Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Science of a Happy Mind, Part 2 | Nat Geo Live


Richard Davidson: There are very simple ways

of cultivating positive outlook.

When you do those simple kinds of practices

we’ve shown that both behavior and the brain changes

and it doesn’t take much.

( Applause )

There are four constituents of well-being that have been

seriously neuroscientifically investigated.

And one of the interesting things

about each of these four is

we understand something about the brain circuits

that are associated with them

and each of these circuits exhibits plasticity.

The first is resilience. We define resilience as

the rapidity with which you recover from adversity.

And it turns out that

people who recover quickly from adversity do much better.

They clearly have higher levels of well-being

and we understand something about

the brain mechanisms that underlie this

and we can measure this in particular neural systems.

The amygdala is a region of the brain

which is critical for emotion, in particular for threat.

And we can measure the time course of activation

in the amygdala and it turns out that after a certain period

of doing simple forms of mindfulness meditation

you begin to show a more resilient profile.

The second is positive outlook.

Positive outlook is being able to see

the innate basic goodness in each other.

And being able to savor positive experiences.

So that when we have a warm hearted interaction

with a loved one, say in the morning

how long does that glow last?

Does it permeate most of your day?

Or does it dissipate very quickly?

There are very simple ways of cultivating positive outlook.

There are whole group of simple, contemplative practices

that focus on generating loving kindness and compassion

for individuals who are loved ones, who may be suffering

as well as for individuals who may be strangers

people you don’t really know very well

and then even individuals who push your buttons

who are difficult people.

And envisioning them in a genuine way

and cultivating the strong aspiration that

they too be relieved of suffering and are happy

and enjoy well-being.

When you do those simple kinds of practices

we’ve shown that both behavior and the brain changes

and it doesn’t take much.

We published a study just a couple of years ago

where we did this training online.

This is just a very simple form of compassion training.

And we see that after two weeks of training

where people are practicing for 30 minutes a day

people behave in a more pro-social way on tasks

that are designed to measure altruistic behavior.

And these changes in behavior were highly correlated

with changes in the brain.

And these are regions that are important for positive outlook

and they show systematic changes

after just two weeks of modest training.

The third constituent of well-being is something that

you might not typically regard as important for well-being.

But to paraphrase a subtitle

of a recent, important scientific paper

“A wandering mind is an unhappy mind.”

Recent evidence suggests and this…

this was collected using smartphones and

probing people with text, simple text messages

as they go about their day.

And they ask people three questions.

One is, “What are you doing right now?”

And they had to just click off on a list

and indicate what they are doing.

Second question is, “Where is your mind right now?”

Is it focused on what you’re doing

or is it focused elsewhere?”

And the third question is, “Right now–

how happy or unhappy are you, right at this moment?”

Those are the three questions.

The findings from that study revealed

that the average American adult

spends 47 percent of her-his waking life

not paying attention to what they are doing.

( audience laughter )

Forty seven percent of the time!

I would like to invite us to consider the possibility

that we can do better!

( Audience laughter )

And just imagine, the cost in human suffering

in economic terms of that kind of distractibility.

It is staggering!

If there’s one body of evidence that

we really have confidence in it’s that

attention indeed can be learned.

And one of the ways to think about this

one of the most commonly taught forms of mindfulness meditation

involves becoming aware of your breathing

where you focus your awareness on the abdomen

as it’s rising and falling when you’re breathing or

the sensations at the tip of your nostril. I mean this is not

the most interesting compelling stimulus in the world.

But, if you can pay attention to your breath

you can pay attention to almost anything else.

And so, this is really a very effective form of training.

And, when you notice your mind has wandered, which it will

you simply gently bring it back to the object of focus.

It really is about the simplest kind of practice imaginable yet

it has these profound effects on the brain and on behavior.

The fourth is Generosity.

There is overwhelming scientific evidence now showing

that acts of generosity promote well-being

they activate specific brain networks and

it’s the single easiest way to get these networks activated.

One of the things that we’ve been doing

is exploring the nurturing of generosity early in life.

And we’ve developed a curriculum for pre-school children

that we call the “kindness curriculum”.

This is a curriculum that includes

both mindfulness and kindness.

Now, why did we choose pre-school kids?

There are three major periods of increased plasticity

in the brain in the early years of life.

One is right around birth.

The second is around the onset of schooling

between the ages of five and seven years.

And the third is around adolescence.

These are periods when the brain is radically reorganized

and are opportunities for intervention.

So, that’s one reason why we chose the pre-school period.

The second reason is that there are robust data showing

that a child’s ability at four and five years of age

to regulate his or her own behavior is a strong predictor

of major life outcomes when they are in their early 30s.

In fact, it’s a better predictor than IQ

than grade point average

and standardized test scores all put together.

And what it predicts in the early 30s

are major life outcomes. It predicts physical health

it predicts the likelihood of substance abuse.

It predicts the likelihood of court-verified

criminal convictions in large longitudinal research

and it also predicts financial success

with very careful controls for the socio-economic status

of the families of origin.

So, we have a moral obligation, I think

in this culture to do everything we can

to facilitate kids starting out on a positive trajectory.

And one of the things that we did

to assess the impact of this curriculum is

we needed to develop novel measure of kindness

and pro-social behavior in these young kids.

And so, we developed what we call

the “Self-Other Sharing” task. So, what is this?

We chose a currency that is valued very highly

among pre-school children.

( Audience laughter )

Stickers.

And what we did is something incredibly simple.

We gave the kids two envelopes.

One envelope we had a picture of themselves which is not on here.

And another envelope we had pictures

of different kinds of kids.

And we did socio-metric ratings in each classroom

and we found out who each child’s best friend was, and

we found out who each child’s least favorite person was.

And then we also had a picture of

an obviously sick looking child, which is shown here

and we also had a picture of a child

that we call the stranger child

who the child had never seen before.

And then we gave them a bunch of stickers each time and we said

“Please place the stickers in the envelopes

according to who you’d like to give them to.

You can keep as many for yourself

or you can give them to others.”

What we found is the kids who were

randomly assigned to the kindness curriculum

showed more pro-social behavior, more kindness on this task

than the kids who were receiving the standard curriculum.

And actually the sad fact is that at least in the classrooms

that we studied over the course of the pre-school year

kids who get the standard curriculum

become increasingly selfish as the year goes along.

We also gave them other metrics that measure self-regulation.

And one of those metrics is something that

many of you have probably heard about before

which is a measure of the delay of gratification.

And it turns out that a child’s ability to delay gratification

at four and five years of age is one of the

strongest predictors of these adult life outcomes.

And I’d like to just show you a little video clip

that illustrates these original experiments

for how it was originally done.

Okay, so here’s the deal.

Here’s a marshmallow. You can either wait

and I’ll bring you back another one, so you can have two.

Or you can eat it now.

So, you can eat it now

or you can wait and I’ll bring you back two, okay?

Okay, I’ll be back.

( instrumental jazz music )

( instrumental jazz music )

-Careful. -Miss?

Oh, what happened?

Oh, okay.

( instrumental jazz music )

Oh, how good! You waited.

You get two!

Woman: Good job! ( clapping )

You can eat it.

You can eat it now.

( Audience laughter )

Okay, very important skill

and it turns out that although kids differ dramatically

as you can see in their behavior

this can be changed and this can be learned.

Thank you very much.

( Applause )

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *