Press "Enter" to skip to content

What Makes a Fact? | Justin Lewis-Weber | TEDxBaylorSchool


it seems basic right we all know

it seems basic right we all know fact is fact vaccines don’t cause autism

fact is fact vaccines don’t cause autism

fact is fact vaccines don’t cause autism fact human-caused climate change is

fact human-caused climate change is

fact human-caused climate change is wreaking havoc on the earth fact the

wreaking havoc on the earth fact the

wreaking havoc on the earth fact the earth is a sphere that orbits the Sun

earth is a sphere that orbits the Sun

earth is a sphere that orbits the Sun facts are things were sure about but

facts are things were sure about but

facts are things were sure about but what do you think what do you do when

what do you think what do you do when

what do you think what do you do when you seem to have a difference in facts

you seem to have a difference in facts

you seem to have a difference in facts like in the above video perhaps you

like in the above video perhaps you

like in the above video perhaps you might think that there’s a difference in

might think that there’s a difference in

might think that there’s a difference in knowledge a difference in data you and

knowledge a difference in data you and

knowledge a difference in data you and the other person might be educated

the other person might be educated

the other person might be educated differently but I actually don’t think

differently but I actually don’t think

differently but I actually don’t think that’s the case at all at least in

that’s the case at all at least in

that’s the case at all at least in today’s climate I think it’s not a

today’s climate I think it’s not a

today’s climate I think it’s not a difference in facts but a difference in

difference in facts but a difference in

difference in facts but a difference in what a fact is what I think’s the case

what a fact is what I think’s the case

what a fact is what I think’s the case is that we’re not on the same page as to

is that we’re not on the same page as to

is that we’re not on the same page as to what differentiates truths and mistruths

what differentiates truths and mistruths

what differentiates truths and mistruths and this leads to a bigger and even more

and this leads to a bigger and even more

and this leads to a bigger and even more fundamental problem how do we as

fundamental problem how do we as

fundamental problem how do we as individuals as a society know how to act

individuals as a society know how to act

individuals as a society know how to act when we can’t can’t even agree on a

when we can’t can’t even agree on a

when we can’t can’t even agree on a basis of facts or even on a basis of

basis of facts or even on a basis of

basis of facts or even on a basis of what a fact should be so let’s start

what a fact should be so let’s start

what a fact should be so let’s start with a pretty basic question what is a

with a pretty basic question what is a

with a pretty basic question what is a fact well a fact can only be defined one

fact well a fact can only be defined one

fact well a fact can only be defined one way and that’s through the scientific

way and that’s through the scientific

way and that’s through the scientific method so the scientific method is one

method so the scientific method is one

method so the scientific method is one of the most powerful and important ideas

of the most powerful and important ideas

of the most powerful and important ideas ever conceived by man it allows us to

ever conceived by man it allows us to

ever conceived by man it allows us to understand nature to solve problems or

understand nature to solve problems or

understand nature to solve problems or even to invent but it has very specific

even to invent but it has very specific

even to invent but it has very specific steps it starts with an observation we

steps it starts with an observation we

steps it starts with an observation we see something about the world it

see something about the world it

see something about the world it intrigues us we want to know more we ask

intrigues us we want to know more we ask

intrigues us we want to know more we ask the important questions like why or how

the important questions like why or how

the important questions like why or how then we develop a hypothesis we take our

then we develop a hypothesis we take our

then we develop a hypothesis we take our best guess we apply our existing

best guess we apply our existing

best guess we apply our existing understanding of the world and formulate

understanding of the world and formulate

understanding of the world and formulate what we think the answer to our

what we think the answer to our

what we think the answer to our interesting question is then we

interesting question is then we

interesting question is then we formulate a testable prediction if my

formulate a testable prediction if my

formulate a testable prediction if my hypothesis is correct then this other

hypothesis is correct then this other

hypothesis is correct then this other observation should be able to be made we

observation should be able to be made we

observation should be able to be made we obviously know in one situation that our

obviously know in one situation that our

obviously know in one situation that our hypothesis fits that’s why it’s our

hypothesis fits that’s why it’s our

hypothesis fits that’s why it’s our hypothesis in the first place

hypothesis in the first place

hypothesis in the first place but we seek to change the conditions

but we seek to change the conditions

but we seek to change the conditions question our assumptions so that we can

question our assumptions so that we can

question our assumptions so that we can determine what the truth is then we

determine what the truth is then we

determine what the truth is then we conduct the experiment which either

conduct the experiment which either

conduct the experiment which either accepts or rejects our hypothesis then

accepts or rejects our hypothesis then

accepts or rejects our hypothesis then most importantly we iterate this is

most importantly we iterate this is

most importantly we iterate this is perhaps the most and crucial most

perhaps the most and crucial most

perhaps the most and crucial most crucial part by iterating we’re able to

crucial part by iterating we’re able to

crucial part by iterating we’re able to advance our understanding we take it

advance our understanding we take it

advance our understanding we take it further we ask deeper questions we have

further we ask deeper questions we have

further we ask deeper questions we have different tests now most importantly we

different tests now most importantly we

different tests now most importantly we seek to push things our hypothesis our

seek to push things our hypothesis our

seek to push things our hypothesis our assumptions our understandings until we

assumptions our understandings until we

assumptions our understandings until we break them only then do we discover only

break them only then do we discover only

break them only then do we discover only then do we learn now none of this is new

then do we learn now none of this is new

then do we learn now none of this is new to you every middle schooler in the

to you every middle schooler in the

to you every middle schooler in the country is taught the above but even if

country is taught the above but even if

country is taught the above but even if you were taught the above your teachers

you were taught the above your teachers

you were taught the above your teachers probably didn’t take the time to teach

probably didn’t take the time to teach

probably didn’t take the time to teach you the long-range consequences the

you the long-range consequences the

you the long-range consequences the long-term effects of this way of

long-term effects of this way of

long-term effects of this way of thinking at least that’s what current

thinking at least that’s what current

thinking at least that’s what current events seem to show and there are two in

events seem to show and there are two in

events seem to show and there are two in my opinion misconceptions about the

my opinion misconceptions about the

my opinion misconceptions about the scientific methods that I want to talk

scientific methods that I want to talk

scientific methods that I want to talk about today and the first one is

about today and the first one is

about today and the first one is certainty the first thing it’s important

certainty the first thing it’s important

certainty the first thing it’s important to understand about the scientific

to understand about the scientific

to understand about the scientific method is that nothing is certain we

method is that nothing is certain we

method is that nothing is certain we keep on iterating on hypotheses coming

keep on iterating on hypotheses coming

keep on iterating on hypotheses coming up with new tests until they break the

up with new tests until they break the

up with new tests until they break the only time we can be certain is when the

only time we can be certain is when the

only time we can be certain is when the hypothesis is disproven until then the

hypothesis is disproven until then the

hypothesis is disproven until then the hypothesis is not proven but simply not

hypothesis is not proven but simply not

hypothesis is not proven but simply not yet disproven and a theory is just a

yet disproven and a theory is just a

yet disproven and a theory is just a system of ideas that we think explains

system of ideas that we think explains

system of ideas that we think explains something it’s kind of our best guess

something it’s kind of our best guess

something it’s kind of our best guess it’s hypotheses that we think is

it’s hypotheses that we think is

it’s hypotheses that we think is probably right that we have confidence

probably right that we have confidence

probably right that we have confidence in scientists can say they believe in

in scientists can say they believe in

in scientists can say they believe in something with more or less certainty

something with more or less certainty

something with more or less certainty they can say they’re more more or less

they can say they’re more more or less

they can say they’re more more or less confident but if you ask a scientist if

confident but if you ask a scientist if

confident but if you ask a scientist if they’re sure if you ask your scientist

they’re sure if you ask your scientist

they’re sure if you ask your scientist if they’re certain they’ll say no

if they’re certain they’ll say no

if they’re certain they’ll say no because if they’re following the

because if they’re following the

because if they’re following the scientific method they never will be

fact the Earth orbits the Sun I think

fact the Earth orbits the Sun I think this is something that hopefully we can

this is something that hopefully we can

this is something that hopefully we can all agree on so this is called the

all agree on so this is called the

all agree on so this is called the heliocentric theory

heliocentric theory

heliocentric theory Noma emphasis on the world theory saying

Noma emphasis on the world theory saying

Noma emphasis on the world theory saying that the correct model of the solar

that the correct model of the solar

that the correct model of the solar system is that all the planets orbit the

system is that all the planets orbit the

system is that all the planets orbit the Sun but we didn’t always used to think

Sun but we didn’t always used to think

Sun but we didn’t always used to think this way we used to believe in

this way we used to believe in

this way we used to believe in geocentrism which is that everything

geocentrism which is that everything

geocentrism which is that everything orbits the earth now we made an

orbits the earth now we made an

orbits the earth now we made an observation we looked up at the sky and

observation we looked up at the sky and

observation we looked up at the sky and that was the thing that made the most

that was the thing that made the most

that was the thing that made the most sense right why should we assume that

sense right why should we assume that

sense right why should we assume that we’re floating around some ball in the

we’re floating around some ball in the

we’re floating around some ball in the sky we aren’t we aren’t moving right now

sky we aren’t we aren’t moving right now

sky we aren’t we aren’t moving right now we make correct collected data and

we make correct collected data and

we make correct collected data and guided more evidence to this theory and

guided more evidence to this theory and

guided more evidence to this theory and in fact when we had kind of conflicting

in fact when we had kind of conflicting

in fact when we had kind of conflicting evidence we just modified the geocentric

evidence we just modified the geocentric

evidence we just modified the geocentric theory to make it still work

theory to make it still work

theory to make it still work now this all changed when Nicholas

now this all changed when Nicholas

now this all changed when Nicholas Copernicus published on the revolutions

Copernicus published on the revolutions

Copernicus published on the revolutions of the celestial spheres where he

of the celestial spheres where he

of the celestial spheres where he presented an alternate theory the theory

presented an alternate theory the theory

presented an alternate theory the theory of gravitation and of heliocentrism it

of gravitation and of heliocentrism it

of gravitation and of heliocentrism it was a mathematical model really not even

was a mathematical model really not even

was a mathematical model really not even observations that was more simple and

observations that was more simple and

observations that was more simple and elegant and altogether more sensical but

elegant and altogether more sensical but

elegant and altogether more sensical but we didn’t believe heliocentrism until

we didn’t believe heliocentrism until

we didn’t believe heliocentrism until Galileo observed the moons of Jupiter

Galileo observed the moons of Jupiter

Galileo observed the moons of Jupiter more specifically he observe this the

more specifically he observe this the

more specifically he observe this the moons orbiting Jupiter itself that was

moons orbiting Jupiter itself that was

moons orbiting Jupiter itself that was absolutely undeniable proof that there

absolutely undeniable proof that there

absolutely undeniable proof that there were bodies orbiting things that weren’t

were bodies orbiting things that weren’t

were bodies orbiting things that weren’t earth we kept believing and geocentrism

earth we kept believing and geocentrism

earth we kept believing and geocentrism until we broke it beyond deniability now

until we broke it beyond deniability now

until we broke it beyond deniability now every observation every space mission

every observation every space mission

every observation every space mission every piece of data ever collected by

every piece of data ever collected by

every piece of data ever collected by man supports this model of the solar

man supports this model of the solar

man supports this model of the solar system we’re extremely unlikely to find

system we’re extremely unlikely to find

system we’re extremely unlikely to find evidence that disproves the fact that

evidence that disproves the fact that

evidence that disproves the fact that the Earth orbits the Sun that the Earth

the Earth orbits the Sun that the Earth

the Earth orbits the Sun that the Earth orbits the Sun is a fact but it is also

orbits the Sun is a fact but it is also

orbits the Sun is a fact but it is also a hypothesis we accept it as a fact in

a hypothesis we accept it as a fact in

a hypothesis we accept it as a fact in base our calculations and lives on it

base our calculations and lives on it

base our calculations and lives on it but there’s always a chance however

but there’s always a chance however

but there’s always a chance however small that we are wrong that we are not

small that we are wrong that we are not

small that we are wrong that we are not orbiting the Sun and ultimately the

orbiting the Sun and ultimately the

orbiting the Sun and ultimately the foundation of the scientific method is

foundation of the scientific method is

foundation of the scientific method is holding both to be true at once

holding both to be true at once

holding both to be true at once simultaneously basing our calculations

simultaneously basing our calculations

simultaneously basing our calculations have not on it but being completely open

have not on it but being completely open

have not on it but being completely open to being wrong now that’s a very current

to being wrong now that’s a very current

to being wrong now that’s a very current intuitive counterintuitive mental state

intuitive counterintuitive mental state

intuitive counterintuitive mental state it’s almost double think holding two

it’s almost double think holding two

it’s almost double think holding two opposite things to be true at once

opposite things to be true at once

opposite things to be true at once except this is absolutely important

except this is absolutely important

except this is absolutely important absolutely vital if we can’t hold

absolutely vital if we can’t hold

absolutely vital if we can’t hold electromagnetic theory to be true well

electromagnetic theory to be true well

electromagnetic theory to be true well open to being wrong we couldn’t have

open to being wrong we couldn’t have

open to being wrong we couldn’t have invented sensors and computers and

invented sensors and computers and

invented sensors and computers and transistors and electron colliders that

transistors and electron colliders that

transistors and electron colliders that would eventually disprove that theory it

would eventually disprove that theory it

would eventually disprove that theory it has to be both true and false at once

has to be both true and false at once

has to be both true and false at once second thing about the scientific method

second thing about the scientific method

second thing about the scientific method non destroy both science in general says

non destroy both science in general says

non destroy both science in general says we can prove things not in disprove

we can prove things not in disprove

we can prove things not in disprove things let’s take two examples we can

things let’s take two examples we can

things let’s take two examples we can all agree that Santa Claus or the Easter

all agree that Santa Claus or the Easter

all agree that Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny are falsehoods they do not exist

Bunny are falsehoods they do not exist

Bunny are falsehoods they do not exist any rational adult would agree but

any rational adult would agree but

any rational adult would agree but question can you disprove the existence

question can you disprove the existence

question can you disprove the existence of either of these two stories sure you

of either of these two stories sure you

of either of these two stories sure you can prove to me that they exist you can

can prove to me that they exist you can

can prove to me that they exist you can find Santa Claus caption study his

find Santa Claus caption study his

find Santa Claus caption study his reindeer find his lair in the North Pole

reindeer find his lair in the North Pole

reindeer find his lair in the North Pole you can prove all of these things but

you can prove all of these things but

you can prove all of these things but can you prove to me that he is merely

can you prove to me that he is merely

can you prove to me that he is merely the figment of a child’s imagination no

the figment of a child’s imagination no

the figment of a child’s imagination no you cannot it’s non disprovable you

you cannot it’s non disprovable you

you cannot it’s non disprovable you simply don’t find any evidence that

simply don’t find any evidence that

simply don’t find any evidence that supports his existence so instead we

supports his existence so instead we

supports his existence so instead we have to look at all available evidence

have to look at all available evidence

have to look at all available evidence and use Occam’s razor what’s the most

and use Occam’s razor what’s the most

and use Occam’s razor what’s the most likely and simple and logical

likely and simple and logical

likely and simple and logical explanation that fits the observations

explanation that fits the observations

explanation that fits the observations that we’re making what’s more likely

that we’re making what’s more likely

that we’re making what’s more likely that a man living in the ice caps has

that a man living in the ice caps has

that a man living in the ice caps has reindeer that defy the laws of physics

reindeer that defy the laws of physics

reindeer that defy the laws of physics and carries enough presents on his small

and carries enough presents on his small

and carries enough presents on his small sleigh that would normally occupy the

sleigh that would normally occupy the

sleigh that would normally occupy the volume of a large mountain or that into

volume of a large mountain or that into

volume of a large mountain or that into the history of societal tradition

the history of societal tradition

the history of societal tradition parents creat the idea and the story of

parents creat the idea and the story of

parents creat the idea and the story of such a man and put presents under the

such a man and put presents under the

such a man and put presents under the tree for their child what’s more

tree for their child what’s more

tree for their child what’s more believable and what’s more likely that a

believable and what’s more likely that a

believable and what’s more likely that a human-sized and sentient rabbit exists

human-sized and sentient rabbit exists

human-sized and sentient rabbit exists or that this is again a story these

or that this is again a story these

or that this is again a story these things are by the scientific method

things are by the scientific method

things are by the scientific method fundamentally non disprovable now this

fundamentally non disprovable now this

fundamentally non disprovable now this brings me back to autism fact vaccines

brings me back to autism fact vaccines

brings me back to autism fact vaccines don’t cause autism but when we ask the

don’t cause autism but when we ask the

don’t cause autism but when we ask the scientists about this what do they say

scientists about this what do they say

scientists about this what do they say they say no link has been shown they

they say no link has been shown they

they say no link has been shown they don’t say vaccines don’t cause autism

don’t say vaccines don’t cause autism

don’t say vaccines don’t cause autism they say no link has been shown because

they say no link has been shown because

they say no link has been shown because that’s how the scientific method works

that’s how the scientific method works

that’s how the scientific method works now you can prove vaccines cause autism

now you can prove vaccines cause autism

now you can prove vaccines cause autism right you can have two groups of babies

right you can have two groups of babies

right you can have two groups of babies with large sample sizes you have a test

with large sample sizes you have a test

with large sample sizes you have a test group and a control group with a control

group and a control group with a control

group and a control group with a control group you don’t give them vaccines and

group you don’t give them vaccines and

group you don’t give them vaccines and with the test group you do give them

with the test group you do give them

with the test group you do give them back scenes and then you follow these

back scenes and then you follow these

back scenes and then you follow these babies along their lives

babies along their lives

babies along their lives you see if one group is more or less

you see if one group is more or less

you see if one group is more or less likely to develop signs of autism if you

likely to develop signs of autism if you

likely to develop signs of autism if you see a disproportionate development of

see a disproportionate development of

see a disproportionate development of autism in the test group you have proven

autism in the test group you have proven

autism in the test group you have proven vaccines cause autism

vaccines cause autism

vaccines cause autism but how do you prove vaccines don’t

but how do you prove vaccines don’t

but how do you prove vaccines don’t cause autism you can’t you simply find

cause autism you can’t you simply find

cause autism you can’t you simply find no difference in the expression of

no difference in the expression of

no difference in the expression of autism in the test and control group you

autism in the test and control group you

autism in the test and control group you simply show that there is no link

simply show that there is no link

simply show that there is no link proving that vaccines don’t cause autism

proving that vaccines don’t cause autism

proving that vaccines don’t cause autism is just as impossible as proving that

is just as impossible as proving that

is just as impossible as proving that Santa Claus doesn’t exist both

Santa Claus doesn’t exist both

Santa Claus doesn’t exist both fundamentally impossible let’s change

fundamentally impossible let’s change

fundamentally impossible let’s change topics the science is not settled on

topics the science is not settled on

topics the science is not settled on this me and I tell somebody said just

this me and I tell somebody said just

this me and I tell somebody said just because you have a group of scientists

because you have a group of scientists

because you have a group of scientists and stood up and said here is the fact

and stood up and said here is the fact

and stood up and said here is the fact we don’t know what’s causing climate

we don’t know what’s causing climate

we don’t know what’s causing climate change on this planet and the idea of

change on this planet and the idea of

change on this planet and the idea of spending trillions and trillions of

spending trillions and trillions of

spending trillions and trillions of dollars to try and reduce co2 emissions

dollars to try and reduce co2 emissions

dollars to try and reduce co2 emissions is not the right course for us four

is not the right course for us four

is not the right course for us four percent of US Senate Republicans

percent of US Senate Republicans

percent of US Senate Republicans publicly questioned the science of

publicly questioned the science of

publicly questioned the science of global warm AIDS the dinosaurs was

global warm AIDS the dinosaurs was

global warm AIDS the dinosaurs was dramatically warmer than this is right

dramatically warmer than this is right

dramatically warmer than this is right now and it didn’t cook the planet and in

now and it didn’t cook the planet and in

now and it didn’t cook the planet and in fact life is fine you convinced that

fact life is fine you convinced that

fact life is fine you convinced that climate change is man-made

climate change is man-made

climate change is man-made well I look I don’t know that that is a

well I look I don’t know that that is a

well I look I don’t know that that is a resolved issue in science today so what

resolved issue in science today so what

resolved issue in science today so what I’m hearing from this video is that we

I’m hearing from this video is that we

I’m hearing from this video is that we need to be certain about something

need to be certain about something

need to be certain about something before we act but don’t you see how this

before we act but don’t you see how this

before we act but don’t you see how this conflicts we’ve just agreed that you can

conflicts we’ve just agreed that you can

conflicts we’ve just agreed that you can never be sure about anything if the bar

never be sure about anything if the bar

never be sure about anything if the bar for action is this impossible standard

for action is this impossible standard

for action is this impossible standard we never take action we drowned before

we never take action we drowned before

we never take action we drowned before we put on a life jacket so what’s the

we put on a life jacket so what’s the

we put on a life jacket so what’s the right way to decide whether or not to

right way to decide whether or not to

right way to decide whether or not to act so it’s actually an expected value

act so it’s actually an expected value

act so it’s actually an expected value equation shown here it’s the chance of

equation shown here it’s the chance of

equation shown here it’s the chance of something something happening multiplied

something something happening multiplied

something something happening multiplied by the goodness of that happening minus

by the goodness of that happening minus

by the goodness of that happening minus the chance of some other event happening

the chance of some other event happening

the chance of some other event happening multiplied by the badness of that event

multiplied by the badness of that event

multiplied by the badness of that event happening apply to autism X’s vaccines

happening apply to autism X’s vaccines

happening apply to autism X’s vaccines functioning properly why these vaccines

functioning properly why these vaccines

functioning properly why these vaccines functioning improperly and causing

functioning improperly and causing

functioning improperly and causing autism so putting some numbers to this

let’s say there’s a 1% chance that

let’s say there’s a 1% chance that vaccines cause autism it’s not but let’s

vaccines cause autism it’s not but let’s

vaccines cause autism it’s not but let’s just say there is so you have a 99%

just say there is so you have a 99%

just say there is so you have a 99% chance of good things happening and in

chance of good things happening and in

chance of good things happening and in this case

this case

this case on a scale of 1 100 let’s say you’re

on a scale of 1 100 let’s say you’re

on a scale of 1 100 let’s say you’re saving millions of lives worldwide per

saving millions of lives worldwide per

saving millions of lives worldwide per year let’s say that’s a 80 on a scale of

year let’s say that’s a 80 on a scale of

year let’s say that’s a 80 on a scale of 1 100 now on the 1 percent chance that

1 100 now on the 1 percent chance that

1 100 now on the 1 percent chance that you your kid does get autism you know

you your kid does get autism you know

you your kid does get autism you know that’s really bad because it’s your kid

that’s really bad because it’s your kid

that’s really bad because it’s your kid even worse the millions of other kids

even worse the millions of other kids

even worse the millions of other kids dying so let’s put that at 100 so even

dying so let’s put that at 100 so even

dying so let’s put that at 100 so even in that case it’s a 78 point 2 right and

in that case it’s a 78 point 2 right and

in that case it’s a 78 point 2 right and if it’s greater than 50 we should act so

if it’s greater than 50 we should act so

if it’s greater than 50 we should act so here’s the thing though we don’t think

here’s the thing though we don’t think

here’s the thing though we don’t think about decisions this way when we think

about decisions this way when we think

about decisions this way when we think about decisions we ask ourselves

about decisions we ask ourselves

about decisions we ask ourselves questions and we generally ask ourselves

questions and we generally ask ourselves

questions and we generally ask ourselves this question what happens if I do

this question what happens if I do

this question what happens if I do something hope to leave you today with

something hope to leave you today with

something hope to leave you today with these three tools because at the end of

these three tools because at the end of

these three tools because at the end of the day the scientific method and these

the day the scientific method and these

the day the scientific method and these three ideas are what separates man from

three ideas are what separates man from

three ideas are what separates man from ape it’s what has allowed us in the past

ape it’s what has allowed us in the past

ape it’s what has allowed us in the past to get here to invent to progress and to

to get here to invent to progress and to

to get here to invent to progress and to thrive if we want a positive future

thrive if we want a positive future

thrive if we want a positive future these three ideas are not optional they

these three ideas are not optional they

these three ideas are not optional they are necessary let’s hope we remember how

are necessary let’s hope we remember how

are necessary let’s hope we remember how we got here before it is too late thank

we got here before it is too late thank

we got here before it is too late thank you very much

you very much

you very much [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *