Press "Enter" to skip to content

A secret in the Box – Un Secreto en la Caja | Javier Izquierdo | TEDxQuito


well, the filmmakers are supposed to

We express better with images than with

words but I’ve decided to take this

challenge to come here and talk to them about a

little of my work that have a lot that

do with the reality and lies and

what is a trip

the documentary to fiction

I must admit that I have had certain

reluctance with this format because I

he remembers a lot the cinematic pits

which is a very particular instance of

cinema and very uncomfortable at times it is

basically to sell your project to a

group of strangers almost always

jury of funds and possible

investors and it has not always gone

well in that field

so I understand that it ‘s something else and I’m going

to try to talk is the most

relaxedly possible within the case

of my work as a filmmaker in a

moment when the cinema the equator has

grown a lot and looking for new ways to

of production exhibition and in general

of creation and

everything started in the late 90’s

I wanted to study film but there was no

so many options at that time as there are

now

finally opt for a university of

whose name I do not want to remember that in

his presentation brochure showed a

man with a movie camera

I said here it’s into account how sometimes

the most transcendental decisions can

be so casual

luckily now there is more information and

the boys find out more in the

internet of what to what they are going to

to enter not but at that time it was not

so so

and the truth is that we never saw until

plus

we never saw them even though we had

some teachers who worked in the

theme film and audiovisual

we never got to see any camera in

no side and that gave us a

feeling of how disappointed with

regarding our studies and we decided

do something about it

with a partner and photographer friend

if we get a camera a camera

little one a homemade camera in that

epoch video 8 I think it was still and

we started to aggravate testimonies of the

college people students

teachers and even staff

administrative and so on

for several weeks and and we achieved something

as well as 100 testimonials with a

camarita and clear people what

we tried to explore was this

feeling that we had the

disappointment regarding our

studies through the others not

we were because there was a discontent

widespread also at that time in

the whole country there is a discontent

widespread I’m talking about the year 99

2000 an environment was lived and through

of his testimonies was achieved how to capture

that as a feeling from something

as simple as taking a camera and and

converse with people and record these

interviews this exercise for me and

it woke up many things record those

conversations did not and I think it marked everything

what I have done after that why

he mentioned

that is the first exercise of the caller

presence of interviews after

see the material to transcribe the

interviews of to go arming a story to

from these these loose pieces a

kind of puzzle that is the cinema

documentary what the cinema can be

documentary and that is also very very

feasible to do it especially in this

era that they were beginning to see cameras

digital ones which cheapened the

costs of documentary and cinema in

general that as you know is a

expensive activity and

arduous in many cases and especially in

our countries is the first

experience motivated me to leave the

university which I do not recommend for

right now that is so important

cardboard and when you throw yourself fully into a

documentary project on a subject that

passionate about a historical subject a

character that was real but seemed

fiction that is to taste san miguel el

first filmmaker of this country who are

the first fiction movies in

the 20s in guayaquil with titles

as suggestive as the treasure of

atahualpa you need a bus a

abyss and two souls and so on

the terrible thing about this whole story is that

the movies did not exist

movies were lost in time

as it happened with a good part of the

production of your years in the world already

that if not, it was not considered an art

still nothing or something very

future

then all that material all the

first movies all those memories

of the country was lost and there were even 10

the legend that San Miguel had

buried with his movies

then they will realize that it was a

great starting point for a

documentary then I have again a

camarita now yes a a little camera

better a better microphone and I went to

guayaquil to converse with people

great that I could remember and help

reconstruct that forgotten story

it’s that aspect that a lot of people do not

knew that there had been or not a

kind that the 20s

he made movies in guayaquil

curiously with mountain themes

so that was my first serious job

adusto san miguel has died yesterday

I like to say it’s kind of

cult movie because I still

they know in the most unusual places

I tell people mostly students

Young girl interested in cinema in this movie

a little looking for the origin of this

activity in our country

So that was my first job

serious in the year 2003 and and especially

there I learned one thing that I think is

relates to what I am going to tell you

after

and is that the documentary is not always

something like you think completely

objective neither truthful nor you have

relation to the documentary with the veracity

with the real and today is the first job

I already realized certain things that

the documentaries happened that those that

what the approach to fiction

the single fact of selecting some

things to put some things and others no longer

it is a manipulation

then it was the great lesson for

my

of that work and that in some way

also food what came after

After that experience I went to Europe

where I was some years I studied

film courses in some cities but

I mainly dedicated myself to watching movies

I think that’s important for

all people interested in the

art

if you want to do if you do not have to see

a lot of cinema if you want to write you have

to read a lot and so no more than

the academic part let’s say I’m a

little a defender of the pasture of that

self-taught capacity especially in the

land of art and in those years in

Europe

I discovered the character that he would be the

the character of me of me of my

next movie and for which I have

invited here that is what is called a

secret in the box

the character is called marcelo chiriboga

you some of you will have

heard from this one

Mr

I discover it in a book by de jose

Donoso a Chilean writer where

mention for the first time this success

if boom Ecuadorian writer the

generation of the Latin American boom that

many will know composed of people

as vargas llosa garcía marquez

cortázar etcetera

and suddenly I read of this one marcelo

chiriboga that with his novel a secret

in the box had been translated to a

thousands of language to the main

languages ​​of the world and has sold around

side and it was super famous it caused me

a kind of doubt not who is

who is this guy and how is that how

It is possible that I, being an Ecuadorian

have never heard of this man

who is I think that whoever was

hiding not then investigating

I realized that obviously I did not know

nothing of chivas by chiriboga does not exist

it’s a fictional character but that’s

the doubt that woke up in me

ss that question and that question not me

they seemed again a great excuse

to make another movie not for

make a documentary but not a

documentary as we know it but

a documentary a fake documentary that is

an exciting cinematographic genre

and in which I got into Hong Kong with

this character by luck

Donoso had not given so many details

about the life and work of

chiriboga then I set out to arm

that is the artist’s biographical account

as I had done with august san

miguel and I started to investigate I started

investigate about boom writers

and especially about the literature on

the history of the equator because for me

the key question of the movie was

that he had tried the great novel

Ecuadorian boom

If this had existed or not, that was

the key question for

to boot and as I said

researching and studying on

boom writers

I realized that almost all of them what

they did was to work with the stories

from their countries in a reworked way

the stories of their countries through

of that of fiction not then the

answer for me was the novel grain

of the homeland of the boom written by

us and I’m going to call the line

imaginary was about the war of 41

with the Peru that for me is a fact

key to understanding the equator in the

20th century

so if there was any way

became an excuse to explore

the history of the equator as I tell you in

the 20th century as a result of this conflict and

everything that came after

then it’s a job where where where

reality and fiction are

they intermingle is this movie was

released a year ago

we released it on the internet during

like in a weird movie too

we wanted to do something with nothing with the

distribution that as you will know

is one of the most complex parts of

cinema then we continue April to open to

aguilar the possibility of seeing it in

internet for ten days as a

way to promote the movie before

go through an alternative circuit of

rooms we did not want to go to the halls

commercial because many times the

Ecuadorian movies are like

out of context and between so much

Hollywood blockbuster for

a childish and or infantilized public

the Ecuadorian movies sometimes many

times they are out of context as he said

so

we designed this this alternative plan of

exhibition that works very well and

which was very interesting because a lot

people saw in those ten days

was on the internet and many people a lot

many people who believe that the

I would have seen if we were premiered

in salads not then and the movie

he also generated many comments

many articles many reflections what

which was super interesting especially

because a lot of people a lot of people believed

the story or wanted to believe the story to

despite several clues that there are in the

documentary is one of the

characteristics of the false documentary

that gives clues about their own facility

falsehood

it’s not about cheating but in spite of

that many people ate the story and

they even started looking for the books

in the bookstores of the city I

they called desperate from the

major bookstores to tell me oiec

how do we go to for

convince them to pay for this

people was not a problem even for

the bookstores when I told them not this

type no no no no people want

I did not know how to react they thought

finally a problem and with the booksellers

luckily the movie

then it came out weak and it ‘s available

in divided and clarifies a bit the subject

but a little the idea as I said no

it’s with this kind of work it’s not about

to deceive the public but rather

to invite him to a kind of game and and

stimulate a little more a viewer

critical

a spectator who does not accept everything

what is presented to you just because it is

presented in a format linked to the

objective with works like the documentary

then these these breaks are what

what interests me now in the cinema

no and now the movie also had a

important travel through festivals that

a little bit for me not a month ago in the

bafici is a film festival

independent of buenos aires one of the

most important of the region

where the movie got a recognition

important prize and

somehow a year after

have premiered it closes a little the

cycle of movie exhibition by

another side is still alive through the

bid and as I said they can not acquire

in your favorite stores some hopefully

I still think I have a little more

weather

he read them you read the last thing he wants

is that I can tell you is about me

new project a movie that

we signed in February of this year and that

It is already a fiction but inspired by

historical facts again is not like

the constant

you could say my work in this case

the armed movements of the 80s

for me it’s the story of the

I meet in between two friends of ex

schoolmates lifelong

about 12 years after graduates who

have seen us in times and

they meet by chance at the exit of

a movie theater in panama city and they start

to talk and expensive have taken roads

completely different does not give us to

work banking and is in Panama for

business not always lawful and the other

he appears as a journalist but in

reality is part of alfaro lives

fuck and they are organizing a

just that position in jeans but

He left it there leave it there for history

that they see the movie and rather they

I wanted to tell you about the way

production that this project had that

I also believe that it is relevant for the

The current moment of Ecuadorian cinema was

a fight is a movie that the

beginning was conceived as a

very small and very feasible movie

filming has few few characters

occasions and many dialogues then the

we filmed it in a very short period

for a movie for a feature film

of fiction that is

that was seven days and the interesting thing about

all this what can be shared is

what and I think it’s important

as I said or relevant to talk about

this kind of thing because there are no longer

resources to make films that were made

a time are not very clear at all

case but also with the movie

we had an alternative scheme of

production in the sense that

we manage an associative scheme with the

technical team not receiving a salary

but they have a percentage I thank them

a lot for having listened to my thousands of

stories about my stories

[Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *