Press "Enter" to skip to content

Render unto Washington | Jesse Lin | TEDxYouth@Lincoln


[Music]

[Music] going up in Lincoln

going up in Lincoln

going up in Lincoln I was raised Chinese Christian that

I was raised Chinese Christian that

I was raised Chinese Christian that means I attended the Chinese Christian

means I attended the Chinese Christian

means I attended the Chinese Christian Church which is pretty normal we had

Church which is pretty normal we had

Church which is pretty normal we had church every Sunday but in this quaint

church every Sunday but in this quaint

church every Sunday but in this quaint little side auditorium branched off from

little side auditorium branched off from

little side auditorium branched off from a full-fledged Church here in Lincoln

a full-fledged Church here in Lincoln

a full-fledged Church here in Lincoln the entrance actually was set off by

the entrance actually was set off by

the entrance actually was set off by this rusty fire escape because was the

this rusty fire escape because was the

this rusty fire escape because was the main entrance to the building and so

main entrance to the building and so

main entrance to the building and so every Sunday we’d have to pass under

every Sunday we’d have to pass under

every Sunday we’d have to pass under that to go to service and it got to the

that to go to service and it got to the

that to go to service and it got to the point where when I was younger I thought

point where when I was younger I thought

point where when I was younger I thought church was something that was really

church was something that was really

church was something that was really sketchy and sort of not normal but

sketchy and sort of not normal but

sketchy and sort of not normal but really it was just mine that was a

really it was just mine that was a

really it was just mine that was a little odd here is a picture of me with

little odd here is a picture of me with

little odd here is a picture of me with Santa Claus who I thought was a God when

Santa Claus who I thought was a God when

Santa Claus who I thought was a God when I was younger then I learned about that

I was younger then I learned about that

I was younger then I learned about that story in Exodus where God tells Moses no

story in Exodus where God tells Moses no

story in Exodus where God tells Moses no one sees the face of God and lives and

one sees the face of God and lives and

one sees the face of God and lives and that wasn’t really the Christmas miracle

that wasn’t really the Christmas miracle

that wasn’t really the Christmas miracle I was looking forward to that year but

I was looking forward to that year but

I was looking forward to that year but anyway a more interesting result of my

anyway a more interesting result of my

anyway a more interesting result of my unconventional upbringing in the

unconventional upbringing in the

unconventional upbringing in the Christian faith is that I was absolutely

Christian faith is that I was absolutely

Christian faith is that I was absolutely ignorant of some of the etiquette namely

ignorant of some of the etiquette namely

ignorant of some of the etiquette namely that there is this sort of gag order on

that there is this sort of gag order on

that there is this sort of gag order on religion for example at a dinner with

religion for example at a dinner with

religion for example at a dinner with friends you always have to keep the

friends you always have to keep the

friends you always have to keep the conversation away from the so called

conversation away from the so called

conversation away from the so called controversies which inevitably means

controversies which inevitably means

controversies which inevitably means religious opinions now first I thought

religious opinions now first I thought

religious opinions now first I thought this was just my anecdotal experience

this was just my anecdotal experience

this was just my anecdotal experience but as it turns out it’s systemic

but as it turns out it’s systemic

but as it turns out it’s systemic about 49% of Americans rarely if ever

about 49% of Americans rarely if ever

about 49% of Americans rarely if ever discuss religion with people outside

discuss religion with people outside

discuss religion with people outside their family and later I learned the

their family and later I learned the

their family and later I learned the other half of this because this doesn’t

other half of this because this doesn’t

other half of this because this doesn’t affect just religion rather we proper

affect just religion rather we proper

affect just religion rather we proper Americans can’t talk about two things to

Americans can’t talk about two things to

Americans can’t talk about two things to polite company that’s religion and

polite company that’s religion and

polite company that’s religion and politics now first I didn’t get it

politics now first I didn’t get it

politics now first I didn’t get it especially the religion part now sure no

especially the religion part now sure no

especially the religion part now sure no two people will share the same

two people will share the same

two people will share the same perspective on religious issues and

perspective on religious issues and

perspective on religious issues and that’s partially why it’s such a taboo

that’s partially why it’s such a taboo

that’s partially why it’s such a taboo subject and so I had to grow to accept

subject and so I had to grow to accept

subject and so I had to grow to accept this explanation but it’s really not the

this explanation but it’s really not the

this explanation but it’s really not the whole story because Christianity is

whole story because Christianity is

whole story because Christianity is important to American politics in unique

important to American politics in unique

important to American politics in unique ways it’s enshrined in our money in the

ways it’s enshrined in our money in the

ways it’s enshrined in our money in the Declaration of Independence and the

Declaration of Independence and the

Declaration of Independence and the original pilgrim communities that found

original pilgrim communities that found

original pilgrim communities that found in our society in other words

in our society in other words

in our society in other words American politics is rooted in

American politics is rooted in

American politics is rooted in Christianity and curiously nowadays

Christianity and curiously nowadays

Christianity and curiously nowadays there’s been a huge backlash to that a

there’s been a huge backlash to that a

there’s been a huge backlash to that a barn our group survey found that from

barn our group survey found that from

barn our group survey found that from 1996 to 2004 the percentage of

1996 to 2004 the percentage of

1996 to 2004 the percentage of non-christians who had a quote/unquote

non-christians who had a quote/unquote

non-christians who had a quote/unquote bad impression of Christianity nearly

bad impression of Christianity nearly

bad impression of Christianity nearly doubled and the surveyors also found

doubled and the surveyors also found

doubled and the surveyors also found some of the problem around three out of

some of the problem around three out of

some of the problem around three out of four of all surveyed called Christianity

four of all surveyed called Christianity

four of all surveyed called Christianity too involved in politics and nearly nine

too involved in politics and nearly nine

too involved in politics and nearly nine out of ten called Christianity

out of ten called Christianity

out of ten called Christianity hypocritical or judgmental clearly least

hypocritical or judgmental clearly least

hypocritical or judgmental clearly least historic ties between Christianity and

historic ties between Christianity and

historic ties between Christianity and American politics have had a rather

American politics have had a rather

American politics have had a rather negative effect on its public image in

negative effect on its public image in

negative effect on its public image in the modern day but now I don’t think

the modern day but now I don’t think

the modern day but now I don’t think it’s right to just blame Americans being

it’s right to just blame Americans being

it’s right to just blame Americans being ideologically opposed to Christian

ideologically opposed to Christian

ideologically opposed to Christian politics because I don’t think that’s

politics because I don’t think that’s

politics because I don’t think that’s necessarily true but rather Christianity

necessarily true but rather Christianity

necessarily true but rather Christianity also has this internal image problem

also has this internal image problem

also has this internal image problem simply put when it comes to our beliefs

simply put when it comes to our beliefs

simply put when it comes to our beliefs we believers don’t know how to express

we believers don’t know how to express

we believers don’t know how to express them and so often we just won’t and

them and so often we just won’t and

them and so often we just won’t and those who do speak out and bring up

those who do speak out and bring up

those who do speak out and bring up religion only do so in relation to

religion only do so in relation to

religion only do so in relation to political issues now of course in many

political issues now of course in many

political issues now of course in many ways politics and religion are similar

ways politics and religion are similar

ways politics and religion are similar they’re both places where people find

they’re both places where people find

they’re both places where people find their values their sense of right and

their values their sense of right and

their values their sense of right and wrong and they’re both communities for

wrong and they’re both communities for

wrong and they’re both communities for something bigger than ourselves as

something bigger than ourselves as

something bigger than ourselves as individuals and so it’s understandable

individuals and so it’s understandable

individuals and so it’s understandable that their goals overlap sometimes but

that their goals overlap sometimes but

that their goals overlap sometimes but the mistake comes when we treat them the

the mistake comes when we treat them the

the mistake comes when we treat them the same way because they’re still not the

same way because they’re still not the

same way because they’re still not the same thing and so we often treat them

same thing and so we often treat them

same thing and so we often treat them the same way not people will go to us

the same way not people will go to us

the same way not people will go to us into these two long political type

into these two long political type

into these two long political type arguments I saw a study recently that

arguments I saw a study recently that

arguments I saw a study recently that sums this up nicely now this is satire

sums this up nicely now this is satire

sums this up nicely now this is satire to the best of my knowledge but it makes

to the best of my knowledge but it makes

to the best of my knowledge but it makes an apt point which is that political

an apt point which is that political

an apt point which is that political discourse has a very particular tone to

discourse has a very particular tone to

discourse has a very particular tone to it away framing discussions that may be

it away framing discussions that may be

it away framing discussions that may be appropriate for the elections but

appropriate for the elections but

appropriate for the elections but clearly not through everything so we

clearly not through everything so we

clearly not through everything so we should aim to change the terms of this

should aim to change the terms of this

should aim to change the terms of this discussion to change the forum in which

discussion to change the forum in which

discussion to change the forum in which we conduct it which doesn’t necessarily

we conduct it which doesn’t necessarily

we conduct it which doesn’t necessarily require changing its content now why do

require changing its content now why do

require changing its content now why do I say that because

I say that because

I say that because there are certain political facts about

there are certain political facts about

there are certain political facts about Christianity in the United States that

Christianity in the United States that

Christianity in the United States that we cannot change overnight

we cannot change overnight

we cannot change overnight for example that evangelicals generally

for example that evangelicals generally

for example that evangelicals generally vote in certain ways on certain issues

vote in certain ways on certain issues

vote in certain ways on certain issues and that has been the huge sticking

and that has been the huge sticking

and that has been the huge sticking point for a lot of people but these are

point for a lot of people but these are

point for a lot of people but these are all issues of content their doctrinal

all issues of content their doctrinal

all issues of content their doctrinal issues that pastors have debated and

issues that pastors have debated and

issues that pastors have debated and will continue to do so but what all of

will continue to do so but what all of

will continue to do so but what all of us here today us common people or us non

us here today us common people or us non

us here today us common people or us non pastors at least what we all can do is

pastors at least what we all can do is

pastors at least what we all can do is change the way we think about and the

change the way we think about and the

change the way we think about and the way we hold these everyday conversations

way we hold these everyday conversations

way we hold these everyday conversations about religion if we do at all and if we

about religion if we do at all and if we

about religion if we do at all and if we can divest ourselves from the political

can divest ourselves from the political

can divest ourselves from the political model of conflict we can open up these

model of conflict we can open up these

model of conflict we can open up these discussions to a diversity of viewpoints

discussions to a diversity of viewpoints

discussions to a diversity of viewpoints and then to a genuine understanding and

and then to a genuine understanding and

and then to a genuine understanding and connection between people because well

connection between people because well

connection between people because well politics almost by its nature is

politics almost by its nature is

politics almost by its nature is irreconcilable one side will win when it

irreconcilable one side will win when it

irreconcilable one side will win when it counts religion is not that same sort of

counts religion is not that same sort of

counts religion is not that same sort of ballgame and it doesn’t do us any good

ballgame and it doesn’t do us any good

ballgame and it doesn’t do us any good to treat them the same way what I

to treat them the same way what I

to treat them the same way what I imagine is a future in which we can

imagine is a future in which we can

imagine is a future in which we can freely open these discussions about

freely open these discussions about

freely open these discussions about faith about ethics and about community

faith about ethics and about community

faith about ethics and about community because whether we’re religious or

because whether we’re religious or

because whether we’re religious or non-religious whichever religion were

non-religious whichever religion were

non-religious whichever religion were part of we all have a stake in these

part of we all have a stake in these

part of we all have a stake in these issues and these topics all matter and

issues and these topics all matter and

issues and these topics all matter and they matter so much that we cannot

they matter so much that we cannot

they matter so much that we cannot afford to play it like the pundits now

afford to play it like the pundits now

afford to play it like the pundits now of course when you go to open these

of course when you go to open these

of course when you go to open these discussions you’ll never meet with

discussions you’ll never meet with

discussions you’ll never meet with perfect agreement and that’s just how it

perfect agreement and that’s just how it

perfect agreement and that’s just how it is but only through trying this more

is but only through trying this more

is but only through trying this more open form of communication can we

open form of communication can we

open form of communication can we actually gain something to improve our

actually gain something to improve our

actually gain something to improve our communities and improve ourselves as

communities and improve ourselves as

communities and improve ourselves as individuals and I think we should give

individuals and I think we should give

individuals and I think we should give that a chance but we won’t gain anything

that a chance but we won’t gain anything

that a chance but we won’t gain anything if we always set out with this singular

if we always set out with this singular

if we always set out with this singular goal to convert which is almost like an

goal to convert which is almost like an

goal to convert which is almost like an expectation nowadays now I don’t mean to

expectation nowadays now I don’t mean to

expectation nowadays now I don’t mean to say that you need to compromise on your

say that you need to compromise on your

say that you need to compromise on your beliefs and I don’t mean to say that you

beliefs and I don’t mean to say that you

beliefs and I don’t mean to say that you need to agree to disagree but rather our

need to agree to disagree but rather our

need to agree to disagree but rather our beliefs are inevitably colored by

beliefs are inevitably colored by

beliefs are inevitably colored by encountering other people’s opinions by

encountering other people’s opinions by

encountering other people’s opinions by building relationships with them and by

building relationships with them and by

building relationships with them and by maneuvering in these relationships so in

maneuvering in these relationships so in

maneuvering in these relationships so in other words these conversations they’re

other words these conversations they’re

other words these conversations they’re valuable in and of themselves and really

valuable in and of themselves and really

valuable in and of themselves and really it’s on us for intentionally falling

it’s on us for intentionally falling

it’s on us for intentionally falling into these patterns of device

into these patterns of device

into these patterns of device that have been so counterproductive and

that have been so counterproductive and

that have been so counterproductive and so detrimental to Christianity and to

so detrimental to Christianity and to

so detrimental to Christianity and to the public image of organized religion

the public image of organized religion

the public image of organized religion as a whole in this country just talk for

as a whole in this country just talk for

as a whole in this country just talk for talks sake then maybe it can be powerful

talks sake then maybe it can be powerful

talks sake then maybe it can be powerful i opening and maybe even fun so i

i opening and maybe even fun so i

i opening and maybe even fun so i challenge all of you to raise the

challenge all of you to raise the

challenge all of you to raise the religion subject to a friend and break

religion subject to a friend and break

religion subject to a friend and break that silence and i know it can be done

that silence and i know it can be done

that silence and i know it can be done because i used to do it all the time

because i used to do it all the time

because i used to do it all the time when i was younger and i didn’t know any

when i was younger and i didn’t know any

when i was younger and i didn’t know any better and i know it can be done because

better and i know it can be done because

better and i know it can be done because i’ve done it right here politics and

i’ve done it right here politics and

i’ve done it right here politics and religion are these two secret topics

religion are these two secret topics

religion are these two secret topics that we have to avoid at the dinner

that we have to avoid at the dinner

that we have to avoid at the dinner table but let’s de couple those two and

table but let’s de couple those two and

table but let’s de couple those two and let’s deal with them differently because

let’s deal with them differently because

let’s deal with them differently because they are different and we have the power

they are different and we have the power

they are different and we have the power to change the way we hold these

to change the way we hold these

to change the way we hold these discussions and the way we consider

discussions and the way we consider

discussions and the way we consider these issues so let’s leave the news

these issues so let’s leave the news

these issues so let’s leave the news media to deal with vicious political

media to deal with vicious political

media to deal with vicious political conflicts and as for the rest of us

conflicts and as for the rest of us

conflicts and as for the rest of us let’s proclaim the good news

let’s proclaim the good news

let’s proclaim the good news [Music]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *