Press "Enter" to skip to content

La mondialisation des migrations | Catherine Wihtol de Wenden | TEDxBelfort


good evening he was a

from

from over a hundred years ago

1800 cases

1 men and women started

to move around the world a lot more

many than before

there were a lot of reasons that

were political but also

economic reasons that explain that this

mobility

this entry into mobility of the world this

that was called the first big wave

migratory

my great grandfather we did

party he left russia the states

Baltics more precisely and he has

decided to migrate first to France

then in south america they

work in the railways

he was from German culture he

belonged to Russia and he has

decided to dedicate his life

to the railways between

Brazil and Argentina

my grandfather himself was

educated in German having a mother

French living in argentine

my father was educated

primary and secondary school

in argentina while having a mother

French by being highly educated

in German language and so we have

always juggle the languages ​​the

country the nationality issues the

naturalization issues the

discrimination issues too is a

subject very present in my family and

I do not know if that’s the reason for

which I devoted myself to cnrs

to international migration but I

think that this sensitivity to all

these themes

maybe explain my path

scientist

when I started working

on it all early 80s

it was a tiny research topic

especially in political science that is

my discipline

whereas today it has become a

global topic and today we talk

sometimes even rightly and rightly

of these questions by mixing a lot

of things and I will try to you

explain a whole series of things that

happened

not in 1880 even if I’m going back

quickly but also today

first of all the migrations they have

they came massive

from the end of the 19th century because

we did not change the means of transport

we went into the second half

19th century sailing boat in

steamboat which required

make the boats profitable so Europe

In particular, there were

touts who sought to find

customers for that big boats

steamboats that went to the

united states to south america to

Asia do not leave empty and he

had to fill these boats and that

was the first big wave

migratory 31 million Italian

example went to europe but also

in the united states in south america the

Germans who were very numerous

not only in what was not

still Germany but the countries of

German culture are gone too

very many towards the united states to

Brazil to Argentina

we also had migrations linked to

colonization at the counters at the

trade

so the world starts to move to

that time

then we had both wars

some important waves of

refugees from people who had lost

their nationality that had come from

stateless and today since the

1990s especially we are on we are

entered a second big wave

of mass migration this is what

you see on the map we have the world

whole today they meet the

world with migrations even though

some regions of the world

europe japan gulf countries have

hard to accept that they have become

immigration lands and this is one of

big misunderstandings that we have

today migrations are not

so many because it does not correspond

that 3 to 5% of the world population

240 million international migrants

on seven billion inhabitants but 740

millions of intel migrants on the other hand

what we see is that all

the regions of the world are concerned

by migrations

today we have moreover

of migration to the south of the planet

that towards the north we hardly speak

that migrations north north since this

are the ones that concern us the most and

we also have north-south migrations

south north north so in this context we have

quantities of migrant varieties

we often forget that women

make up half of the migrants

international than among these migrants one

has refugees of whom we have many

spoken especially since 2015 with this

that we called the refugee crisis

them but also we have minors not

accompanied by migrations of people

very qualified

we have environmental migrations we

has a whole series of new figures

of migrants who have appeared since 1990

what has happened since 1990

we had a sort of generalization of the

right of exit that’s very very

important

for a very long time he was very

difficult to leave home

once upon a time a century ago

because a lot of countries of departure

were powerful countries they

considered that their population

was a wealth a wealth

agricultural a military wealth a

also tax wealth so they

often kept relatively closed

and all the more firm and they

were authoritarian regimes their

border it was powerful countries

the countries where the migrants went

were weak countries on the

international scene that were

obliged to accept the country rule

of departure and these weak countries were

countries that was looking for the population

to work from the workforce but

also to settle for a

stand migration this is the case of

united states 2 of canada of america

from south australia and amount of

regions of the world

today the opposite that happened

product it has become since years

90 since the fall of the Iron Curtain

a lot easier to get out of

today in almost every country

of the world

we can go out except perhaps the korea

from the north today of cuba on

can go out today

on the other hand he became very

difficult to enter somewhere so the

sense of migration has reversed it

is difficult to input but it is

easy to get out the starting countries on

weak countries on the scene

international host countries are

powerful countries that through their

migration policies enacts

global rules of migration

international

so we are in a couple a context

completely reversed compared to

that of the 1880s the one to which

my great example has decided to

leave the Baltic states that was at

the time russia

these migrations they became

structural, that is, during

In particular, we tend to consider

that migration is something that

has come back from time to time and that he

have to accept because we signed

some agreements including

retirees

the Geneva convention of 1951

for asylum and therefore European countries

at various times since the

cold war since it was war

cold 1951 have hosted waves of

refugees more or less well with more

or less of chilliness but be

welcome refugees

at the same time there have been periods

where lack of manpower was the

period called the glorious thirty in

europe 1945 1974 we needed a hand

we brought people but

Europe has realized that many

these people who were welcomed do

do not leave when we thought that

would be cyclical today the

migration she is structural she

corresponds to major trends in

world who are the particular ones

inequalities of human development

that we see on this map that shows

especially africa

sub-Saharan one of the largest

regions of inequality

human development that crosses three

essential criteria which are those of a

Nobel Prize for Economics said

one called amartya sen

life expectancy at birth the

level of education the standard of living is

so today people are no longer

in the fatality of the ancients they

are waiting for better days

happens they tell themselves if I want

realize my life project

there is only migration people are

more and more educated more and

more urban more and more informed

they are connected very often not

only on the television but on

internet and on the cell phone

and so they know that elsewhere we can

live differently so the migration she

is in all the heads of the countries of

south if he considers that there is no

has no hope of living otherwise and

even sometimes at home it’s war

and so we have to leave so we got this

phenomenon that accelerated

for the last 30 years of

structural way with others

phenomena that added to this

structural trend of the world that is

demographics

we are in a world where in the north we have

an aging population as we

sees countries that often in glass or in

pale yellow

this is also the case of russia this is the

japan case also not just of

europe

and then to the south we have countries that are

yellows that are what’s called the

demographic transition into a

generation

in most countries around the world

Mediterranean including in countries

Islam

contrary to a widespread idea one

had a very fast transition from the

family size we went from 6

children per woman to 2.5 children per

woman around the euro perimeter

Mediterranean especially Mediterranean

from South

which completely changes the situation

since today we have a population

young in this region of the age

median the average age that splits in two

equal groups the population its 25 years

in sub-Saharan Africa 19 years old and in

europe is

forty years so that’s a given

very deep which also explains this

Willingness to leave from people

poor from young people who

are healthier better informed

another structural element is the

big inequalities outlines

of fracturing the world every time we have

political fracture lines

the social cultural economic

migration mitigates by its mobility

it ‘s fracture line and therefore proposes

a new deal is the case of the

Mediterranean is the case of the

border between the united states and the

Mexico between the countries of Europe and its

neighbors between rich countries and

poor countries of asia and then the

context in which one migrates is very

different according to his passport and that

this is one of the great inequalities of

world today there is a movement

a whole series of attempts at forums

who tries to say we have to promote the

right to mobility as rights of

the man of the twentieth century if you are

European or American you can

traveling for three months in 174 countries

in the world where 173 according to your

passport

if you are Russian in 91 countries if you

are Eritrean Somali you or under

delay for that if you represent this

called a migration risk and it

only the smugglers can you

allow to circulate because you do not

can not enter anywhere so a moment

where today we consider that the

mobility is part of modernity

only a very small part of the

population of the world can move then

that two-thirds of the population of

the planet are finally assigned to

residence at home in countries where he

is not very good live in general

with civil wars with crises

with a whole series of form of

economic predation

and then with a population that is of

more and more aware that the only

way out

these two parts

draws so here’s a little context in

which it is now with

migrations and you have to try to

understand this phenomenon which is a

reality we can be could we can

to be against but it’s a reality

which is one of the major issues of this

century

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *