the science of political science that I’m here for
I represent refers to a large cloud
of Social Sciences
studying social relations
sociology anthropology
culturology criminology economists do not
very much like when they relate to it
a lot but they also study
public relations
specific subject of my interest
science of political science are both in the
general follows from the name of political
Institutions and political processes
ideology of political technology when
we are trying to isolate what exactly we are
we study unlike all other sciences
who also study in much the same way
most because we often use
same data one and the
same court with surveys of the same
an array of information about how the
consumption of calories per capita in
the age of accession
in marriage how many live those or other
political regimes as varied
use of contraceptives at different
continents of the world all these public
science are looking at this
on this wealth of data and do from there
my conclusions so if you try
to isolate this is what is politically logical
separate than we are interested in, we would
I would formulate
it’s like a mutable part of what’s going on
with society that is changing right now
that this transformation is undergoing
places are the subject of our
specific interest in this matter
tracking changes
What can be called a story in mode
Real time our science has two
the enemy is actually a lot but the main ones
2 and it’s not fools and roads and not the army and
fleet
This is personalization and historical
analogy personalization is sticking
names
on the processes of institutions and phenomena it is in the
general human properties and people
Our brains are built so we are before
all draw attention to people
newborn babies are fixed on
people’s faces longer than any other
object including a colorful rattle
therefore, and becoming adults, we too
we track the faces of other people to us
It is more habitual to call political regimes
We want to designate the name of the person
the era of
name and most outstanding as we are
seems representative of not less than
This interferes with why personalization is
such an enemy because it turns
political processes in the placer
By chance, it turns our science into a
some perverted subspecies of psychology
infinitely trying to understand that in
head of this or that person she
It denies the fact that people are
speakers of certain processes
representatives of interests
personified by them institutions
but do not determine their historical
analogy enemy number 2 and he somehow here
is visible to us all as it seems to me public
space is very clear this
parallels between the current
historical moment and love others
sometimes this is done under the influence of magic
figures 2014 is quite like 914 and 2017
directly poured 917 and why yes because
the figures rhyme an anniversary
enchant our imagination than bad
historical analogy to the fact that it
denies the development of the wire here these here
lines of seeming similarities between us
today’s moment and some moment
in the past we see exactly what is not important
superficial relationship we do not see exactly
what is important is what has changed
actually, what should we turn to
attention nonetheless subject of my
speech is indicated as
technological middle ages high
The Middle Ages on the new technological
level why it would seem I
what a great enemy of historical analogies
This analogy would seem to be held here
I would like to distinguish between
analogies and metaphors analogy is
drawing parallels
metaphor is the assimilation to be
it is understandable when a poet says that a smile
Like his beloved
pearls in blooming roses this comparison
The metaphor does not mean that he wants to
to thread them on a thread
use as an ornament here
Analogues think exactly
that is, when we hear that
A hundred years ago there was a revolution and this was not
They prevented because of that and because of that there
it happened because of that and that’s why
now we are now in the present moment
Quickly you’ll fix everything and then from
st of bad what happened then not
there will be three designer delirium
one of the leading mental disorders
Our time can not be repeated again
back in the past I want to say this
original thought
Nevertheless, the comparison metaphor may
be fruitful because she
shows us some things in the present
and the near future which we otherwise would
Did not notice the meaning of this comparison
with high Middle Ages those changes
which occur with societies those
changes that occur with
public relations with the economy with
family with the labor market with political
institutions with political regimes they
More and more fortunately attracted
attention to humanity because it is understandable
that these changes
scale enough and they already
here they are already here
because we are generally used to
to pay more attention to threats than
on some positive signals this too
on and the sad property of our brain is well
helped primitive people survive but
she often catches our eyes
so we see often more threatening
than bright prospective topics
less all see that you are something
It is going well here
what changes what becomes different
shows us to what extent the world here
in which we let this live without realizing
this to the end was the fruit of a certain
specific historical period
which can be called post Westphalian
peace
Westphalian peace treaty as we know
in the middle of the 17th century he graduated from a 30-year
the war
bloody war swept through
throughout Europe what exactly is fixed
The Westphalian world is so new
world order then appeared
Reformation destroyed the Christian
she destroyed this unity here
baptized world under authority
The Roman Pontiff Post Westphalian World
became a world of sovereign states that
subsequently transformed
state national concept
sovereignty and is now one of the most
Our columns and pillars of ours
we often hear this
The term may seem that maintaining
protection of national sovereignty is something
what now most of all excites as
political elites and citizens themselves
Nevertheless, one must remember that this is
called so it was not always
The Westphalian world weakened the sacred
the Roman Empire
some such supranational
education which, in turn , is
followed the Western Roman Empire so
Here and if
the assumptions that
are expressed in our science of political science
then we can enter into a historical
an era when here’s the uniform
unified national states
which at the previous historical stage
have won the race of history have become the most
progressive most advanced in
economic technical military
respect somehow
conquered the world
surrounding that here these here
structure of national sovereignty
exposed to some erosion on two
levels on which two
at the top level should be national
formations unions contracts as
an example
The European Union or our Eurasian Union or
These ocean partnerships do not matter what
now it happens with some kind of
specific
structures or arrangements for
which I say is important, what is there
the great silk road to the new great
Silk way can be called important is that
globalization unites countries in
supranational level and develops
certain norms that are
preferential advantage
in relation to the national
Again, we are not
talking about whether it’s good or bad
I like it or does not like it
just fix this phenomenon at the level of
below
national sovereignty and are subject to
erosion from the side of what is called
new regionalism or even a new one
tribalism is a tribal
consciousness we see numerous
quite often sometimes successfully
Again, unsuccessful, it does not matter what
attempt to win regional
sovereignty is a successful one.
a successful trend is currently important
We look at the trend is not on the news
she process and on what happened
now it is something that basically happens
from here is this new regionalism
desire to find a new
Identity is more applied more
narrow in contrast or because of or
due to the processes of globalization and this
one of the
I do not want to say threats, but here’s one of the
such things as somehow from below
undermine these very national
unified national structures
one more thing I want to say about
this is an obvious concentration of economic
and manpower from hence
present future concentration
political power in cities and
urban agglomerations process
urbanization which was a key
The process of the 20th century led to
Well, in the whole world, well, let’s say so in
developed world in the first world, but also in our
Russia is more and more and people and
production and money and cultural life
concentrated in cities and around
urban areas of these
agglomerations is the assumption that
The cities and cities unions will be the centers
progress will be the centers of production
centers of innovation and, accordingly,
because I’m looking at everything with my own
specific scientific bell tower and
centers of course political
processes, too, that reminds us of this
the good old Hanseatic League of Cities
free cities of Italian cities
republic of the lightest republic
Venetian city which then yes in
this is before the Westphalian world in the period
The high Middle Ages were the centers
progress in the centers of civilization and
culture a few more would seem
scattered and signs that are here
such a funny way when
You say this magic formula
the high Middle Ages on the new
technological level, the disintegration of
lifestyle that brought
industrial twentieth century that is
disintegration of work
production as the city was arranged 20
century before this industrial enterprise
housing for workplaces for children
workers and people who massively in the morning
go to their factory
work out their shift massively
come back we are not not up to the end
realize to what extent our cities
is arranged around this
now rapidly becoming obsolete in
ways to work people more and more
no longer work at the plant, and certainly
not even in the office, at home or wherever they can
such people are becoming more and more
more and this is also suspicious to us
resembles a medieval man
who did not have a fixed worker
the day
but as if all the time was busy when
it is said that here people work
fewer and fewer according to estimates
Sociologists residents of the UK
compared with the eighties
increased free seven hours
a week when people tell them
this causes indignation
they say yes no, we are for or in general
day and night we are working now
the rhythm of life, then everything accelerates
speed up before time was some kind of
slow and cozy and quiet I now it
some kind of stormy
means and almost impossible
you manage to figure out this flow
information that falls on you
all the time, all someone wants something for you
we are 24 hours a day, so it seems like
as it seems to us that we are round the clock
work but this particular work is
work to some extent by oneself
it also reminds a person before
mass society of man yes I’m here
These unified and unified
unifies their states a new role
religion in people really appeared
more free time even if they
it is not realized in people at least
in the first world in many respects satisfied
primary needs lower floors
pyramids of oil somehow rebuilt people
begin to think of themselves about the soul
begin to think at all these reflections to
differently do not always lead to a good
new religiosity has its own dark
aside
do not even tell everyone himself
can they have a very visual
representation is still a fact people
rational 18 19 20 of the century was striking as
this in the Middle Ages means such
quantities could be killed by a friend
friend for the idea for
religious discern how it is a little
It will no longer be clear though
be we would not want this to such a
degree is well understood here is this one
A new way of life in which no one you
A finished work place does not provide
which is this
the perfect dream of the 20th century came boy
to the factory and from there he was buried
she somehow already crumbles is no longer
it turns out that they are only
The Soviet dream is when the Japanese ideal
too, including no more probably
Such are the giant industries that
ready for you
absorb and give you ready and
workplaces ready to work and
respectively, a ready identity
generally ready-made identities are less and less
less and more and more to us
You have to choose them for yourself
already even a sex accessory to you in
the maternity home is not given out as it is necessary
to imagine her in a more mature
age, not to mention the more subtle
things
this imposes on a modern person
responsibility that often becomes
He is beyond the power of a relationship we are waiting for
Something new compared to again with
the twentieth century when people can not
saw each other often in the morning to work
left the evening the work came the children in the summer
and in the pioneer camp, well, can only
Weekend as you pay attention who
there next to you lives a
respectively, before the era
traditional societies of common interest in
family was just an interest in survival and there
This requirement that the partner should
give me self-realization and and
spiritual growth and satisfaction of all my
The emotional needs of others are not
had a common interest was simple with hunger
do not die in winter do not freeze
accordingly this one here
burden of responsibility for choosing a partner
for choosing the type of family for choosing not a worker
there is no such place anymore but for choosing
the type of occupation that you will be
education also stopped
be an education once and for life
people learn all the time and it is obvious that this
will continue to increase
Qualifications change their qualifications
here is another interesting similarity is here
this transformation of education
medieval universities do not give
They studied seven professions
free art 7 noble art
the goal was not practical application
This knowledge for something out there and the goal was
the education of this man here
noble, elevated enlightened
as they said in the era a little later
under the influence of these seven
We now have this free art
seems a little more understandable can already from
the first education is expected sooner
formation of a general picture of the world
the formation of a personal
our skeleton than rather than applied
knowledge we understand that we do not care
we will have to get them and not one
time and again several times if we
themselves do not imagine a kind of occupation
think of what we will sell to it
the world that looks at us then no one for
we can not be like this like this
great responsibility is the new
freedom that seems important here and
valuable and meaningful we often hear the phrase
There is no freedom without responsibility and the fact that
it will be for freedom it will be
some permissiveness we will say
another is not responsible without freedom
responsibility comes for one’s choice
This is not a bag that can be entrusted
man on the back and say let’s go
and when he does not want to bear that reproach
his is that he is so irresponsible
what I myself chose for it, and I answer and
what other people have assigned to me I can
also if I am so full
sense of duty but it’s not mine
responsibility because it’s not mine
freedom is this new world
differentiated full
more horizontal than vertical rather
networks than strict hierarchical structures
a world in which
at each stage it is necessary to choose
In fact, of course it does not look like any
a different historical period so
metaphors can show it to us
some new angle
But the analogy will not give us
no fruitful conclusions
less often it is necessary to repeat about
yourself here this very same
the formulation is this this new world
blossoming complexities I will recall this formula
bakhtin in relation to the high
the Middle Ages
world of post absolutism and there can be peace
post of sovereignty and there can be peace in
which the national state
transformed into something else it is that
fascinating reality in which we are
you have to live
[applause]
”
Be First to Comment