more than half said that they feel a
more than half said that they feel a
more than half said that they feel a deep connection to nature and the earth
deep connection to nature and the earth
deep connection to nature and the earth more than 1/3 classified themselves as
more than 1/3 classified themselves as
more than 1/3 classified themselves as spiritual though not religious and one
spiritual though not religious and one
spiritual though not religious and one in five said that they pray every day so
in five said that they pray every day so
in five said that they pray every day so yeah our audience and yes even the
yeah our audience and yes even the
yeah our audience and yes even the majority of scientists are willing to
majority of scientists are willing to
majority of scientists are willing to accept that a divine intelligence might
accept that a divine intelligence might
accept that a divine intelligence might be a possibility and yet here we are
be a possibility and yet here we are
be a possibility and yet here we are publicly mocking references to God in
publicly mocking references to God in
publicly mocking references to God in scientific articles well in the same
scientific articles well in the same
scientific articles well in the same breath we’ll talk about science like
breath we’ll talk about science like
breath we’ll talk about science like it’s a god we call our critics and high
it’s a god we call our critics and high
it’s a god we call our critics and high intellectual are we being anti intuitive
intellectual are we being anti intuitive
intellectual are we being anti intuitive anti empathetic astrophysicist Neil
anti empathetic astrophysicist Neil
anti empathetic astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson once observed that a
deGrasse Tyson once observed that a
deGrasse Tyson once observed that a careful reading of older texts shows
careful reading of older texts shows
careful reading of older texts shows that authors invoke divinity only when
that authors invoke divinity only when
that authors invoke divinity only when they reach the boundaries of their
they reach the boundaries of their
they reach the boundaries of their understanding they appeal to a higher
understanding they appeal to a higher
understanding they appeal to a higher power
power
power only when staring into the ocean of the
only when staring into the ocean of the
only when staring into the ocean of the ignorance that’s true but what Tyson
ignorance that’s true but what Tyson
ignorance that’s true but what Tyson overlooks is that every researcher will
overlooks is that every researcher will
overlooks is that every researcher will have to encounter the ocean of their own
have to encounter the ocean of their own
have to encounter the ocean of their own ignorance and it’s the experience of
ignorance and it’s the experience of
ignorance and it’s the experience of that limitation the experience of the
that limitation the experience of the
that limitation the experience of the mysterious which sustains the curiosity
mysterious which sustains the curiosity
mysterious which sustains the curiosity that leads to scientific progress Ming
that leads to scientific progress Ming
that leads to scientific progress Ming Jin lu encountered it when contemplating
Jin lu encountered it when contemplating
Jin lu encountered it when contemplating the perfection of the hands design
the perfection of the hands design
the perfection of the hands design simona Gherardini encountered it when
simona Gherardini encountered it when
simona Gherardini encountered it when contemplating the mystery of genetic
contemplating the mystery of genetic
contemplating the mystery of genetic code redundancy to suggest in fact that
code redundancy to suggest in fact that
code redundancy to suggest in fact that there will one day no longer be a need
there will one day no longer be a need
there will one day no longer be a need to reference the mysterious imposes more
to reference the mysterious imposes more
to reference the mysterious imposes more limits on the future of scientific
limits on the future of scientific
limits on the future of scientific inquiry than does a personification of
inquiry than does a personification of
inquiry than does a personification of that mysterious it suggests that there
that mysterious it suggests that there
that mysterious it suggests that there will be no need for scientist or
will be no need for scientist or
will be no need for scientist or scientific investigation because
scientific investigation because
scientific investigation because everything in the universe will be known
everything in the universe will be known
everything in the universe will be known and that fullness of knowledge will be
and that fullness of knowledge will be
and that fullness of knowledge will be conceived in the mind of each individual
conceived in the mind of each individual
conceived in the mind of each individual that’s not going to happen and so I’m
that’s not going to happen and so I’m
that’s not going to happen and so I’m here asking you to give up your belief
here asking you to give up your belief
here asking you to give up your belief in science because I don’t think that
in science because I don’t think that
in science because I don’t think that science is a very good name for the
science is a very good name for the
science is a very good name for the mysterious science is what we do it’s
mysterious science is what we do it’s
mysterious science is what we do it’s how we interact with the mysterious we
how we interact with the mysterious we
how we interact with the mysterious we can’t let that be forgotten but on the
can’t let that be forgotten but on the
can’t let that be forgotten but on the same hand we also have to accept that
same hand we also have to accept that
same hand we also have to accept that references to divinity are not only
references to divinity are not only
references to divinity are not only normal in scientific discourse sometimes
normal in scientific discourse sometimes
normal in scientific discourse sometimes they’re necessary scientism the belief
they’re necessary scientism the belief
they’re necessary scientism the belief in the supremacy of the scientific
in the supremacy of the scientific
in the supremacy of the scientific method and the rejection of all beliefs
method and the rejection of all beliefs
method and the rejection of all beliefs that cannot be proven empirically is an
that cannot be proven empirically is an
that cannot be proven empirically is an idea that should be debated in
idea that should be debated in
idea that should be debated in philosophical discourse not
philosophical discourse not
philosophical discourse not indiscriminately acted upon within the
indiscriminately acted upon within the
indiscriminately acted upon within the pages of the scientific article we have
pages of the scientific article we have
pages of the scientific article we have to stop presenting science as a deity
to stop presenting science as a deity
to stop presenting science as a deity that wants to dethrone the God of our
that wants to dethrone the God of our
that wants to dethrone the God of our audiences faith we need to invite all
audiences faith we need to invite all
audiences faith we need to invite all faiths into scientific communication we
faiths into scientific communication we
faiths into scientific communication we need to show that science is non
need to show that science is non
need to show that science is non partisan and nondenominational we need
partisan and nondenominational we need
partisan and nondenominational we need to invite everyone to talk about and
to invite everyone to talk about and
to invite everyone to talk about and embrace the mysterious it is after all
embrace the mysterious it is after all
embrace the mysterious it is after all the most beautiful experience we can
the most beautiful experience we can
the most beautiful experience we can have thank you
have thank you
have thank you you
”
Be First to Comment