Press "Enter" to skip to content

Relational urban models | Enriqueta Llabres-Valls | TEDxVilnius


this is a map of London in 1800 that

this is a map of London in 1800 that time London was the largest city in the

time London was the largest city in the

time London was the largest city in the world

world

world he was overcrowded and poor citizens

he was overcrowded and poor citizens

he was overcrowded and poor citizens were living surrounded by their own

were living surrounded by their own

were living surrounded by their own fields when cholera broke through in

fields when cholera broke through in

fields when cholera broke through in Soho in 1854 it was believed that

Soho in 1854 it was believed that

Soho in 1854 it was believed that cholera was spreading by miasma in the

cholera was spreading by miasma in the

cholera was spreading by miasma in the air one of its residents dr. young is

air one of its residents dr. young is

air one of its residents dr. young is now decided to gather the location and

now decided to gather the location and

now decided to gather the location and map the location of the wells in Soho

map the location of the wells in Soho

map the location of the wells in Soho he also mapped the location of all the

he also mapped the location of all the

he also mapped the location of all the known deaths caused by cholera when he

known deaths caused by cholera when he

known deaths caused by cholera when he put these two streams of data together

put these two streams of data together

put these two streams of data together he realized that there was the cluster

he realized that there was the cluster

he realized that there was the cluster of deaths around one of the wells

of deaths around one of the wells

of deaths around one of the wells in this case it was enough for dr. snow

in this case it was enough for dr. snow

in this case it was enough for dr. snow to gather and evaluate data in order to

to gather and evaluate data in order to

to gather and evaluate data in order to solve a problem 200 years earlier in

solve a problem 200 years earlier in

solve a problem 200 years earlier in London in 1666 there was the great fire

London in 1666 there was the great fire

London in 1666 there was the great fire for four days the city of London was in

for four days the city of London was in

for four days the city of London was in flames after the fire the city was

flames after the fire the city was

flames after the fire the city was completely destroyed and king charles ii

completely destroyed and king charles ii

completely destroyed and king charles ii decided to ask a series of architects

decided to ask a series of architects

decided to ask a series of architects and surveyors in order to present new

and surveyors in order to present new

and surveyors in order to present new proposals for the city five proposals

proposals for the city five proposals

proposals for the city five proposals were presented all of them had better

were presented all of them had better

were presented all of them had better provision of green infrastructure better

provision of green infrastructure better

provision of green infrastructure better road network and better lighting

road network and better lighting

road network and better lighting conditions for the dwellings but at the

conditions for the dwellings but at the

conditions for the dwellings but at the end none of them went through the city

end none of them went through the city

end none of them went through the city was rebuilt exactly the same way why

was rebuilt exactly the same way why

was rebuilt exactly the same way why they had data they knew the land

they had data they knew the land

they had data they knew the land ownership they also had evidence of the

ownership they also had evidence of the

ownership they also had evidence of the benefits of the new solutions but this

benefits of the new solutions but this

benefits of the new solutions but this time it was not enough

time it was not enough

time it was not enough because the land owners didn’t have any

because the land owners didn’t have any

because the land owners didn’t have any instrument to negotiate and to agree it

instrument to negotiate and to agree it

instrument to negotiate and to agree it was a common ground in urban design you

was a common ground in urban design you

was a common ground in urban design you have parameters parameters belong to a

have parameters parameters belong to a

have parameters parameters belong to a particular system that everybody agrees

particular system that everybody agrees

particular system that everybody agrees parameters such as decibels can help us

parameters such as decibels can help us

parameters such as decibels can help us to assess noise pollution but you also

to assess noise pollution but you also

to assess noise pollution but you also have values values are what is worth for

have values values are what is worth for

have values values are what is worth for someone in urban design different

someone in urban design different

someone in urban design different communities and individuals might value

communities and individuals might value

communities and individuals might value the space differently this problem is

the space differently this problem is

the space differently this problem is still persist nowadays and despite we

still persist nowadays and despite we

still persist nowadays and despite we have new technologies to capture much

have new technologies to capture much

have new technologies to capture much more sophisticated data we are still in

more sophisticated data we are still in

more sophisticated data we are still in the same problem

the same problem

the same problem for example this image is built with

for example this image is built with

for example this image is built with satellite data it can help us to

satellite data it can help us to

satellite data it can help us to understand the status of coastal

understand the status of coastal

understand the status of coastal ecosystems we also have activism mapping

ecosystems we also have activism mapping

ecosystems we also have activism mapping citizens can today generate their own

citizens can today generate their own

citizens can today generate their own data and upload it into the internet or

data and upload it into the internet or

data and upload it into the internet or we can send life the city’s technology

we can send life the city’s technology

we can send life the city’s technology like this monitoring a station of

like this monitoring a station of

like this monitoring a station of pollution but despite all this

pollution but despite all this

pollution but despite all this technology if we look at the report from

technology if we look at the report from

technology if we look at the report from Yoona and Avatar in 2016 which is the

Yoona and Avatar in 2016 which is the

Yoona and Avatar in 2016 which is the United Nations program for route 1

United Nations program for route 1

United Nations program for route 1 development it clearly says that our

development it clearly says that our

development it clearly says that our organization model is unsustainable it

organization model is unsustainable it

organization model is unsustainable it consumes too much land and is energy

consumes too much land and is energy

consumes too much land and is energy intensive and this is because in our

intensive and this is because in our

intensive and this is because in our current organization model there are no

current organization model there are no

current organization model there are no instruments that measure individual

instruments that measure individual

instruments that measure individual values against the common interest so I

values against the common interest so I

values against the common interest so I wanted to tap into this problem and I

wanted to tap into this problem and I

wanted to tap into this problem and I found that urban design practice

found that urban design practice

found that urban design practice relational organism relational refers to

relational organism relational refers to

relational organism relational refers to the way in which two or more things or

the way in which two or more things or

the way in which two or more things or people come together

people come together

people come together relational urban models are interactive

relational urban models are interactive

relational urban models are interactive design toolkits interface platforms that

design toolkits interface platforms that

design toolkits interface platforms that aim to share evidence on a design but

aim to share evidence on a design but

aim to share evidence on a design but they’ll remain open so they serve as a

they’ll remain open so they serve as a

they’ll remain open so they serve as a catalyst for negotiation and the

catalyst for negotiation and the

catalyst for negotiation and the creation of share values I’m going to

creation of share values I’m going to

creation of share values I’m going to give you a series of examples back to

give you a series of examples back to

give you a series of examples back to China in 2013 we work on the urban issue

China in 2013 we work on the urban issue

China in 2013 we work on the urban issue of the urban villages urban villages are

of the urban villages urban villages are

of the urban villages urban villages are fragments of the city that result from

fragments of the city that result from

fragments of the city that result from rural to urban migration some are very

rural to urban migration some are very

rural to urban migration some are very in healthy but some fragments are very

in healthy but some fragments are very

in healthy but some fragments are very life and they are very nice but what is

life and they are very nice but what is

life and they are very nice but what is more important is that they are all

more important is that they are all

more important is that they are all scattered across the city and they host

scattered across the city and they host

scattered across the city and they host low pay workers

low pay workers

low pay workers immigrants students in the city the

immigrants students in the city the

immigrants students in the city the trend at that time was to demolish the

trend at that time was to demolish the

trend at that time was to demolish the urban villages relocate this population

urban villages relocate this population

urban villages relocate this population in the outskirts of the city creating

in the outskirts of the city creating

in the outskirts of the city creating inequalities increasing insecurity and

inequalities increasing insecurity and

inequalities increasing insecurity and making all these people to commute to

making all these people to commute to

making all these people to commute to work for long hours local NGOs and

work for long hours local NGOs and

work for long hours local NGOs and universities were trying to challenge

universities were trying to challenge

universities were trying to challenge this model but it never got accepted

this model but it never got accepted

this model but it never got accepted under the grounds that it was not

under the grounds that it was not

under the grounds that it was not economically viable so we wanted to help

economically viable so we wanted to help

economically viable so we wanted to help them to try to challenge this argument

them to try to challenge this argument

them to try to challenge this argument and we built the first relational urban

and we built the first relational urban

and we built the first relational urban model the relational orem model was the

model the relational orem model was the

model the relational orem model was the platform in which you could input

platform in which you could input

platform in which you could input demolitionist scenarios so we could

demolitionist scenarios so we could

demolitionist scenarios so we could defend partial demolition personal

defend partial demolition personal

defend partial demolition personal regeneration of urban villages and we

regeneration of urban villages and we

regeneration of urban villages and we could input also urban blocks and

could input also urban blocks and

could input also urban blocks and land-use distribution and we had output

land-use distribution and we had output

land-use distribution and we had output the cost-benefit analysis and the urban

the cost-benefit analysis and the urban

the cost-benefit analysis and the urban population mix

a traditional architectural practice

a traditional architectural practice they will do three to four options we

they will do three to four options we

they will do three to four options we were able to develop 16 iterations in

were able to develop 16 iterations in

were able to develop 16 iterations in which we proved that some of the options

which we proved that some of the options

which we proved that some of the options of partial demolition were economically

of partial demolition were economically

of partial demolition were economically valuable in this case the relational

valuable in this case the relational

valuable in this case the relational Ludwin model helped us to assess the

Ludwin model helped us to assess the

Ludwin model helped us to assess the individual value of the business

individual value of the business

individual value of the business developer against the common interest

developer against the common interest

developer against the common interest I’m trying to find a common ground that

I’m trying to find a common ground that

I’m trying to find a common ground that is more fair for the next example I’m

is more fair for the next example I’m

is more fair for the next example I’m going to talk about is a completely

going to talk about is a completely

going to talk about is a completely different scenario in this case we use

different scenario in this case we use

different scenario in this case we use the relational urban model to try to

the relational urban model to try to

the relational urban model to try to approach to the local communities and

approach to the local communities and

approach to the local communities and try to understand what was the nature of

try to understand what was the nature of

try to understand what was the nature of the problem we work in this project in

the problem we work in this project in

the problem we work in this project in South Dublin the context is a park that

South Dublin the context is a park that

South Dublin the context is a park that has strong problems of anti-social

has strong problems of anti-social

has strong problems of anti-social behavior and street drinking there was a

behavior and street drinking there was a

behavior and street drinking there was a local group of skaters and BMX riders

local group of skaters and BMX riders

local group of skaters and BMX riders who try to evoke aid for the generation

who try to evoke aid for the generation

who try to evoke aid for the generation of a skate park

of a skate park

of a skate park but despite efforts from the ideas

but despite efforts from the ideas

but despite efforts from the ideas architectural foundation and Dublin City

architectural foundation and Dublin City

architectural foundation and Dublin City Council to build community engagement

Council to build community engagement

Council to build community engagement the local community opposed to the

the local community opposed to the

the local community opposed to the project so we wanted to generate

project so we wanted to generate

project so we wanted to generate something positive with with this

something positive with with this

something positive with with this conflict and the first thing we did was

conflict and the first thing we did was

conflict and the first thing we did was to engage the local community the young

to engage the local community the young

to engage the local community the young people into the design we built this

people into the design we built this

people into the design we built this tool kit that was constituted by a

tool kit that was constituted by a

tool kit that was constituted by a sandbox where the children and the

sandbox where the children and the

sandbox where the children and the skaters could model and could explain

skaters could model and could explain

skaters could model and could explain what they wanted the park to be then we

what they wanted the park to be then we

what they wanted the park to be then we was captured by a Kinect and a projector

was captured by a Kinect and a projector

was captured by a Kinect and a projector at the beginning they were a bit real

at the beginning they were a bit real

at the beginning they were a bit real long-term especially the skaters but

long-term especially the skaters but

long-term especially the skaters but then I was transparent they did it

then I was transparent they did it

then I was transparent they did it themselves they did my job actually

themselves they did my job actually

themselves they did my job actually so the other part of the community who

so the other part of the community who

so the other part of the community who didn’t want the project was basically

didn’t want the project was basically

didn’t want the project was basically because they didn’t want to scale their

because they didn’t want to scale their

because they didn’t want to scale their park to be turned into concrete so we

park to be turned into concrete so we

park to be turned into concrete so we convinced the local estate stakeholders

convinced the local estate stakeholders

convinced the local estate stakeholders that if the stators were going to have a

that if the stators were going to have a

that if the stators were going to have a skatepark they should have a beautiful

skatepark they should have a beautiful

skatepark they should have a beautiful garden so with the earthworks we used to

garden so with the earthworks we used to

garden so with the earthworks we used to extract to generate the skateboard with

extract to generate the skateboard with

extract to generate the skateboard with the develop a series of grass mounds

the develop a series of grass mounds

the develop a series of grass mounds where we could integrate a playground

where we could integrate a playground

where we could integrate a playground for all and a garden I believe as a

for all and a garden I believe as a

for all and a garden I believe as a designer and educator that everybody in

designer and educator that everybody in

designer and educator that everybody in its own way designs we design the way we

its own way designs we design the way we

its own way designs we design the way we look and we give meaning to things this

look and we give meaning to things this

look and we give meaning to things this is the way we build our identity by

is the way we build our identity by

is the way we build our identity by sharing the design with the local

sharing the design with the local

sharing the design with the local skaters and children we build the

skaters and children we build the

skaters and children we build the identity of the place together and doing

identity of the place together and doing

identity of the place together and doing so I esteem a sense of belonging and a

so I esteem a sense of belonging and a

so I esteem a sense of belonging and a capacity for cooperation in the last

capacity for cooperation in the last

capacity for cooperation in the last project I’m going to talk about we try

project I’m going to talk about we try

project I’m going to talk about we try to use the relational model to engage

to use the relational model to engage

to use the relational model to engage the community about origin environmental

the community about origin environmental

the community about origin environmental issues in the side and try to promote an

issues in the side and try to promote an

issues in the side and try to promote an urban model that was more according to

urban model that was more according to

urban model that was more according to the logics of the environment three

the logics of the environment three

the logics of the environment three months ago I was approached by a

months ago I was approached by a

months ago I was approached by a colleague from the architectural

colleague from the architectural

colleague from the architectural Association in London he’s also one of

Association in London he’s also one of

Association in London he’s also one of the owners of one of the oldest

the owners of one of the oldest

the owners of one of the oldest architectural films in Nazareth in the

architectural films in Nazareth in the

architectural films in Nazareth in the Middle East I remember one of the first

Middle East I remember one of the first

Middle East I remember one of the first things he told me was in my homeland in

things he told me was in my homeland in

things he told me was in my homeland in 60 years it’s going to be so hot that

60 years it’s going to be so hot that

60 years it’s going to be so hot that nobody will be able to live there

nobody will be able to live there

nobody will be able to live there anymore so we worked together in this

anymore so we worked together in this

anymore so we worked together in this development in the coast of the Sea of

development in the coast of the Sea of

development in the coast of the Sea of Galilee

when we did the first research we

when we did the first research we learned that actually the sea is trying

learned that actually the sea is trying

learned that actually the sea is trying up and that is getting more and more

up and that is getting more and more

up and that is getting more and more polluted due to the excess of nutrients

polluted due to the excess of nutrients

polluted due to the excess of nutrients our first idea about the project was to

our first idea about the project was to

our first idea about the project was to propose a system of ecology where we

propose a system of ecology where we

propose a system of ecology where we could take out the water and run the

could take out the water and run the

could take out the water and run the water through our site so it gets

water through our site so it gets

water through our site so it gets oxygenated and it helps to clean the

oxygenated and it helps to clean the

oxygenated and it helps to clean the delay but when we used the model to

delay but when we used the model to

delay but when we used the model to assess our site we realized that

assess our site we realized that

assess our site we realized that actually that all the morphology of the

actually that all the morphology of the

actually that all the morphology of the ground was compromised so we couldn’t

ground was compromised so we couldn’t

ground was compromised so we couldn’t run the water by gravity we convinced

run the water by gravity we convinced

run the water by gravity we convinced the local stakeholders to recover the

the local stakeholders to recover the

the local stakeholders to recover the identity of the crown and to try to

identity of the crown and to try to

identity of the crown and to try to implement a new ecology that will help

implement a new ecology that will help

implement a new ecology that will help the lake to perform better ten days ago

the lake to perform better ten days ago

the lake to perform better ten days ago we were communicated that we got the

we were communicated that we got the

we were communicated that we got the project and for me this has a much

project and for me this has a much

project and for me this has a much bigger meaning it means that there is

bigger meaning it means that there is

bigger meaning it means that there is still out there people no matter where

still out there people no matter where

still out there people no matter where they come from from different

they come from from different

they come from from different communities that they are willing to

communities that they are willing to

communities that they are willing to come together to make a better planet

cities are currently designed mainly

cities are currently designed mainly following private interest we need

following private interest we need

following private interest we need instruments and tools that are able to

instruments and tools that are able to

instruments and tools that are able to measure individual values against common

measure individual values against common

measure individual values against common interest this is my commitment as an

interest this is my commitment as an

interest this is my commitment as an architect designer researcher and

architect designer researcher and

architect designer researcher and educator I believe we need to lead

educator I believe we need to lead

educator I believe we need to lead future generations in that direction

future generations in that direction

future generations in that direction with entrepreneurship creativity and

with entrepreneurship creativity and

with entrepreneurship creativity and imagination and maybe in the future with

imagination and maybe in the future with

imagination and maybe in the future with camber garden pollution

camber garden pollution

camber garden pollution or we can lunch share our backyard to

or we can lunch share our backyard to

or we can lunch share our backyard to generate more fresh food for all I

generate more fresh food for all I

generate more fresh food for all I believe we need to teach designers and

believe we need to teach designers and

believe we need to teach designers and architects to use technology and

architects to use technology and

architects to use technology and evidence in support of their design but

evidence in support of their design but

evidence in support of their design but they should open it up to the people

they should open it up to the people

they should open it up to the people listen to the people and design with

listen to the people and design with

listen to the people and design with humanity and compassion the way I do it

humanity and compassion the way I do it

humanity and compassion the way I do it is by using my relational urban models

is by using my relational urban models

is by using my relational urban models which are nothing more than connecting

which are nothing more than connecting

which are nothing more than connecting people with environments and people with

people with environments and people with

people with environments and people with people the environment and the values

people the environment and the values

people the environment and the values from other communities need to be part

from other communities need to be part

from other communities need to be part of our own ethos our own shared identity

of our own ethos our own shared identity

of our own ethos our own shared identity as humanity thank you

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *