Press "Enter" to skip to content

Où en est la physique ? | Marc Lachieze Rey | TEDxEMLYON


[Music]

good evening are we there yet

where are we today where in

are we in the knowledge of

world looking for this knowledge

of this understanding of this

explanation of the world is a great

adventure that lasts for more than two

millennia and that continues today

and the question is to know exactly

where we are and what we are

near the goal ie is what we

are close to understanding the world

so obviously understand the world

I think it’s a desire that existed

always and everywhere in all

civilizations but it happened

something in our civilization

let’s say in the fifth century before

jesus christ pretty much with

philosophers of nature who’s called

the Presocratics who wanted to approach

this question in a rational way

and that was new and this concern for

rationality that is to say to introduce

reasoning finally for

understand and explain how

works the world

well we can consider that this is the

beginning of science not really a

science as it is understood today

but at least the beginning of the research

scientist and so from the vth

century before BC during all

Greek antiquity for example and then

it’ll continue after in a way that

I will explain different schools of

philosophers of nature philosophers

as they are called it’s the name we

gave if you want to scientists

at the time have issued assumptions have

tried to build systems

explanation of the world

so what’s important is that they

have set up a kind of framework and

which is always the framework in which

we operate today a framework

which allows precisely 2

to address this issue of

knowledge of the world on the mode of

rationality

so this framework is what it is

to adopt broad principles of

great principles

for example it can be love and

hate condensation on the contrary

expansion the symmetry the harmony or the

chaos the chance it depends on the

philosophers it depends on the schools of

philosophy a few some of

his ideas work very well others do not

walk less well and then

they mix, we are

adopts one rejects them

and it gives different systems of the world

different explanations of the world to

the time

the second thing is to know from

what is the world made of

compose the world for example space

from the extended the concept of spaced not

really established among the Greeks

an extent therefore in which are going to

continue the phenomena for one

for example for Greek atomists

it’s empty

and then know in this framework what is this

that there is some matter and then

the material and well we will think that these

facts of fundamental elements then by

example for platon aristotle it’s going to be

four fundamental elements that are the

earth the water the air and the fire and everything

we see around us these are

combinations these four elements for

others called the atomists

greg down these are atoms that are

spread out in an unlimited empty space that

looks like what’s called today

elementary particles

so see there are several ways

to approach the world who are in

competition

and it will be that of Plato and Aristotle

which will prevail at the time not

because it’s better but for

lots of historical reasons that’s going

last about until the rebirth

and then there is a third point after

the principles after the content it’s the

laws and finally the laws they go

be expressed in a mathematical way

because very early in this story

in this development of this adventure

this cultural adventure to explain

the world we see the need

to use mathematics for

explain the world so that was said

since the fifth century before

jesus christ for example pythagoras everything

and number but also platon than the draw

enter here

geometer then we will have galilée the

world is written in mathematical language

and then newton that goes mathematized on

world that goes mathematized physics and

then stein steira and it goes on

still continues today so we have

a vision

we already have a forecast of the world or

rather a set of vision

competitors none of which works

really very well and that’s not all

no longer functional we have this already

in Greek antiquity

and then it’ll last for almost two

millennia where we will see that these

designs are questioned there are

competitions we show that some

stuff does not work other steps

finally and we end up at the xvi

century to the seventeenth century to the great

Newtonian revolution which is the

foundation of physics or finally if

you want and a really system that

will set up and who will

operate and this system is fine that’s

newton so who will set it up and

this is again the beginning of the

modern physics and also of

modern astrophysics low newton is going

resume all that but he will specify

ie he will say there is a frame

for the world and this framework is space

and the time

there is a content it’s particles

it’s matter made of particles

then also radiation waves

finally it also depends on the conceptions of

the time there is nothing bit of debate on

that question

and then all that and mathematized from a

very precise way and newton ago

a lot of math in this

foundation of physics and there are

laws laws that will be expressed

mathematically but all notions

Physical are represented by

mathematical notions so the laws are

mathematics and it’s going to work from a

extraordinary way it’s going very, very

well-marketed and in physics there are

always two aspects is the aspect

practice is what we today

allows satellites to be sent around

of land or probes that arises

on march or to make manufacturing

computers to make transistors

lasers all you want from

manufacture systems that allows

to implement intelligence

artificial good all this these results

basic research in physics

but there is also in physics

knowledge of the world how

the world works and so newton us

gives a frame of thought for the world

in the world and a space framework and the

time and then there is content

the particles for example that obey

to laws and it’s going very well on

a practical plan it works a little bit

less conceptually because

that this conception of the world

Newtonian she is not at all

perfect and suddenly in the twentieth century for

different reasons

it’s going to be challenged again on

is going to have a fundamental revolution

in physics that goes completely

swept the conceptual framework the framework of

Newtonian thinking to establish one

other in fact to establish another

it’s not quite true because it

will be two different and

competitor to know that in the twentieth century

there is not a scientific revolution

but there is a double revolution

scientist also from one side we

have the theories of relativity

general in the 1950s 1910 1915

until 1920 established essentially by

a single man who is albert einstein and

on the other side we have physics

quantum of which einstein is also a

founder but there are many others

protagonists as of irak freudiger

eisenberg edge and other names that

you may have already heard and his

two new frameworks of thought in

physics will give conceptions of the

completely new world and

completely different from the design

Newtonian and the problem is that these

two conceptions of the world are

different and they are even

incompatible go very quickly that

tells us for example the design the

general relativity

she tells us that we have to give up

some Newtonian notions it takes

abandon the notion of spaced the notion

of time it is necessary to replace them with a

notion of space-time which is something

something really different ie

sometimes we will hear that

space time is space and the

time simply no it’s some

something much more subtle than that and

which completely changes our perception

things that is, what we

let’s call the time that allows us to

we gather here to give us some

appointments and be on time at

go and well it’s kind

of illusion that nour and pencils that

works fine on our scale but

that does not work at all on the scale of

fundamental physics so the

general relativity we can say this is

a

I conceptual framework

the explanation of the conception of the world

Newtonian for the benefit of a new

will deny space and time and who will

replace his part a new notion

which is the time space in which the

material design made of

particles does not really change

if we look now at the other component

of this scientific revolution it’s up to

to say quantum physics is

completely different

the Newtonian frame is going to be also

rejected but we will keep the space and the

time and this is the material that we are going

change is the design of the

matter ie according to physics

quantum the material is not made of

small particles that can be located

which one can say they are there they

have some speed and everything but

it’s something a little blurry you

may have heard of this

which is called the uncertainty principle

and well the uncertainty of physics

quantum that’s ultimately what

expresses that the conception we have of

the material ie the contents of

the universe is no longer that of

newton

she is new so see on one side

general relativity on the other side

quantum physics rejects

completely forces us to reject the

Newtonian design replaces it with

a new design but the problem

it is that these two conceptions are not

not the same and they are even

antagonists

so if they are different but

they can not be both

true since they are contradictory

so is there one that is

true or neither of them

is not true and there is one that we do not

not yet know who would be the right one

so that’s what most people think

physicists and obviously this

design

he seeks everyone seeks

what is the good physical theory that

would go beyond general relativity

and beyond quantum physics that

would be a lot more unified a lot

more global that would allow us

to have a unique conception of the world

so you may have heard of

of string theory of gravity

quantum of other approaches that have

names a little barbaric called the

twister where noncommutative geometry

no matter ultimately

but that means we’re looking for people

theoretical physicists looking for a

new conception of the world today

so obviously always with the idea

that it will have to be expressed by

mathematics so probably with some

new mathematics

so today we are looking for a new

world design

we are looking for a new conception of

framework in which the phenomena are played out

maybe always space time but

a space time that is not the one

which we think today a

new conception of the material that

is probably a little fuzzy because the

quantum physics tells us that it has to

to be blurry and ultimately also

new laws that they express themselves without

doubt the new at the news level

formulas and new tools

mathematics and that’s the job of

theorists of theoretical physicists

today who founded physics

conceptual and so to answer the

starting question where are we

today

and here we are we are not

are not the end of the road physics

theoretical the fundamental physics it’s

an activity that continues there are heaps

of theoretical physicists who do that and

believe me it’s extremely interesting

and it’s a great pleasure

thank you

[Applause]

[Music]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *