Press "Enter" to skip to content

Por qué la desigualdad económica no es un problema | Luis Alberto Iglesias | TEDxMalagueta


after equality is not a problem

equality is intrinsic diversity

talents and behaviors of beings

humans and a natural phenomenon in

societies where people act with

freedom the unjust is to impose the

equality

so let’s respect the diversity and

let’s celebrate inequality

frankly that’s all I have to

say but as I have the impression of

that today claim that the

inequality is not a problem can

be a bit shocking or provocative or

impertinent I’m going to ask you to be

benevolent with me and allow me to explain

why do I think that the struggle of so many

intellectual politicians or creators of

opinion for imposing equality in all

the fields at all costs is really

a fight against our own

nature that can cause the swing

of the fragile model of free society and

thriving in which we live and for that

they started singing is not a story

very brief the life of two children march and

victory but I will ask you to try

put yourself in the shoes of the characters

so that history can supply

greater effect because they reached their

records we can all be March and

victory

Let’s go there March was born in a country

called equality to all men

born in that month received the same

name the same from birth as

marked the law was not to be true that

that a name chosen for its

pairs freely that could print a

kind of special character those would be

intolerable

that same day in a neighboring country called

freedom a girl was born her parents

they decided to call her

soria because it was a name that evoked

success excellence effort in all

who listened to him tutored by

social workers March grew and it

He educated just like other children

he learned that victories should always

be shared with rivals and that the

only fair competition is that in the

that there are neither winners nor losers

He also learned to endure the pain of

play soccer with ten dates in the

boots

after all, he was born with

skills for sport was necessary

compensate for not committing injustices

with the rest of the companions more

slow and less agile

from very early in victoria woke up

what was to be the passion of his life

the farm within its possibilities

his parents spared no effort

so that victory can be studied with

best teachers in the best

schools after the effort and

víctor skills did the rest and

she grew up as a dancer and was accumulating

awards and honours

March work life began in the

occupation that was assigned by the

corresponding committee based on the

jobs that were available in that

moment for 40 years with the same

salary than the rest of the classmates and

was playing the occupations that

they were being assigned victory

he traveled all over the world dancing for

different companies eventually arrived

to found their own and their

shows enjoyed the favor of

public and critics and they came to the

fame and money with part of which

He opened his first school dance the

March working life ended when

fulfilled the deadline indicated by the law yet

he lived a few years a life

quiet and modest as a retiree with the

pension that will receive from the state the same

for all of course March died and

your belongings

also his small savings were

transferred to the contribution fund

social that had to redistribute them

among the members of your community

of course the children of March were

excluded from said distribution

it was necessary to promote equality of

opportunities

victory died old and happy surrounded

of children and grandchildren who helped

until the last moment the patrimony

accumulated all his life he divided

between them and a couple of organizations

charities that he chose with the hope of

that also from them could help

that other accomplices in their dreams their

goals

two very different looks true how many

we would want for ourselves and for

our children a life of total

equality of absolute suppression of

differences from the cradle to the

burial like the one the poor man lived in

March in that country called equality

many would seem horrible to be

absurd and intolerable for going against

of our own diverse nature and

unequal of human beings

and yet every day more and more

people who aspire to gain power

influence in our societies

they work to convince us that there is

at least one area of ​​our life where

similar imposition of equality no

it is only necessary but it is

morally fair

guess what scope I refer to the economy

we must put an end to inequality

economic say politicians is not

true and it does not seem casual to me that this

is happening when poverty has

stopped being a problem for the

most of us who live in societies

free and prosperous like ours and

when the organization of happiness

affirms that we will assist in the eradication

of extreme poverty across the planet

probably before the year 2030

let’s take a good look we are about to finish

with the largest of the tests in all the

world and yet they tell us that the

problem is economic inequality

that is, some earn more than others that

some have more than others sometimes

Much more

is true but why should this be a

problem because it helps to be denounced and

to prevent

that certain people earn too much and

Who is nobody to say how much is

too much to what that definitively comes

I hate the rich because it’s unfair that

certain people earn a lot of money

for being excellent in the professions

who have chosen singers like bruce

springsteen or madonna honest joaquin

sabina and july churches actors like

George Clooney film directors like

pedro almodóvar sportsmen like

Christian ronaldo or rafa nadal and could

keep citing business designers

fashionable novelists architects all

they share talent passion for what

do and effort capacity

They have also become excellent in

occupations activities where the

competition is huge because then to

report that they earn too much money

it’s more the thousands or millions of people

who decide to give him is part of his money

I do not care much or little

to enjoy a concert vibrate in

a game of tennis or football or

get excited with a movie they do it

free and voluntarily because

understand and each of these

excellent professionals help do

life better and easier to others

people

why then should we avoid preventing

that they fully enjoy the fruit of their

success because we have to cross out their

obscene income when they have been

obtained precisely by serving us

everyone else providing us the

well the pleasure enjoyment the service

that we were looking for because in addition to

be unfair that some people do not

they only earn a lot

money but throughout a whole

life they come to accumulate great fortunes

because what is unjust must be just enough

be confiscated with wealth taxes

of entrepreneurs like bill gates or more

accurate whose innovations and creations

they have made our lives better and easier

to so many around the world

why should they be prevented from transpiring

fully if you want

that wealth to his heirs or to the

1,000 charitable purposes they choose

how victory did the country called

freedom who we work with a

Windows operating system or we dress

zara clothes or buy in amazon not

we are poorer because I have become more

strong today the president of amazon

yes they have made so rich

they have become so rich

because they have helped us all to live

rather better and that includes the

millions of people who charge a

salary working in any of its

companies and the rich already is because

I won a lot because I have a lot they do not have

the obligation to benefit the

society for having become rich not

have the obligation to benefit the

society for getting rich is

just the other way round they have become rich

because they have benefited society

first to society means to

all of us but would not have been done

rich

we must understand that in our

extensive broad market societies

some few

fortunately more and more people will be able

get to win and have a lot because we

will have helped many to win and have

more they will be able to win and have a lot

because they have not only led many to

win and get more because then what

it just has to be frying the taxes for

confiscate their wealth

perhaps we want a world where nobody

have the minimum incentive to create

improve the lives of others

a world where talent is punished

and persecuted instead of rewarding the

promoted as that country called

equality where power lived in March

if you think

Let’s play and imagine what that world would be like

ideal egalitarian seems goes beyond

say congratulations on the boots

ronaldo and messi

so we will match your game at the level of

other players with less talent

what do you think I just did not see but

good

we go with another we force that

springsteen and sabina sings in without

microphone like this let’s go to your

concerts your income will go down and win

the same as the rest of singers less

popular is a foolish truth is this

yes yes it is sure we force that

all of them pay the tax to the state

80 percent of what they earn and staff

total to them what else does it give them if they already earn

too true

yes true but think in a moment

please a society

so agree and it would be worth more

egalitarian but it would be one more society

fair

think about it because if you think not

they get doubts then is that the

problem is not inequality and for

Of course it is not

as claimed by a famous Nobel Prize winner

American economy

a society that puts equality before

freedom will not have any of the two

things but one that puts freedom

to equality will inevitably reach

greater freedom and greater equality

come to this point I have to tell you

rather confess that he has not been

sincere with you if you remember started

affirming that inequality is not

no problem and that the unfair is

impose equality in all areas

and at all costs and until now tried

explain why I think the

economic inequality can be a

completely fair and natural phenomenon

and I say it can be and I say good because if

there is a type of inequality that is a

problem a kind of inequality that is

found at the source of the soaring

income and the great fortunes of

certain people in our societies

if you do not intuit it, I’m referring to

to the inequality caused by the

favors and arbitrary decisions of the

political power because our society

is the biggest source of inequality has

been

and it’s still the granting of

special privileges on the part of

our governments to certain groups and

certain people or what is the same

our politicians use the power of

been to enrich a few to

cost of impoverishing us to all

the rest

as I explained before amancio ortega

he has become much richer than me

selling clothes all over the world

to me he has not made me poorer but

multimillion-dollar bailouts of the system

savings banks in our country

controlled by politicians and ruined by

the fraudulent management of their curators

hand-picked

yes they have left all of our

pockets to pay for their fixes and their

compromises granted

by the president of my region

country to the communication group that

publishes the newspaper on the internet that runs

his wife if they come out of our pockets

to enrich her and her company the

arbitrary business concession

friends of gigantic projects of

engineering and civil works with the guarantee

that if they are profitable

the gains are for them and that if

the losses are not, we pay them all

we do enrich a few

at the expense of resembling everyone else

you need to keep naming examples

because all this has happened and continues

happening in my country in Spain with

names and surnames that we can

find in newspapers

that and not another is the inequality that

we must denounce and fight

then we must ask ourselves can we finish

with her

frankly I think so but for

end this kind of inequality

unfair and immoral

all of us must fully assume

our inescapable obligation to act

as responsible citizens

permanently vigilant of power

political citizens who will never accept

for himself a privilege that he has to

pay another who will fail so much that we

grant as to those who receive it

citizens in short that never

they will support them with their vote

through political power they commit

promote or tolerate the favoritism of

crime and injustice

said well it is very true but

perhaps it is convenient to put feet on the ground

because be realistic because this is not going to

happen overnight

then until that day arrives there is

something we can do here now

Of course we do celebrate the joust

inequality as the natural fruit of the

diversity of talents and behaviors

of free men and women

let’s understand that said inequality

will necessarily derive results

different for each person who in

some situations lead to

inequalities income differences and

of wealth totally just and natural

and we hope that someday we will all be

able to stop envying the

triumphant and dare to dream and

live with strength illusion our own

lifetime

many thanks

[Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *