[Music] so if you heard what happened in Sweden
so if you heard what happened in Sweden
so if you heard what happened in Sweden last week ok this is really it’s not a
last week ok this is really it’s not a
last week ok this is really it’s not a huge it’s huge I mean in Sweden right
huge it’s huge I mean in Sweden right
huge it’s huge I mean in Sweden right now they decided to teach people I need
now they decided to teach people I need
now they decided to teach people I need little people by elementary school
little people by elementary school
little people by elementary school students that are this pronunciation
students that are this pronunciation
students that are this pronunciation between legitimate news vegetarian
between legitimate news vegetarian
between legitimate news vegetarian sources of a news and those sources from
sources of a news and those sources from
sources of a news and those sources from anonymous places in Macedonia which we
anonymous places in Macedonia which we
anonymous places in Macedonia which we are going to mention so what the sweets
are going to mention so what the sweets
are going to mention so what the sweets said what did their Minister of
said what did their Minister of
said what did their Minister of Education say we need to teach our
Education say we need to teach our
Education say we need to teach our children critical differentiation
children critical differentiation
children critical differentiation between sources the same way we taught
between sources the same way we taught
between sources the same way we taught them scientific theory and that’s very
them scientific theory and that’s very
them scientific theory and that’s very interesting because it relates two
interesting because it relates two
interesting because it relates two important concepts two important
important concepts two important
important concepts two important concepts of 2016 2017 and years to come
concepts of 2016 2017 and years to come
concepts of 2016 2017 and years to come fake news and science and I will offer
fake news and science and I will offer
fake news and science and I will offer you three reasons why those concepts
you three reasons why those concepts
you three reasons why those concepts should be connected and the reason
should be connected and the reason
should be connected and the reason number two will shock you reason number
number two will shock you reason number
number two will shock you reason number one science has been fighting fake news
one science has been fighting fake news
one science has been fighting fake news for a while now where that while is a
for a while now where that while is a
for a while now where that while is a basic century science has seen
basic century science has seen
basic century science has seen pseudoscience bad science bad signs
pseudoscience bad science bad signs
pseudoscience bad science bad signs supporting all this time from scientific
supporting all this time from scientific
supporting all this time from scientific journals to news outlets it has always
journals to news outlets it has always
journals to news outlets it has always been some sort of miscommunication
been some sort of miscommunication
been some sort of miscommunication between scientists the general public
between scientists the general public
between scientists the general public and fellow scientists with science
and fellow scientists with science
and fellow scientists with science journalists in the mill and that’s
journalists in the mill and that’s
journalists in the mill and that’s something sick CTO of Monsanto has been
something sick CTO of Monsanto has been
something sick CTO of Monsanto has been discussing is a recent article probably
discussing is a recent article probably
discussing is a recent article probably dr. Robert Fraley says that fake news is
dr. Robert Fraley says that fake news is
dr. Robert Fraley says that fake news is not amused perceptive community it has
not amused perceptive community it has
not amused perceptive community it has been there for all she said and he
been there for all she said and he
been there for all she said and he mentions two particular cases the case
mentions two particular cases the case
mentions two particular cases the case of MMR vaccines cause autism the study
of MMR vaccines cause autism the study
of MMR vaccines cause autism the study that has been retracted decade ago and
that has been retracted decade ago and
that has been retracted decade ago and yet it’s still influential in people
yet it’s still influential in people
yet it’s still influential in people deciding whether to vaccinate their kids
deciding whether to vaccinate their kids
deciding whether to vaccinate their kids or not the other case of being monsanto
or not the other case of being monsanto
or not the other case of being monsanto sathya at the end time with some study
sathya at the end time with some study
sathya at the end time with some study GMO causing cancer for with vibrant and
GMO causing cancer for with vibrant and
GMO causing cancer for with vibrant and the third one the most interesting one
the third one the most interesting one
the third one the most interesting one was deliberately fake study which was
was deliberately fake study which was
was deliberately fake study which was determining whether chocolate helps
determining whether chocolate helps
determining whether chocolate helps people lose weight and the floor the
people lose weight and the floor the
people lose weight and the floor the result was yes what helps people will
result was yes what helps people will
result was yes what helps people will wait and of course the fabricated and
wait and of course the fabricated and
wait and of course the fabricated and the main reason for that study was to
the main reason for that study was to
the main reason for that study was to show just how uncritical some
show just how uncritical some
show just how uncritical some journalists i won’t go to the perfect
journalists i won’t go to the perfect
journalists i won’t go to the perfect science rooms are dope sighs and that’s
science rooms are dope sighs and that’s
science rooms are dope sighs and that’s what science has been coping with for a
what science has been coping with for a
what science has been coping with for a while now s27 let’s take just one
while now s27 let’s take just one
while now s27 let’s take just one example my favorite one there was this
example my favorite one there was this
example my favorite one there was this theory presented in the book called
theory presented in the book called
theory presented in the book called collision of worlds by bukowski you can
collision of worlds by bukowski you can
collision of worlds by bukowski you can see pseudoscience you can feel it you
see pseudoscience you can feel it you
see pseudoscience you can feel it you can taste it you can smell it and yet
can taste it you can smell it and yet
can taste it you can smell it and yet you can’t put a finger on you’re not
you can’t put a finger on you’re not
you can’t put a finger on you’re not really sure why it’s you the science but
really sure why it’s you the science but
really sure why it’s you the science but it is so that makes question is you know
it is so that makes question is you know
it is so that makes question is you know science the matter of when you see it
science the matter of when you see it
science the matter of when you see it you’ll know it well at least we hope
you’ll know it well at least we hope
you’ll know it well at least we hope it’s on we had to find a way to solve
it’s on we had to find a way to solve
it’s on we had to find a way to solve this so-called demarcation problem make
this so-called demarcation problem make
this so-called demarcation problem make a difference between science and
a difference between science and
a difference between science and non-science where that’s nonsense
non-science where that’s nonsense
non-science where that’s nonsense necessarily have to be pseudo science or
necessarily have to be pseudo science or
necessarily have to be pseudo science or bad science can be laid out whether just
bad science can be laid out whether just
bad science can be laid out whether just not science and we found a few criteria
not science and we found a few criteria
not science and we found a few criteria some of those were introduced by our
some of those were introduced by our
some of those were introduced by our proper the father of philosophy of
proper the father of philosophy of
proper the father of philosophy of sciences we know it today we’re proper
sciences we know it today we’re proper
sciences we know it today we’re proper introduced the concept of thought speak
introduced the concept of thought speak
introduced the concept of thought speak ability so if you can make an experiment
ability so if you can make an experiment
ability so if you can make an experiment that will refute your theory you’re
that will refute your theory you’re
that will refute your theory you’re going to go that sounds like a
going to go that sounds like a
going to go that sounds like a scientific theory however if it’s
scientific theory however if it’s
scientific theory however if it’s impossible to design such an experiment
impossible to design such an experiment
impossible to design such an experiment you are making a dogma and not synthetic
you are making a dogma and not synthetic
you are making a dogma and not synthetic and that might be a bit problematic so
and that might be a bit problematic so
and that might be a bit problematic so close but no sky and the problem with
close but no sky and the problem with
close but no sky and the problem with this criterion is that a lot of
this criterion is that a lot of
this criterion is that a lot of pseudoscience can ask because people
pseudoscience can ask because people
pseudoscience can ask because people will durable deliberately put some
predictions or some part of the theory
predictions or some part of the theory will make sense in this house style away
will make sense in this house style away
will make sense in this house style away however there’s another thing there is
however there’s another thing there is
however there’s another thing there is purification so if it can be falsifiable
purification so if it can be falsifiable
purification so if it can be falsifiable well then was just make the experiment
well then was just make the experiment
well then was just make the experiment and that’s where the pseudo science will
and that’s where the pseudo science will
and that’s where the pseudo science will fail now what does this have to do with
fail now what does this have to do with
fail now what does this have to do with our fake news wait for the third part
our fake news wait for the third part
our fake news wait for the third part now the second shocking part science may
now the second shocking part science may
now the second shocking part science may take years yes I know it may come off as
take years yes I know it may come off as
take years yes I know it may come off as a shock but that’s just the postmodern
a shock but that’s just the postmodern
a shock but that’s just the postmodern concept as little puts it it had to
concept as little puts it it had to
concept as little puts it it had to happen because postmodern is the fight
happen because postmodern is the fight
happen because postmodern is the fight against meta-narratives which was helped
against meta-narratives which was helped
against meta-narratives which was helped by the deliverer development of science
by the deliverer development of science
by the deliverer development of science and technology so it had to happen with
and technology so it had to happen with
and technology so it had to happen with all this critical thinking we were led
all this critical thinking we were led
all this critical thinking we were led to do because ever since that correct
to do because ever since that correct
to do because ever since that correct started we were questioning everything
started we were questioning everything
started we were questioning everything even that questioning was
even that questioning was
even that questioning was question so that’s how we ended up here
question so that’s how we ended up here
question so that’s how we ended up here it’s good it’s really good because it
it’s good it’s really good because it
it’s good it’s really good because it will help us make the next step it’s
will help us make the next step it’s
will help us make the next step it’s just another step in our evolution so
just another step in our evolution so
just another step in our evolution so bring it on and let’s see what the third
bring it on and let’s see what the third
bring it on and let’s see what the third thing is the third thing the cure the
thing is the third thing the cure the
thing is the third thing the cure the way we are going to struggle with faith
way we are going to struggle with faith
way we are going to struggle with faith news win eventually and build a new
news win eventually and build a new
news win eventually and build a new knowledge system for us so we start off
knowledge system for us so we start off
knowledge system for us so we start off with a network that’s something we’re
with a network that’s something we’re
with a network that’s something we’re good at making it and let’s put in that
good at making it and let’s put in that
good at making it and let’s put in that Network a few tools let’s bring in this
Network a few tools let’s bring in this
Network a few tools let’s bring in this closet of silence let’s bring in this
closet of silence let’s bring in this
closet of silence let’s bring in this logic logic is always good and combine
logic logic is always good and combine
logic logic is always good and combine it with some information theory AKA
it with some information theory AKA
it with some information theory AKA information science and bring in some
information science and bring in some
information science and bring in some probability and statistics just for
probability and statistics just for
probability and statistics just for those people who I numbers and you’ll
those people who I numbers and you’ll
those people who I numbers and you’ll have a tool a big to actually its
have a tool a big to actually its
have a tool a big to actually its framework what are we aiming at we are
framework what are we aiming at we are
framework what are we aiming at we are aiming at just like 50 ohms we’re aiming
aiming at just like 50 ohms we’re aiming
aiming at just like 50 ohms we’re aiming at destroying two big metal narratives
at destroying two big metal narratives
at destroying two big metal narratives because otherwise we won’t get through
because otherwise we won’t get through
because otherwise we won’t get through this postmodern so we’ll get narratives
this postmodern so we’ll get narratives
this postmodern so we’ll get narratives for each one of us it’s fine that’s fine
for each one of us it’s fine that’s fine
for each one of us it’s fine that’s fine I like the idea of 7 billion meritus or
I like the idea of 7 billion meritus or
I like the idea of 7 billion meritus or even more you can you can have to it’s
even more you can you can have to it’s
even more you can you can have to it’s on the house and the idea of having
on the house and the idea of having
on the house and the idea of having multiple narratives and losing the big
multiple narratives and losing the big
multiple narratives and losing the big dramatic ones is great because then you
dramatic ones is great because then you
dramatic ones is great because then you cannot be controlled by them and just
cannot be controlled by them and just
cannot be controlled by them and just look at it we have this idea of mass
look at it we have this idea of mass
look at it we have this idea of mass communication yes but yeah puts it in
communication yes but yeah puts it in
communication yes but yeah puts it in simulation in small crack it’s not you
simulation in small crack it’s not you
simulation in small crack it’s not you munication mass media are faking
munication mass media are faking
munication mass media are faking communication they are not interacting
communication they are not interacting
communication they are not interacting with us I’m not sure how much I am
with us I’m not sure how much I am
with us I’m not sure how much I am directing with you but mass media isn’t
directing with you but mass media isn’t
directing with you but mass media isn’t directing with us and the trick is fake
directing with us and the trick is fake
directing with us and the trick is fake news is a bit closer to us because it’s
news is a bit closer to us because it’s
news is a bit closer to us because it’s shared your beer just 10 years ago
shared your beer just 10 years ago
shared your beer just 10 years ago nobody shared the news peer-to-peer use
nobody shared the news peer-to-peer use
nobody shared the news peer-to-peer use or shared peer-to-peer just if there
or shared peer-to-peer just if there
or shared peer-to-peer just if there were the big ones like did you see 911
were the big ones like did you see 911
were the big ones like did you see 911 happened or small ones did you see our
happened or small ones did you see our
happened or small ones did you see our neighbor has new dog that’s it you
neighbor has new dog that’s it you
neighbor has new dog that’s it you didn’t share the middle ones the
didn’t share the middle ones the
didn’t share the middle ones the intermediate ones just the big ones and
intermediate ones just the big ones and
intermediate ones just the big ones and small ones now you share those needs
small ones now you share those needs
small ones now you share those needs that matter or do they so the question
that matter or do they so the question
that matter or do they so the question whether the news that are shared matter
whether the news that are shared matter
whether the news that are shared matter or not is something that has to be
or not is something that has to be
or not is something that has to be addressed here let’s remember what is
addressed here let’s remember what is
addressed here let’s remember what is 2016 year word of the year in Oxford
2016 year word of the year in Oxford
2016 year word of the year in Oxford Dictionary Oh truth oh shoot meaning
Dictionary Oh truth oh shoot meaning
Dictionary Oh truth oh shoot meaning something that goes against the
something that goes against the
something that goes against the established facts appealing to your
established facts appealing to your
established facts appealing to your beliefs and to your emotions okay great
beliefs and to your emotions okay great
beliefs and to your emotions okay great sounds like us reading news because we
sounds like us reading news because we
sounds like us reading news because we are always going to be a bit biased and
are always going to be a bit biased and
are always going to be a bit biased and there it is there it is that what we
there it is there it is that what we
there it is there it is that what we need to fight we need to bring
need to fight we need to bring
need to fight we need to bring rationality into the game because
rationality into the game because
rationality into the game because otherwise the use of meeting us on their
otherwise the use of meeting us on their
otherwise the use of meeting us on their own field otherwise we won’t be able to
own field otherwise we won’t be able to
own field otherwise we won’t be able to put science into this aside I’ve of this
put science into this aside I’ve of this
put science into this aside I’ve of this talk science the noise ratio because
talk science the noise ratio because
talk science the noise ratio because otherwise it will just remain the signal
otherwise it will just remain the signal
otherwise it will just remain the signal and the noise is going to rise because
and the noise is going to rise because
and the noise is going to rise because fake news can be generated in vast
fake news can be generated in vast
fake news can be generated in vast quantities so how do we put signs there
quantities so how do we put signs there
quantities so how do we put signs there again the touch that you can’t put
again the touch that you can’t put
again the touch that you can’t put science somewhere what’s on signs
science somewhere what’s on signs
science somewhere what’s on signs it’s not concrete what’s not rational Oh
it’s not concrete what’s not rational Oh
it’s not concrete what’s not rational Oh simple enough make the use rationale
simple enough make the use rationale
simple enough make the use rationale make work on the news work on your
make work on the news work on your
make work on the news work on your reading of the news by bringing it to
reading of the news by bringing it to
reading of the news by bringing it to the world of the facts and not the world
the world of the facts and not the world
the world of the facts and not the world of your emotions or your beliefs I know
of your emotions or your beliefs I know
of your emotions or your beliefs I know it so it’s again an ideal case but we
it so it’s again an ideal case but we
it so it’s again an ideal case but we can always make an effort in that
can always make an effort in that
can always make an effort in that direction otherwise again we are being
direction otherwise again we are being
direction otherwise again we are being manipulated so what are we going to put
manipulated so what are we going to put
manipulated so what are we going to put from the science field we are going to
from the science field we are going to
from the science field we are going to put those verifiability and fulfill
put those verifiability and fulfill
put those verifiability and fulfill falsifiability which was also suggested
falsifiability which was also suggested
falsifiability which was also suggested earlier this year by include wine and
earlier this year by include wine and
earlier this year by include wine and what are we bringing from statistics and
what are we bringing from statistics and
what are we bringing from statistics and probability well we are keeping track so
probability well we are keeping track so
probability well we are keeping track so let’s make our own measure of how good
let’s make our own measure of how good
let’s make our own measure of how good or how bad news outfit is so we won’t
or how bad news outfit is so we won’t
or how bad news outfit is so we won’t let someone else tell us that a
let someone else tell us that a
let someone else tell us that a particular news outlet is big news we
particular news outlet is big news we
particular news outlet is big news we are making this decision on our own
are making this decision on our own
are making this decision on our own based on our experience but that
based on our experience but that
based on our experience but that experience needs to be an educated one
experience needs to be an educated one
experience needs to be an educated one we need to follow a particular news a
we need to follow a particular news a
we need to follow a particular news a particular news that is of interest was
particular news that is of interest was
particular news that is of interest was from the beginning to the end otherwise
from the beginning to the end otherwise
from the beginning to the end otherwise we just read the headline and we don’t
we just read the headline and we don’t
we just read the headline and we don’t know if it was refuted in the end if it
know if it was refuted in the end if it
know if it was refuted in the end if it was confirmed was the new sources one
was confirmed was the new sources one
was confirmed was the new sources one and another finger while we are at that
and another finger while we are at that
and another finger while we are at that what if we are able to review news for
what if we are able to review news for
what if we are able to review news for one another so I ask you what do you
one another so I ask you what do you
one another so I ask you what do you think about that news did you read that
think about that news did you read that
think about that news did you read that particular thing what do you think what
particular thing what do you think what
particular thing what do you think what what does your logic what does your
what does your logic what does your
what does your logic what does your verification say and you give me your
verification say and you give me your
verification say and you give me your response and I put you into my database
response and I put you into my database
response and I put you into my database and again if you were good if I see in
and again if you were good if I see in
and again if you were good if I see in the end
the end
the end use or Greg and you said so and be it
use or Greg and you said so and be it
use or Greg and you said so and be it you’re a good reviewer if you’re bad
you’re a good reviewer if you’re bad
you’re a good reviewer if you’re bad well I won’t ask you again and that
well I won’t ask you again and that
well I won’t ask you again and that subtle and what are we bringing from I
subtle and what are we bringing from I
subtle and what are we bringing from I said logix watch it we’re bringing
said logix watch it we’re bringing
said logix watch it we’re bringing formal logic statements formal wash
formal logic statements formal wash
formal logic statements formal wash clothes because using them we can prove
clothes because using them we can prove
clothes because using them we can prove or disprove facts oh no thanks can only
or disprove facts oh no thanks can only
or disprove facts oh no thanks can only be confirmed sorry there are no friends
be confirmed sorry there are no friends
be confirmed sorry there are no friends ok and speaking of logic you can bring
ok and speaking of logic you can bring
ok and speaking of logic you can bring in how comes raisin Fraser is a
in how comes raisin Fraser is a
in how comes raisin Fraser is a rather simple thing if you have two
rather simple thing if you have two
rather simple thing if you have two theories and if they both explain a
theories and if they both explain a
theories and if they both explain a certain thing and if one of them is more
certain thing and if one of them is more
certain thing and if one of them is more than a simpler than the other that one
than a simpler than the other that one
than a simpler than the other that one has somewhat larger possibility of being
has somewhat larger possibility of being
has somewhat larger possibility of being true being the right one because you
true being the right one because you
true being the right one because you know most of those fringe science and
know most of those fringe science and
know most of those fringe science and conspiracy theories fail at Occam’s
conspiracy theories fail at Occam’s
conspiracy theories fail at Occam’s razor because it’s much more complicated
razor because it’s much more complicated
razor because it’s much more complicated to build a tin foil hat theory than to
to build a tin foil hat theory than to
to build a tin foil hat theory than to explain it with physics what we also
explain it with physics what we also
explain it with physics what we also have to mention here is that this
have to mention here is that this
have to mention here is that this science does seem like an over kingdom
science does seem like an over kingdom
science does seem like an over kingdom like all this logic phallological
like all this logic phallological
like all this logic phallological fallacies and Occam’s razor and all this
fallacies and Occam’s razor and all this
fallacies and Occam’s razor and all this philosophy whatever I mention and yet we
philosophy whatever I mention and yet we
philosophy whatever I mention and yet we have a common reason common sense a
have a common reason common sense a
have a common reason common sense a critical reasoning something that we
critical reasoning something that we
critical reasoning something that we have been told that can solve in and
have been told that can solve in and
have been told that can solve in and yeah I totally agree I just don’t know
yeah I totally agree I just don’t know
yeah I totally agree I just don’t know what comes and sees I mean I know how it
what comes and sees I mean I know how it
what comes and sees I mean I know how it results me when I see people using the
results me when I see people using the
results me when I see people using the word scientific theory wrong and I am
word scientific theory wrong and I am
word scientific theory wrong and I am pretty sir
pretty sir
pretty sir that some philosophers feel the same
that some philosophers feel the same
that some philosophers feel the same when people like me or you are who ever
when people like me or you are who ever
when people like me or you are who ever use the word common sense without their
use the word common sense without their
use the word common sense without their problem definition and unfortunately I
problem definition and unfortunately I
problem definition and unfortunately I still don’t know the definition that
still don’t know the definition that
still don’t know the definition that memo still hasn’t reached me and I’ve
memo still hasn’t reached me and I’ve
memo still hasn’t reached me and I’ve noticed that while preparing for this
noticed that while preparing for this
noticed that while preparing for this speech it was a few weeks ago I will I
speech it was a few weeks ago I will I
speech it was a few weeks ago I will I googled the part of interview of CEO of
googled the part of interview of CEO of
googled the part of interview of CEO of Twitter with Edward Snowden and that’s
Twitter with Edward Snowden and that’s
Twitter with Edward Snowden and that’s soon and I mentioned there that we can’t
soon and I mentioned there that we can’t
soon and I mentioned there that we can’t fight fake news with centralized system
fight fake news with centralized system
fight fake news with centralized system of restrictions centralized system of
of restrictions centralized system of
of restrictions centralized system of truth detection centralized censorship
truth detection centralized censorship
truth detection centralized censorship and I totally agree and yet he mentioned
and I totally agree and yet he mentioned
and I totally agree and yet he mentioned that it’s the job of all of us to
that it’s the job of all of us to
that it’s the job of all of us to interact to use our critical thinking
interact to use our critical thinking
interact to use our critical thinking are common sense and work together and
are common sense and work together and
are common sense and work together and create more speech he said that the
create more speech he said that the
create more speech he said that the banning free speech is not an option but
banning free speech is not an option but
banning free speech is not an option but fighting fake news is creating mortgage
fighting fake news is creating mortgage
fighting fake news is creating mortgage so great maybe it I go buh it the first
so great maybe it I go buh it the first
so great maybe it I go buh it the first hit on google are very known outlet
hit on google are very known outlet
hit on google are very known outlet known for thank yous ok I’ll bite I’ll
known for thank yous ok I’ll bite I’ll
known for thank yous ok I’ll bite I’ll click through it and there I go and see
click through it and there I go and see
click through it and there I go and see it’s really their the Texas there in the
it’s really their the Texas there in the
it’s really their the Texas there in the comments below are staggering you have
comments below are staggering you have
comments below are staggering you have people from how to college right now
people from how to college right now
people from how to college right now alright talking how Snowden’s rights how
alright talking how Snowden’s rights how
alright talking how Snowden’s rights how Snowden is a great man and kale I won’t
Snowden is a great man and kale I won’t
Snowden is a great man and kale I won’t deny or confirm that but hey they are
deny or confirm that but hey they are
deny or confirm that but hey they are talking how they have this quick
talking how they have this quick
talking how they have this quick thinking and
thinking and
thinking and common sense and everything however the
common sense and everything however the
common sense and everything however the law is on the other side don’t have
law is on the other side don’t have
law is on the other side don’t have those hey mister the day mr. class in
those hey mister the day mr. class in
those hey mister the day mr. class in high school or your horse they haven’t
high school or your horse they haven’t
high school or your horse they haven’t been taught that schools because schools
been taught that schools because schools
been taught that schools because schools are destroying our youth and
are destroying our youth and
are destroying our youth and everything’s so be it okay so everyone
everything’s so be it okay so everyone
everything’s so be it okay so everyone has a monopoly on common sense
has a monopoly on common sense
has a monopoly on common sense everyone’s best think they have common
everyone’s best think they have common
everyone’s best think they have common sense other people don’t all that makes
sense other people don’t all that makes
sense other people don’t all that makes perfect sense because you know if there
perfect sense because you know if there
perfect sense because you know if there was a text on beauty or width everyone
was a text on beauty or width everyone
was a text on beauty or width everyone would want to pay as much as possible
would want to pay as much as possible
would want to pay as much as possible and if possible more than the neighbor
and if possible more than the neighbor
and if possible more than the neighbor that’s fine but back to the logic sorry
that’s fine but back to the logic sorry
that’s fine but back to the logic sorry if you start applying logic to use if
if you start applying logic to use if
if you start applying logic to use if you start rejecting use that aren’t /
you start rejecting use that aren’t /
you start rejecting use that aren’t / fiable or falsifiable if it couldn’t be
fiable or falsifiable if it couldn’t be
fiable or falsifiable if it couldn’t be proved wrong by anything that happens
proved wrong by anything that happens
proved wrong by anything that happens later is really news can really work on
later is really news can really work on
later is really news can really work on that and then Occam’s razor command
that and then Occam’s razor command
that and then Occam’s razor command Occam’s razor with any illogical process
Occam’s razor with any illogical process
Occam’s razor with any illogical process and you get to induction deduction or
and you get to induction deduction or
and you get to induction deduction or sherlock holmes favorite abduction and
sherlock holmes favorite abduction and
sherlock holmes favorite abduction and you’re going to go and I don’t think
you’re going to go and I don’t think
you’re going to go and I don’t think Sherlock Holmes would buy it for a fake
Sherlock Holmes would buy it for a fake
Sherlock Holmes would buy it for a fake news cycle or anything I mean he
news cycle or anything I mean he
news cycle or anything I mean he probably nobody bites for fake news
probably nobody bites for fake news
probably nobody bites for fake news there was a study that there was like
there was a study that there was like
there was a study that there was like just you get one per year to really
just you get one per year to really
just you get one per year to really accept it as true okay but we don’t like
accept it as true okay but we don’t like
accept it as true okay but we don’t like the environment of fake news being
the environment of fake news being
the environment of fake news being around us that’s perfectly fine so yeah
around us that’s perfectly fine so yeah
around us that’s perfectly fine so yeah if truck homes and with all his
if truck homes and with all his
if truck homes and with all his induction deduction and abduction
induction deduction and abduction
induction deduction and abduction wouldn’t
wouldn’t
wouldn’t take it why should we so that’s the
take it why should we so that’s the
take it why should we so that’s the general idea get the pelagic out and
general idea get the pelagic out and
general idea get the pelagic out and beat the news thank you very much
beat the news thank you very much
beat the news thank you very much [Applause]
”
Be First to Comment