Hello everyone
I am Wu Jinchang, sponsor of the 20 for future NGO Coalition.
I am very happy to have this opportunity to share with you here
Do you believe that consumer choice can change the world?
The development of scientific and technological civilization
On the one hand bring more enjoyment of life and work more convenient
On the other hand, it also brings some problems
I hope to say there are ways
Can solve some bad problems brought by some technologies
Then my approach is to change the world with consumption.
Content is divided into four parts
The first thing to mention in these four parts is the next decade.
Some of the major risks we will face
At the World Economic Forum
The major risks that will be faced in the next decade
The World Economic Forum has annual economic development
To predict some of the risks that will arise in the future
In 2014 and 2016 respectively
It made some comments
Then I put some future risks in these two years
I sum it up into two parts
Is divided into environmentally sustainable climate change issues
There are problems with pollution
The other is the unbalanced distribution of wealth in society.
There is also the problem of insufficient job opportunities
We see from the report
Less than 1% of companies in 2014
Mastered 40% of global wealth
The richest 85 people
His net worth equals the sum of the assets of the poor 3.5 billion people
And this situation continues to deteriorate
So we saw 2016
Is becoming more and more concentrated in wealth
Become the richest 62 people
His wealth equals the sum of the assets of the poor 3.6 billion people
Artificial intelligence and robot development and application are getting faster
So we can almost imagine
One day it will be the ten richest people in the world
His wealth is equal to the total assets of the poor 3.6 billion people
When will that time come?
What should we do in the face of such a future?
In fact, the development of artificial intelligence and robots
It not only said that it caused the concentration of wealth
And it also has a great influence on job opportunities.
So we have this kind of traditional thinking above
Some gold rice bowls and iron rice bowls that work in government agencies
That is under this kind of development in the future
Is it possible to continue to exist?
Let’s go down to a movie
Robot grab rice bowl
All we see above are true records
Instead of the plot inside the movie
What should we do in the future?
In fact, the use of robots
The future will be widely used in all aspects
Included in industry
Included in social services
Contained in Intelligent Transportation
Included in medical services
Can you imagine how long it will take in the future?
Maybe when you go to the store to buy something
Serving you is primarily a robot
Then when you are riding a car
Taxi and bus are no one driving
When will the world like this come?
I think the time may come sooner than everyone imagined
Singapore will test at the end of 2016
Driverless taxi on the road
In the year of 2016,
Amazon uses 30,000 transfer robots
Save 900 Million U.S. Dollars in Manpower Annually
In addition, more and more companies in Japan
Robotic clerk
In addition we also see that in AlphaGo
It competed with Korean chess players
That is an absolute advantage to victory
So we can see that artificial intelligence and robots
The threat to us is actually very great
We can imagine that
Does the future have any impact on our work?
Let’s take a look at the number of experts’ estimates
His estimate at the World Economic Forum
Before 2020
There are 5 million jobs in existing jobs will disappear
Gartner Report 2016 Its Estimate
Before 2026
One third of the existing work in the world will disappear
What should we do if we face this kind of development?
What we have just seen is the increasing concentration of wealth.
That job opportunity is quickly lost
what should we do
Who can help us solve this problem?
Is it government or business?
Or we need to be self-reliant
Then I want to solve the problem. Let’s see where the resources are.
We know from the report
Cash in U.S. companies now has $1.24 trillion
The debt of the entire government of the United States and the European Union
USD 27.4 trillion
This information shows that wealth is in the hands of enterprises
Then when we know this then
Then our traditional thinking
State, business and human rank
Is that the country is the highest
So we think about it under this kind of thinking
The government must do something for us.
It means the government wants to find a way for businesses and rich people.
Taxes with more taxes
Let us solve the problem of the social environment
But this is not feasible in the end
We see from the experience of Greece
Greek government wants to increase taxes
The result has not yet been added to the tax
The business first fled
That’s not only Greece
We see the same in the United States that includes the big country.
The U.S. was proposed by the U.S. in 2014
We must enlist the rich
To collect overseas income from some companies and individuals
As a result, some people gave up their U.S. membership
Then we see here say
Isn’t the company very unconscience?
Ignore some social conditions
In fact, companies have the difficulties of enterprises.
Because now the entire competition of the company
What it faces is also a kind of global competition.
So in the entire enterprise competitive environment
It has to consider his cost, its cost
Including taxes is also a competitive element
So that is to say
If it is a country, it goes for a higher tax
That company in this country
When it is doing global competition
It is possible that because of this, its business has no way to survive.
In order to allow its business to survive forever
It had to go away
What should we do in the end?
We must first know that in the enterprise, the country and the people
The level of the three has changed in its implementation
Now the corporate hierarchy is above the country
The whole change is what we see
Because of the development and application of science and technology
There is also internationalization and liberalization
It is the country in which the company chooses where to invest
So it becomes a business choice country
So that the corporate hierarchy is above the country
In addition, we must pay attention to
Generally we will ignore the fact
We are now choosing people for work
People are choosing which brand to buy
Which channel to purchase
So people are choosing companies
In other words, the person’s rank is above the enterprise
Why do we generally ignore this phenomenon?
Because of the power of people
It’s the power to get together
So change it
The power of change comes from the power of group action
So we need to find ways to make more and more people
Ability to act in groups
That’s for this
So I launched 20 for future in 2010
This consumption choice
Then I hope to say that through consumer choice
To drive some changes in resource allocation
Where does one of my inspiration come from?
From democratic politics
We are all familiar with the election every four years.
Some politicians in order to choose representatives for public opinion
Local heads even state leaders
So he will attach great importance to the opinions of the voters
So do we use such an experience in other aspects?
We use this to do charity
Then we have to choose
It is just like me to get money out to support non-profit organizations.
Which non-profit organization do I want to give money to?
It can make a bigger contribution to society for my money
Or is it a social enterprise I want to choose?
That I support it
It can generate more public welfare contributions to society
The same reasoning
We can also use the consumer choice to choose a company
Then we started to make a choice
That is when we are buying the same thing
In the case of flower-like money
Let’s choose to see which company I support
Can make a bigger contribution to society
Then I will give priority to supporting it
In this way, there will be opportunities for the competition of enterprises.
Enter competition for social contribution
To be able to make such things easy
So the charity company made three promises
The first is to donate 20% of the net profit
That in order to ensure that consumer support
Must be able to generate charity behavior
So the second point of commitment is
At least 2% of the capital will be donated each year
The third point is to ensure that things do not sell more expensive
The same thing guarantees buying expensive post difference
That’s under these three commitments
Let the consumer when he is making consumer choices
He does not need extra burden
Then the power of a company is limited
So we are going to develop a coalition of public companies
This figure is a common mark of our Commonwealth Enterprises Alliance.
20 for future public companies 20% net profit to do charity
A better future for the social environment
So we have to promote a concept
In fact, it is to change the world with consumption.
We hope to be able to choose through consumption
To start a love cycle
Let’s take a look at the entire loop of love
20 for future charity enterprise alliance
The most wanted to bring this society is
The positive power of the cycle through this love
Can bring a better future to society
We are very happy with the Alliance for Public Welfare
Now some companies have joined
We currently have a total of 9 companies
Members of the Commonwealth Enterprise Alliance
There are 13 more in the application
Such a consumption choice
How much power can it generate?
If we say we all begin to carry out such a cycle of love
In addition to saying that they are going
Then we also passed it to the world.
That kind of power can be great
If 20% of companies in Taiwan donate 20% of net profit
This can generate 67.2 billion public welfare funds each year
This figure is already greater than Taiwan’s annual public welfare donations of RMB 40 billion.
So this figure can actually bring about society
Many positive forces and warmth
If over 100 companies in the world donate 20% of net profit
That can generate 211 billion U.S. dollars in public welfare funds each year
It’s impossible for this matter to happen to all of us
We are not accepting such a concept
Whether we are willing to pass ten or pass ten hundred
Finally, I want to share an idea
Is the contribution of one person to society
It’s not how much you pay
How much is it in the society for you?
The family is so
The business is so
Doing charity and doing good
Concept turns a happy infinite width
I hope that we can combine our love with our wisdom
To do wise love
Le’s work hard
I believe we can change this world
We can change the world with consumption
Can make the world a better place
Above is my share
Thank you everybody thanks
”
Be First to Comment