Press "Enter" to skip to content

Mohnish Pabrai’s Top 10 Rules For Success


– In reality, entrepreneurs do

everything they can to minimize risk.

The first thing you want to do

is define the market that you’re going after.

That it’s not the size of the circle

that matters but knowing its boundaries.

So if you don’t truly think it’s something

that you would yourself be a customer of,

don’t try to pitch it.

The single biggest advantage

a value investor has is not IQ.

It’s patience and waiting.

Avoid the use of spreadsheets

and avoid precision thinking.

And that’s no fun, it’s not fun

to hit your head against a brick wall.

So what you want is a business

that has a deep moat with lots of piranha in it,

and that’s getting deeper by the day.

I’m flexible, I think it’s very important

in investing to be a learning machine.

Pay a lot of close attention

to the feedback you get from the people

who are listening to the pitch.

– He’s an Indian-American investor,

businessman, and philanthropist.

He sold his company TransTech Inc.

in 2000 for twenty million dollars.

Today he is a managing partner of Pabrai Investment Funds.

He’s Mohnish Pabrai and here

are his top ten rules for success.

(musical zoom)

– People think that entrepreneurs take risk

and they get rewarded because they take risk.

In reality, entrepreneurs do

everything they can to minimize risk.

They’re not interested in taking risks.

They want free lunches, and they

go after free lunches, and so

if you study any number of entrepreneurs,

from Ray Kroc to Herb Schultz at Starbucks

to even Buffett and Munger and so on,

what you’ll find is that they have

repeatedly made bets which are low risk bets

which have high return possibilities.

So they are not going high risk, high return.

They’re going low risk, high return.

And even with Bill Gates, for example,

the total amount of capital that ever went

into Microsoft was less than 30 thousand

between the time it started and today.

That’s a total amount of capital

that went into the company, so

Microsoft, you cannot say was a high risk venture,

because there was no capital deployed.

But it had high uncertainty.

Bill Gates could have gone bankrupt

or Bill Gates could have ended up

the wealthiest person on the Forbes 400.

And he ended up at the extreme end

of the bell curve, and that’s fine,

but he did not take risk to get there.

He was comfortable with uncertainty,

so entrepreneurs are great at dealing

with uncertainty and also very good

at minimizing risk, that’s the

classic, great entrepreneur.

If you look at any market, any product,

any market, they will typically be

three or four players at the most

that control 80 percent of that market,

and it could be making airplanes,

or it could be making hair clips,

you can pretty much go across the board.

It could be making software, anything you want,

and I found that stunning, and if you

invert that, so one of my heroes

Charlie Munger says, every time you

encounter something always invert

the logic to try to get some other place.

So if you invert that principle,

first of all if you agree with

that principle, then the inversion will be

that if you’re starting a business

and you say that this is a ten billion dollar market

and I just need ten percent of it

and I’ll be a billion dollar company

well, right there, you’re off,

because the inversion will be that

if you’re going after a market,

your approach has to be, how do I get

sixty percent of that market, and so

if your starting point is that

I’m going to take two percent of this market

or five percent of this market,

what you have not done is you have not

segmented that market properly.

And that is a fatal flaw, so the first

thing you want to do is define the market

that you’re going after, and after

you defined it, if you don’t get to

very clear cut game plan, to get

50, 60 percent market share, then

don’t even try, because either

you have not done your job correctly

or you don’t have anything to offer

that is going to be that compelling to people.

I think another very important

trait for successful investing

is to stay within your circle of competence.

So I think Buffett always says

that it’s not the size of the circle that matters

but knowing its boundaries is absolutely critical,

and Charlie Munger talks about

that he used a couple of examples.

One is, he says, that if in a small town

you bought the Mcdonalds franchise,

you bought the Ford dealership–

– [Man] Gas station?

– Ford dealership, gas station not so good.

And gas station we’ll leave for the Patels,

low cost operations, okay, and then

you want the best classy office building

and you want the best residential buidling,

so if you got these four assets,

and you don’t need to own them completely,

you could own 20 percent of each of them.

So his perspective was that if in Peoria, Illinois

you own these four assets and you just

sat on them for your whole life,

you would end up probably quite wealthy.

And if so you think about it from a

modern portfolio theory point of view,

you would say, well, you’re not diversified,

everything is in one geography, et cetera, et cetera.

Yeah, but the odds still work out.

And in fact he has a friend here in, near Stanford,

John Arrillaga, who, all he did, was bought

real estate within a mile of the Stanford campus.

And I think Arrillaga is a billionaire.

And so what is Arrillaga’s circle of competence?

It’s this small, so the size of the circle is not relevant.

Staying inside the circle is very fundamental.

Do not try to sell something that you wouldn’t buy yourself.

So if you don’t truly think it’s something

that you would yourself be a customer of,

don’t try to pitch it, don’t be

a used car salesman, so please

make sure that whatever you’re trying

to come up with is compelling enough

that you would yourself be deeply

interested in buying that product.

So Charlie Munger likes to say that

you don’t make money when you buy stocks

and you don’t make money when you sell stocks.

You make money by waiting,

and so the biggest, the single biggest advantage

a value investor has is not IQ.

It’s patience, and waiting, waiting for

the right pitch, and waiting

for many years for the right pitch.

– So what’s that saying of Pascal

that you like about just sitting, and?

– Yeah, all man’s misery stems from

his inability to sit in a room alone and do nothing,

and all I do to adapt Pascal

is all investment managers’ miseries

stem from their inability to sit alone

in a room and do nothing.

The way to really look at investing is that,

when you look at, again, a business like Google

or Microsoft or BugShare, you really

have to put yourself in the shoes

of the people running the business

and you do ask yourself how do they run the business.

Do they run it through Excel spreadsheets,

or how do they run it?

And I would bet that most of these

businesses are run in a manner where

the founders or CEOs are really looking

at kind of three to five variables

that dominate most of their thinking

and outcome and direction, and so

as an investor you’ve got to hone in

on those same variables, so if you

can get to the same variables,

if you want to invest in Microsoft,

you can get to the same variables

that they are using, and if you’re

Google, you get the same variables

that they are using, then you are

getting very close to

trying to figure out what the business might do

and from there you can extrapolate

whether it’s underpriced or fairly priced and so on.

So that’s all I would suggest is

avoid the use of spreadsheets and

avoid precision thinking.

The stronger the marketing,

the weaker the sales engine can be, so I do not consider

myself a good salesman.

I consider myself a poor salesman.

I consider myself a pretty strong marketing person.

And so if you have done your marketing homework,

you can be a leper and make sales.

And a standing example of that is

someone in front of you, because

basically my approach to sales

would be 180 degrees approach to

your traditional used car salesman

schmoozing model and golf courses and all that,

none of that is of much interest to me.

So the stronger the marketing,

the less important the sales engine becomes.

So it is very important in my opinion

to spend incredible amounts of time

on the marketing aspect of the business.

Because if you don’t spend that time

on that aspect of it, you will spend

50 extra that time on that sales end

and hit your head against a brick wall.

And that’s no fun, it’s not fun

to hit your head against a brick wall.

So it’s good not to go there, so I just feel

the stronger the marketing, the weaker the sales.

– Now, quickly define moats in terms of

a business that keeps competition away.

– Well, you know, if you talk to

Michael Porter, he would give you

five books on what is meant by strategy

and competitor advantage and durable competitor

advantage, and if you talk to Warren

and Charlie they would just say

it is a moat, and they’d break it down to one word,

but basically it’s the ability of a business

to have some type of an enduring competitive advantage

that allows it to earn a better-than-average

rate of return over an extended period of time,

and so some businesses have narrow moats,

some have broad moats, some have moats

that are deep but get filled up

pretty quickly, so what you want

is a business that has a deep moat

with lots of piranha in it

and that’s getting deeper by the day.

That’s a great business.

I’m flexible, I think it’s very

important in investing to be a learning machine,

and to have flexibility and to be

willing to look at the opportunity set

and decide whether you need to do anything at all

or what is the best thing you can do

based on the available opportunities.

Let’s say you have come up with a

compelling value proposition.

Let’s say you’re absolutely truthful,

you truly understand it, and your pitch

is truthful and all of that.

What I have found is that basically

whatever you come up with, and

you’ve come up with it in your lab

and thinking about it, talk with friends,

looks great, the service, the product looks great.

The real litmus test of that is

when you put it in front of customers.

So when you go out and make your pitch,

your kit and ad and whatever else,

and the very, very important thing for a

entrepreneur to do is when they put that out there

be very, very, pay a lot of close attention

to the feedback you get from the people

who are listening to the pitch,

and this is very important at the front end.

Because what is probably the case

is that whatever you came up with, is off base.

It’s not exactly what your market wants.

And I’ll give you an example.

There’s a friend of mine in Chicago

and he started this company started InstallShield,

and many of you might be familiar

with the company and you’re installing

different windows products, InstallShield comes up,

and Viresh basically was like,

I think 19 years old or something

when he came up with InstallShield,

and he said, he went to a trade show,

he was going to go to a trade show,

some software tools trade show,

and he was trying to do

a whole bunch of different things, he was

trying to GoogleMaps 30 years ago,

when there was no way that the

computing could support that sort of thing.

But he went to this trade show

and he had created this kind of

trade show booth with the different products

and he had seven products, seven

different tools that he was pitching,

and it wasn’t balancing on that booth

’cause he wanted to put four bullets on one side

and four bullets on the other

and he was at like four and three

so it was really bothering him

and so, as an afterthought, this little tool he had

was just to install software,

for installing software was his eighth bullet.

He just put that at the end, the bottom,

and it will install a software installation tool.

And through all of the whole week goes by,

I think it was just a couple of days

he was at this trade show booth

and all of these people are coming by

and all this stuff going on, and there

was a guy across the aisle from him

who spent two days looking at those eight things

because he was in the software business

and after two days he came up to him

and said you know, that product,

I am interested in that product.

And this product did not exist,

it was in Viresh’s mind, and so

this was one of the only leads

he’d picked up at the show,

so he went back and created the product

and gave it to the guy, and then

he found that other people wanted

it, and so on, and so forth.

So bottom line is, if you study startups,

you will find over and over that

what actually works is not what you actually came up with.

What actually works is that, you know,

some tangent or some kind of, you mentioned something

to a customer in passing and then they grab

onto that, say I want that, and you say

oh, he’s unusual, he wants unusual thing,

I’ll still keep my core pitch: no.

What you really have to do is pay

really close attention to what is going on.

– Thank you so much for watching.

I made this video because Caesar V asked me to.

So if there’s a famous entrepreneur

that you want me to profile next,

leave it in the comments below

and I’ll see what I can do.

I’d also love to now which of the top ten

rules had the biggest impact on you and why.

Leave it in the comments, I’ll join

in the discussion, thank you so much for watching.

Continue to believe.

I’ll see you soon.

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *