Press "Enter" to skip to content

The insanity of nuclear deterrence | Robert Green | TEDxChristchurch


in 1968 I was a 24 year old of Tennant

in 1968 I was a 24 year old of Tennant navigating strike jets from an aircraft

navigating strike jets from an aircraft

navigating strike jets from an aircraft carrier

carrier

carrier I was among four of the best crews in my

I was among four of the best crews in my

I was among four of the best crews in my squadron and we were given the honor to

squadron and we were given the honor to

squadron and we were given the honor to be a nuclear crew with a top-secret

be a nuclear crew with a top-secret

be a nuclear crew with a top-secret security clearance the buzz intensified

security clearance the buzz intensified

security clearance the buzz intensified when we were told what a huge

when we were told what a huge

when we were told what a huge responsibility this was we were being

responsibility this was we were being

responsibility this was we were being entrusted with the last are playing a

entrusted with the last are playing a

entrusted with the last are playing a part the last-ditch defense of Great

part the last-ditch defense of Great

part the last-ditch defense of Great Britain our target was a Soviet military

Britain our target was a Soviet military

Britain our target was a Soviet military air base outside Leningrad formally

air base outside Leningrad formally

air base outside Leningrad formally subpoenas birth after we had planned how

subpoenas birth after we had planned how

subpoenas birth after we had planned how to attack it we were told not to discuss

to attack it we were told not to discuss

to attack it we were told not to discuss it we obeyed and proudly celebrated

it we obeyed and proudly celebrated

it we obeyed and proudly celebrated initiation into this elite within an

initiation into this elite within an

initiation into this elite within an elite after a few years I switched to

elite after a few years I switched to

elite after a few years I switched to anti-submarine helicopters our slow

anti-submarine helicopters our slow

anti-submarine helicopters our slow lightweight torpedoes could not catch

lightweight torpedoes could not catch

lightweight torpedoes could not catch Soviet nuclear submarines so we were

Soviet nuclear submarines so we were

Soviet nuclear submarines so we were given a nuclear depth bomb unlike my

given a nuclear depth bomb unlike my

given a nuclear depth bomb unlike my strike jet my helicopter was too slow to

strike jet my helicopter was too slow to

strike jet my helicopter was too slow to escape the detonation I realized that

escape the detonation I realized that

escape the detonation I realized that this would be a suicide mission when I

this would be a suicide mission when I

this would be a suicide mission when I complained my leaders

my leaders reassured me that we would

my leaders reassured me that we would probably never have to use it besides I

probably never have to use it besides I

probably never have to use it besides I didn’t want to cut short a promising

didn’t want to cut short a promising

didn’t want to cut short a promising career did I I fell silent but doubt set

career did I I fell silent but doubt set

career did I I fell silent but doubt set here in 1978 my silence was rewarded as

here in 1978 my silence was rewarded as

here in 1978 my silence was rewarded as a newly promoted commander in the

a newly promoted commander in the

a newly promoted commander in the Ministry of Defence in London assisting

Ministry of Defence in London assisting

Ministry of Defence in London assisting an Admiral responsible for advising on

an Admiral responsible for advising on

an Admiral responsible for advising on nuclear policy mrs. Thatcher became

nuclear policy mrs. Thatcher became

nuclear policy mrs. Thatcher became prime minister and she wanted Trident an

prime minister and she wanted Trident an

prime minister and she wanted Trident an American nuclear-armed missile system

American nuclear-armed missile system

American nuclear-armed missile system launched from huge militarily useless

launched from huge militarily useless

launched from huge militarily useless submarines my Admiral warned that it’s

submarines my Admiral warned that it’s

submarines my Admiral warned that it’s it was far too destructive for Britain’s

it was far too destructive for Britain’s

it was far too destructive for Britain’s needs and its massive cost would mean

needs and its massive cost would mean

needs and its massive cost would mean cuts in warships that were militarily

cuts in warships that were militarily

cuts in warships that were militarily useful mrs. Thatcher drove the Trident

useful mrs. Thatcher drove the Trident

useful mrs. Thatcher drove the Trident decision through then sure enough her

decision through then sure enough her

decision through then sure enough her government announced warship cuts to pay

government announced warship cuts to pay

government announced warship cuts to pay for it so I applied for redundancy my

for it so I applied for redundancy my

for it so I applied for redundancy my application was approved one week into

application was approved one week into

application was approved one week into the 1982 Falklands War between Britain

the 1982 Falklands War between Britain

the 1982 Falklands War between Britain and Argentina I had to stay on until

and Argentina I had to stay on until

and Argentina I had to stay on until after we had won and I had handed over

after we had won and I had handed over

after we had won and I had handed over my job which was running a forty strong

my job which was running a forty strong

my job which was running a forty strong intelligence team in the command bunker

intelligence team in the command bunker

intelligence team in the command bunker outside London that war was a close-run

outside London that war was a close-run

outside London that war was a close-run thing some of our ships were sunk and

thing some of our ships were sunk and

thing some of our ships were sunk and colleagues killed if an aircraft carrier

colleagues killed if an aircraft carrier

colleagues killed if an aircraft carrier or troop ship had been taken out we

or troop ship had been taken out we

or troop ship had been taken out we could have faced defeat what would mrs.

could have faced defeat what would mrs.

could have faced defeat what would mrs. Thatcher have done before the war she

Thatcher have done before the war she

Thatcher have done before the war she was the most unpopular British Prime

was the most unpopular British Prime

was the most unpopular British Prime minister in history now her political

minister in history now her political

minister in history now her political career at stake she became the Iron Lady

after I left the Navy I was reliably

after I left the Navy I was reliably informed that there had been a

informed that there had been a

informed that there had been a top-secret contingency plan to move the

top-secret contingency plan to move the

top-secret contingency plan to move the patrolling British nuclear-armed

patrolling British nuclear-armed

patrolling British nuclear-armed submarine

submarine

submarine within range of Argentina that raised

within range of Argentina that raised

within range of Argentina that raised the nightmare for me of a desperate

the nightmare for me of a desperate

the nightmare for me of a desperate British leader with nuclear weapons and

British leader with nuclear weapons and

British leader with nuclear weapons and the shameful possibility of our

the shameful possibility of our

the shameful possibility of our submariners being ordered to commit a

submariners being ordered to commit a

submariners being ordered to commit a pointless war crime after all British

pointless war crime after all British

pointless war crime after all British nuclear weapons had not deterred

nuclear weapons had not deterred

nuclear weapons had not deterred Argentina’s president general Galtieri

Argentina’s president general Galtieri

Argentina’s president general Galtieri from invading the Falkland Islands with

from invading the Falkland Islands with

from invading the Falkland Islands with victory in his grasp what a nuclear

victory in his grasp what a nuclear

victory in his grasp what a nuclear threat have even been believed let alone

threat have even been believed let alone

threat have even been believed let alone worked less than two years later my

worked less than two years later my

worked less than two years later my beloved aunt and mentor Hilda Morel was

beloved aunt and mentor Hilda Morel was

beloved aunt and mentor Hilda Morel was murdered she was an anti-nuclear

murdered she was an anti-nuclear

murdered she was an anti-nuclear campaigner and the police did not

campaigner and the police did not

campaigner and the police did not investigate her bizarre murder properly

investigate her bizarre murder properly

investigate her bizarre murder properly I received information from several

I received information from several

I received information from several reliable sources

reliable sources

reliable sources that agents of the British security

that agents of the British security

that agents of the British security service mi5 had been involved outraged I

service mi5 had been involved outraged I

service mi5 had been involved outraged I felt betrayed by my beloved country’s

felt betrayed by my beloved country’s

felt betrayed by my beloved country’s corrupt government my support for

corrupt government my support for

corrupt government my support for nuclear deterrence collapsed with the

nuclear deterrence collapsed with the

nuclear deterrence collapsed with the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War

Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War

Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War I now know that nuclear deterrence is an

I now know that nuclear deterrence is an

I now know that nuclear deterrence is an ineffective

ineffective

ineffective unlawful and utterly immoral strategy to

unlawful and utterly immoral strategy to

unlawful and utterly immoral strategy to prevent nuclear war let’s look at three

prevent nuclear war let’s look at three

prevent nuclear war let’s look at three aspects of nuclear deterrence first does

aspects of nuclear deterrence first does

aspects of nuclear deterrence first does it in fact prevent war just because

it in fact prevent war just because

it in fact prevent war just because World War three hasn’t broken out yet

World War three hasn’t broken out yet

World War three hasn’t broken out yet doesn’t mean that nuclear deterrence has

doesn’t mean that nuclear deterrence has

doesn’t mean that nuclear deterrence has prevented it arch-rivals India and

prevented it arch-rivals India and

prevented it arch-rivals India and Pakistan are into a nuclear arms race

Pakistan are into a nuclear arms race

Pakistan are into a nuclear arms race despite a common border aping the

despite a common border aping the

despite a common border aping the irresponsible example of the former

irresponsible example of the former

irresponsible example of the former colonial masters the British they

colonial masters the British they

colonial masters the British they naively believe that this is their path

naively believe that this is their path

naively believe that this is their path to security and greatness blind faith in

to security and greatness blind faith in

to security and greatness blind faith in nuclear deterrence has emboldened both

nuclear deterrence has emboldened both

nuclear deterrence has emboldened both sides to launch provocative military

sides to launch provocative military

sides to launch provocative military actions into disputed Kashmir several

actions into disputed Kashmir several

actions into disputed Kashmir several times so despite the fact that each side

times so despite the fact that each side

times so despite the fact that each side is armed to the teeth with nuclear

is armed to the teeth with nuclear

is armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons the risk of war has increased

weapons the risk of war has increased

weapons the risk of war has increased second to be credible nuclear deterrence

second to be credible nuclear deterrence

second to be credible nuclear deterrence must never fail this requires

must never fail this requires

must never fail this requires demonstrating the capabilities plans and

demonstrating the capabilities plans and

demonstrating the capabilities plans and determination to use nuclear weapons

determination to use nuclear weapons

determination to use nuclear weapons which brings me to number three is

which brings me to number three is

which brings me to number three is nuclear deterrence a rational strategy

nuclear deterrence a rational strategy

nuclear deterrence a rational strategy after all initiating a nuclear attack

after all initiating a nuclear attack

after all initiating a nuclear attack against the nuclear-armed opponent would

against the nuclear-armed opponent would

against the nuclear-armed opponent would basically be suicidal

basically be suicidal

basically be suicidal an irrational opponent knows that

an irrational opponent knows that

an irrational opponent knows that nuclear retaliation will be no more than

nuclear retaliation will be no more than

nuclear retaliation will be no more than pointless revenge

pointless revenge

pointless revenge unlike the aftermath from conventional

unlike the aftermath from conventional

unlike the aftermath from conventional war nuclear war will leave a vast

war nuclear war will leave a vast

war nuclear war will leave a vast radiated wasteland a medical catastrophe

radiated wasteland a medical catastrophe

radiated wasteland a medical catastrophe for any survivors climate scientists

for any survivors climate scientists

for any survivors climate scientists Alan robock and Brian tune have run a

Alan robock and Brian tune have run a

Alan robock and Brian tune have run a computer model of what would happen if a

computer model of what would happen if a

computer model of what would happen if a South Asian nuclear war broke out apart

South Asian nuclear war broke out apart

South Asian nuclear war broke out apart from millions of dead untreatable

from millions of dead untreatable

from millions of dead untreatable survivors radioactive poisoning and

survivors radioactive poisoning and

survivors radioactive poisoning and apocalyptic destruction across South

apocalyptic destruction across South

apocalyptic destruction across South Asia the smoke alone from fire storms

Asia the smoke alone from fire storms

Asia the smoke alone from fire storms over cities would blot out the Sun

over cities would blot out the Sun

over cities would blot out the Sun around the entire

around the entire

around the entire northern hemisphere causing massive crop

northern hemisphere causing massive crop

northern hemisphere causing massive crop failure and global famine the robot can

failure and global famine the robot can

failure and global famine the robot can tune simulation involves just 100

tune simulation involves just 100

tune simulation involves just 100 nuclear weapons yet the United States

nuclear weapons yet the United States

nuclear weapons yet the United States and Russia each still have nearly 1,000

and Russia each still have nearly 1,000

and Russia each still have nearly 1,000 nuclear weapons at 30 minutes notice or

nuclear weapons at 30 minutes notice or

nuclear weapons at 30 minutes notice or less for launch another 5,000 nuclear

less for launch another 5,000 nuclear

less for launch another 5,000 nuclear weapons on each side are held in reserve

the seven other nuclear-armed States

the seven other nuclear-armed States China France Great Britain India

China France Great Britain India

China France Great Britain India Pakistan Israel and North Korea have

Pakistan Israel and North Korea have

Pakistan Israel and North Korea have another 1000 nuclear weapons between

another 1000 nuclear weapons between

another 1000 nuclear weapons between them since the nuclear weapons were

them since the nuclear weapons were

them since the nuclear weapons were first deployed in the 1950s there have

first deployed in the 1950s there have

first deployed in the 1950s there have been many close calls

been many close calls

been many close calls what’s more horrifying is that most of

what’s more horrifying is that most of

what’s more horrifying is that most of these have been inverted

these have been inverted

these have been inverted due to malfunction human error or

due to malfunction human error or

due to malfunction human error or misunderstanding

misunderstanding

misunderstanding in 1962 the Soviet Union placed

in 1962 the Soviet Union placed

in 1962 the Soviet Union placed nuclear-armed missiles in Cuba targeting

nuclear-armed missiles in Cuba targeting

nuclear-armed missiles in Cuba targeting the United States in retaliation for

the United States in retaliation for

the United States in retaliation for United States missiles placed in Turkey

United States missiles placed in Turkey

United States missiles placed in Turkey u.s. President Kennedy threatened the

u.s. President Kennedy threatened the

u.s. President Kennedy threatened the Soviets with nuclear attack because he

Soviets with nuclear attack because he

Soviets with nuclear attack because he didn’t know that those Soviet missiles

didn’t know that those Soviet missiles

didn’t know that those Soviet missiles were nuclear-armed and that there were

were nuclear-armed and that there were

were nuclear-armed and that there were Soviet operators in Cuba ready to use

Soviet operators in Cuba ready to use

Soviet operators in Cuba ready to use them I remember aged 18 my anxiety when

them I remember aged 18 my anxiety when

them I remember aged 18 my anxiety when the whole world held its breath

catastrophic nuclear war was averted by

catastrophic nuclear war was averted by luck and a secret agreement to withdraw

luck and a secret agreement to withdraw

luck and a secret agreement to withdraw missiles from Turkey and Cuba less than

missiles from Turkey and Cuba less than

missiles from Turkey and Cuba less than 30 years later Iraq invaded Kuwait 1990

30 years later Iraq invaded Kuwait 1990

30 years later Iraq invaded Kuwait 1990 speaking to 20,000 anti-war protesters

speaking to 20,000 anti-war protesters

speaking to 20,000 anti-war protesters in London

in London

in London I warned that if Salim Hussein felt

I warned that if Salim Hussein felt

I warned that if Salim Hussein felt personally threatened he could attack

personally threatened he could attack

personally threatened he could attack Israel with conventionally armed Scud

Israel with conventionally armed Scud

Israel with conventionally armed Scud missiles and become the Arabs champion

missiles and become the Arabs champion

missiles and become the Arabs champion if one Scud attack caused excessive

if one Scud attack caused excessive

if one Scud attack caused excessive casualties Israel’s leader would come

casualties Israel’s leader would come

casualties Israel’s leader would come under massive pressure to respond with a

under massive pressure to respond with a

under massive pressure to respond with a nuclear strike on Baghdad a week after I

nuclear strike on Baghdad a week after I

nuclear strike on Baghdad a week after I spoke israelis learned that their

spoke israelis learned that their

spoke israelis learned that their nuclear deterrent had failed 39 Scud

nuclear deterrent had failed 39 Scud

nuclear deterrent had failed 39 Scud attacks from Iraq caused miraculously

attacks from Iraq caused miraculously

attacks from Iraq caused miraculously few casualties

few casualties

few casualties the Americans rushed more anti scud

the Americans rushed more anti scud

the Americans rushed more anti scud missile defenses there and congratulated

missile defenses there and congratulated

missile defenses there and congratulated Israel on its restraint fast forward

Israel on its restraint fast forward

Israel on its restraint fast forward five years in 1995 a Norwegian research

five years in 1995 a Norwegian research

five years in 1995 a Norwegian research rocket was misidentified by Russian

rocket was misidentified by Russian

rocket was misidentified by Russian radar as an incoming United States

radar as an incoming United States

radar as an incoming United States nuclear strike the Russian leader

nuclear strike the Russian leader

nuclear strike the Russian leader activated his special briefcase

activated his special briefcase

activated his special briefcase authorizing nuclear armed submarines to

authorizing nuclear armed submarines to

authorizing nuclear armed submarines to prepare for launch

prepare for launch

prepare for launch cadet catastrophe was avoided by a few

cadet catastrophe was avoided by a few

cadet catastrophe was avoided by a few minutes which brings me to the ongoing

minutes which brings me to the ongoing

minutes which brings me to the ongoing crisis in Northeast Asia custom built to

crisis in Northeast Asia custom built to

crisis in Northeast Asia custom built to showcase nuclear deterrence mad bad

showcase nuclear deterrence mad bad

showcase nuclear deterrence mad bad North Korean leader Kim jong-un is

North Korean leader Kim jong-un is

North Korean leader Kim jong-un is portrayed as the new Hitler but the

portrayed as the new Hitler but the

portrayed as the new Hitler but the nuclear weapons so Donald Trump declares

nuclear weapons so Donald Trump declares

nuclear weapons so Donald Trump declares that if the United States is threatened

that if the United States is threatened

that if the United States is threatened either itself or its allies they will

either itself or its allies they will

either itself or its allies they will have no choice but to totally destroy

have no choice but to totally destroy

have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea that makes Trump little

North Korea that makes Trump little

North Korea that makes Trump little better than Kim both have bought into

better than Kim both have bought into

better than Kim both have bought into the bogey

the bogey

the bogey mantra that only nuclear deterrence can

mantra that only nuclear deterrence can

mantra that only nuclear deterrence can guarantee their country’s security the

guarantee their country’s security the

guarantee their country’s security the United States claims to provide a

United States claims to provide a

United States claims to provide a nuclear umbrella protecting its allies

nuclear umbrella protecting its allies

nuclear umbrella protecting its allies South Korea and Japan but if nuclear

South Korea and Japan but if nuclear

South Korea and Japan but if nuclear deterrence fails those countries become

deterrence fails those countries become

deterrence fails those countries become targets while the United States mainland

targets while the United States mainland

targets while the United States mainland would remain relatively untouched so

would remain relatively untouched so

would remain relatively untouched so nuclear deterrence for them is actually

nuclear deterrence for them is actually

nuclear deterrence for them is actually more like a sieve

more like a sieve

more like a sieve but all is not lost more and more people

but all is not lost more and more people

but all is not lost more and more people are realizing that this is an

are realizing that this is an

are realizing that this is an ineffective and inexcusable strategy and

ineffective and inexcusable strategy and

ineffective and inexcusable strategy and they’re starting to do something helpful

they’re starting to do something helpful

they’re starting to do something helpful about it I joined the veterans in

about it I joined the veterans in

about it I joined the veterans in Britain who became my friends after many

Britain who became my friends after many

Britain who became my friends after many of my former colleagues shun me I also

of my former colleagues shun me I also

of my former colleagues shun me I also was befriended by seasoned anti-nuclear

was befriended by seasoned anti-nuclear

was befriended by seasoned anti-nuclear campaigners one of whom I married here

campaigners one of whom I married here

campaigners one of whom I married here in nuclear-free New Zealand in 1997 soon

in nuclear-free New Zealand in 1997 soon

in nuclear-free New Zealand in 1997 soon after my anti-nuclear shift received

after my anti-nuclear shift received

after my anti-nuclear shift received support from a sensationally

support from a sensationally

support from a sensationally well-qualified veteran in his last job

well-qualified veteran in his last job

well-qualified veteran in his last job from 1992 to 94 General Lee Butler

from 1992 to 94 General Lee Butler

from 1992 to 94 General Lee Butler United States Air Force was commander in

United States Air Force was commander in

United States Air Force was commander in chief of the entire American nuclear war

chief of the entire American nuclear war

chief of the entire American nuclear war machine yet when he examined it in

machine yet when he examined it in

machine yet when he examined it in detail he was so horrified by the

detail he was so horrified by the

detail he was so horrified by the incoherent madness of nuclear deterrence

incoherent madness of nuclear deterrence

incoherent madness of nuclear deterrence planning that after retiring he spoke

planning that after retiring he spoke

planning that after retiring he spoke out against it

out against it

out against it and back in 1999 I accompanied him and

and back in 1999 I accompanied him and

and back in 1999 I accompanied him and another reassuring convert former United

another reassuring convert former United

another reassuring convert former United States

States

States Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to

Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to

Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to urge the Japanese government to stop

urge the Japanese government to stop

urge the Japanese government to stop relying on the United States nuclear

relying on the United States nuclear

relying on the United States nuclear protection on the 7th of July this year

protection on the 7th of July this year

protection on the 7th of July this year in New York

in New York

in New York I witnessed 122 United Nations member

I witnessed 122 United Nations member

I witnessed 122 United Nations member states successfully negotiate and adopt

states successfully negotiate and adopt

states successfully negotiate and adopt a treaty to prohibit to prohibit nuclear

a treaty to prohibit to prohibit nuclear

a treaty to prohibit to prohibit nuclear weapons this built upon a historic

weapons this built upon a historic

weapons this built upon a historic judgment over twenty years ago by the

judgment over twenty years ago by the

judgment over twenty years ago by the International Court of Justice in answer

International Court of Justice in answer

International Court of Justice in answer to the question is the threat or use of

to the question is the threat or use of

to the question is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance

nuclear weapons in any circumstance

nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law i

permitted under international law i

permitted under international law i chaired the british arm of that

chaired the british arm of that

chaired the british arm of that international campaign which persuaded

international campaign which persuaded

international campaign which persuaded most UN member states to agree to ask

most UN member states to agree to ask

most UN member states to agree to ask the court that question in its judgment

the court that question in its judgment

the court that question in its judgment the court confirmed that the threat let

the court confirmed that the threat let

the court confirmed that the threat let alone use of nuclear weapons would

alone use of nuclear weapons would

alone use of nuclear weapons would generally be illegal no surprise that

generally be illegal no surprise that

generally be illegal no surprise that the three leading guardians of nuclear

the three leading guardians of nuclear

the three leading guardians of nuclear deterrence the United States Great

deterrence the United States Great

deterrence the United States Great Britain and France led a boycott of

Britain and France led a boycott of

Britain and France led a boycott of those negotiations furiously protesting

those negotiations furiously protesting

those negotiations furiously protesting that the irresponsibility and naivety of

that the irresponsibility and naivety of

that the irresponsibility and naivety of those 122 supportive States ironically

those 122 supportive States ironically

those 122 supportive States ironically the absence of the nine nuclear-armed

the absence of the nine nuclear-armed

the absence of the nine nuclear-armed States was why the negotiations raced

States was why the negotiations raced

States was why the negotiations raced along in a wonderfully cooperative

along in a wonderfully cooperative

along in a wonderfully cooperative spirit and succeeded New Zealand was a

spirit and succeeded New Zealand was a

spirit and succeeded New Zealand was a leading negotiator as the first ally of

leading negotiator as the first ally of

leading negotiator as the first ally of a nuclear-armed state to have rejected

a nuclear-armed state to have rejected

a nuclear-armed state to have rejected nuclear deterrence over 30 years ago

there’s more good news

there’s more good news this year the Nobel Peace Prize was

this year the Nobel Peace Prize was

this year the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the international campaign to

awarded to the international campaign to

awarded to the international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons which played a

abolish nuclear weapons which played a

abolish nuclear weapons which played a leading role in mobilizing public and

leading role in mobilizing public and

leading role in mobilizing public and political support for that treaty most

political support for that treaty most

political support for that treaty most importantly for my successes in the

importantly for my successes in the

importantly for my successes in the Royal Navy who have to be ready to do

Royal Navy who have to be ready to do

Royal Navy who have to be ready to do the dirty work of pressing the nuclear

the dirty work of pressing the nuclear

the dirty work of pressing the nuclear weapon launch button for their posturing

weapon launch button for their posturing

weapon launch button for their posturing political leaders this treaty

political leaders this treaty

political leaders this treaty strengthens the stigma against nuclear

strengthens the stigma against nuclear

strengthens the stigma against nuclear deterrence the main difference between

deterrence the main difference between

deterrence the main difference between military professionals and terrorists is

military professionals and terrorists is

military professionals and terrorists is that military professionals need to act

that military professionals need to act

that military professionals need to act within the law that is why chemical and

within the law that is why chemical and

within the law that is why chemical and biological weapons are not recognized by

biological weapons are not recognized by

biological weapons are not recognized by military professionals as weapons at all

military professionals as weapons at all

military professionals as weapons at all they are indiscriminate terror devices

they are indiscriminate terror devices

they are indiscriminate terror devices which have been outlawed and abolished

which have been outlawed and abolished

which have been outlawed and abolished nuclear weapons are far worse for all

nuclear weapons are far worse for all

nuclear weapons are far worse for all these reasons nuclear deterrence is no

these reasons nuclear deterrence is no

these reasons nuclear deterrence is no more than a repulsive unlawful

more than a repulsive unlawful

more than a repulsive unlawful protection racket used as a counterfeit

protection racket used as a counterfeit

protection racket used as a counterfeit currency of power but hugely profitable

currency of power but hugely profitable

currency of power but hugely profitable for the corporate arms industry the

for the corporate arms industry the

for the corporate arms industry the power elites of the nuclear-armed states

power elites of the nuclear-armed states

power elites of the nuclear-armed states are in denial that their game of nuclear

are in denial that their game of nuclear

are in denial that their game of nuclear chicken really does threaten the

chicken really does threaten the

chicken really does threaten the survival of us all but the tide of

survival of us all but the tide of

survival of us all but the tide of history is at last churning towards

history is at last churning towards

history is at last churning towards justice it is time for us all to step up

justice it is time for us all to step up

justice it is time for us all to step up and end the threat to humanity in the

and end the threat to humanity in the

and end the threat to humanity in the planet from this irresponsible hoax

planet from this irresponsible hoax

planet from this irresponsible hoax holding us all hostage thank you

holding us all hostage thank you

holding us all hostage thank you you

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *