Press "Enter" to skip to content

¿Por qué?, ¿Por qué? | Pablo Ruíz | TEDxUTPL


[Music]

very good days counted

when I was little and studied in the

Miguel Angel Suarez to school in

90 for all of us who are still of

the 90s and we are studying science

social or social studies

let’s see the story and the teacher said

the following and you are going to remember

from this we are going to study the beings

heroics of our country with red

abdón calderón points and stripes that

blue begins to notice abdón calderón

it is a May 24, 1822 in the war

receives a bullet in the left arm and

continues to maintain the national pavilion

receives another bullet in the right leg

and continues to maintain the flag

national receives another bullet in the leg

left and continued to maintain the

national flag and one asked him

to the teacher or because the teacher said

because if it’s out there someone

more and I said teacher I do not have red

you can write the title with black with

red is when I was little too

we would be walking the streets

Dad always told me to walk in

the streets on the sidewalks you have to

put your sister on the left at

corner because it remains weaker

because her sister is much more delicate

and you have to protect you have to

be gentleman one did not understand why

years later when one asks

why he said because that’s

years later I understood two things the

first we live in a society

patriarchal and other regulations that do not

guarantees exactly the same

rights to women and considers them

as inferior beings

unfortunately and the second thing that if

I passed a car I had a reaction

similar to this one and it took me by the

left when I was little too

I was the object of bullying but

bullying from a to the bulle of no

they accepted my request

on facebook they did not give me I love no

measured the physical click

the physicist where the

inventiveness of a child and now pretty

chubby because here in Laja you eat

quite especially in the house of the

grandmother and object of my physical I had

issues like this

winnie pooh tank reservoir and beanbag

head shirt are my interpretations

when I was doing the

presentation of what I think my

friends wanted to say and I was wondering

why when he came home and saw

I learned to television and

television showed this tall people

blond people zukas like blue eyes and

they told me that ‘s the stereotype that

I must defend and with an apprentice to the

radio women transmitted this to him

no makeup

I’m fantastic make up today a work

of art that the arts quality founded or is

one of the main theorists of the

constructive social himself and he said

something fundamental

they have recorded our heads and

we think how we think and do

exactly what we do because

they use two mechanisms first

the spontaneous mechanisms the family to

through popular dances customs

etcetera tells you what to do what is

well and what is wrong and the second the

formal mechanisms that are two

basically education and the media

of communication that are backed by

the state and they tell you what it is that

and you must do it together

they realize this is guardian concatenation

to the three stories but it was always

well not 500 years before

we all believed that the earth was the

center of the universe and this was the

tendency and the thesis defended by

absolutely all institutions

until a madman came as a

telescope that decided will no longer see the

earth but see the stars said

Caramba wondered why he said no

we are or we are not the center of the universe

We were around the sun or only

with a why

the last century until the last century

only men could vote

until we had a beautiful crazy woman who

We are proud to say that it is lohan

to matilde hidalgo navarro that since 1924

to 1928 he fought for the seat the vote

female

juan vote that expanded by ecuador and

struggle that expanded even by

Latin America thanks to her when she

he asked why because only

men can vote

in 1993 they have not done more than begins to

media study

it says ok what we are getting

they are only products and he gives

account that all means of

communication and information

they transmit depends on certain

things 1

who are the owners of the media

of communication through their

interests

2 the advertising that is agreed and 3

an anti communist ideology in what

we differentiate ourselves from them in

that they made of their practice

daily of his daily philosophy he

because they decided not to be

automatons of life in which they

they decided not to be dependent on what

they tell them what they have to do

now I am a lover of politics

and in the same way of speech and I

he began to question certain things

first abdón calderón is a myth

second

my sister is much stronger and

intelligent that I and third is a

little fat and that has nothing of

bad

as a result of that I said this happens

exactly the same in politics

every four years I realized that

they appeared politicians and they told me this

is the left and this is the right

write with blue with red and the

politicians and they told me

we are the future and they are the

past

write with blue and with red and if someone

out there said I want to score with black

is wrong is traitor

they also give us nothing account appears

about the school in mind that

came politicians and they told me

have to defend

the political party with your corner life

protect them the ideal which when

my dad told me to protect your sister

it does not matter if something happens here

and it’s taking you protect it

here the fanaticism and of the same one is created

way when one was learning the media

of communication about all the

TV

I saw politicians that every four years

they are environmentalists and politicians that every

four years defend women

politicians who handle every four years

bicycle and they do political sport that

every four years

they also like animals and one

buy that product and do not ask about

what then we decided to form here in

the university a structure

Kauai flame Hawaii is an observatory of

the political agenda and what you are trying to do

measure what they tell us and why

They tell it as we say and this

is and this is the advantage of kauai

when we start measuring white

we compare certain things

the political discourse and because of that

we use an academic that is called

Hernán Guzmán says that absolutely

every message has a frame or a

circumscription of reality I think that

imagine a blank wall and in that

blank wall a picture what I

I want to convey what I want

transmit and think it’s better

what I want to convey is what is

only in the box

if this message that I transmit has

The following things are the following

elements a cause a problem a

solution a negative moral assessment

or positive and a cultural resonance and

in the cultural resonance that he used

things like numbers like data like

emotions as statistics to get

and convince with my message

so we use I’m starting to

measure the speech of the party

official

they were going to realize what we

they made 1 officialist speech the cause

of all the problems we have in

our country is the partidocracia and the

previous matches crisis problem

economic crisis institutional crisis

policy solution that comes to the party

of government

citizen revolution moral evaluation

negative to all those who did in the

past

positive to everything what I am going to be me

cultural resonance that used holiday

banking eloy alfaro che guevara

bolivar and beyond we are going to analyze

now the opposition speech for

see that has exactly the

same five elements one cause of

all the problems the revolution

citizen the current government problem the

corruption the institutional crisis the

economic crisis solution that comes the

negative moral evaluation opposition

everything that was done before evaluation

positive moral everything what I’m going to

make cultural resonance corruption

ministers comecheques etcetera and more

there

exactly the same message and

we started playing with data

we hear a lot also in the campaign

who told us if he wins a

candidate we are going to do as Venezuela

if another candidate wins

let’s do as Argentina

we compare the discourses of socialism

of the 21st century

for this is a parenthesis is more

he said something fundamental

he said that apart from these five

elements so that the message arrives

much more the frame this frame that

I tell you this circumscription of the

reality of the message that I want

transmit has to be negative and

have to have a greater burden of

cultural resonance and this is what

came out with the main speech of

possession of each of these

presidents

the cultural resonance overflows

matter a logical problem solution

but talk about bolivar talk about elche

talk about emotional issues and a lot

beyond and then we said why

it ended there we can not bring it up to date

a day

this would be very interesting because no

we can ask ourselves what everyone

tell us every day and go back to

recover the inquisitive nature

because education society

Absolutely everyone puts us

this platonic cavern in which

we are and how we said ok

facing education

we went from a crime of education that

it tells us that we do not know absolutely

nothing and that to know something we have to

study at the college of the masters

I will be the university then do the

doctorate and postdoctoral and so on and

every time we know more more more more and

more and we know more about something so little

and the economist defends

theory of economics and the political scientist

defends his theory of politics and

doctor defends in his theory from the

medicine but none of the three know

read the sky as we already did two

thousand years before anyone wonders

what exactly happens in the family

same

and here in society uses us the

negative premium and society is going to

say the following you have to

mature because it can not remain a

child, you do not have to work and

produce because you can not do what

you like it or what you are passionate about, not you

you have to defend someone’s ideas

more because it can not be different

negative framing and we went to the

media and is another

exercise that we did with hawaii and

we compare the speech of the last

re-election of the former president

like a speech with a newspaper

public and with a private newspaper and

we realized that the newspaper

he published replicated exactly the same

the speech of the former president and the

private newspaper did the opposite

that is, if you wanted a truth or

an information bought a newspaper

if you wanted another truth and another

information bought another newspaper and

nobody wondered why but what

happens when we ask ourselves why

we left the cave when we

we ask why we can understand

that responding is better to react than

reflect is better to criticize than

thinking is better to impose the first

the second humanity implies wisdom

when we ask ourselves why we

we realize that there is a world outside

amazing nature that gives us

lessons every day the sun illuminates

and he does not ask how much he burns

I am the moon talk and make love

in the night and they give us in teachings of

that good and evil come together and

when we ask ourselves why do we understand

something else that is basic we do not know about

everything but we just do not know

ignorant that is one of the most

great virtues of the human being when

we wonder why

remove absolutely all the isms

we have when we ask ourselves

why do not we defend someone’s ideas

plus

we started thinking about what ideas

we defend each one of us

that happens when we ask ourselves why

we want an idea to change the world

let’s ask why Galileo did it

he asked why he changed absolutely

all the physics that would be the basis for

the laws of kepler and newton matilde

he did he wondered why we

he taught tolerance and he taught us

equality can be matilde chomsky what

he asked himself why

and in the same way he taught us that

everything we consume is a product and

that the only thing we have lost is the

inquisitive nature of asking

why now well done exactly what

same as I am criticizing here use

framing and we’re in a university that

house is a university that is

first formal element that told us the

cha will show us carnage in the

home and nobody really asked

why does he say the following on the internet

photo of senior adult savio I chose the

first photo and scaling tsc

Now he presents the real calvache

that is here

in the same way with this legitimizes my

message and obviously I showed them

numbers

the study is real but the numbers of the

final are altered

the trends are real that is to say

paraphrasing to pure do not take the

dogma that I am saying here

ask yourself and take only what

that you need now has not been

totally liar so to speak if

they want to ask or want to ask

why respect

abdón calderón can see it in

internet and play it

If you want to ask about my sister

that put the corner here is

my sister too and if they want

ask also about the child and the

bullying and so on

Well yes it happened in agreement

enough of vueling that we ask

then why and why do we

We wonder why why be 3d

if something fundamental

the man is what they did of him but

if we ask ourselves why we can

come to understand that we can be what

we want to be and finally to

finish I want to offer a little to

a mother poet of our america

latina of our brunette america

Gabriela Mistral

she said where there is a tree that

plant, plant it where there is a

effort to make

do it where there is an error to amend

lotu amendment but more important where

there is a question to ask

Ask it you will not say thanks

If I’m not going to tell you why

[Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *