Press "Enter" to skip to content

El futuro de la energía | Luis Fredes | TEDxEldorado


ashley

well they introduced me as a dinosaur

of the dinosaur industry and I

I come to pose two challenges for you

the next 25 years in 25 years

I will see how we are doing in an hour

more will be born 230 boys in india

about 200 more or less in China about 180

more or less in Africa and a

unrecognized son of maradona

if we draw a trend

from here to 2040 what we will find

is that for that time we are going to do something

as well as nine thousand 100 million

people against the 7,300 that we are today

and what I’m optimistic that we’re going

another good news because it’s a good

news that there are births

another good economic news two good

economic news

the most optimistic say that from here to

2040 the gross world product will have to

duplicate and the best news I think is

that it is also predicted that there will be a

promotion to the middle class of today

we consider low classes

today more or less the middle class are 2,000

million of the 7,000 and it is anticipated that

by 2040 there will be five thousand and

families more than 50%

Now imagine that people more wealth

more people who access wealth when

you access wealth this is about

seek comfort is about satisfying

the basic needs go beyond

basic needs buy the air

conditioning shopping the car and weights

Energy

or that stays good energy is

sustains growth with energy

it needs energy when we take the

example of the exponential growth that

had the Chinese economy of the past 20

years

what we see is that there was a trend

dangerous plus money plus kilowatts

very much co2 very much dioxide

carbon emitted if you project that same

trend towards 2040

we are going to have a problem for that time

we would be consuming something like the

double the global energy that today

consumed from the point of view of

emissions

that would be fatal days or literally if

follow that trend

we are in the liberal oven then it

always raises the debates good the

coal was the first source of energy

Then came the oil and its derivatives

of oil is less polluting than

charcoal

then the natural gas natural gas is

cleaner than the oil

renewable energy comes at a gallop but

I’m going to talk about renewable energy

because it comes at a gallop

that is something that is going to happen is

happening faster than

we thought

that debate totally which is more

pollutant that another is a debate

totally sterile and ples my advice is

let’s not waste time on that I could

tell them that the only energy that is not

pollutant is the energy that is not

consume this is the only one if we put together a

triangle a triangle of power between

the governments

the consumer technology and we

we agree is feasible that

we can be that trend from which

posed just

that trend we see from the economy

china and instead of doubling the energy

from here to 2040, increase only 25

cent with an increase in emissions

of the order of 15% at the most

that is sustainable and sustains the

demographic growth and growth

productive that raises the beginning is the

first challenge to keep growing

but grow without polluting without

self-destruct when we see that 25% of

why almost 90% of 25% is

tolerate that I am an engineer and that now

always from numbers to be generation

of electric power and the the greatest

source for power generation

electrical in the next 25 years

it’s still going to be the gas

natural is going to replace coal and

back the renewable energies are going to

grow in the period that I am

speaking at least four times but

even with that growth they will occupy in

the energy matrix no more than 15% if

it’s going to grow a lot but it’s still going to be

little if the 19th century was the kingdom of the

coal as a source of energy and the century

20 was oil and its derivatives

the king comes a new reign that goes

to be that of renewable energies but

meanwhile we have to pass a

transition where still always

dominating fossil fuels is the

second challenge then I will

raised how to survive with something that does not

he has good press we do not like

a lot and I started thinking about him on how

survive with something fixed

I looked in the mirror and said black

survive 55 years with this that look

and trying to find the round the

explanation is that I survived good with

attitude is to survive with attitude with

the fossils is to use it so

efficient

there are two components the component

technology and there is the component of

users

today we had a very excellent

dissertation about what is coming

technologically and did not underestimate us the

effort in the technological

but it is something that advances and advances and

advances and advances and is unstoppable

for example if we to all our

electricity generation plants there

in Argentina and they burn fuel

we close the cycles and take advantage of the

heat to be with gases

we would be increasing almost three times

generation efficiency we are

talking a lot lately about the

electric vehicles

the penetration of vehicles

electrical will take a little time

the most optimistic say five the least

optimists say ten years to be

equate the price of a vehicle

electric with a combustion vehicle

internal that is to say technology is advancing

if it advances in innovating in 10 some

ruptures such as vehicles

electric

but just that irruption that

innovation is pushing that the

traditional automotive industry

put the batteries in a good time in that

only 20 percent of the fuel

that burns a conventional vehicle is

they convert the energy that mobilizes it

and say that there is 80 percent energy

that the vehicle is being lost

typical classic can travel 10 12

kilometers per liter

good or very little you can go over 10 or

12 to 20 and the countries that have signed the

Paris agreement for the reduction of

emissions has set goals to

turn to pressure the industry

automotive to accelerate those

optimization processes for example

Japan is encouraged to say that a vehicle

conventional will be able to do 40

kilometers per liter

I have been less than a month

I left my old vehicle and bought myself one

new that is consumed half five

five years of technological change

he said of electric vehicles that

they have a strong impact but when one

measures that impact even in spite of

huge penetration huge acceleration of

the penetration

we are talking about a saving of 2 per

cent of the energy while if the

conventional vehicles are modified

that is to contributions 8 percent

of energy saving back as

I can tell you guys, guys, I do not know

worry about the wave technology

involve yourself with technology

if there are any who are thinking what

university careers continue to consider

engineering luis

the other thing is technology can make a

lots of things but what can not

to do is calibrate to control what

we humans do there

we have a theme

because we can have a lot of optimization

from the technological point of view

but it will not help if we do not

we change our habits when

Habits are consolidating habits

they become culture and what I

I come to raise here is a change

cultural of all our behavior in

please be of surviving as a species

that cultural change that brought them

from my point of view it has at least

two pillars one move from the individual

to the collective and another is to make the

ethics will win the aesthetic has to

see this with the energy rose the

Flocks of birds such as going on

sky is a subject that is a subject

geometric is an aesthetic subject is not the

way that birds are incorporated

to save energy on your flight is a

organized collective flight is a way

collective to organize themselves in the

north access of the city of good

airs every business day centers

around 3 300 thousand vehicles

they know how many passengers go by vehicle

average 1.2

know what is the average capacity a

vehicle five years there is a problem of

turkey individualism or not over

it’s expensive and it’s also boring

we put the speaker to the journalist for

to make the trip instead of chatting

with someone

now he just transported also

you can change that fashion is that

modality can be changed to others

habits of life in a remote place

from the city

We live about a thousand people

closest supermarket I have left

sixteen kilometers

if each of the thousand families a

representative my family has to

do 32 kilometers to go to

Supermarket

we are wasting energy uselessly

we have organized among friends to

do the shopping and we have told the

supermarket from us go see you

we came to see us many years ago

When I was a boy to my house, came the

baker came the milkman came the

dealer of whatever and there is not

need to move one there was one that

optimally he came and offered his

product

the second thing that raised them is the ethical

versus the aesthetic and why do I say this

because for that weird thing that never

I’m going to understand that obsession of January we

leads to having something more and more

sophisticated

when sometimes we do not need it said

someone that many of us

spend the money they do not have to

buy things you do not need to

impress people who do not care

among other things huge vehicles

200 horses vehicles like mine

accuracy if you did not impress with the car

him but that’s here we had just now

Gardel is evident in the head

someone can become happy that

way if someone is happy so I

I think I need a good therapist or

or I would recommend that you adopt a

pup puppy from the street that

surely you will find more

meaning to life doing so having

a giant refrigerator that occupies the

5% of the volume

yes factory cigars in less

an hour or else it has an air

conditioning of 500 frigorías does not have

ignited in august in río negro

that is not this

no, I do not think that gratifies is the

change of habit that will impact a

cultural change and surely

as a consequence besides being better

people will lower consumption

energy and energy consumption not

it is the problem itself but the

emissions and emissions are not the

problem in itself

the problem is that if this land is

keep heating

we ‘re going to mash and there’s

something that sometimes we do not have in

consideration we are not alone there are other

species that are more vulnerable and what

they suffer

before us and us to change

climate

so back I was presented as a

dinosaur of the industry of

dinosaurs and he reflected that the

dinosaurs disappeared

we want our species to be a little

smarter as at least since

our side does not force

it is to that end that they had those

old habits

Thank you

[Applause]

[Music]

me

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *