
engage to build a world more
durable
many of you are putting
energy in projects of
energy transition from
preservation of biodiversity
new models of education but I
you ask this question is what we
can build tomorrow with
tools of the past century
we took a first step towards a
new paradigm towards a new
way to see the world
we are gradually leaving the world of
competition to try and test the
collaboration but how are we
keep this posture assumed this
vision if we continue to
press two of the main tools
without allowing us to put them back into
question I want to talk about money and
more precisely of creation
monetary a subject of which we speak very
rarely because they remain obscure
sometimes even for bankers
and then our organizational systems
who are still too often
hierarchy and whose
limits but for which it is difficult to
find solutions
so for that to tell you about that
I would like to take on the image of a
engine
money is its fuel energy
outside that allows it to work
and then the organization model and
well it’s his performance
his inner energy and I’m going
start by talking to you about money
since in my personal capacity I decided
to act to engage me in the farinet
the local currencies project and
complementary in worth to engage me
in this project led me to dive
in nearly 5000 years of history has
studied many alternatives
economic it be contemporary
or older
we are all projecting something
particular about money be it the
success the power
security or even pleasure
but beyond these considerations
money remains a great tool that
allows us to have resources
physical and human that allows us to
carry out our projects in my
career I had the opportunity to
work in very environments
varied in some of them there
seems that money flows freely I
think about the bank
I’m thinking of consulting marketing name and
to communication
and then in others he was
sorely lacking art creation
the small medical start up the world
associative
so my first observation is this is
that this fuel is very
unequally distributed
surely you’ve all seen these
graphs that represents the
distribution of wealth in the world
and we understand easily that those who
own all this money have like
main interest in making the
system that allowed them to get rich
that they will always invest that money
essentially in the areas that
allowed them that allowed them
to accumulate their fortune when a
billionaire a maniac of
the computer for example decides
to commit millions for research
promotion and development of
gmo
he decides alone without control
democratic future of
agriculture
while other small projects that
seeks to develop a more world
fair where it is good to live for
everyone so often cruelly
of this precious fuel to start
then if we study a little bit
the history of money well we get
realizes that she has often been a
tool of power and domination
in medieval times for example
it was the ruler who created the
money to pay his soldiers the
merchants the merchants the
producers had the obligation to
accept
and to be sure they were doing it
and a good part of it was taken
in the form of a tax the joystick is
so a way for the sovereign to
to puncture the producers in exchange
protection against another
sovereign and another army that
practiced the same technique
so we have to identify both
main issues associated
to the currency is the power that is
generated by the accumulation of
wealth and power that is
generated by monetary creation
she even then through her version
current the farinet does not come
revolutionize the world of economics
but many mechanisms that have
created by local currencies
and complementary seeks to solve
these issues and it is not
excluded that in the future we would decide
to incorporate them into our model by
example a melting currency a currency
melting be it that a debt ends
always go out
it does so by melting the
accumulated capital as much as
debts in time that for advantage
to give the same ability to
monetary creation at all
generations that she passed
present or future
then such a system asks us
especially compared to our system
which is based on
accumulation may
and it can shock some of them
you but that’s exactly what we live
currently with the negative turns that
we are imposed by the banks
power plants that come and rode day
after day the capital stock at the
bns the big difference lies in
what is made of the money that has melted
as part of the bns well he
disappears simply while in
models like the chiemgauer in
Germany a paper ticket it takes
reactivate regularly by sticking
small thumbnails on it and well
in this case what is recovered
which melted and re-injected into the
local community projects credit
shared is another tool that is
the origin of the creation of the veer
in 1934 he decentralized the creation
monetary policy to entrust it to all
citizens or at least at all
members of the network
everyone then has the opportunity to create
a certain amount of money and
invest in the exchanges that him
seems important it’s another way
to conceive citizen engagement where
we do not just vote or else
to elect someone for us
represent but where each exchange
every act of purchase becomes a
commitment to the world that one
wish to set up these mechanics
requiring a shift a transformation
in our vision is in our way
to see the world to entrust the
monetary creation to all rather
that a small group
well we have to trust our
similar to accept that debts
go out and well you have to have a
deep need for equity
you have to go from logic of
competition to a logic of
collaboration but how
could we think collaboration
while we have always bathed
in a competitive atmosphere that this
either at school or in our
jobs be it in the examples
which are conveyed to us by the
media
it seems that it is always the fort
outweigh the weak and even that
ultimately outweigh all
other camps in our education have
taught us to collaborate which tools
we were sent to do it
that brings me to my second point
that of engine performance
it seems that today our
yields are at a low so I do not
do not talk about productivity the
productivity she was boosted by
the arrival of IT by
automation
No, I’m talking about everyone’s commitment
of us in our businesses and our
organizations
a study of the Institute gallops to
united states schematizes the commitment
in companies through the image
of the boat if ten people
board and well three will row to
the front 5 will hit in the water for
generate some snags is taboo on
and give the impression that they
work and 2 will even come back in
back and everything we found
to try to speed up this boat is
well it is to put the rowers in
compete with each other
it causes many overheating
also called burnout
so me what I believe and well that’s
that we should rather be aware
of our solidarity our only and
to inherit not in the sense that we hear
usually which is to leave
to die no one by giving him the
vital minimum
not our solidarity in the sense that
we are united
from each other to the image of the wheels
toothed in an engine together they
work and collaborate for
allow the engine to provide
mechanical energy inside the
block
each piece pistons pipe candles and
different from each other
each has its utility but all
together they interact for
allow to reach a final goal and I
think as a human and what is
that too that we should be
called but still need to have the
vision of what we are called to
build together then to smaller
ladder
well that’s what we tried
to do around the farinet project
together as a group
we took the time to establish a
vision and a mission we know
a 6th all bigger towards which our
collaborator our participation is going
to arrive
we are going to take all the work they
had to do and we cut it
in a number of roles to
the image of the gears each
different each with its utility
but all interact with each other
others and not to choke the
people’s creativity well we do not
have not defined them with a list of
tasks to do no we have them
have expressed in the form of a
potential to achieve a goal to
reach
because ultimately what does it matter
chosen path provided the function
to fill this type of organization
relies heavily on autonomy and
creative creativity of individuals a
exercise that is not easy for everything
the world but we believe that this
potential is in all of us
even though sometimes it’s buried under a
big layer
of resignation of disappointment of fear
accumulated during different
professional experiences put in
place this type of mechanics require
the same two values as for the
currency and equity trust is
must trust others
know that even if they are wrong they
will learn and improve only if they
have joined this common goal they
will do what must be it
there is no need for two carrots and
even less stick but that the
motivation it can come from elsewhere
something deeper in us
who call us to contribute to the good
common and for that trust
can be established and well it takes
that they can grow on a potting soil
fair so I’m not talking about salary
but already having the same rules
for all the same access to
information for each by two games
of power but on the contrary a
clear authority and
distributed among all
today there are many
inspiring examples of such
organizations and tools for
set up in the project the
farinet well it seemed to us
must-have today if we
really wanted to impact the
company to set up a system
democratic management and by
democratic I mean that everyone
can be heard and see his
considered needs this is how
we hope to sow the seeds that
will allow our companies to
reconsider their way to homework
money and organizational models
so that tomorrow your projects can
emerge in a context favorable to
sustainability and sustainability and
to collaboration
thank you
[Applause]
”
Be First to Comment