Press "Enter" to skip to content

Peter Thiel Interview – Peter Thiel’s Top 10 Rules For Success (@peterthiel)


– He’s an American entrepreneur, venture capitalist,

and hedge fund manager.

– He co-founded PayPal, with Max Levchin and Elon Musk.

– He’s ranked fourth on the Forbs Midas list of 2014,

at 2.2 billion dollars.

– He’s Peter Thiel and here

are his top ten rules for success.

(swooshing)

– You are the entrepreneur of your life.

And you can, you can decide you know,

what you’re going to do, what you’re going to prioritize,

and you should never forget that you have

a tremendous amount of freedom as it is

to make these very basic decisions

on what you’re going to do with your life.

You can start anytime you want.

The most critical thing for every start up

is to be doing one thing uniquely well,

better than anyone else in the world.

Technology’s a fundamentally global business

and the really great technology companies,

are doing something significantly better

than anybody else in the world and you want to be

in that sort of position.

I think if you’re just starting a business,

one of the questions that’s always valuable to answer

is what do you know that’s true that nobody

else understands or more prosaically,

what great business exists that nobody is building?

One part that I’m always very focused on

is sort of, the structure of these companies

and how well are people aligned?

So you can and making sure that people are you know

aligned properly, not just that they say they are.

I think this is sort of a very, a very legal kind of a

framework to think about;

what are peoples’ incentives, you know,

are they going to be aligned or not

and I think you want to both have formal alignment,

where you set the structure right,

and you want to have informal alignment,

where the people would naturally try to work together well

in one way or another.

And I think that somehow tends to get obscured

in all these other ways.

You know there’s always, there’s always a, there’s always a

pre-history question I like to ask founders of companies

which is how did you, how did you um, meet,

what’s the pre-history of the company before you got started

and I find that to be a really instructive set of questions

to ask; a bad answer is something like, you know,

we met a week ago at a social networking function

at a business networking function.

We decided to start a company because we both

wanted to be entrepreneurs.

You know that’s like saying,

I married the first person I met at the slot machines

in Las Vegas and you might hit the jackpot,

but it’s probably a really bad idea.

A much better answer is you know, we’ve been talking

about his for a long time.

You know, maybe one of us is more on the tech side,

the other ones more on the business side.

We have these sort of complimentary skills

and so I think this question of alignment and structure

is incredibly important.

I think that all, if you’re a founder or entrepreneur,

what you want to aim for is monopoly.

You want to aim to build a company that is one of a kind.

That’s so far differentiated from the competition

that it’s not even competing.

And I this conventionalism is always with capitals

and competition are somehow synonyms;

I believe they’re antonyms.

A capitalist is someone whose in the business of

accumulating capital; a world of perfect competition

is a world where all the profits are competed away.

If you want to compete like crazy then you should just

open a restaurant in Chicago.

And um, and I think the great companies like Google,

so the paradigm example I use,

has had no serious competition in Search since 2002

when it definitively distance itself

from Yahoo and Microsoft and as a result it’s been

generating enormous cash flows for the last 12 years.

But yeah, there probably are a lot of people who end up

trying to be somewhat fake entrepreneurs

where the goal is to be an entrepreneur.

If you ask people what do you want to do with your life?

What do you want to do when you grow up?

I want to be an entrepreneur,

which I always think is a somewhat too common,

disturbingly somewhat too common

and I think you know it’s a, it’s saying that you

want to be entrepreneur sort of like saying

I want to be rich or I want to be famous.

You know, nobody in their right mind starts a company

for the sake of starting a company.

You start a company because there’s a very important

problem to solve that’s not getting solved

in large you know, governmental or nonprofit

or for profit institutions and that’s why

you actually need to start a new company.

Just starting a company for the sake of doing so

is a really odd thing to do.

On an individual level I think it is always,

it’s always really good if there’s something

that you’re incredibly passionate about

and just sort of are find to be intrinsically interesting

and the people pursue that and so the,

you know one of the resolutions I came up with

a number of years ago was to always

value substance over status; substance over prestige.

And you know if I sort of was giving my younger self advice

on what to, what to do or how to think about ones’ life,

I probably, I think I you know, I probably would still

go to Stanford, I might still go to law school.

But I’d ask sort of, I’d ask a lot more questions

why I was doing these things and I think

I think if I was honest about it,

too much of it was driven by, by prestige and status

and not quite enough about really the substance of

trying to learn things.

I have sort of this, I sort of just think of it as this

sort of crazy rolling quarter life crisis

and sort of culminated in this big New York law firm

where you know, from the outside everybody wanted to get in.

From the inside everybody wanted to get out.

You know, after, I lasted seven months and three days

and after, when I left one of the people down the hall said,

it’s so reassuring to see you leave Peter.

I had no idea it was possible to escape from Alcatraz.

Which again, and again I, and all you had to do was go

through the front door, but our identity,

people’s identities get so wrapped up in

the things they compete for that it was inconceivable

for people to actually do that

and then the question was you know,

well how had I ended up there?

Why had I not thought about that more?

And I think it was that I had taken too many of these

shortcuts of valuing sort of what was prestigious,

what was conventional over what I really wanted to do.

So I think always substance over status.

And this is why I think competitions always this very

two edged thing; when you compete ferociously,

you will get better at that which you are competing on,

but you will always narrow your focus

to beating the people around you

and it often comes at this very hight price

of losing sight of what is more important

or perhaps more valuable.

The general theme I would suggest is that all trends

are overrated and so if you think about current trends

in technology, you know,

health care, I.T. software, education software, overrated.

SAS enterprise software really overrated.

Big data, cloud computing, if you hear those words

you need to think fraud; you need to run away

as fast as you possibly can.

And the reason these buzzwords tell you

that something, these buzzwords are sort of like a tell

in poker that people are bluffing

and that there’s nothing, that the business

is not undifferentiated because the buzzwords tell you

that it is one company of a category that’s undifferentiated

from the others in that category and therefore,

are symptomatic somehow of a lot of competition

and a bad business idea.

And so you know, you don’t want to be the fourth online

pet food company, you don’t want to be the tenth

tin foam solar panel company, you don’t want to be

the one-thousandth restaurant in San Francisco

and so there’s something about if you can describe

what a company is doing very straight forwardly

by referencing these buzzwords, these categories

that already exist.

That’s actually a sign that it’s a pretty bad,

that it’s a pretty bad idea.

I think there’s a problem in western Europe where,

where failure is, it’s too impossible to fail.

Once you fail you can never, you can never start over.

I think there’s an opposite version of this in California

where I think sometimes people are a little bit too

facile about failure because I think it actually is always

incredibly damaging to people and if you work

really hard at something and it doesn’t work

that’s, you know, that’s going to be psychologically

damaging, you know, people have less confidence.

All sorts of reasons why that tends to be,

that tends quite bad.

I think that when people, I don’t think there’s that much

you learn from failure by the way because

it’s typically overdetermined; it’s like why is technology

slowing down, why did you fail?

It’s typically five separate reasons:

you work with the wrong people, the idea was bad,

the timing was wrong, it wasn’t a monopoly,

the product didn’t work, and okay,

next time I’m working with different people.

You figure out one of the five things,

you’re likely to fail again.

So I think, I think failure is not something

we can learn very much from.

I think that’s sort of a myth that I would challenge.

But what I think you should do

when something goes badly wrong is

you just keep going; you do something else

and you don’t dwell on the past.

Already in the time of Shakespeare the word ape

meant both primate and to imitate

and there is something very deep in human nature

that is imitated; it’s how, it has a lot of good things,

it’s how language gets learned by kids.

It’s how culture gets transmitted in our society.

But it also can lead to sort of a lot of insane behavior.

It can lead to the madness of crowds, to bubbles,

to sort of mass delusions of one sort or another

and I think it can, I think it’s advertising.

We always think of, we always tell ourselves

that we’re not that prone to this

and I think that’s something I would encourage all of us

to rethink; you know, we always think of

advertising as something that just afflicts other people,

that never afflicts ourselves.

I think this is very far from the case and so,

and so, the monopoly competition is not just this

intellectual failure, it’s also this thing where

you have a tiny door where everyone’s trying to rush through

and there may be around the corner a vast

and a secret gate that no ones taking

and you should always find the secret path

and go ahead and take that.

– Thank you guys so much for watching.

– Now we made this video because Chain Wan Chung

on YouTube asked Evan to make it.

If you have a famous entrepreneur

that you really really really want Evan to make a video on

leave it in the comments below.

– I’d also love to know which of Peter Thiel’s top ten rules

hit you the most; leave it in the comments.

We’re going to join in the discussion.

Thank you so much for watching.

Continue to believe and we’ll see you soon.

(swooshing)

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *