Aucho: A silent participation in the words
Osho World Foundation
Oosho: Why is communication so difficult, especially between love?
These conversations are the basis for your belief.
Sitting with me in these conversations is nothing but creating meditation in you more and more.
I am not speaking to know anything; I am speaking to create something.
These are not lectures; they are simply a tool for you to become silent. – Osho
Why is communication so difficult,
Especially between love?
Brambada,
Communicating this way is difficult.
Of course it is much harder among the loves.
But first you have to understand
General difficulty of communication.
Every ‘Think’
it has been
Adapted to the diversity of parents, diversity of teachers,
Diversity of clergy, diversity of politicians.
It is a diverse world in itself.
And when two try to communicate
With regard to ordinary worldly matters,
There is no difficulty.
But the moment it starts to get over things
To the world of concepts,
Communication seems more and more difficult.
For example,
The Buddha Rings
He does not have a god
In his philosophy.
It is a great deal
Liberated from the Lord even more than Frederick Nietzsche.
At least Friedrich Nietzsche
He declares that the Lord is dead.
What suggests to us is obvious
He was alive in the past, and now he is dead.
The Buddha rings do not speak of the Lord at all.
It is not important
So that he pays no attention to the subject.
Now to the Christian, or to the Hindu, or to Muhammadi,
It is impossible to imagine a religion without a god.
God is the center of most religions.
There are only three religions liberated from God.
One is for Buddha’s gems,
Others are for Mahfira,
The third is Lao Tsu.
When for the first time there was a connection between the Christian missionaries
With sacred Buddhist books, she could not
So imagine the idea that a religion can be without a god.
What kind of religion is there no god in it?
How will you pray? For whom?
Who will send His prophets and His only begotten Son?
Who will send the Savior to you?
Who will be tried
what if I was
Will it be sent to Fire or Paradise?
If you delete the God,
The fire and paradise are also extinguished.
If you delete the God,
He shall remove punishment and reward also.
If you delete the God,
The idea of arithmetic itself is undermined.
Then there is no sin,
No virtue.
Who will decide this?
They were even more surprised
That is the Buddha’s gems
He is known by his followers
And now even by those who are not followers
It is known as the Bhagavan of the Buddha rings.
Now ‘Bhagavan’ means the god.
This was very puzzling.
He did not believe in the Buddha’s gatherers of any god.
How even allows for follow-up
To address him as ‘Bhagavan’ (a)?
The same situation is with the ‘jenna’.
So they’re more serious
With regard to the absence of God.
Buddha simply ignores the whole subject.
It does not deserve any consideration.
‘Al Jaina’ was not ignored,
Because there is danger
Of the whole thing to emerge again,
As soon as Mahfira goes.
He wants to clearly state that there is no God,
And that there was no god at all,
There is no creation
For there was no Creator,
It is a world that develops gradually.
That is what Charles Darwin found
Later two thousand years later
It was known to Mahavira, that man is not created,
It is a world that develops gradually.
He has been here forever and will stay here forever.
The concept of Creation and the Creator as a whole
Is just stupid.
This is a preview of the longest-running Ocho talk available for translation
With a translation project for video Ochu chats – www.oshotalks.info
Full video after annotation and translation has been completed.
Join the project and record for this talk.
A joint venture between DSAP and Osho International
Copyright © Ocho International Foundation, Switzerland – Ocho is a registered trademark of Ocho International Foundation
”
Be First to Comment