Press "Enter" to skip to content

El periodismo científico ayuda a tomar decisiones | Nora Bär | TEDxDuraznoWomen


[Music]

Hello Goodnight

[Applause]

I’m going to tell you a story

when I was little I wanted to be

stewardess if I wanted to be a stewardess for

be able to fly to visit other

countries

Of course my parents had arrived from

germany they settled in the

conurbano de buenos aires and for the

neighbors of my block travel to others

countries was as far as becoming

in astronaut but then crisis and

I met my husband

we had children and then trying to

find a job that will allow me

combined times of my family and

those at work can work at night

when the kids were at school

I became a journalist who

thinking it over is another way of

travel and travel from the pyramids

Egyptian to the underworld of matter or to

the worlds of outer space go with

the space probes visit pluton and

also travel

in fact because thanks to journalism

visit many places where I interviewed

to personalities that were

building the knowledge of our

days

that’s why this morning I did what I do

every morning as soon as I put a foot

out of bed I started to read the

news but not football news

of politics or show

I started reading

the news that have to do with

It became a science fiction world that

visit the world’s scientists

whole and I did not have to go very far

It was enough to open my twitter to

find there data as for example

that a baby was born with material

of three people or that the

biodiversity is so threatened that it

only mammals are at risk

but also to the insects and that

for example in the future it is thought that

there will be operations with scalpel is

molecular all things really

incredible goes credible because they are the

advances that are taking place

our scientists

for example one of the news that you and

is that there will be autonomous cars that

they will be able to transport us without need

of driver said there I am for the

side of an autonomous car keel is

is developing in california and that

I was fortunate to know just in

a trip that I made last week to the

World conference of journalists

scientists

this is a car in which one sits

and a car does not have a clear steering wheel

autonomous seems a fantastic thing

but it also poses problems

unused so far for example

if the car is carried ahead to a

person and that to whom you have to throw the

blame the car on the person and if the car

still has a group of

people who do not want to step on were due and

it turns out that – other than how it’s going

to indicate to the car

what do you have to do to be in

your program to avoid these accidents

all these questions are asked by the

scientists and they also show the

wonderful duality of science that

it allows us to access possibilities

unsuspected so far but that

It also poses new problems

the science is impressive the amount

of progress of discoveries of

findings that are made every day every

month the scientific journals are thousands

and every year millions of

jobs

let’s think that only China has thought

by 2020 to have 20 million doctors

and researchers is something that we

overwhelm

but what floods us and is the new world

in which we live and you are going to

say good or read the news

scientific because you are curious and have

reason one for your own curiosity about

the curiosity that we all feel and

we want to know all these news

a philosopher named douglas costa ter

once he said science is awarded

of fascination and mystery not in the

sense of that superficial curiosity

that vanishes very quickly but in the

sense of wonder and strangeness that

they suggest to the human being the vastness of the

cosmos and then stereo of the most

minimum constituents of the material

we live in a wonderful world and

just in science what can

reveal all those mysteries

but science is not only attractive

because he presents us with a film that does not

Surprise at every step

it is also a way of thinking is a

tool to achieve things that such

ten years ago we would have thought

that are incredible

for example two years ago a probe

launched ten years before he was able to meet

millions of kilometers

with this that they see on the screen is a

Kite

comet 67 p the scientists of the

European space agency

they planned to the millimeter the trip of that

probe that circled around

of the sun and the earth to get to

find yourself as if you will meet

with a tiny grain of sand in the

cosmic ocean science also we

gives vaccines and poses problems

about which you have to decide every day

from here you can not see but if I

say for example who of you who

tell me who and who of you if it is

he had to decide whether to give

vaccinate your children if you opt for a test

of prenatal pregnancy or an abortion or

for surgery or had to decide if

He wanted his country to install the

electronic vote or sky mining

open it is likely that almost all have

had to take any of these

decisions and to be able to decide

confuse

Bento based on objective facts is

It is necessary to understand what science is

of our days because if we do not fall in

the hands of warlocks of tarot players

healers who can really

recommend treatments or exits that

they have no handle nothing to do

with reality

what I am telling you what

we invent ourselves is not something new no

it’s something of the 21st century

in 1801 the merchant telegraph that was

the first newspaper published in the

viceroyalty

I already said that it was published to inspire

the love of the arts and sciences and

to promote the inspiration of the

arts and sciences in the minds of the

people in the mercantile telegraph already in

those days, notes were published

example about glass technology

Anyway if the glass and notes

archaeological findings that were made

think that we were in 1801

for example an article that had the

phenomenon title attributed the

find those bones so big that

they just belonged to animals

prehistoric were fossil bones what

attributes to the goodness of the land of

100 terrado cadaver of regular stature

if it is taken out after some time it

they find the bones extremely grown

which is why some believe that in that

earth there were giants

they thought with some theories

a little naive that when one

buried to some bones in a land

fertile so how the plants grew

the bones also grew

well before the telegraph

merchant more than twenty centuries before and

Plato considered that who did not know

the rudiments of science was

committing an insult

he said the man who could not

discerning the one nor the 2003 and in general

parents and the odd or the one who does not

I knew nothing to tell or that it was not

able to measure day and night or

lacked experience about the

revolutions of the moon or the sun or of

the other stars good said platón

that’s more like beasts

swine tremendous good to write about

scientific journalism is almost the same

what to write about the wars of

afghanistan the election campaigns or

all the other stories that the

journalism there are also heroes like the

on Mars that developed rockets capable

of going into space back because they are

reusable and descend in shape

vertical something that had not been seen and

it seemed impossible and there are also

villains like the gentleman who is at

right of you in science

there are also heroes and villains because

science is made by people by

men and women who have six children

that are crossed by prejudices and

by all the tendencies of the culture

before

of our days it was considered that the

science was simply the search for

the truth without any interest

so much so that at the time of the

ancient Greece

euclid the great mathematician of upyd is

one day he was presented at the door of

his house a disciple and he made him

ask what is the use of studying

math

then the wise man sent his slave in

that era there were slaves and he said

give an ovule to that poor devil that

he thinks he has to study to win

something in the mind of utilities did not fit

the possibility that one would like to use

the knowledge to get some

revenue

but all that was changing the science

much closer

at the end of the 19th century and already in the 20th century

was organized as a company in which

If you look for new findings, you look for

solve the mysteries answer

questions that we all ask ourselves and that

do the scientists themselves but already

it is a profession

today scientists are subject to

all kinds of pressures

On the one hand they have to fulfill their

deadlines have to answer in front of

agencies that grant them subsidies

they have to prove that what they are

investigating will serve to apply

in something profitable for your country for its

community and they also have to

develop research that can

be publishable only in your country but

also in scientific journals

of the northern hemisphere means that

they are really

and pressed but we said that all

that knowledge that is added

week week day after day van

conditioning our world and then

they present us with new dilemmas we have to

decide on many issues for

that you have to be prepared

for example not long ago it was given to

meet in all media

that angelina jolie had opted for

get a radical double mastectomy

because I had a high risk of suffering

hereditary breast cancer

how she took that decision had to

find out about the risk he had

had to know that it existed before

laboratory that could detect if she

had those genes that predispose

breast cancer and had to argue with

your doctor if you really perform that

surgery could protect it and prevent

arise in your body

this disease when along

our life we see ourselves

confronted with these decisions

many times we have to know not only

the results offered by the

scientific research but also

how this process of

investigation

we have to know for example that when

we read in a newspaper that people who

they drink a lot of coffee they have less risk of

suffer from Alzheimer

that tells us a lot because we do not know if

those same people

they also take care of their weight they make a life

fury

maintain a healthy diet

then of course they have less risk of

have Alzheimer’s but maybe it’s not because

the coffee since they did an experiment

there are two variables we do not know to which of

the two or three or four do not know to

which of the two

attribute the result to him that two things

occur simultaneously as per

example Alzheimer’s and coffee not

means that one is the cause of the

other

in the same way as the fact that it comes out

the sun is in the morning and the rooster sings

it does not mean that the sun comes out because

The rooster sings are two facts

simultaneous but we do not know about the

cause of the other the cause of the other

we also have to know for example

that the experiments in mice are

very far from what happens next in

humans

many times we see great headlines that

they say they cured diabetes and then

tiny in mice in mice

They rushed everything but as the

last week just in this

meeting in san francisco

an English researcher told me the

mice are exaggerated and liars

it was a way of jokingly saying that

experiments in mice are always

preliminaries do not prove what is going to happen

the same can not be extrapolated

directly what happens in mice to

humans

all this we have to know

when we read news about

scientific discoveries

not long ago it reached Argentina a

economist a few years ago a

Economist named Juan Enriquez

I think

the life sciences institute of

the harvard university and in said the

February 12 , 2001 something so happened

impressive as when Columbus arrived

to america changed the world map in

the one that we live

you know what happened on that 2001 date the

February 12, 2001 was published in the

two most important magazines in the world

scientist science in major

the decoding of the human genome is

spelled the book of life and then

said Enriquez is knowing the genes

know the language of genes and

knowing the digital language is going to

change everything forever

today we can make corn plants that

produce nylon we can produce

artificial intelligence and algorithms

of the world and digital are those that are

managing our world

then the countries that dominate that

language the language of science and the

technology are those that advance those that

they get rich and those who do not

those whose kids do not know the

language of science are those that go to

get fit and win behind many of

you the biggest ones surely the

will know and others may know

for the stories that tell of him was

a great popularizer of science maybe

the biggest one that came to more

people and in his last book before

die the world and its demons in

synthesized

all this that I am telling you about

of the

yearning to know the language of

science to make equivocal decisions

in all government on earth

there is some trace of human weakness

all government degenerates

if you trust only the

rulers the town said sagan is the

only safe depository but so that

exist security must cultivate the

thought

if we can not think for ourselves

we are pure putty in the hands of those who

they exercise power and not only those who

they exercise power from governments

but those who exercise power from

all the areas in which it is exercised

the power from a doctor who may not

give us the explanations that we

we ask, we need, we need a

company that may want to take us to

a diet that is not the most

healthy to be able to move and take

decisions in this world where the

science surrounds us

we must understand the language of the

science science is confined in its

areas but society is interested

the messages of the media by means of

words

we can produce effects the

scientific journalists as well as the

motto of this meeting

We can build bridges between the

science and scientists and laymen

between science and society and the most

important and the biggest challenge that

we have the 12 scientific journalists

it is not to count results but to transmit

the basics of critical thinking

is thinking

I feel that led the scientists to

the tests that we all know

what is clear is that science we

belongs to everyone

we want it or we do not want it we live in

march be they we have to talk about

she in the cafes in the newspapers in the

television on the radio because without

scientific knowledge as you say

do we are pure putty in the hands of

others who will make decisions for

told us that when he was

little one wanted to be a flight attendant but now

considered that journalism and in

particular scientific journalism is

the best trade in the world

talk about science transmit the

rudiments of the scientific method is

also put our two cents

so we can make informed decisions

in every moment for our life to

our neighborhood for the future of the

human family

science is too important for

leave it aside and especially and

too important to leave it only

in the hands of scientists

thank you very much

[Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *