Press "Enter" to skip to content

30 Years After Chernobyl, Nature Is Thriving | National Geographic


large reason why these animals seem to

large reason why these animals seem to be persisting in high densities or high

be persisting in high densities or high

be persisting in high densities or high abundance within the exclusion zone is

abundance within the exclusion zone is

abundance within the exclusion zone is because of the absence of humans as you

because of the absence of humans as you

because of the absence of humans as you drive around the exclusion zone you’re

drive around the exclusion zone you’re

drive around the exclusion zone you’re overcome by all the lush nature it’s

overcome by all the lush nature it’s

overcome by all the lush nature it’s really an eerie reminder of the tragic

really an eerie reminder of the tragic

really an eerie reminder of the tragic human impact that occurred there back

human impact that occurred there back

human impact that occurred there back around 30 years ago

the Chernobyl exclusion zone is

the Chernobyl exclusion zone is basically a 30 kilometer radius that was

basically a 30 kilometer radius that was

basically a 30 kilometer radius that was created that extends around the nuclear

created that extends around the nuclear

created that extends around the nuclear reactor where the accident occurred and

reactor where the accident occurred and

reactor where the accident occurred and within that 30 kilometer zone

within that 30 kilometer zone

within that 30 kilometer zone that’s where preventive measures were

that’s where preventive measures were

that’s where preventive measures were taken to exclude people so all the towns

taken to exclude people so all the towns

taken to exclude people so all the towns villages cities within that area that 30

villages cities within that area that 30

villages cities within that area that 30 kilometer area were evacuated so two

kilometer area were evacuated so two

kilometer area were evacuated so two years after the accident this year

years after the accident this year

years after the accident this year Woodlands increase it up to one half or

Woodlands increase it up to one half or

Woodlands increase it up to one half or more times so now approximately 70% of

more times so now approximately 70% of

more times so now approximately 70% of area on this force if we talk about

area on this force if we talk about

area on this force if we talk about large mammals like carnivores and

large mammals like carnivores and

large mammals like carnivores and ungulates it’s really good habitat

ungulates it’s really good habitat

ungulates it’s really good habitat sickles

sickles

sickles it’s about editing now and especially

it’s about editing now and especially

it’s about editing now and especially this very wild spots along the border

this very wild spots along the border

this very wild spots along the border with Belarus and also many different

with Belarus and also many different

with Belarus and also many different water sources like lakes and rivers and

water sources like lakes and rivers and

water sources like lakes and rivers and springs

so the work that we’ve been involved

so the work that we’ve been involved with in the Chernobyl exclusion zone has

with in the Chernobyl exclusion zone has

with in the Chernobyl exclusion zone has been to look at the distribution and

been to look at the distribution and

been to look at the distribution and relative abundance of wildlife

relative abundance of wildlife

relative abundance of wildlife particularly large mammals and

particularly large mammals and

particularly large mammals and especially carnivores specifically

especially carnivores specifically

especially carnivores specifically looking at radiation contamination so as

looking at radiation contamination so as

looking at radiation contamination so as you move from areas of low to high

you move from areas of low to high

you move from areas of low to high contamination do you see a subsequent

contamination do you see a subsequent

contamination do you see a subsequent drop-off in the number of species that

drop-off in the number of species that

drop-off in the number of species that you detect the the relative abundance of

you detect the the relative abundance of

you detect the the relative abundance of those animals species we most commonly

those animals species we most commonly

those animals species we most commonly documented were raccoon dogs large

documented were raccoon dogs large

documented were raccoon dogs large numbers of photographs of grey wolves

numbers of photographs of grey wolves

numbers of photographs of grey wolves red fox Eurasian boar Eurasian badger

red fox Eurasian boar Eurasian badger

red fox Eurasian boar Eurasian badger when we have human dominated landscapes

when we have human dominated landscapes

when we have human dominated landscapes we have lower densities of animals

we have lower densities of animals

we have lower densities of animals especially animals that come into

especially animals that come into

especially animals that come into conflict with humans like wolves and so

conflict with humans like wolves and so

conflict with humans like wolves and so after people were removed even though

after people were removed even though

after people were removed even though the landscape was highly contaminated it

the landscape was highly contaminated it

the landscape was highly contaminated it allowed them to increase what this

allowed them to increase what this

allowed them to increase what this research is not looking at is the

research is not looking at is the

research is not looking at is the individual health of those animals so it

individual health of those animals so it

individual health of those animals so it doesn’t suggest that these animals are

doesn’t suggest that these animals are

doesn’t suggest that these animals are incredibly healthy although on the

incredibly healthy although on the

incredibly healthy although on the surface they appear very healthy it

surface they appear very healthy it

surface they appear very healthy it doesn’t imply that there are more subtle

doesn’t imply that there are more subtle

doesn’t imply that there are more subtle genetic effects and that’s an important

genetic effects and that’s an important

genetic effects and that’s an important area that I think we need to continue to

area that I think we need to continue to

area that I think we need to continue to explore with future research down the

explore with future research down the

explore with future research down the road

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *