daily millions
children of young people
worldwide visits
school lessons
university lectures on
history on these
lessons and lectures 7
are outlined
view of everything
nature of the world
historical
the process
representation
formed in
historical science in
mostly in Europe
mostly they
the course of 18 20
centuries and practically
for today they
are considered
unshakable
but how amazing
it does not sound like they
are the
incorrect in nature
false
this
concept
previous world
historical
process is built on
the fact that
a certain stage
development of
settled
agricultural
tribes occurred
social division
formed in
rich
poor and
rich in order to
to hold power
keep accumulated
or captured and
wealth created
state in which
occupied the position
the ruling
classes
it arose
statehood then
that we call the early
statehood
early civilization and
as though this truth with
this process with
a similar process
the emergence of
scarcely
absolute
most of all
ancient and even
medieval
states for all
the Eurasian
and even on the continent
a number of adjacent
territories with
this position
already in the 19th century beginning of the 20th
centuries turned out
absolutely disagree
many major
European scientists
and here first of all
you probably need to talk
about the outstanding in its
scientific achievement
German
historical school
this school gave birth to
A few dozens
major scientists
very
greater knowledge
uncommonly
erudite that is
each of these people
was a scientist of the world
level in the first place
there was an idea that
despite the differences
for availability
individual traits of
every each of
ancient civilizations
from early states
on a certain
specific features
all the same more
the general
what unites them
all these states
be it a state
which arose in
Europe at a distant
east of Mesopotamia in
Asia and India and even for
beyond
the Eurasian
continent is such
known region as
north africa where
Egypt appeared
Egyptian
civilization alongside
Sumerian has
chronological
priority over others
Well, you can surely
say that this is not
the most ancient well this
the oldest of
known to us
civilizations in such
conditions
a number of scientists
first of all about carl
jaspers alfred webber
began to look for a certain
Centre
where did the new one come from
center that spawned
those common features
which are present
in all these
civilizations
antiquity such a center
they could not find
According to Carla Japers
this center was
in undefined
depths
asia
a significant group
German scientists
representatives from
German
historical school
put forward so
called
conquering
theory of education
statehood
they argued that
agricultural
society is not
does not
social groups
classes, not to mention
statehood
that all States
which arose
history and that is
the result of conquest
pastoralists
farmers
naturally the main
region that
gave birth to a nomadic
pastoralist
culture was
the Eurasian steppe
which I call
central
the Eurasian steppe
this is very important
time since
the Eurasian steppe
is the
center of the Eurasian
the
less even this
outstanding scientist
which acted
almost
collectively
coordinate their
actions combining
Their efforts are not
could break through
sufficiently broad
breach in durable
bastion of adepts in
the root of the error
theory
agricultural
of origin
statehood
naturally i wanted
with a maximum
degree
authenticity
to identify
Your place itself
identified in
this world but the most
identification
person is impossible
beyond
cultural and historical
in defecation
ethnos to which he
this belongs to
just as it is impossible to
all this and many
others
circumstances
prompted me
study
studying history
more
serious study
history has come
understanding that
traditional method
which moves
the science that method
which moved
representatives
German
historical school
who put forward
conquering
theory and which
practically
enjoy all the others
historians
in the given conditions, this
traditional method
analysis
consolidation
conscientious
interpretations
scientific facts he
unproductive
so
required
turn to knowledge
other level and
no matter how strange it sounds
to the fundamental
world
development
the universe
formulated in
known
philosophical laws and
Firstly
law
unity and struggle
opposites
this law states that
all that is not
everything that does not appear
is born is
result
interactions
opposites
classical
European
philosophy does not give
opportunity
project this
law on the human
society
but here to help
because the
European
philosophy
developed in isolation
from science this
known fact
science in itself
philosophy by itself
yourself but another
the situation has developed
whales
about
beginning of 1 millennium
BC is here
the doctrine appeared
It was not
religious teaching in
religious teaching
she degenerated
Later it was
philosophical and
materialistic
doctrine and it is up to the mustache
Not only
formulated on
the Hegelian
generality of this
The law also did
implemented
classification and not
brought
not only to science at the
their lives in general this
law they said that
there is nothing in this world
the same all the different
in every phenomenon or
same more female
only masculine
but did not operate
these concepts you are about
this concept you know
it’s me man
substance and
female substance
they set out their
views as follows
manner
masculine she
is always in
center and phenomena and then
there is a heavy
the central part is
energetically
charged
positive part
bright creative
there is a woman who
is always on
extreme on the periphery
biology of men
start
this animal biology
feminine is this
plants for men
the beginning of
feminine of
and that’s it
still allowed me
project these
principles on
Eurasian
continent at its
history and has developed
absolutely exactly I
almost
geometrically
calibrated
picture of the world
development during
Neolithic happened
separation
pastoralists and
farmers this is
was the so-called
Neolithic
revolution transition
producing
farming herders and
farmers
divided just
the central
steppe part
the Eurasian
the continent
male tribes
pastoralists and
farmers
settled over
washed
oceans
periphery
the Eurasian
continent from Korea and
japan on the far
east to spain and
slightly more northern
regions in the west
continent it was
so-called
civilized
civilized belt
Europe’s future
civilized
there arose
state
central
Eurasian steppe
Rig is not
but civilization
gave
teaches that the central
part of any phenomenon
I’m not she
invariably
and the female externally she
changeable there
there are changes and
this is again clearly
falls on
historical process
on its features
noted already in
of antiquity
that way of life
Scythians of the Cimmerians in
accuracy is repeated
Kazakhs 20 or Mongols 20
century is absolute
unity
material and
the spiritual
culture that is, here
she is this stability
masculine at the same time
we see what we see on
women’s periphery
farming there
new
States withdraw
the past arise
new languages
mixing occurs
peoples, that is,
hanging women
part so here
modern
concept it does not
does not fit into
laws of the world
development so that
we are trying to impose
and impose
every day that is
female
agricultural
community it is not
can create the
there is it can be
compare I do not know
the Immaculate Conception
when she has to bear
fruit if the site
the future of civilization
or
state as a fruit
but it remains
a virgin
that is, it’s like
contradicts everything
our physical
experience before
therefore
absolutely right and
supporters and this
concept
aggressive
concepts that everything
world development
was determined
movement of nomadic
tribes from the central
Eurasia
there are reasons for
which they left
most often they were not
aggressive
hiking conquests
Directly behind it is a great
rarity as
the conquest of Timur there
who won
it means that he captured
or there Genghis Khan
which means
invaded China later
a Russian
state
Moscow
The state is not in
mostly it was
constant struggle for
pastures of the steppe
constantly
existed over
high growth
population and this was
associated with
polygamy
nomads
polygamy
nomads
the queue was connected
so that all work
perform only
women men
fought men
hunted
the men were amused
playing on instruments
sang and so on but
naturally ate
beshbarmak therefore
if some steppe
I wanted to expand my
he needs
there were additional
women’s hands and
therefore Anatolia
the Khazans said so
china was big in
all times great
cash cow for
Turkic nomads
they went there like in
shop and did not go for
some
awesome
fakes they went
behind
in these campaigns for
young women
girls and brought
great amount
those young Chinese women
their auls but this
not only
with China in all
adjacent it was
wound it was
representatives for
Finno-Ugric
of the people so well
each of them she was
not just a worker
strength of one’s youth
and attractiveness
she became or
wife to have a concubine
nomad each
was on my harem
was his harem sik
twenty thirty
forty-fifty women
it was ok
even in the thirteenth
century wrote about this
carpini plan
it confirms
other Arab
European
travel which
lived among
Mongolian
nomads therefore
say about
two hundred sons
wanted and she did not
is an
exaggeration
but all must be fed
a lot is born
children imagine
imagine 20 wives if they
at least two
the child is 40 of their children
it is necessary to feed
but there is
certain
pasture
territory on which
you can be wary
certain
cattle
need at least this
livestock so that the family
could exist
it means it means
invasion of
territory of another
other nomadic themes
this meant
imminent war are
who lost them
pompeii
the historian called
exiles from the Scythians
they left in
mostly outside
the Eurasian steppe
these exiles from
Scythia here they were
amazed themselves and there they are
created came
as the ruling
grade
all states
which arose on
territories of Eurasia
is the result of
imposition
ethnocultural
community of conquerors
pastoralists to the local
settled
agricultural
this fact
unfortunately acknowledge
only Poles from
modern
the Eurasian peoples
they clearly speak
our know it
Sarmatians are our lower
layer this
Slavic
farmers but this
the picture is absolutely
universal for
the whole continent
of course you could
much to tell
Unfortunately, the
we do not have much
it’s essence
the concept that I
suggested I think that
I’m a concept I’m sure
that it will
dominant
I soon do not know this
but to deny this
the concept of
this denies the basic
laws of the world
development of
laws to which
obey
absolutely all phenomena
in this world thanks for
Attention
”
Be First to Comment