Press "Enter" to skip to content

Solo una decrescita felice ci può salvare | Maurizio Pallante | TEDxTaranto


[Applause]

[Music]

Good evening I would like to start these

reflections

starting from two facts that have me a lot

hit recently not because not

it was to be expected after a summer

hot like the one that was there but for

the rapid sequence that followed

the hurricane harvey at the end of August

in the United States in the Caribbean

Caribbean and Texas

the irmen hurricane in the first ten days

in september in cuba and miami in florida

and the flood of livorno all these

phenomena should open have open

eyes to people who until now

they did have underestimated

totally the consequences of the effect

greenhouse of climate change

unfortunately I think we have to wait

still the most negative consequences

if I see if we analyze the results of the

cup and fortune in Paris where they have

passed as a great victory

the fact of having agreed on

a containment of the temperature

increase in the Earth’s temperature of

1.5 degrees two maximum by the end

of the century in the last century

earth temperature has increased

compared to the pre-industrial age of 0.8

degrees 1.5 and double of 0.82 and two

half times

if 0.8 has set the changes in motion

climate that has set in motion

I believe we must expect well

worse

from this kind of increase the only thing

to do is to try not to control one

further increase is up to the current one

but to decrease the earth temperatures

and as in increasing temperatures

terrestrial and predominantly affect

the carboniscrysis and the methane

you have to do three things basically

first reduce the burning of sources

fossils to get energy

second increase the wooded areas

to increase photosynthesis

chlorophyll that absorbs Latinas

carbonic lost limit the farms

industrial consumption of meat for

limit the emissions of methane is

avoid that they are deforested

vast areas of the earth’s surface

to make grazing for animals

breeding that is what is needed

it is this decrease because anyway

humanity has exceeded the limit of

environmental compatibility not only on the

co2 emissions that this year lover

shot day the day humanity has

consumed all renewable resources

that the earth will recall in the course of a

year was 2 August

last year it was August 15th

ten years ago it was 15 of

September 20 years ago it was 15 of

October or the number of gods is reported

progressively towards December 31, not c

it is a future for humanity

but think about the fact that in all the

oceans hovering masses of mush

of plastic larger than the states

united while the fish population is

it is halved, think about the reduction

of the fertility of the soils that are there

there is a whole series of phenomena

that make us understand that the only one

solution to tackle this turning point

which can question the

survival of humanity itself and the

decrease and decrease

because all these phenomena are

increased are fed by the increase

of the production of goods from the increase

of the use of resources by the increase of

missions that are made in the course of the

production cycles

now there is no alternative is not one

choice of degrowth

one realizes that this is not there

alternative that there is no choice yes

must ask the problem to understand if it is

It is possible to make a decrease that does not

involves an excessive deterioration

of the living conditions of the peoples

developed to allow improvement

of the living conditions of the peoples

underdeveloped and can guarantee

a transition of humanity has lost

a historical phase of a different character but

to see if this is possible to us

we first cruise understand that

what is growing and cheap because

we are so used to thinking that

economic growth is the increase of the

goods that are produced and services

that are supplied in reality

the indicator with which the measure is measured

growth of the gross domestic product is the

sum of the sales prices of the

objects and services has its own final

that is, goods and being the sum

of the goods does not tell us anything about the

quality of these goods

that is, if there is anything that damages

that I know the traffic accidents do

grow the gross domestic product

the energy was spoken before you think

that to heat our buildings us

we consume on average 20 liters of

diesel or twenty cubic meters of methane al

square meter per year

the maximum that is allowed in Germany

and 7 liters 7 cubic meters per square meter

a year a third of what

we consume

these are the worst buildings i

better buildings consume one liter e

the middle of the square meter per year

then all these things that they do

grow the trade on the 20 of the product

gross inside is not said to be

things that give results of

positive character for which what

it is necessary to do is to introduce some

qualitative and qualitative elements

objectively reduce the productions of

objects

that have no use when you

it speaks of no use I am not

making a speech of the theory of the

needs

nobody can afford to enter

desires of people even if someone

he thinks they bought sure there is the

excessive number of clothes or spend the

money for something objectively

as damaging as the cigarettes he sees is

a negative fact the people who

they want to get lots of t-shirts

replace the frequency smoking mobiles

some cigarettes buy some cars

powerful people have the right to do it because

however, this is a requirement of

subjective character

we talk about problems of objects that

they are the products that are objectively

useless what are the products

objectively useless I do some

examples the food that nobody throws

let’s say you want to buy some food

to throw away the energy that is explained

in buildings

nobody is happy to spend the

triple what it could spend

to waste energy abuse

medicines

raw materials contained in objects

that are abandoned if the objects that

are issued are buried or

burned they are completely lost

raw materials that contain the

decrease is the selective reduction

of the waste of things that is

objectively they are useless

it is not an intervention within the

choices of people

this we say so is one of the ways in

which can be degressed which

involves an improvement of the

life condition

if our houses reduced the

waste of energy

we could save some money

we reduce the anhydrite emissions

carbon and let’s say the greenhouse effect e

improve

the habitability of the houses this is a

specific example of happy degrowth

if the food waste is reduced

decrease the waste decreases the

part of the most difficult to manage

waste that putrescibile and yes

reduce costs decrease means

use of the most advanced technologies

to reduce waste of substances that

they create problems

degrowth is not the many review

comparison but decreases from the recession

I do not know if for bad faith or ignorance

for what

well the recession is the decrease

generalized and uncontrolled throughout

the production of goods is useful

that the useless ones the consequence more

serious of the recession and the

unemployment the decrease being the

selective reduction of goods that

they have no use in creating

employment and the only way in the countries

advanced industrials to create

employment a useful occupation because

employment is never a value of

for itself

the taranto ilva creates employment

creating environmental damage

the factories of weapons creates a

employment by increasing the possibilities

of the wars we must create

occupation of useful activities ie

give the element of a qualitative character

well as well as being a useful occupation

it is an occupation that costs nothing

this is an element that almost seems

paradoxical but we make the hypothesis of

have a house that consumes 20 liters of

random per square meter per year and that

this house is restored and that i

its consumption drops to 5 liters per meter

square a year

means that the owner of that

house spends after renovation a

quarter of what he spent before

they can even make contracts

for which the energy renovations of

they are made at the expense of the company that

the attorney that he does and the owner

of the House

commits to continue to pay the amount

who pays today for a number of

years predetermined contractually in

this way the savings serve every

year to amortize the shares of the

investments and were necessary to

to renovate the house, that is me

that I can not understand that we

we buy a lot of energy from abroad

many fossil sources spending a lot

money and that this energy for 70 per

one hundred is wasted as a result of

technological inefficiency in consequence

of irresponsibility of behavior

it would not be better than the money that today

we spend to buy energy that

we waste respond to pay the

wages and salaries of people who

they work to make sure we stop

to waste energy you can build

a whole economic policy e

industrial

on these things the first aspect of the

decrease is the reduction of goods

that have no use

objectively the second aspect is the

ability to produce goods that

they are not bought or self-produced

exchange as a gift in the audio

of solidarity relations between the

people in our family us

we have for 18 years a vegetable garden where

we build fruit from vegetables

which serves to satisfy our needs

become that fruit with vegetables

they do not make the internal product grow

gross because they are not bought and

sold reduce the product

gross internal

because we do not go buy the

vegetable equivalent to that which

we produce for ourselves therefore

let’s reduce the demand for the

fruit and vegetable merchandise and the other aspect

beyond the production and capacity of

establish relationships between us

on the gift of time on solidarity e

not competition on competition

as he did until now

degrowth is not one is an idea that

born in the economic field but not yes

exhausts in the economic field is one

goes immediately in a conception of the

world in a conception of life

it’s not putting the minus sign in front of the

pil

because if you just put the

minus sign during the pil would not come out

from the quantitative logic of those who

they want the sign more in front of the mind

pil is the introduction of criteria for

qualitative evaluation in human doing

it is a change of cultural paradigm

a different way to set up reports

of the human species with the world and with the

non-human living and the only way to

overcome not only the ecological crisis but

also the economic crisis allowing the

humanity to open a new phase

more evolved of its history thanks

[Applause]

[Music]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *