Press "Enter" to skip to content

What Can We Learn From Economic Experts? | George Magnus | TEDxSevenoaksSchool


[Applause]

[Applause] good evening ladies and gentlemen my

good evening ladies and gentlemen my

good evening ladies and gentlemen my talk tonight is entitled what can we

talk tonight is entitled what can we

talk tonight is entitled what can we learn from economic experts so

learn from economic experts so

learn from economic experts so somebody’s already kind of pinched my

somebody’s already kind of pinched my

somebody’s already kind of pinched my first line really as you know as you

first line really as you know as you

first line really as you know as you know now at least the queen meeting was

know now at least the queen meeting was

know now at least the queen meeting was famously asked at the London School of

famously asked at the London School of

famously asked at the London School of Economics after the financial crisis why

Economics after the financial crisis why

Economics after the financial crisis why didn’t anybody see this coming and the

didn’t anybody see this coming and the

didn’t anybody see this coming and the truth is actually some people did but no

truth is actually some people did but no

truth is actually some people did but no matter the point was clearly made and

matter the point was clearly made and

matter the point was clearly made and last year as you will remember very

last year as you will remember very

last year as you will remember very clearly during the referendum that we

clearly during the referendum that we

clearly during the referendum that we had in this country a lively debate

had in this country a lively debate

had in this country a lively debate erupted about economic experts and

erupted about economic experts and

erupted about economic experts and whether we could actually learn anything

whether we could actually learn anything

whether we could actually learn anything from them at all and this debate has

from them at all and this debate has

from them at all and this debate has continued to this day now there’s no

continued to this day now there’s no

continued to this day now there’s no question in my view that economics and

question in my view that economics and

question in my view that economics and economists have issues we teach our

economists have issues we teach our

economists have issues we teach our undergraduates much too much about maths

undergraduates much too much about maths

undergraduates much too much about maths and modelling and not enough about

and modelling and not enough about

and modelling and not enough about economic history and about economic

economic history and about economic

economic history and about economic thinkers and why they change their views

thinkers and why they change their views

thinkers and why they change their views obviously in the context of their time

obviously in the context of their time

obviously in the context of their time but economists don’t actually make only

but economists don’t actually make only

but economists don’t actually make only make predictions we also do quite a lot

make predictions we also do quite a lot

make predictions we also do quite a lot of work actually trying to explain the

of work actually trying to explain the

of work actually trying to explain the consequences of doing making choices and

consequences of doing making choices and

consequences of doing making choices and what the consequences of those choices

what the consequences of those choices

what the consequences of those choices are so as you know politicians will do

are so as you know politicians will do

are so as you know politicians will do anything and say anything and promise

anything and say anything and promise

anything and say anything and promise anything to be popular and to win your

anything to be popular and to win your

anything to be popular and to win your votes at elections it’s the sad job

votes at elections it’s the sad job

votes at elections it’s the sad job unfortunately of economists to be able

unfortunately of economists to be able

unfortunately of economists to be able to have to tell you why some of these

to have to tell you why some of these

to have to tell you why some of these choices are not always possible or why

choices are not always possible or why

choices are not always possible or why they might be incompatible or if they

they might be incompatible or if they

they might be incompatible or if they are compatible the conditions under

are compatible the conditions under

are compatible the conditions under which that might be so in these days and

which that might be so in these days and

which that might be so in these days and times economic experts I think face very

times economic experts I think face very

times economic experts I think face very very big challenges perhaps no more no

very big challenges perhaps no more no

very big challenges perhaps no more no less than other experts in different

less than other experts in different

less than other experts in different fields but as you know there are many

fields but as you know there are many

fields but as you know there are many things that describe uncertain times

things that describe uncertain times

things that describe uncertain times that we live in we’re going through what

that we live in we’re going through what

that we live in we’re going through what some people call the fourth Industrial

some people call the fourth Industrial

some people call the fourth Industrial Revolution we have just come away from

Revolution we have just come away from

Revolution we have just come away from 25 years of the most rapid globe

25 years of the most rapid globe

25 years of the most rapid globe réalisation that’s happened in the

réalisation that’s happened in the

réalisation that’s happened in the world since the 98 19th century and

world since the 98 19th century and

world since the 98 19th century and we’re still trying to come to terms with

we’re still trying to come to terms with

we’re still trying to come to terms with the rise of China and many emerging

the rise of China and many emerging

the rise of China and many emerging markets in the global system and this

markets in the global system and this

markets in the global system and this has given rise to many social economic

has given rise to many social economic

has given rise to many social economic Geographic tensions which have exposed

Geographic tensions which have exposed

Geographic tensions which have exposed our institutions both at home and

our institutions both at home and

our institutions both at home and internationally as being somewhat

internationally as being somewhat

internationally as being somewhat fragile giving us a big headache and

fragile giving us a big headache and

fragile giving us a big headache and many questions about how we cope with

many questions about how we cope with

many questions about how we cope with unpredictability and lots of a radical

unpredictability and lots of a radical

unpredictability and lots of a radical change so what can we learn from

change so what can we learn from

change so what can we learn from economic experts I’d like to propose

economic experts I’d like to propose

economic experts I’d like to propose tonight six things that you may like to

tonight six things that you may like to

tonight six things that you may like to think about the first is that financial

think about the first is that financial

think about the first is that financial crises really do matter and they matter

crises really do matter and they matter

crises really do matter and they matter much more than we even thought they did

much more than we even thought they did

much more than we even thought they did seven or eight years ago and they have

seven or eight years ago and they have

seven or eight years ago and they have long-lasting effects if we hadn’t had

long-lasting effects if we hadn’t had

long-lasting effects if we hadn’t had Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008 the

Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008 the

Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008 the last eight years would have been

last eight years would have been

last eight years would have been completely different from the way that

completely different from the way that

completely different from the way that we have experienced it and remember it

we have experienced it and remember it

we have experienced it and remember it now for many of the problems that we now

now for many of the problems that we now

now for many of the problems that we now discuss about globalization about income

discuss about globalization about income

discuss about globalization about income inequality about the quality of jobs and

inequality about the quality of jobs and

inequality about the quality of jobs and the amount of jobs these things predated

the amount of jobs these things predated

the amount of jobs these things predated the financial crisis by quite some time

the financial crisis by quite some time

the financial crisis by quite some time but the crisis itself I think was the

but the crisis itself I think was the

but the crisis itself I think was the last straw it gave rise to a very

last straw it gave rise to a very

last straw it gave rise to a very ubiquitous political backlash not just

ubiquitous political backlash not just

ubiquitous political backlash not just amongst our steel workers and car

amongst our steel workers and car

amongst our steel workers and car workers and public sector workers but

workers and public sector workers but

workers and public sector workers but amongst the middle class and even

amongst the middle class and even

amongst the middle class and even amongst some of the one percent a

amongst some of the one percent a

amongst some of the one percent a backlash against what they perceive to

backlash against what they perceive to

backlash against what they perceive to be the collusion of vested interests in

be the collusion of vested interests in

be the collusion of vested interests in finance politics and big business the

finance politics and big business the

finance politics and big business the phrase we’re all in it together just

phrase we’re all in it together just

phrase we’re all in it together just rang really hollow for a lot of people

rang really hollow for a lot of people

rang really hollow for a lot of people as you know and as we’re all conscious

as you know and as we’re all conscious

as you know and as we’re all conscious now so the lesson is we have to

now so the lesson is we have to

now so the lesson is we have to understand the systemic causes of crises

understand the systemic causes of crises

understand the systemic causes of crises like we’ve experienced and also the need

like we’ve experienced and also the need

like we’ve experienced and also the need not only to preach fairness but also to

not only to preach fairness but also to

not only to preach fairness but also to dem

dem

dem straight fairness in our economic and

straight fairness in our economic and

straight fairness in our economic and social policies the second lesson is

social policies the second lesson is

social policies the second lesson is really a kind of a variation of a phrase

really a kind of a variation of a phrase

really a kind of a variation of a phrase that was made famous by Bill Clinton’s

that was made famous by Bill Clinton’s

that was made famous by Bill Clinton’s political strategist James Carville 25

political strategist James Carville 25

political strategist James Carville 25 years ago he coined the phrase it’s the

years ago he coined the phrase it’s the

years ago he coined the phrase it’s the economy stupid and we have to rebrand

economy stupid and we have to rebrand

economy stupid and we have to rebrand that now as it’s the political economy

that now as it’s the political economy

that now as it’s the political economy stupid because what we’ve seen in 2016

stupid because what we’ve seen in 2016

stupid because what we’ve seen in 2016 was people vote not necessarily in there

was people vote not necessarily in there

was people vote not necessarily in there what we might strictly define as their

what we might strictly define as their

what we might strictly define as their economic interests long term so a lot of

economic interests long term so a lot of

economic interests long term so a lot of people voted to leave the EU despite the

people voted to leave the EU despite the

people voted to leave the EU despite the fact that the overwhelming amount of

fact that the overwhelming amount of

fact that the overwhelming amount of evidence about leaving the EU from an

evidence about leaving the EU from an

evidence about leaving the EU from an economic point of view was negative

economic point of view was negative

economic point of view was negative unless it could be mitigated and a lot

unless it could be mitigated and a lot

unless it could be mitigated and a lot of people voted for Donald Trump despite

of people voted for Donald Trump despite

of people voted for Donald Trump despite the fact that he campaigned on policies

the fact that he campaigned on policies

the fact that he campaigned on policies to cut taxes for the rich and for

to cut taxes for the rich and for

to cut taxes for the rich and for companies and on trade policies which

companies and on trade policies which

companies and on trade policies which will harm American workers so sometimes

will harm American workers so sometimes

will harm American workers so sometimes people vote for things that have nothing

people vote for things that have nothing

people vote for things that have nothing to do really with pocketbook economics

to do really with pocketbook economics

to do really with pocketbook economics and we have to understand that economic

and we have to understand that economic

and we have to understand that economic policies have consequences that

policies have consequences that

policies have consequences that sometimes result in feedback that we

sometimes result in feedback that we

sometimes result in feedback that we will find surprising or negative the

will find surprising or negative the

will find surprising or negative the third thing that we can learn i think is

third thing that we can learn i think is

third thing that we can learn i think is something that I call the fallacy of

something that I call the fallacy of

something that I call the fallacy of disaggregation now don’t faint I’m going

disaggregation now don’t faint I’m going

disaggregation now don’t faint I’m going to it’s a very very simple concept so in

to it’s a very very simple concept so in

to it’s a very very simple concept so in a more conventional concept which is the

a more conventional concept which is the

a more conventional concept which is the fallacy of aggregation what’s good for

fallacy of aggregation what’s good for

fallacy of aggregation what’s good for one person doesn’t necessarily mean it’s

one person doesn’t necessarily mean it’s

one person doesn’t necessarily mean it’s good for everybody so if you think about

good for everybody so if you think about

good for everybody so if you think about saving for example if I save more that’s

saving for example if I save more that’s

saving for example if I save more that’s good for me and you may congratulate me

good for me and you may congratulate me

good for me and you may congratulate me for being prudent and you know a good

for being prudent and you know a good

for being prudent and you know a good economic citizen but if we all save more

economic citizen but if we all save more

economic citizen but if we all save more together the economy will tip into a

together the economy will tip into a

together the economy will tip into a recession because nobody will spend if I

recession because nobody will spend if I

recession because nobody will spend if I had drive my car down seven oaks high

had drive my car down seven oaks high

had drive my car down seven oaks high street it’s great for me because I’m

street it’s great for me because I’m

street it’s great for me because I’m comfortable and you know I’m going to

comfortable and you know I’m going to

comfortable and you know I’m going to have a good time and i’ll get more

have a good time and i’ll get more

have a good time and i’ll get more quickly to where I want to get to maybe

quickly to where I want to get to maybe

quickly to where I want to get to maybe but of course if we all drive our

but of course if we all drive our

but of course if we all drive our cars down seven oaks high street

cars down seven oaks high street

cars down seven oaks high street together we’re just going to end up with

together we’re just going to end up with

together we’re just going to end up with congestion and pollution so the fallacy

congestion and pollution so the fallacy

congestion and pollution so the fallacy of disaggregation is the mirror image of

of disaggregation is the mirror image of

of disaggregation is the mirror image of that where what’s good for everybody

that where what’s good for everybody

that where what’s good for everybody doesn’t necessarily resonate for each

doesn’t necessarily resonate for each

doesn’t necessarily resonate for each individual so if you think about jobs

individual so if you think about jobs

individual so if you think about jobs and unemployment so in this country and

and unemployment so in this country and

and unemployment so in this country and in the United States for example we have

in the United States for example we have

in the United States for example we have record levels of employment and low

record levels of employment and low

record levels of employment and low levels of unemployment so in the

levels of unemployment so in the

levels of unemployment so in the aggregate it looks fantastic but if I

aggregate it looks fantastic but if I

aggregate it looks fantastic but if I give you one example in America white

give you one example in America white

give you one example in America white people account for seventy eight percent

people account for seventy eight percent

people account for seventy eight percent of the labor force and about seventy

of the labor force and about seventy

of the labor force and about seventy percent of the population in smaller

percent of the population in smaller

percent of the population in smaller cities outside of New York and Los

cities outside of New York and Los

cities outside of New York and Los Angeles and so on and so forth and if

Angeles and so on and so forth and if

Angeles and so on and so forth and if you look at American employment since

you look at American employment since

you look at American employment since 2007 it has grown almost more rapidly

2007 it has grown almost more rapidly

2007 it has grown almost more rapidly than in any recovery that America has

than in any recovery that America has

than in any recovery that America has had since 1945 but white people have

had since 1945 but white people have

had since 1945 but white people have 700,000 jobs fewer today that they had

700,000 jobs fewer today that they had

700,000 jobs fewer today that they had in 2007 compared with other ethnic

in 2007 compared with other ethnic

in 2007 compared with other ethnic groups so we have to look more carefully

groups so we have to look more carefully

groups so we have to look more carefully beyond the bland and a kind of broad

beyond the bland and a kind of broad

beyond the bland and a kind of broad statistics which supposedly define

statistics which supposedly define

statistics which supposedly define whether we’re doing well or not there

whether we’re doing well or not there

whether we’re doing well or not there are individual stories and group stories

are individual stories and group stories

are individual stories and group stories that matter the fourth lesson that I

that matter the fourth lesson that I

that matter the fourth lesson that I think we’re starting to learn is that we

think we’re starting to learn is that we

think we’re starting to learn is that we can walk on two legs and what I mean by

can walk on two legs and what I mean by

can walk on two legs and what I mean by that is that for many years during the

that is that for many years during the

that is that for many years during the last few what since 2008 we were told

last few what since 2008 we were told

last few what since 2008 we were told that there’s only one game in town which

that there’s only one game in town which

that there’s only one game in town which is monetary policy you’ve all heard now

is monetary policy you’ve all heard now

is monetary policy you’ve all heard now of quantitative easing which is the

of quantitative easing which is the

of quantitative easing which is the unusual method that was adopted by

unusual method that was adopted by

unusual method that was adopted by central banks to try to keep the

central banks to try to keep the

central banks to try to keep the financial system alive and then the

financial system alive and then the

financial system alive and then the economy alive over the last seven or

economy alive over the last seven or

economy alive over the last seven or eight years but we always knew that

eight years but we always knew that

eight years but we always knew that there were limits to what central banks

there were limits to what central banks

there were limits to what central banks Bank of England could do so the Bank of

Bank of England could do so the Bank of

Bank of England could do so the Bank of England and Mark Carney just because

England and Mark Carney just because

England and Mark Carney just because he’s the governor they have no remit

he’s the governor they have no remit

he’s the governor they have no remit when it comes to the provision of

when it comes to the provision of

when it comes to the provision of ubiquitous broadband they have no

ubiquitous broadband they have no

ubiquitous broadband they have no remit when it comes to hospital beds or

remit when it comes to hospital beds or

remit when it comes to hospital beds or health education educational attainment

health education educational attainment

health education educational attainment or even for you know ways of increasing

or even for you know ways of increasing

or even for you know ways of increasing productivity this is not the job of

productivity this is not the job of

productivity this is not the job of monetary policymakers it’s the job of

monetary policymakers it’s the job of

monetary policymakers it’s the job of governments and governments are starting

governments and governments are starting

governments and governments are starting to fortunately and finally learn that

to fortunately and finally learn that

to fortunately and finally learn that they do have a role to play in trying to

they do have a role to play in trying to

they do have a role to play in trying to nurture us out of this kind of funk that

nurture us out of this kind of funk that

nurture us out of this kind of funk that we’ve been in for some time it’s

we’ve been in for some time it’s

we’ve been in for some time it’s happening in Japan Donald Trump says

happening in Japan Donald Trump says

happening in Japan Donald Trump says he’s going to spend a lot of money on

he’s going to spend a lot of money on

he’s going to spend a lot of money on infrastructure Theresa May today

infrastructure Theresa May today

infrastructure Theresa May today launched an industrial strategy green

launched an industrial strategy green

launched an industrial strategy green paper which will have in government

paper which will have in government

paper which will have in government intervention is a very very prominent

intervention is a very very prominent

intervention is a very very prominent phenomenon so things are beginning to

phenomenon so things are beginning to

phenomenon so things are beginning to change fifthly we’re beginning to learn

change fifthly we’re beginning to learn

change fifthly we’re beginning to learn also something else which is a little

also something else which is a little

also something else which is a little bit more alarming which is to bid

bit more alarming which is to bid

bit more alarming which is to bid farewell to freer trade so we have

farewell to freer trade so we have

farewell to freer trade so we have widely propagated discussion about jobs

widely propagated discussion about jobs

widely propagated discussion about jobs unfair competition migration and so on

unfair competition migration and so on

unfair competition migration and so on and trade is widely seen as the culprit

and trade is widely seen as the culprit

and trade is widely seen as the culprit in some respects or the agent of some of

in some respects or the agent of some of

in some respects or the agent of some of our problems but now instead of having

our problems but now instead of having

our problems but now instead of having kind of some of the tensions that we’ve

kind of some of the tensions that we’ve

kind of some of the tensions that we’ve grown used to with trade we now have a

grown used to with trade we now have a

grown used to with trade we now have a completely new phenomenon which is the

completely new phenomenon which is the

completely new phenomenon which is the fact that anti free-trade policies may

fact that anti free-trade policies may

fact that anti free-trade policies may be propagated by the United States under

be propagated by the United States under

be propagated by the United States under the new presidency that’s just taking

the new presidency that’s just taking

the new presidency that’s just taking its position so the the rather kind of

its position so the the rather kind of

its position so the the rather kind of chilling prospect actually is of losing

chilling prospect actually is of losing

chilling prospect actually is of losing the United States as the champion of

the United States as the champion of

the United States as the champion of this kind of liberal rules-based system

this kind of liberal rules-based system

this kind of liberal rules-based system which has underpinned the global economy

which has underpinned the global economy

which has underpinned the global economy since 1945 the danger is that trade

since 1945 the danger is that trade

since 1945 the danger is that trade outcomes now become the result of power

outcomes now become the result of power

outcomes now become the result of power and leverage exercised by the biggest

and leverage exercised by the biggest

and leverage exercised by the biggest economies that we might get into or the

economies that we might get into or the

economies that we might get into or the Americans might get into a trade war

Americans might get into a trade war

Americans might get into a trade war with China that could spill over seas to

with China that could spill over seas to

with China that could spill over seas to other countries and regions and of

other countries and regions and of

other countries and regions and of course as you know this is particularly

course as you know this is particularly

course as you know this is particularly important to this country which is in

important to this country which is in

important to this country which is in the process of leaving

the process of leaving

the process of leaving EU and is in desperate need to build

EU and is in desperate need to build

EU and is in desperate need to build trade agreements with others in time so

trade agreements with others in time so

trade agreements with others in time so in conclusion and I think I’d like to

in conclusion and I think I’d like to

in conclusion and I think I’d like to say that the world economy is not doing

say that the world economy is not doing

say that the world economy is not doing too bad actually I just think I’ve left

too bad actually I just think I’ve left

too bad actually I just think I’ve left out my sixth factor and which was yes no

out my sixth factor and which was yes no

out my sixth factor and which was yes no that is my conclusion actually the

that is my conclusion actually the

that is my conclusion actually the conclusion that the world economy is not

conclusion that the world economy is not

conclusion that the world economy is not doing too bad at the moment but there

doing too bad at the moment but there

doing too bad at the moment but there are a significant number of what I would

are a significant number of what I would

are a significant number of what I would call what we call tail risks so tail

call what we call tail risks so tail

call what we call tail risks so tail risks are things like food poisoning and

risks are things like food poisoning and

risks are things like food poisoning and serious sports injuries these are things

serious sports injuries these are things

serious sports injuries these are things that don’t happen all the time

that don’t happen all the time

that don’t happen all the time especially not to us individually but

especially not to us individually but

especially not to us individually but they do happen and they happen

they do happen and they happen

they do happen and they happen unexpectedly and with rather unpleasant

unexpectedly and with rather unpleasant

unexpectedly and with rather unpleasant consequences as you may know so we

consequences as you may know so we

consequences as you may know so we should be aware of the adverse

should be aware of the adverse

should be aware of the adverse consequences of the pursuit of

consequences of the pursuit of

consequences of the pursuit of nationalism the abandonment of rules

nationalism the abandonment of rules

nationalism the abandonment of rules based systems the risks inherent in

based systems the risks inherent in

based systems the risks inherent in perhaps Donald Trump’s economic programs

perhaps Donald Trump’s economic programs

perhaps Donald Trump’s economic programs and also the political and economic

and also the political and economic

and also the political and economic dangers which are inherent in the

dangers which are inherent in the

dangers which are inherent in the current situation in the EU and also i

current situation in the EU and also i

current situation in the EU and also i would say in china so ladies and

would say in china so ladies and

would say in china so ladies and gentlemen I economists and economics I

gentlemen I economists and economics I

gentlemen I economists and economics I mean there’s no pretending about it they

mean there’s no pretending about it they

mean there’s no pretending about it they can’t substitute for profits and they

can’t substitute for profits and they

can’t substitute for profits and they certainly tend to lean more towards the

certainly tend to lean more towards the

certainly tend to lean more towards the idea of probabilities and uncertainty

idea of probabilities and uncertainty

idea of probabilities and uncertainty than to belief and conviction in in that

than to belief and conviction in in that

than to belief and conviction in in that particular regard but by focusing on how

particular regard but by focusing on how

particular regard but by focusing on how economic systems work and why they’re

economic systems work and why they’re

economic systems work and why they’re prone to dysfunction or to change we can

prone to dysfunction or to change we can

prone to dysfunction or to change we can help i think understand better the way

help i think understand better the way

help i think understand better the way the world works and by understanding

the world works and by understanding

the world works and by understanding that certainly the first route towards

that certainly the first route towards

that certainly the first route towards trying to learn how to cope and adapt in

trying to learn how to cope and adapt in

trying to learn how to cope and adapt in uncertain times so those of you in this

uncertain times so those of you in this

uncertain times so those of you in this audience who are thinking possibly are

audience who are thinking possibly are

audience who are thinking possibly are going to study economics in future I

going to study economics in future I

going to study economics in future I would certainly urge you strongly to do

would certainly urge you strongly to do

would certainly urge you strongly to do so and university courses and university

so and university courses and university

so and university courses and university syllabuses are gradually changing

syllabuses are gradually changing

syllabuses are gradually changing to take on board some of the information

to take on board some of the information

to take on board some of the information i mentioned right at the beginning and

i mentioned right at the beginning and

i mentioned right at the beginning and for those of you in the audience who are

for those of you in the audience who are

for those of you in the audience who are past studying i hope that some of the

past studying i hope that some of the

past studying i hope that some of the things that economic experts will say to

things that economic experts will say to

things that economic experts will say to you in the future will resonate in some

you in the future will resonate in some

you in the future will resonate in some way and help you understand a little bit

way and help you understand a little bit

way and help you understand a little bit about our complicated world thank you

about our complicated world thank you

about our complicated world thank you very much indeed

very much indeed

very much indeed [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *