when the Manhattan Project national park was established in three locations
park was established in three locations
park was established in three locations at Oakridge Los Alamos and Hanford it
at Oakridge Los Alamos and Hanford it
at Oakridge Los Alamos and Hanford it established a new plane for interpretive
established a new plane for interpretive
established a new plane for interpretive complexity the history of these three
complexity the history of these three
complexity the history of these three separate locations was very different
separate locations was very different
separate locations was very different and at the Hanford unit part of its
and at the Hanford unit part of its
and at the Hanford unit part of its history was underrepresented in the
history was underrepresented in the
history was underrepresented in the written record namely the contribution
written record namely the contribution
written record namely the contribution of the contractor the DuPont company
of the contractor the DuPont company
of the contractor the DuPont company whose foundational characteristics were
whose foundational characteristics were
whose foundational characteristics were so pivotal in the success of the Hanford
so pivotal in the success of the Hanford
so pivotal in the success of the Hanford project I mean of the Manhattan Project
project I mean of the Manhattan Project
project I mean of the Manhattan Project at Hanford you guests that come out to
at Hanford you guests that come out to
at Hanford you guests that come out to be reactor are well introduced into the
be reactor are well introduced into the
be reactor are well introduced into the what and why of the facilities out there
what and why of the facilities out there
what and why of the facilities out there but the how and the who we say very
but the how and the who we say very
but the how and the who we say very little about how was Hanford built in
little about how was Hanford built in
little about how was Hanford built in such a short period of time it’s very
such a short period of time it’s very
such a short period of time it’s very difficult to understand the timeliness
difficult to understand the timeliness
difficult to understand the timeliness of Hanford unless the how and the who is
of Hanford unless the how and the who is
of Hanford unless the how and the who is added to the narrative it’s a
added to the narrative it’s a
added to the narrative it’s a fascinating story the April 16th issue
fascinating story the April 16th issue
fascinating story the April 16th issue in 1951 of the Time magazine gives us a
in 1951 of the Time magazine gives us a
in 1951 of the Time magazine gives us a glimpse of how DuPont was looked upon
glimpse of how DuPont was looked upon
glimpse of how DuPont was looked upon after the manhattan project was
after the manhattan project was
after the manhattan project was completed their feature story was of the
completed their feature story was of the
completed their feature story was of the Wizards of Wilmington the history of the
Wizards of Wilmington the history of the
Wizards of Wilmington the history of the DuPont company and started out telling
DuPont company and started out telling
DuPont company and started out telling about DuPont building the Savannah River
about DuPont building the Savannah River
about DuPont building the Savannah River project which was located to make
project which was located to make
project which was located to make materials for the hydrogen bomb they had
materials for the hydrogen bomb they had
materials for the hydrogen bomb they had taken that project reluctantly a
taken that project reluctantly a
taken that project reluctantly a generation before they had been branded
generation before they had been branded
generation before they had been branded merchants of death when a committee from
merchants of death when a committee from
merchants of death when a committee from the US Congress had looked at profit
the US Congress had looked at profit
the US Congress had looked at profit prophet Ison during World War one and
prophet Ison during World War one and
prophet Ison during World War one and they would do anything to avoid that
they would do anything to avoid that
they would do anything to avoid that Bree brand rebranding but now the
Bree brand rebranding but now the
Bree brand rebranding but now the government was saying DuPont was the
government was saying DuPont was the
government was saying DuPont was the only company that could bill the
only company that could bill the
only company that could bill the Savannah River project one expert in
Savannah River project one expert in
Savannah River project one expert in atomic energy said to give that job to
atomic energy said to give that job to
atomic energy said to give that job to any other corporation when you could get
any other corporation when you could get
any other corporation when you could get DuPont would be like accepting a rookie
DuPont would be like accepting a rookie
DuPont would be like accepting a rookie when you had the opportunity to get Babe
when you had the opportunity to get Babe
when you had the opportunity to get Babe Ruth in the prime of his career the
Ruth in the prime of his career the
Ruth in the prime of his career the story continued with events of nine
story continued with events of nine
story continued with events of nine years earlier and explained why DuPont
years earlier and explained why DuPont
years earlier and explained why DuPont was held in such high esteem at that
was held in such high esteem at that
was held in such high esteem at that time DuPont had taken on the
time DuPont had taken on the
time DuPont had taken on the construction of the plutonium
construction of the plutonium
construction of the plutonium manufacturing facilities at Hanford as
manufacturing facilities at Hanford as
manufacturing facilities at Hanford as part of the Manhattan Project that was a
part of the Manhattan Project that was a
part of the Manhattan Project that was a far bigger project than the Savannah
far bigger project than the Savannah
far bigger project than the Savannah River project and it was probably the
River project and it was probably the
River project and it was probably the biggest contract ever led to one
biggest contract ever led to one
biggest contract ever led to one contracting agent in the history of our
contracting agent in the history of our
contracting agent in the history of our country and it was also a much riskier
country and it was also a much riskier
country and it was also a much riskier project so little was known about the
project so little was known about the
project so little was known about the materials and the processes involved
materials and the processes involved
materials and the processes involved there was so much fear that we were
there was so much fear that we were
there was so much fear that we were behind the Germans in the development of
behind the Germans in the development of
behind the Germans in the development of the atomic bomb and so much secrecy but
the atomic bomb and so much secrecy but
the atomic bomb and so much secrecy but wait this talk is not an infomercial for
wait this talk is not an infomercial for
wait this talk is not an infomercial for the DuPont company as a matter of fact
the DuPont company as a matter of fact
the DuPont company as a matter of fact in our efforts to see whether we were
in our efforts to see whether we were
in our efforts to see whether we were well shall we say exaggerating we tried
well shall we say exaggerating we tried
well shall we say exaggerating we tried to get in touch with them they don’t
to get in touch with them they don’t
to get in touch with them they don’t want to even discuss the Manhattan
want to even discuss the Manhattan
want to even discuss the Manhattan Project but the real reason for the talk
Project but the real reason for the talk
Project but the real reason for the talk is it’s an extra it’s a reaction that
is it’s an extra it’s a reaction that
is it’s an extra it’s a reaction that while most of the popular histories of
while most of the popular histories of
while most of the popular histories of the Manhattan Project treat the
the Manhattan Project treat the
the Manhattan Project treat the contractor as a secondary citizen
contractor as a secondary citizen
contractor as a secondary citizen only they’re in the service of their
only they’re in the service of their
only they’re in the service of their contracting agent those sources that
contracting agent those sources that
contracting agent those sources that looked at Hanford concluded things were
looked at Hanford concluded things were
looked at Hanford concluded things were very very different at Hanford they’re
very very different at Hanford they’re
very very different at Hanford they’re probably there was no time in our
probably there was no time in our
probably there was no time in our history when we as a country were more
history when we as a country were more
history when we as a country were more dependent upon the performance of a
dependent upon the performance of a
dependent upon the performance of a single commercial identity how was
single commercial identity how was
single commercial identity how was DuPont selected for that job well a
DuPont selected for that job well a
DuPont selected for that job well a little history in the fall of 1941 and
little history in the fall of 1941 and
little history in the fall of 1941 and 42 I’m sorry
42 I’m sorry
42 I’m sorry the Manhattan Project was established
the Manhattan Project was established
the Manhattan Project was established with the Corps of Engineers under the
with the Corps of Engineers under the
with the Corps of Engineers under the direction of Brigadier General Leslie
direction of Brigadier General Leslie
direction of Brigadier General Leslie groves the initial objective of this
groves the initial objective of this
groves the initial objective of this huge secret project was to produce the
huge secret project was to produce the
huge secret project was to produce the alternative ingredients for a bomb first
alternative ingredients for a bomb first
alternative ingredients for a bomb first approach
approach
approach separate out the scarce isotope u-235 it
separate out the scarce isotope u-235 it
separate out the scarce isotope u-235 it was president only in less than 1% from
was president only in less than 1% from
was president only in less than 1% from the rest of uranium the second approach
the rest of uranium the second approach
the rest of uranium the second approach produce an entirely new element that
produce an entirely new element that
produce an entirely new element that theoretically had the same
theoretically had the same
theoretically had the same characteristics as u-235 the intent was
characteristics as u-235 the intent was
characteristics as u-235 the intent was that both of these materials would be
that both of these materials would be
that both of these materials would be produced at Oak Ridge Tennessee because
produced at Oak Ridge Tennessee because
produced at Oak Ridge Tennessee because there was a vast amount of power in that
there was a vast amount of power in that
there was a vast amount of power in that location and toward that end some seven
location and toward that end some seven
location and toward that end some seven different corporations were under
different corporations were under
different corporations were under contract to build and produce u-235 via
contract to build and produce u-235 via
contract to build and produce u-235 via two different approaches for isotope
two different approaches for isotope
two different approaches for isotope separation but to make an entirely new
separation but to make an entirely new
separation but to make an entirely new element now there was a job that was
element now there was a job that was
element now there was a job that was more like alchemy than chemistry it
more like alchemy than chemistry it
more like alchemy than chemistry it involved the ingenious arrangement of
involved the ingenious arrangement of
involved the ingenious arrangement of natural uranium in what was called a
natural uranium in what was called a
natural uranium in what was called a pile such that it would undergo a
pile such that it would undergo a
pile such that it would undergo a nuclear reaction and produce yes
nuclear reaction and produce yes
nuclear reaction and produce yes an entirely new element plutonium that
an entirely new element plutonium that
an entirely new element plutonium that had never existed on earth and we are
had never existed on earth and we are
had never existed on earth and we are not going to try to go into the details
not going to try to go into the details
not going to try to go into the details of that reaction but we have to state
of that reaction but we have to state
of that reaction but we have to state one very important factor it let loose a
one very important factor it let loose a
one very important factor it let loose a tremendous amount of heat and you just
tremendous amount of heat and you just
tremendous amount of heat and you just its safety was not adequate if you could
its safety was not adequate if you could
its safety was not adequate if you could not get rid of that heat
not get rid of that heat
not get rid of that heat remember the Chernobyl accident
remember the Chernobyl accident
remember the Chernobyl accident aha furthermore plutonium was produced
aha furthermore plutonium was produced
aha furthermore plutonium was produced in very low concentrations within the
in very low concentrations within the
in very low concentrations within the uranium one part in 4000 so you had to
uranium one part in 4000 so you had to
uranium one part in 4000 so you had to dissolve all this uranium put it through
dissolve all this uranium put it through
dissolve all this uranium put it through a lot of chemistry and it had to be done
a lot of chemistry and it had to be done
a lot of chemistry and it had to be done totally remotely because by now the
totally remotely because by now the
totally remotely because by now the uranium was very radioactive very few
uranium was very radioactive very few
uranium was very radioactive very few micrograms of plutonium had ever been
micrograms of plutonium had ever been
micrograms of plutonium had ever been produced anywhere in the world and so in
produced anywhere in the world and so in
produced anywhere in the world and so in March of 1942 an entirely new
March of 1942 an entirely new
March of 1942 an entirely new organization called them metallurgical
organization called them metallurgical
organization called them metallurgical adore the Met lab was set up at the
adore the Met lab was set up at the
adore the Met lab was set up at the University of Chicago some 2,000
University of Chicago some 2,000
University of Chicago some 2,000 scientists were studying all aspects of
scientists were studying all aspects of
scientists were studying all aspects of plutonium and its production but as for
plutonium and its production but as for
plutonium and its production but as for the general he was of the firm opinion
the general he was of the firm opinion
the general he was of the firm opinion that to take their data and make it into
that to take their data and make it into
that to take their data and make it into an industrial operation to produce
an industrial operation to produce
an industrial operation to produce kilograms of plutonium
kilograms of plutonium
kilograms of plutonium there was only one corporation in the
there was only one corporation in the
there was only one corporation in the country that could do that the DuPont
country that could do that the DuPont
country that could do that the DuPont company why well they were relatively
company why well they were relatively
company why well they were relatively successful at all very successful
successful at all very successful
successful at all very successful chemical company most of the materials
chemical company most of the materials
chemical company most of the materials came right out of their own research
came right out of their own research
came right out of their own research labs they built their own plants and
labs they built their own plants and
labs they built their own plants and they had a track record of being able to
they had a track record of being able to
they had a track record of being able to say grand ideas and commercialize them
say grand ideas and commercialize them
say grand ideas and commercialize them very rapidly think nylon also they had a
very rapidly think nylon also they had a
very rapidly think nylon also they had a fixation on safety because they had a
fixation on safety because they had a
fixation on safety because they had a broad experience who is explosives
broad experience who is explosives
broad experience who is explosives the DuPont people couldn’t be less
the DuPont people couldn’t be less
the DuPont people couldn’t be less interested in having anything to do with
plutonium production and they told the
plutonium production and they told the general that my name mainly because they
general that my name mainly because they
general that my name mainly because they were really scared of getting rebranded
were really scared of getting rebranded
were really scared of getting rebranded merchants of death what they had heard
merchants of death what they had heard
merchants of death what they had heard from the general about how you produce
from the general about how you produce
from the general about how you produce plutonium had again convinced him that
plutonium had again convinced him that
plutonium had again convinced him that it oh boy it was a wild scheme with not
it oh boy it was a wild scheme with not
it oh boy it was a wild scheme with not too much chance of success they really
too much chance of success they really
too much chance of success they really sounded more like something from a comic
sounded more like something from a comic
sounded more like something from a comic books and from a textbook and lastly
books and from a textbook and lastly
books and from a textbook and lastly because there was so much urgency to get
because there was so much urgency to get
because there was so much urgency to get ahead of the Germans a commercial
ahead of the Germans a commercial
ahead of the Germans a commercial operation was simply going to be a scale
operation was simply going to be a scale
operation was simply going to be a scale up by a factor of 1 million or more of
up by a factor of 1 million or more of
up by a factor of 1 million or more of the experience in the met lab that is
the experience in the met lab that is
the experience in the met lab that is that is asking for trouble
that is asking for trouble
that is asking for trouble well the general persisted saying the
well the general persisted saying the
well the general persisted saying the nation needed them and finally DuPont
nation needed them and finally DuPont
nation needed them and finally DuPont said ok we’ll take it on but we’ve got
said ok we’ll take it on but we’ve got
said ok we’ll take it on but we’ve got some conditions and their conditions
some conditions and their conditions
some conditions and their conditions made that contract vastly different from
made that contract vastly different from
made that contract vastly different from what those other ones at Oakridge were
what those other ones at Oakridge were
what those other ones at Oakridge were first they would be totally responsible
first they would be totally responsible
first they would be totally responsible for the production of plutonium yeah
for the production of plutonium yeah
for the production of plutonium yeah they would get from the metallurgical
they would get from the metallurgical
they would get from the metallurgical lab all of the parameters for this
lab all of the parameters for this
lab all of the parameters for this wonderful pile but what got designed and
wonderful pile but what got designed and
wonderful pile but what got designed and built would be a dupont decision
built would be a dupont decision
built would be a dupont decision furthermore attached to the contract
furthermore attached to the contract
furthermore attached to the contract would be what they called a memorandum
would be what they called a memorandum
would be what they called a memorandum of understanding and this one was a
of understanding and this one was a
of understanding and this one was a document signed by all parties that said
document signed by all parties that said
document signed by all parties that said this is what we know about producing
this is what we know about producing
this is what we know about producing plutonium and this is what we don’t know
plutonium and this is what we don’t know
plutonium and this is what we don’t know and this is the risk of trying to do it
and this is the risk of trying to do it
and this is the risk of trying to do it in one step you shouldn’t do it thirdly
in one step you shouldn’t do it thirdly
in one step you shouldn’t do it thirdly the President had to ask them to do it
the President had to ask them to do it
the President had to ask them to do it and their profit from this would be $1
and their profit from this would be $1
and their profit from this would be $1 now of course they’d get paid for all
now of course they’d get paid for all
now of course they’d get paid for all the activities but their profit was $1
the activities but their profit was $1
the activities but their profit was $1 fourths there would not be it would not
fourths there would not be it would not
fourths there would not be it would not be built at Oak Ridge and so
be built at Oak Ridge and so
be built at Oak Ridge and so consequently eventually well the
consequently eventually well the
consequently eventually well the decision for that was it just wasn’t
decision for that was it just wasn’t
decision for that was it just wasn’t safe they didn’t know enough about the
safe they didn’t know enough about the
safe they didn’t know enough about the safety of that step so eventually it was
safety of that step so eventually it was
safety of that step so eventually it was built at Hanford of course it was
built at Hanford of course it was
built at Hanford of course it was important that the proximity of the
important that the proximity of the
important that the proximity of the Columbia River and of the electricity
Columbia River and of the electricity
Columbia River and of the electricity that was available from the Grand Coulee
that was available from the Grand Coulee
that was available from the Grand Coulee Dam was very important but the contract
Dam was very important but the contract
Dam was very important but the contract was basically a turnkey from soup to
was basically a turnkey from soup to
was basically a turnkey from soup to nuts and involved in listing some a
nuts and involved in listing some a
nuts and involved in listing some a hundred and twenty thousand people to
hundred and twenty thousand people to
hundred and twenty thousand people to come to work in this vast wilderness so
come to work in this vast wilderness so
come to work in this vast wilderness so to speak of Hanford and to produce a
to speak of Hanford and to produce a
to speak of Hanford and to produce a place for forty five thousand of them to
place for forty five thousand of them to
place for forty five thousand of them to live temporarily and also to build a
live temporarily and also to build a
live temporarily and also to build a city of fifteen thousand for those who
city of fifteen thousand for those who
city of fifteen thousand for those who would operate the plant well all of this
would operate the plant well all of this
would operate the plant well all of this doesn’t respond to the question how did
doesn’t respond to the question how did
doesn’t respond to the question how did they do it how did DuPont turn this
they do it how did DuPont turn this
they do it how did DuPont turn this barren desert into a giant industrial
barren desert into a giant industrial
barren desert into a giant industrial complex in less than 20 months well of
complex in less than 20 months well of
complex in less than 20 months well of course there was the national situation
course there was the national situation
course there was the national situation their concern over survival then there
their concern over survival then there
their concern over survival then there was the organization of the Manhattan
was the organization of the Manhattan
was the organization of the Manhattan Project was the single point of contact
Project was the single point of contact
Project was the single point of contact with an open checkbook highest priority
with an open checkbook highest priority
with an open checkbook highest priority and an iron-fisted boss but far more
and an iron-fisted boss but far more
and an iron-fisted boss but far more important were the foundational
important were the foundational
important were the foundational characteristics of DuPont many of these
characteristics of DuPont many of these
characteristics of DuPont many of these had been developed over the years and
had been developed over the years and
had been developed over the years and later were accepted during the next 20
later were accepted during the next 20
later were accepted during the next 20 years
years
years in the overall construction industry but
in the overall construction industry but
in the overall construction industry but when as practiced by DuPont these are
when as practiced by DuPont these are
when as practiced by DuPont these are something that were almost part of their
something that were almost part of their
something that were almost part of their DNA rather than something they learned
DNA rather than something they learned
DNA rather than something they learned from a textbook and so I would suggest
from a textbook and so I would suggest
from a textbook and so I would suggest that you go to the B reactor org and
that you go to the B reactor org and
that you go to the B reactor org and click on lost in the telling for the
click on lost in the telling for the
click on lost in the telling for the details but I’ll hit on four of these
details but I’ll hit on four of these
details but I’ll hit on four of these one is their propensity for
one is their propensity for
one is their propensity for characterizing I mean visualizing and
characterizing I mean visualizing and
characterizing I mean visualizing and organizing the whole project into a
organizing the whole project into a
organizing the whole project into a series of small tasks thousands of them
series of small tasks thousands of them
series of small tasks thousands of them with known input and output etc and this
with known input and output etc and this
with known input and output etc and this allowed them to compress the schedule
allowed them to compress the schedule
allowed them to compress the schedule for design and construction far beyond
for design and construction far beyond
for design and construction far beyond what was normally assumed to be ACC a
what was normally assumed to be ACC a
what was normally assumed to be ACC a safe schedule for a wartime emergency
safe schedule for a wartime emergency
safe schedule for a wartime emergency situation
situation
situation comparing the two DuPont versus wartime
comparing the two DuPont versus wartime
comparing the two DuPont versus wartime emergency the wartime emergency said
emergency the wartime emergency said
emergency the wartime emergency said that should have taken two and a half
that should have taken two and a half
that should have taken two and a half years longer part of their experience
years longer part of their experience
years longer part of their experience also told them each one of these tasks
also told them each one of these tasks
also told them each one of these tasks has to be such that they can instruct
has to be such that they can instruct
has to be such that they can instruct the worker which meant a tremendous
the worker which meant a tremendous
the worker which meant a tremendous amount of writing of organizational of
amount of writing of organizational of
amount of writing of organizational of skills as to what was required and this
skills as to what was required and this
skills as to what was required and this they did for example at the B reactor
they did for example at the B reactor
they did for example at the B reactor some three thousand pages of procedures
some three thousand pages of procedures
some three thousand pages of procedures were written before a spate of Earth was
were written before a spate of Earth was
were written before a spate of Earth was even turned at building the reactor
even turned at building the reactor
even turned at building the reactor itself then they prioritized their
itself then they prioritized their
itself then they prioritized their uncertainties and improve and increase
uncertainties and improve and increase
uncertainties and improve and increase the conservatism of the design where
the conservatism of the design where
the conservatism of the design where they knew less about the subject the
they knew less about the subject the
they knew less about the subject the most famous is depicted in this slide
most famous is depicted in this slide
most famous is depicted in this slide where DuPont insisted on 30% more of the
where DuPont insisted on 30% more of the
where DuPont insisted on 30% more of the tubes within this pile the physicists
tubes within this pile the physicists
tubes within this pile the physicists said ridiculous as it turned out
said ridiculous as it turned out
said ridiculous as it turned out absolutely necessary
absolutely necessary
absolutely necessary and save some 10 months of getting
and save some 10 months of getting
and save some 10 months of getting plutonium down to Los Alamos anybody
plutonium down to Los Alamos anybody
plutonium down to Los Alamos anybody want to predict what would have happened
want to predict what would have happened
want to predict what would have happened if he had 10 more months of World War 2
if he had 10 more months of World War 2
if he had 10 more months of World War 2 and lastly there being completely
and lastly there being completely
and lastly there being completely focused on safety asking themselves what
focused on safety asking themselves what
focused on safety asking themselves what if what if what if and as a result they
if what if what if and as a result they
if what if what if and as a result they had absolutely no problems with the
had absolutely no problems with the
had absolutely no problems with the cooling contrast that to Fukushima and
cooling contrast that to Fukushima and
cooling contrast that to Fukushima and and and Chernobyl where much more
and and Chernobyl where much more
and and Chernobyl where much more experienced designers didn’t ask the
experienced designers didn’t ask the
experienced designers didn’t ask the right what-if questions well moving on
right what-if questions well moving on
right what-if questions well moving on why is it that if DuPont was so highly
why is it that if DuPont was so highly
why is it that if DuPont was so highly regarded right after the Manhattan
regarded right after the Manhattan
regarded right after the Manhattan Project that so little is written about
Project that so little is written about
Project that so little is written about it in the history well there’s two weeks
it in the history well there’s two weeks
it in the history well there’s two weeks explanations that are closely related
explanations that are closely related
explanations that are closely related one is that historians look for good
one is that historians look for good
one is that historians look for good sources if there’s been a time delay
sources if there’s been a time delay
sources if there’s been a time delay between the events and the writing of
between the events and the writing of
between the events and the writing of the history they love diary there were
the history they love diary there were
the history they love diary there were no Diaries allowed at DuPont furthermore
no Diaries allowed at DuPont furthermore
no Diaries allowed at DuPont furthermore the contribution there was basically for
the contribution there was basically for
the contribution there was basically for a devotion to details details and the
a devotion to details details and the
a devotion to details details and the very substantive application of these
very substantive application of these
very substantive application of these details produced no Diaries and not very
details produced no Diaries and not very
details produced no Diaries and not very interesting reading particularly when
interesting reading particularly when
interesting reading particularly when you compare it to the many biographies
you compare it to the many biographies
you compare it to the many biographies of the scientists the second reason is
of the scientists the second reason is
of the scientists the second reason is there was tension between the scientists
there was tension between the scientists
there was tension between the scientists at the Met Lab and the engineers the
at the Met Lab and the engineers the
at the Met Lab and the engineers the former thought DuPont had stolen their
former thought DuPont had stolen their
former thought DuPont had stolen their project and so when they were approached
project and so when they were approached
project and so when they were approached with what happened at DuPont think where
with what happened at DuPont think where
with what happened at DuPont think where the emphasis was as a matter of fact
the emphasis was as a matter of fact
the emphasis was as a matter of fact Crawford Greenwald who was the director
Crawford Greenwald who was the director
Crawford Greenwald who was the director of the DuPont effort said that he later
of the DuPont effort said that he later
of the DuPont effort said that he later became president another company said
became president another company said
became president another company said that
that
that his opinion hanford was the the best
his opinion hanford was the the best
his opinion hanford was the the best multidisciplinary project that had ever
multidisciplinary project that had ever
multidisciplinary project that had ever been raised but unfortunately the size
been raised but unfortunately the size
been raised but unfortunately the size of the physicists like to pull all the
of the physicists like to pull all the
of the physicists like to pull all the covers over onto their side of the bed
covers over onto their side of the bed
covers over onto their side of the bed well what is the take off away from this
well what is the take off away from this
well what is the take off away from this very brief narrative one is will never
very brief narrative one is will never
very brief narrative one is will never see anything like it again but it is
see anything like it again but it is
see anything like it again but it is very important that we remember what was
very important that we remember what was
very important that we remember what was accomplished through the DuPont effort
accomplished through the DuPont effort
accomplished through the DuPont effort there because you can’t understand what
there because you can’t understand what
there because you can’t understand what the full impact was of the success at
the full impact was of the success at
the full impact was of the success at Hanford without that how and the whose
Hanford without that how and the whose
Hanford without that how and the whose story and there’s also something for you
story and there’s also something for you
story and there’s also something for you come visit us out at B reactor and ask
come visit us out at B reactor and ask
come visit us out at B reactor and ask about the how and the who story and it
about the how and the who story and it
about the how and the who story and it may become a very key factor to
may become a very key factor to
may become a very key factor to improving Hanford’s position in that
improving Hanford’s position in that
improving Hanford’s position in that critical category of encouraging
critical category of encouraging
critical category of encouraging visitors to come out to be reactor
visitors to come out to be reactor
visitors to come out to be reactor because they have developed a
because they have developed a
because they have developed a fascination for Hanford
fascination for Hanford
fascination for Hanford it sure has worked with me thank you
it sure has worked with me thank you
it sure has worked with me thank you [Applause]
”
Be First to Comment