Press "Enter" to skip to content

On Not Being Sure | Steven Vogel | TEDxDenisonU


what I want to talk about is what

what I want to talk about is what critical thinking means we talk at

critical thinking means we talk at

critical thinking means we talk at Denison about critical thinking a lot

Denison about critical thinking a lot

Denison about critical thinking a lot actually that’s this video we just saw

actually that’s this video we just saw

actually that’s this video we just saw said that was part of what went on at

said that was part of what went on at

said that was part of what went on at the TED talks you know it’s part of our

the TED talks you know it’s part of our

the TED talks you know it’s part of our mission statement and we it seems like a

mission statement and we it seems like a

mission statement and we it seems like a significant thing for students to learn

significant thing for students to learn

significant thing for students to learn in a in a university critical thinking

in a in a university critical thinking

in a in a university critical thinking but we don’t actually talk that much

but we don’t actually talk that much

but we don’t actually talk that much about what critical thinking actually is

about what critical thinking actually is

about what critical thinking actually is and what it involves start by just

and what it involves start by just

and what it involves start by just saying what I think it is my own view of

saying what I think it is my own view of

saying what I think it is my own view of it and it’s it’s well stated in a in a

it and it’s it’s well stated in a in a

it and it’s it’s well stated in a in a button that people used to wear back in

button that people used to wear back in

button that people used to wear back in the old days when people wore lots a

the old days when people wore lots a

the old days when people wore lots a button so thing I used to wear the

button so thing I used to wear the

button so thing I used to wear the button myself and that’s what it said

button myself and that’s what it said

button myself and that’s what it said question authority I had trouble at one

question authority I had trouble at one

question authority I had trouble at one point cuz the students said to me does

point cuz the students said to me does

point cuz the students said to me does that mean you’re a question authority

that mean you’re a question authority

that mean you’re a question authority like you’re an expert on questions no

like you’re an expert on questions no

like you’re an expert on questions no that’s not what it means

that’s not what it means

that’s not what it means it means we’re supposed to raise the

it means we’re supposed to raise the

it means we’re supposed to raise the question authority me the the lesson of

question authority me the the lesson of

question authority me the the lesson of critical thinking is never believed

critical thinking is never believed

critical thinking is never believed anybody especially people who are in

anybody especially people who are in

anybody especially people who are in authority people who tell you that they

authority people who tell you that they

authority people who tell you that they know the truth it’s I think the most

know the truth it’s I think the most

know the truth it’s I think the most important thing to learn in college

important thing to learn in college

important thing to learn in college actually is not to believe them not to

actually is not to believe them not to

actually is not to believe them not to believe your parents not to believe your

believe your parents not to believe your

believe your parents not to believe your teachers not to believe your textbooks

teachers not to believe your textbooks

teachers not to believe your textbooks not to believe the president of the

not to believe the president of the

not to believe the president of the university and not to believe the

university and not to believe the

university and not to believe the president it’s not to believe any

president it’s not to believe any

president it’s not to believe any authority when they not that everything

authority when they not that everything

authority when they not that everything they say is false but whatever they say

they say is false but whatever they say

they say is false but whatever they say you have to take the attitude is this

you have to take the attitude is this

you have to take the attitude is this right do you have reasons for it what’s

right do you have reasons for it what’s

right do you have reasons for it what’s your what’s your explanation of it if

your what’s your explanation of it if

your what’s your explanation of it if there’s some counter arguments I could

there’s some counter arguments I could

there’s some counter arguments I could offer what are those counters you have

offer what are those counters you have

offer what are those counters you have to take that critical attitude towards

to take that critical attitude towards

to take that critical attitude towards whatever people tell you towards

whatever people tell you towards

whatever people tell you towards whatever authorities don’t you I think

whatever authorities don’t you I think

whatever authorities don’t you I think that’s the most important kind of lesson

that’s the most important kind of lesson

that’s the most important kind of lesson that one would get from learning how to

that one would get from learning how to

that one would get from learning how to do critical thinking but but there’s

do critical thinking but but there’s

do critical thinking but but there’s something particularly important that

something particularly important that

something particularly important that that has to do with with the foremost

that has to do with with the foremost

that has to do with with the foremost authority that you have to learn how to

authority that you have to learn how to

authority that you have to learn how to question and the foremost authority you

question and the foremost authority you

question and the foremost authority you have to learn how to question is

have to learn how to question is

have to learn how to question is yourself you walk in to any situation

yourself you walk in to any situation

yourself you walk in to any situation already believing all sorts of things

already believing all sorts of things

already believing all sorts of things and the the most important thing to

and the the most important thing to

and the the most important thing to learn I think is as a matter of critical

learn I think is as a matter of critical

learn I think is as a matter of critical thinking is to learn that I might not be

thinking is to learn that I might not be

thinking is to learn that I might not be right that my views might be incorrect

right that my views might be incorrect

right that my views might be incorrect and to and to take that really seriously

and to and to take that really seriously

and to and to take that really seriously that’s a really hard lesson to learn um

that’s a really hard lesson to learn um

that’s a really hard lesson to learn um so I’m gonna talk tonight actually about

so I’m gonna talk tonight actually about

so I’m gonna talk tonight actually about a particular philosopher Karl Popper who

a particular philosopher Karl Popper who

a particular philosopher Karl Popper who has written about this issue and who

has written about this issue and who

has written about this issue and who made a great deal influence on me

made a great deal influence on me

made a great deal influence on me just that’s that’s why I’m talking about

just that’s that’s why I’m talking about

just that’s that’s why I’m talking about it I’m gonna talk about some of his

it I’m gonna talk about some of his

it I’m gonna talk about some of his ideas he lived in he was born in Vienna

ideas he lived in he was born in Vienna

ideas he lived in he was born in Vienna in 1902 he lived in Austria until the

in 1902 he lived in Austria until the

in 1902 he lived in Austria until the 1930s when he had to leave when the

1930s when he had to leave when the

1930s when he had to leave when the Nazis came in he was Jewish and then he

Nazis came in he was Jewish and then he

Nazis came in he was Jewish and then he ended up living the rest of his life in

ended up living the rest of his life in

ended up living the rest of his life in Great Britain he was knighted actually

Great Britain he was knighted actually

Great Britain he was knighted actually he was Sir Karl Popper um and he wrote

he was Sir Karl Popper um and he wrote

he was Sir Karl Popper um and he wrote it he wrote a book or conjectures and

it he wrote a book or conjectures and

it he wrote a book or conjectures and refutations which I’ve got to talk about

refutations which I’ve got to talk about

refutations which I’ve got to talk about an essay from that book and any and he

an essay from that book and any and he

an essay from that book and any and he talks about science he’s interested in

talks about science he’s interested in

talks about science he’s interested in the question of what science is and what

the question of what science is and what

the question of what science is and what and what makes a theory of scientific

and what makes a theory of scientific

and what makes a theory of scientific theory and the first thing I want to say

theory and the first thing I want to say

theory and the first thing I want to say and this is this doesn’t even come in at

and this is this doesn’t even come in at

and this is this doesn’t even come in at popper early he says it too is science

popper early he says it too is science

popper early he says it too is science doesn’t ever prove anything this is a

doesn’t ever prove anything this is a

doesn’t ever prove anything this is a really important fact students sometimes

really important fact students sometimes

really important fact students sometimes will come in and say we know science has

will come in and say we know science has

will come in and say we know science has proven that the earth is round or

proven that the earth is round or

proven that the earth is round or science has proven that that the law of

science has proven that that the law of

science has proven that that the law of gravity is true or something like that

gravity is true or something like that

gravity is true or something like that science doesn’t ever prove anything and

science doesn’t ever prove anything and

science doesn’t ever prove anything and this is not just a sort of a big thing

this is not just a sort of a big thing

this is not just a sort of a big thing to say this is in principle true about

to say this is in principle true about

to say this is in principle true about scientific claims scientific claims have

scientific claims scientific claims have

scientific claims scientific claims have the form everything has some particular

the form everything has some particular

the form everything has some particular characteristic for instance William

characteristic for instance William

characteristic for instance William Harvey in the 17th century 16th century

Harvey in the 17th century 16th century

Harvey in the 17th century 16th century figuring out that that blood circulates

figuring out that that blood circulates

figuring out that that blood circulates in human beings um now when he says

in human beings um now when he says

in human beings um now when he says blood circulates in human beings he

blood circulates in human beings he

blood circulates in human beings he doesn’t just mean that the particular

doesn’t just mean that the particular

doesn’t just mean that the particular human beings he looked at had blood

human beings he looked at had blood

human beings he looked at had blood circulating in them he means all human

circulating in them he means all human

circulating in them he means all human beings have blood circulating them this

beings have blood circulating them this

beings have blood circulating them this is very important it wouldn’t be very

is very important it wouldn’t be very

is very important it wouldn’t be very interesting claim it was just about the

interesting claim it was just about the

interesting claim it was just about the ones he looked at because any doctor

ones he looked at because any doctor

ones he looked at because any doctor when the patient walks into the room has

when the patient walks into the room has

when the patient walks into the room has to be able to never having checked the

to be able to never having checked the

to be able to never having checked the patient before has to be able to know

patient before has to be able to know

patient before has to be able to know that this that this human being has a

that this that this human being has a

that this that this human being has a circulatory system so when you make a

circulatory system so when you make a

circulatory system so when you make a scientific claim like all human beings

scientific claim like all human beings

scientific claim like all human beings have circulatory systems you are

have circulatory systems you are

have circulatory systems you are inevitably making a claim that goes

inevitably making a claim that goes

inevitably making a claim that goes beyond the particular cases you’ve

beyond the particular cases you’ve

beyond the particular cases you’ve looked at right but if you’re going

looked at right but if you’re going

looked at right but if you’re going beyond the particular cases you’ve

beyond the particular cases you’ve

beyond the particular cases you’ve looked at then you can’t really be sure

looked at then you can’t really be sure

looked at then you can’t really be sure that the claim is right you might assert

that the claim is right you might assert

that the claim is right you might assert that a certain thing is true of all

that a certain thing is true of all

that a certain thing is true of all cases but unless the number of cases is

cases but unless the number of cases is

cases but unless the number of cases is really small I’m an example I was

really small I’m an example I was

really small I’m an example I was thinking it was all members of the US

thinking it was all members of the US

thinking it was all members of the US Supreme Court have Ivy League

Supreme Court have Ivy League

Supreme Court have Ivy League so they’re only eight of them you could

so they’re only eight of them you could

so they’re only eight of them you could check this by licking all eight of them

check this by licking all eight of them

check this by licking all eight of them but but with any larger with any

but but with any larger with any

but but with any larger with any reasonably large number you never can

reasonably large number you never can

reasonably large number you never can check every one right you can never be

check every one right you can never be

check every one right you can never be certain that every single human being

certain that every single human being

certain that every single human being has a circulatory system absolutely

has a circulatory system absolutely

has a circulatory system absolutely certain of it

certain of it

certain of it you can never be certain think of think

you can never be certain think of think

you can never be certain think of think of Newton’s law of gravity which says

of Newton’s law of gravity which says

of Newton’s law of gravity which says the two opt any two objects in the

the two opt any two objects in the

the two opt any two objects in the universe attract each other with a force

universe attract each other with a force

universe attract each other with a force that’s you know directly proportional to

that’s you know directly proportional to

that’s you know directly proportional to the product of their masses an

the product of their masses an

the product of their masses an indirectly proportional to the square of

indirectly proportional to the square of

indirectly proportional to the square of the distance between them this is a

the distance between them this is a

the distance between them this is a claim but every two objects in the

claim but every two objects in the

claim but every two objects in the entire universe

entire universe

entire universe how many did a Newton look at right some

how many did a Newton look at right some

how many did a Newton look at right some around here at a particular moment in

around here at a particular moment in

around here at a particular moment in time but we assume that this is true for

time but we assume that this is true for

time but we assume that this is true for the entire universe for all of the time

the entire universe for all of the time

the entire universe for all of the time we explained the Big Bang in terms of

we explained the Big Bang in terms of

we explained the Big Bang in terms of the in terms of this this law we don’t

the in terms of this this law we don’t

the in terms of this this law we don’t have any kind of absolute proof of it we

have any kind of absolute proof of it we

have any kind of absolute proof of it we simply we simply think that it’s true

simply we simply think that it’s true

simply we simply think that it’s true based on it based on actually our faith

based on it based on actually our faith

based on it based on actually our faith in something like well it’s true around

in something like well it’s true around

in something like well it’s true around here and when things are true around

here and when things are true around

here and when things are true around here they’re probably true and the rest

here they’re probably true and the rest

here they’re probably true and the rest of the universe too but the question of

of the universe too but the question of

of the universe too but the question of how we know that is is a hard one to

how we know that is is a hard one to

how we know that is is a hard one to answer so science doesn’t prove anything

answer so science doesn’t prove anything

answer so science doesn’t prove anything but I want to say something else about

but I want to say something else about

but I want to say something else about it which is that if you’ve got it if

it which is that if you’ve got it if

it which is that if you’ve got it if you’ve got a theory about the world in

you’ve got a theory about the world in

you’ve got a theory about the world in order to prove it like like this fact

order to prove it like like this fact

order to prove it like like this fact about about gravity or about about human

about about gravity or about about human

about about gravity or about about human beings having circulatory systems you

beings having circulatory systems you

beings having circulatory systems you have to look at all those different

have to look at all those different

have to look at all those different cases basically infinitely many cases in

cases basically infinitely many cases in

cases basically infinitely many cases in order to prove the theory but to

order to prove the theory but to

order to prove the theory but to disprove a theory it’s very easy right

disprove a theory it’s very easy right

disprove a theory it’s very easy right as soon as you have one case that this

as soon as you have one case that this

as soon as you have one case that this that goes against the theory then you

that goes against the theory then you

that goes against the theory then you know the theory is false so if you want

know the theory is false so if you want

know the theory is false so if you want to say something like all presidents of

to say something like all presidents of

to say something like all presidents of the United States have been born in the

the United States have been born in the

the United States have been born in the continent the continent of North America

continent the continent of North America

continent the continent of North America you could look at lots of lots of cases

you could look at lots of lots of cases

you could look at lots of lots of cases you look at the first one you could look

you look at the first one you could look

you look at the first one you could look at the second where you get a third one

at the second where you get a third one

at the second where you get a third one but only by the time you got to the what

but only by the time you got to the what

but only by the time you got to the what was he the 44th one would you discover

was he the 44th one would you discover

was he the 44th one would you discover actually did the theory is false it’s

actually did the theory is false it’s

actually did the theory is false it’s false because it was the single case the

false because it was the single case the

false because it was the single case the single character example of Obama who

single character example of Obama who

single character example of Obama who was not born in Kenya but who was born

was not born in Kenya but who was born

was not born in Kenya but who was born in Hawaii

in Hawaii

in Hawaii so it takes it takes one case to

so it takes it takes one case to

so it takes it takes one case to disprove a generalization

disprove a generalization

disprove a generalization whereas proving it is very hard that’s

whereas proving it is very hard that’s

whereas proving it is very hard that’s an important kind of logical fact it’s

an important kind of logical fact it’s

an important kind of logical fact it’s in the background of what popper wants

in the background of what popper wants

in the background of what popper wants to say but popper asks the question what

to say but popper asks the question what

to say but popper asks the question what makes a theory of scientific theory and

makes a theory of scientific theory and

makes a theory of scientific theory and the first thing he points out is that to

the first thing he points out is that to

the first thing he points out is that to call a theory a scientific theory is not

call a theory a scientific theory is not

call a theory a scientific theory is not the same as calling it true there are

the same as calling it true there are

the same as calling it true there are plenty of scientific theories that are

plenty of scientific theories that are

plenty of scientific theories that are false the most famous one is Newton’s

false the most famous one is Newton’s

false the most famous one is Newton’s physics which was discovered in the 20th

physics which was discovered in the 20th

physics which was discovered in the 20th century after the nine Stein’s theories

century after the nine Stein’s theories

century after the nine Stein’s theories that it’s not actually true I don’t know

that it’s not actually true I don’t know

that it’s not actually true I don’t know if those of you who are like in first

if those of you who are like in first

if those of you who are like in first year physics say I’m sorry for the

year physics say I’m sorry for the

year physics say I’m sorry for the spoiler but like at the end after they

spoiler but like at the end after they

spoiler but like at the end after they teach you all this stuff they say oh by

teach you all this stuff they say oh by

teach you all this stuff they say oh by the way that’s not right I mean

the way that’s not right I mean

the way that’s not right I mean literally that’s what goes on so so a

literally that’s what goes on so so a

literally that’s what goes on so so a scientific theory can be false and

scientific theory can be false and

scientific theory can be false and furthermore a non-scientific an

furthermore a non-scientific an

furthermore a non-scientific an unscientific a pseudo scientific theory

unscientific a pseudo scientific theory

unscientific a pseudo scientific theory can make all sorts of true predictions I

can make all sorts of true predictions I

can make all sorts of true predictions I can take the example of astrology

can take the example of astrology

can take the example of astrology astrology is not a scientific theory

astrology is not a scientific theory

astrology is not a scientific theory it’s not because the things it says

it’s not because the things it says

it’s not because the things it says don’t turn out to be true it’s sort of

don’t turn out to be true it’s sort of

don’t turn out to be true it’s sort of because the things it says turn out to

because the things it says turn out to

because the things it says turn out to be true too easily so if I once was

be true too easily so if I once was

be true too easily so if I once was checking what’s mine what’s my horoscope

checking what’s mine what’s my horoscope

checking what’s mine what’s my horoscope and it says something like you will

and it says something like you will

and it says something like you will receive news from afar and that you know

receive news from afar and that you know

receive news from afar and that you know like I went to the office that day I

like I went to the office that day I

like I went to the office that day I like to open up my email right and I got

like to open up my email right and I got

like to open up my email right and I got you know my friend in Portland Oregon

you know my friend in Portland Oregon

you know my friend in Portland Oregon sent me something and I’m with them on

sent me something and I’m with them on

sent me something and I’m with them on some listserv that gets I get

some listserv that gets I get

some listserv that gets I get information from Europe about

information from Europe about

information from Europe about conferences and so so it turned out to

conferences and so so it turned out to

conferences and so so it turned out to be true

be true

be true all right so true theories that make

all right so true theories that make

all right so true theories that make true predictions cannot become you

true predictions cannot become you

true predictions cannot become you non-scientific that’s an important point

non-scientific that’s an important point

non-scientific that’s an important point as well um

as well um

as well um popper talks about about two different

popper talks about about two different

popper talks about about two different theories that were that were very much

theories that were that were very much

theories that were that were very much in the air in the 1920s and in Vienna

in the air in the 1920s and in Vienna

in the air in the 1920s and in Vienna where he was living

where he was living

where he was living and one was Marx’s ‘m and he says he

and one was Marx’s ‘m and he says he

and one was Marx’s ‘m and he says he says he was struck his friends who were

says he was struck his friends who were

says he was struck his friends who were Marxists were able to explain everything

Marxists were able to explain everything

Marxists were able to explain everything that happened and it was a period of a

that happened and it was a period of a

that happened and it was a period of a lot of political ferment in Austria and

lot of political ferment in Austria and

lot of political ferment in Austria and Germany in other places in the earth

Germany in other places in the earth

Germany in other places in the earth everything that happened politically

everything that happened politically

everything that happened politically they found they found ways to explain it

they found they found ways to explain it

they found they found ways to explain it they could explain it in terms of their

they could explain it in terms of their

they could explain it in terms of their their Marxist theory of the world it was

their Marxist theory of the world it was

their Marxist theory of the world it was it was fabulous how easily they could

it was fabulous how easily they could

it was fabulous how easily they could explain everything he said a Marxist

explain everything he said a Marxist

explain everything he said a Marxist could not open the newspaper in the

could not open the newspaper in the

could not open the newspaper in the morning without finding confirmations of

morning without finding confirmations of

morning without finding confirmations of his theory on every

his theory on every

his theory on every aged both in terms of what it was what

aged both in terms of what it was what

aged both in terms of what it was what was written in the newspaper also what

was written in the newspaper also what

was written in the newspaper also what was not written there’s paper because

was not written there’s paper because

was not written there’s paper because because of the class interest of a

because of the class interest of a

because of the class interest of a newspaper editors um and and then popper

newspaper editors um and and then popper

newspaper editors um and and then popper said what they thought this was a great

said what they thought this was a great

said what they thought this was a great strength of their theory but in fact it

strength of their theory but in fact it

strength of their theory but in fact it was a weakness it’s a really actually

was a weakness it’s a really actually

was a weakness it’s a really actually interesting remark um they’re the

interesting remark um they’re the

interesting remark um they’re the ability to explain everything might be a

ability to explain everything might be a

ability to explain everything might be a weakness of a theory he compares this to

weakness of a theory he compares this to

weakness of a theory he compares this to Einstein’s theory which had been

Einstein’s theory which had been

Einstein’s theory which had been recently developed and which is still

recently developed and which is still

recently developed and which is still very much in debate and discussion and

very much in debate and discussion and

very much in debate and discussion and and he talks about a famous experiment

and he talks about a famous experiment

and he talks about a famous experiment I’ll just describe it very quickly um

I’ll just describe it very quickly um

I’ll just describe it very quickly um this guy named Arthur Eddington in 1919

this guy named Arthur Eddington in 1919

this guy named Arthur Eddington in 1919 it was a consequence of Einstein’s

it was a consequence of Einstein’s

it was a consequence of Einstein’s theory that that light traveling from

theory that that light traveling from

theory that that light traveling from from a star or something that passes by

from a star or something that passes by

from a star or something that passes by a very massive object like the Sun would

a very massive object like the Sun would

a very massive object like the Sun would Bend and and actually Newton’s theory

Bend and and actually Newton’s theory

Bend and and actually Newton’s theory there was also a little bending but

there was also a little bending but

there was also a little bending but there’s a lot of bending in the

there’s a lot of bending in the

there’s a lot of bending in the Newtonian anything Einstein he in theory

Newtonian anything Einstein he in theory

Newtonian anything Einstein he in theory so this guy the trouble is you can’t see

so this guy the trouble is you can’t see

so this guy the trouble is you can’t see stars and you’re the Sun for kind of

stars and you’re the Sun for kind of

stars and you’re the Sun for kind of obvious reason it’s kind of the same

obvious reason it’s kind of the same

obvious reason it’s kind of the same reason I can’t see anything right now

reason I can’t see anything right now

reason I can’t see anything right now and and but but if the Sun isn’t

and and but but if the Sun isn’t

and and but but if the Sun isn’t eclipsed then you’d be able to do it so

eclipsed then you’d be able to do it so

eclipsed then you’d be able to do it so it this guy Eddington in 1919 went and

it this guy Eddington in 1919 went and

it this guy Eddington in 1919 went and did have an expedition to I think West

did have an expedition to I think West

did have an expedition to I think West Africa and observed an eclipse of the

Africa and observed an eclipse of the

Africa and observed an eclipse of the Sun and discovered that the bending of

Sun and discovered that the bending of

Sun and discovered that the bending of the star’s light was exactly the way

the star’s light was exactly the way

the star’s light was exactly the way that I’m Stan had predicted this was a

that I’m Stan had predicted this was a

that I’m Stan had predicted this was a enormous this is a big deal there was

enormous this is a big deal there was

enormous this is a big deal there was front-page news all over the world you

front-page news all over the world you

front-page news all over the world you know Einstein’s theory has been proven

know Einstein’s theory has been proven

know Einstein’s theory has been proven by this by this test now before I get to

by this by this test now before I get to

by this by this test now before I get to that so the point is that that actually

that so the point is that that actually

that so the point is that that actually Einstein’s theory wasn’t proven in terms

Einstein’s theory wasn’t proven in terms

Einstein’s theory wasn’t proven in terms of what we were just saying before but

of what we were just saying before but

of what we were just saying before but the the impossibility of science proving

the the impossibility of science proving

the the impossibility of science proving things it wasn’t proven there might’ve

things it wasn’t proven there might’ve

things it wasn’t proven there might’ve been other reasons whether light was

been other reasons whether light was

been other reasons whether light was bent Newton’s theory was disproven

bent Newton’s theory was disproven

bent Newton’s theory was disproven that’s what happened with that expert

that’s what happened with that expert

that’s what happened with that expert with that with that experiment but of

with that with that experiment but of

with that with that experiment but of course there’s also at that point some

course there’s also at that point some

course there’s also at that point some reason to start to think that Einstein’s

reason to start to think that Einstein’s

reason to start to think that Einstein’s theory might be a better one and the

theory might be a better one and the

theory might be a better one and the reason is that this prediction about the

reason is that this prediction about the

reason is that this prediction about the about the bending of the light was a

about the bending of the light was a

about the bending of the light was a risky prediction it was something that

risky prediction it was something that

risky prediction it was something that no one would have expected would happen

no one would have expected would happen

no one would have expected would happen and Einstein’s theory involves saying

and Einstein’s theory involves saying

and Einstein’s theory involves saying something that you’d expect would happen

something that you’d expect would happen

something that you’d expect would happen to non-bending with their not much

to non-bending with their not much

to non-bending with their not much bending of the light that’s not gonna

bending of the light that’s not gonna

bending of the light that’s not gonna happen

happen

happen um Einstein’s theory could have failed

um Einstein’s theory could have failed

um Einstein’s theory could have failed if the experiment had ended up

if the experiment had ended up

if the experiment had ended up differently if the observations were

differently if the observations were

differently if the observations were different it would have failed um and

different it would have failed um and

different it would have failed um and and popper decided that that this is

and popper decided that that this is

and popper decided that that this is what’s important in terms of making a

what’s important in terms of making a

what’s important in terms of making a theory scientific um it’s easy to find

theory scientific um it’s easy to find

theory scientific um it’s easy to find confirmations for your theory if you

confirmations for your theory if you

confirmations for your theory if you look for if you like the way astrology

look for if you like the way astrology

look for if you like the way astrology does if you look for him it’s easy to

does if you look for him it’s easy to

does if you look for him it’s easy to find them you can always make the theory

find them you can always make the theory

find them you can always make the theory as vague as possible and kind of

as vague as possible and kind of

as vague as possible and kind of interpret whatever happens to make the

interpret whatever happens to make the

interpret whatever happens to make the to make the theory work um

to make the theory work um

to make the theory work um confirmations are only important if

confirmations are only important if

confirmations are only important if you’ve made a risky prediction and then

you’ve made a risky prediction and then

you’ve made a risky prediction and then it turned out that turned out to work

it turned out that turned out to work

it turned out that turned out to work every good theory forbid something

every good theory forbid something

every good theory forbid something happened says as in the Einsteinian case

happened says as in the Einsteinian case

happened says as in the Einsteinian case that this this small bending of the

that this this small bending of the

that this this small bending of the light of the light won’t occur a theory

light of the light won’t occur a theory

light of the light won’t occur a theory which is not refutable by any

which is not refutable by any

which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific and

conceivable event is non-scientific and

conceivable event is non-scientific and that’s really what was the case with the

that’s really what was the case with the

that’s really what was the case with the Marxist right whatever happened they

Marxist right whatever happened they

Marxist right whatever happened they were going to be able to explain it a

were going to be able to explain it a

were going to be able to explain it a genuine test of a theory is an attempt

genuine test of a theory is an attempt

genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it

to falsify it

to falsify it um what’s really what what you want to

um what’s really what what you want to

um what’s really what what you want to do with your theory and I’m not just

do with your theory and I’m not just

do with your theory and I’m not just talking about science I’m talking about

talking about science I’m talking about

talking about science I’m talking about you and me and just the world when

you and me and just the world when

you and me and just the world when you’ve got a view about the world you

you’ve got a view about the world you

you’ve got a view about the world you should be trying to falsify it trying to

should be trying to falsify it trying to

should be trying to falsify it trying to refute it um because if you can refute

refute it um because if you can refute

refute it um because if you can refute it then you’ve learned something you

it then you’ve learned something you

it then you’ve learned something you learn that it was wrong and you can

learn that it was wrong and you can

learn that it was wrong and you can replace it by a better theory if all

replace it by a better theory if all

replace it by a better theory if all you’re trying to do is to confirm it

you’re trying to do is to confirm it

you’re trying to do is to confirm it it’s always gonna work and and and

it’s always gonna work and and and

it’s always gonna work and and and you’re not gonna get anywhere with it

you’re not gonna get anywhere with it

you’re not gonna get anywhere with it this is the criterion of the scientific

this is the criterion of the scientific

this is the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability

status of a theory is its falsifiability

status of a theory is its falsifiability there has to be something that you can

there has to be something that you can

there has to be something that you can specify ahead of time that would cause

specify ahead of time that would cause

specify ahead of time that would cause you to say I give up this theory you

you to say I give up this theory you

you to say I give up this theory you have to be willing to give up the theory

have to be willing to give up the theory

have to be willing to give up the theory and look for ways to refute it it

and look for ways to refute it it

and look for ways to refute it it distinguishes between recalls of

distinguishes between recalls of

distinguishes between recalls of dogmatic attitude and a critical

dogmatic attitude and a critical

dogmatic attitude and a critical attitude dogmatic attitude is familiar

attitude dogmatic attitude is familiar

attitude dogmatic attitude is familiar we all have it we love our theories we

we all have it we love our theories we

we all have it we love our theories we want them to be true we look for

want them to be true we look for

want them to be true we look for confirmations of them we whenever

confirmations of them we whenever

confirmations of them we whenever something that goes a little wrong with

something that goes a little wrong with

something that goes a little wrong with them we try to reinterpret things in

them we try to reinterpret things in

them we try to reinterpret things in order to make it know actually that

order to make it know actually that

order to make it know actually that didn’t refute my theory I really want to

didn’t refute my theory I really want to

didn’t refute my theory I really want to my theory the better attitude is the

my theory the better attitude is the

my theory the better attitude is the critical one that recognizes that

critical one that recognizes that

critical one that recognizes that theories are often wrong probably wrong

theories are often wrong probably wrong

theories are often wrong probably wrong and looks for reputations of them looks

and looks for reputations of them looks

and looks for reputations of them looks for their weakest point and tries to

for their weakest point and tries to

for their weakest point and tries to test them and if you if you’ve looked

test them and if you if you’ve looked

test them and if you if you’ve looked for their weakest for the weakest point

for their weakest for the weakest point

for their weakest for the weakest point of your theory and tried to test it and

of your theory and tried to test it and

of your theory and tried to test it and it succeeded it survived the test then

it succeeded it survived the test then

it succeeded it survived the test then you’ve got a reason to say to yourself

you’ve got a reason to say to yourself

you’ve got a reason to say to yourself not that my theory has been proven but

not that my theory has been proven but

not that my theory has been proven but that I tried as hard as I could to

that I tried as hard as I could to

that I tried as hard as I could to refute it and I couldn’t and for the

refute it and I couldn’t and for the

refute it and I couldn’t and for the time being I’m gonna tentatively hold it

time being I’m gonna tentatively hold it

time being I’m gonna tentatively hold it although I know I’m not positive and

although I know I’m not positive and

although I know I’m not positive and can’t be positive that it’s true but now

can’t be positive that it’s true but now

can’t be positive that it’s true but now I want to talk about Donald Trump and

I want to talk about Donald Trump and

I want to talk about Donald Trump and and but I’m not gonna say what I think

and but I’m not gonna say what I think

and but I’m not gonna say what I think you think I’m gonna say um I’m not gonna

you think I’m gonna say um I’m not gonna

you think I’m gonna say um I’m not gonna say that his that he’s an example of a

say that his that he’s an example of a

say that his that he’s an example of a dogmatic attitude that he doesn’t take

dogmatic attitude that he doesn’t take

dogmatic attitude that he doesn’t take he and his supporters don’t take a kind

he and his supporters don’t take a kind

he and his supporters don’t take a kind of critical attitude towards their ideas

of critical attitude towards their ideas

of critical attitude towards their ideas that they’re always looking to confirm

that they’re always looking to confirm

that they’re always looking to confirm their theories and so forth although I

their theories and so forth although I

their theories and so forth although I believe all those things I just said

believe all those things I just said

believe all those things I just said about him and his supporters what I want

about him and his supporters what I want

about him and his supporters what I want to talk about is us and by us I don’t

to talk about is us and by us I don’t

to talk about is us and by us I don’t know I can’t even see who’s in the room

know I can’t even see who’s in the room

know I can’t even see who’s in the room right now but and but I suspect that

right now but and but I suspect that

right now but and but I suspect that most of the people in this room have the

most of the people in this room have the

most of the people in this room have the same view about Trump that I do which is

same view about Trump that I do which is

same view about Trump that I do which is that he’s a bad guy and a dangerous guy

that he’s a bad guy and a dangerous guy

that he’s a bad guy and a dangerous guy and a bad president and we’re pretty

and a bad president and we’re pretty

and a bad president and we’re pretty unhappy about him being president and

unhappy about him being president and

unhappy about him being president and we’re concerned about the bad things

we’re concerned about the bad things

we’re concerned about the bad things he’s doing I suspect most people this

he’s doing I suspect most people this

he’s doing I suspect most people this room feel that way um and and actually

room feel that way um and and actually

room feel that way um and and actually what I is what I have to say is gonna

what I is what I have to say is gonna

what I is what I have to say is gonna work in both direct whichever way you

work in both direct whichever way you

work in both direct whichever way you for you but I’m just talking about that

for you but I’m just talking about that

for you but I’m just talking about that myself there’s this phenomenon that’s

myself there’s this phenomenon that’s

myself there’s this phenomenon that’s that’s been talking about it’s sort of

that’s been talking about it’s sort of

that’s been talking about it’s sort of the bubble I mean it’s it is the case

the bubble I mean it’s it is the case

the bubble I mean it’s it is the case that I don’t think I know anyone

that I don’t think I know anyone

that I don’t think I know anyone certainly not no one well who I’m sure

certainly not no one well who I’m sure

certainly not no one well who I’m sure voted for Trump almost everyone I know

voted for Trump almost everyone I know

voted for Trump almost everyone I know you know didn’t and has the same ideas

you know didn’t and has the same ideas

you know didn’t and has the same ideas about Trump that I do um and in the

about Trump that I do um and in the

about Trump that I do um and in the conversations I have it’s later and in

conversations I have it’s later and in

conversations I have it’s later and in the dinner parties I go to and the

the dinner parties I go to and the

the dinner parties I go to and the conversations I had with my friends and

conversations I had with my friends and

conversations I had with my friends and in the philosophy department and even

in the philosophy department and even

in the philosophy department and even with most of my students we all agree

with most of my students we all agree

with most of my students we all agree and in my facebook page all the time I’m

and in my facebook page all the time I’m

and in my facebook page all the time I’m it’s filled with confirmations of my

it’s filled with confirmations of my

it’s filled with confirmations of my view about Trump that’s what we give to

view about Trump that’s what we give to

view about Trump that’s what we give to each other all the time we cannot open

each other all the time we cannot open

each other all the time we cannot open the newspaper every morning without

the newspaper every morning without

the newspaper every morning without finding confirmation

finding confirmation

finding confirmation the barbule about Trump about the

the barbule about Trump about the

the barbule about Trump about the meaning of his election and we might

meaning of his election and we might

meaning of his election and we might think that’s the strength of our view

think that’s the strength of our view

think that’s the strength of our view but I actually think it’s a weakness I

but I actually think it’s a weakness I

but I actually think it’s a weakness I think what we ought to be doing and I

think what we ought to be doing and I

think what we ought to be doing and I sort of tried this as an experiment in

sort of tried this as an experiment in

sort of tried this as an experiment in the in the days after the election or

the in the days after the election or

the in the days after the election or weeks after the election after got

weeks after the election after got

weeks after the election after got myself off the floor but um is to think

myself off the floor but um is to think

myself off the floor but um is to think what would falsify our views about Trump

what would falsify our views about Trump

what would falsify our views about Trump what would falsify the fear that say I

what would falsify the fear that say I

what would falsify the fear that say I felt about his election under what

felt about his election under what

felt about his election under what conditions would I decide I was wrong

conditions would I decide I was wrong

conditions would I decide I was wrong and if you supported Trump that under

and if you supported Trump that under

and if you supported Trump that under what conditions would you decide that

what conditions would you decide that

what conditions would you decide that you were wrong that what we have to say

you were wrong that what we have to say

you were wrong that what we have to say about Trump is right for instance I

about Trump is right for instance I

about Trump is right for instance I think it’s a really interesting exercise

think it’s a really interesting exercise

think it’s a really interesting exercise I posed it for people on my Facebook

I posed it for people on my Facebook

I posed it for people on my Facebook page and also in some listservs I’m on

page and also in some listservs I’m on

page and also in some listservs I’m on people found it incredibly difficult to

people found it incredibly difficult to

people found it incredibly difficult to do this to specify what would cause them

do this to specify what would cause them

do this to specify what would cause them at least one person said nothing could

at least one person said nothing could

at least one person said nothing could possibly happen that would cause me to

possibly happen that would cause me to

possibly happen that would cause me to change my mind about Trump it’s like and

change my mind about Trump it’s like and

change my mind about Trump it’s like and it’s like that’s bad that nothing could

it’s like that’s bad that nothing could

it’s like that’s bad that nothing could possibly happen you’ve got to admit the

possibly happen you’ve got to admit the

possibly happen you’ve got to admit the possibility that you’re wrong so I

possibility that you’re wrong so I

possibility that you’re wrong so I actually invite you to think about the

actually invite you to think about the

actually invite you to think about the question action if you’d like to email

question action if you’d like to email

question action if you’d like to email me Vogel at Denison uh ddu because I’m

me Vogel at Denison uh ddu because I’m

me Vogel at Denison uh ddu because I’m trying to keep a list of this I’m quite

trying to keep a list of this I’m quite

trying to keep a list of this I’m quite serious with this what would lead you to

serious with this what would lead you to

serious with this what would lead you to change your views about Trump no matter

change your views about Trump no matter

change your views about Trump no matter what those views are at the moment I

what those views are at the moment I

what those views are at the moment I think it’s a really important exercise

think it’s a really important exercise

think it’s a really important exercise to think about um these are some answers

to think about um these are some answers

to think about um these are some answers I got there they’re good answers I have

I got there they’re good answers I have

I got there they’re good answers I have my own list I think some of those are on

my own list I think some of those are on

my own list I think some of those are on my list but but I want to point out one

my list but but I want to point out one

my list but but I want to point out one more thing just before I end about that

more thing just before I end about that

more thing just before I end about that um our views and again I’m talking to

um our views and again I’m talking to

um our views and again I’m talking to those of us who think he’s a bad guy

those of us who think he’s a bad guy

those of us who think he’s a bad guy have already been falsified alright we

have already been falsified alright we

have already been falsified alright we thought he was impossible we thought he

thought he was impossible we thought he

thought he was impossible we thought he was never get the Republican nomination

was never get the Republican nomination

was never get the Republican nomination we thought he would lose the election

we thought he would lose the election

we thought he would lose the election our views have been falsified have we

our views have been falsified have we

our views have been falsified have we modified them after the election I don’t

modified them after the election I don’t

modified them after the election I don’t know um here are some other things

know um here are some other things

know um here are some other things that’s and it’s missing um some of the

that’s and it’s missing um some of the

that’s and it’s missing um some of the some of the suggestions I got were

some of the suggestions I got were

some of the suggestions I got were things like if the Affordable Care Act

things like if the Affordable Care Act

things like if the Affordable Care Act is not repealed well it hasn’t been

is not repealed well it hasn’t been

is not repealed well it hasn’t been repeal if Social Security and Medicare

repeal if Social Security and Medicare

repeal if Social Security and Medicare are

are

are are not gutted well he’s proposed a

are not gutted well he’s proposed a

are not gutted well he’s proposed a budget that says that there should be no

budget that says that there should be no

budget that says that there should be no changes in them if Hillary if Hillary

changes in them if Hillary if Hillary

changes in them if Hillary if Hillary Clinton is not a foot in jail

Clinton is not a foot in jail

Clinton is not a foot in jail locked up that’s not happening so so

locked up that’s not happening so so

locked up that’s not happening so so some of our expectations about about

some of our expectations about about

some of our expectations about about Trump have already been falsified and I

Trump have already been falsified and I

Trump have already been falsified and I think it’s worth noticing that and

think it’s worth noticing that and

think it’s worth noticing that and paying attention to it um so what’s

paying attention to it um so what’s

paying attention to it um so what’s critical thinking it’s knowing that you

critical thinking it’s knowing that you

critical thinking it’s knowing that you might be wrong and remembering that all

might be wrong and remembering that all

might be wrong and remembering that all the time

the time

the time it’s always considering the possibility

it’s always considering the possibility

it’s always considering the possibility you’re wrong it’s looking for refutation

you’re wrong it’s looking for refutation

you’re wrong it’s looking for refutation of your views and not just looking for

of your views and not just looking for

of your views and not just looking for confirmations of them and being prepared

confirmations of them and being prepared

confirmations of them and being prepared to change your views if things happen to

to change your views if things happen to

to change your views if things happen to refute them it’s holding on to your

refute them it’s holding on to your

refute them it’s holding on to your unrefuted which just means not yet

unrefuted which just means not yet

unrefuted which just means not yet refuted views um

refuted views um

refuted views um tentatively and fellow ballistically and

tentatively and fellow ballistically and

tentatively and fellow ballistically and and and therefore it’s it involves

and and therefore it’s it involves

and and therefore it’s it involves always not being sure and living with

always not being sure and living with

always not being sure and living with the uncertainty of not being sure and

the uncertainty of not being sure and

the uncertainty of not being sure and and wrecking and recognizing that you

and wrecking and recognizing that you

and wrecking and recognizing that you don’t know the truth for sure and no one

don’t know the truth for sure and no one

don’t know the truth for sure and no one else does either that’s what I have to

else does either that’s what I have to

else does either that’s what I have to say thank you

say thank you

say thank you [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *