Press "Enter" to skip to content

Waking up to the post-truth era | Priyesh Perera | TEDxGeorgiaTechSalon


[Applause]

[Applause] what if I told you that emotions and

what if I told you that emotions and

what if I told you that emotions and resonance plays more influential part in

resonance plays more influential part in

resonance plays more influential part in making decisions as opposed to the part

making decisions as opposed to the part

making decisions as opposed to the part that factual details will play and no

that factual details will play and no

that factual details will play and no I’m not just talking about trivial

I’m not just talking about trivial

I’m not just talking about trivial decisions I’m not just talking about our

decisions I’m not just talking about our

decisions I’m not just talking about our day to day lives but I’m also talking

day to day lives but I’m also talking

day to day lives but I’m also talking about the decisions that would go on to

about the decisions that would go on to

about the decisions that would go on to affect subculture societies and Nations

affect subculture societies and Nations

affect subculture societies and Nations in their entirety by show of hands how

in their entirety by show of hands how

in their entirety by show of hands how many of you would believe me when I say

many of you would believe me when I say

many of you would believe me when I say that emotions do play a bigger part than

that emotions do play a bigger part than

that emotions do play a bigger part than facts well for those of you who do

facts well for those of you who do

facts well for those of you who do believe me I believe me too

believe me I believe me too

believe me I believe me too but what’s interesting is why this is so

but what’s interesting is why this is so

but what’s interesting is why this is so believable why this makes so much a

believable why this makes so much a

believable why this makes so much a sense and why is it that we’re finally

sense and why is it that we’re finally

sense and why is it that we’re finally waking up to this post truth error

waking up to this post truth error

waking up to this post truth error despite it being prevalent in nations

despite it being prevalent in nations

despite it being prevalent in nations and societies long before we even began

and societies long before we even began

and societies long before we even began to think of its existence now before I

to think of its existence now before I

to think of its existence now before I leave the stage tonight my goal is to

leave the stage tonight my goal is to

leave the stage tonight my goal is to introduce to you the audience a new way

introduce to you the audience a new way

introduce to you the audience a new way to approach political rhetoric

to approach political rhetoric

to approach political rhetoric especially when it’s false so how do we

especially when it’s false so how do we

especially when it’s false so how do we wake up to this post truth era what is

wake up to this post truth era what is

wake up to this post truth era what is post truth relating to or denoting

post truth relating to or denoting

post truth relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts

circumstances in which objective facts

circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public

are less influential in shaping public

are less influential in shaping public opinion then appeals to emotion and

opinion then appeals to emotion and

opinion then appeals to emotion and personal beliefs now this is the

personal beliefs now this is the

personal beliefs now this is the definition that the oxford english

definition that the oxford english

definition that the oxford english dictionary gave us when the word post

dictionary gave us when the word post

dictionary gave us when the word post truth was named 2016’s word of the year

truth was named 2016’s word of the year

truth was named 2016’s word of the year now I understand that this might still

now I understand that this might still

now I understand that this might still be a little difficult to comprehend so

be a little difficult to comprehend so

be a little difficult to comprehend so let’s put this in simpler terms in his

let’s put this in simpler terms in his

let’s put this in simpler terms in his book the post truth era author Ralph

book the post truth era author Ralph

book the post truth era author Ralph Keyes went on to further simplify this

Keyes went on to further simplify this

Keyes went on to further simplify this concept of post truth by saying that it

concept of post truth by saying that it

concept of post truth by saying that it is to be economical with the truth it is

is to be economical with the truth it is

is to be economical with the truth it is to sweeten the truth and it is to tell

to sweeten the truth and it is to tell

to sweeten the truth and it is to tell the truth improved

the truth improved

the truth improved now before I continue I’d be remiss if I

now before I continue I’d be remiss if I

now before I continue I’d be remiss if I don’t take the time to mention my

don’t take the time to mention my

don’t take the time to mention my perspective and mention why my

perspective and mention why my

perspective and mention why my perception is shaped the way it is where

perception is shaped the way it is where

perception is shaped the way it is where I’m from the humble little island of Sri

I’m from the humble little island of Sri

I’m from the humble little island of Sri Lanka we are still as a nation and as an

Lanka we are still as a nation and as an

Lanka we are still as a nation and as an economy rising from the ashes of a

economy rising from the ashes of a

economy rising from the ashes of a disastrous civil war that lasted the

disastrous civil war that lasted the

disastrous civil war that lasted the better part of thirty years where I’m

better part of thirty years where I’m

better part of thirty years where I’m from political rhetoric has gone on to

from political rhetoric has gone on to

from political rhetoric has gone on to shape the mindsets of the people of Sri

shape the mindsets of the people of Sri

shape the mindsets of the people of Sri Lanka having been born and raised in Sri

Lanka having been born and raised in Sri

Lanka having been born and raised in Sri Lanka having lived nearly 21 years of my

Lanka having lived nearly 21 years of my

Lanka having lived nearly 21 years of my life in Sri Lanka

life in Sri Lanka

life in Sri Lanka I found myself developing an interest

I found myself developing an interest

I found myself developing an interest towards political rhetoric especially

towards political rhetoric especially

towards political rhetoric especially the emotional aspect of it this is why

the emotional aspect of it this is why

the emotional aspect of it this is why I’m here today talking to you about post

I’m here today talking to you about post

I’m here today talking to you about post truth and its emotional aspects so let’s

truth and its emotional aspects so let’s

truth and its emotional aspects so let’s get back let’s take a little deeper into

get back let’s take a little deeper into

get back let’s take a little deeper into the history of post truth the post

the history of post truth the post

the history of post truth the post modernism era and the late 1980s is when

modernism era and the late 1980s is when

modernism era and the late 1980s is when this concept first came about due to the

this concept first came about due to the

this concept first came about due to the general level of distrust of theories

general level of distrust of theories

general level of distrust of theories and ideologies that the post modernism

and ideologies that the post modernism

and ideologies that the post modernism brought along with it but it wasn’t

brought along with it but it wasn’t

brought along with it but it wasn’t until 1992 that the term post truth

until 1992 that the term post truth

until 1992 that the term post truth itself was used in a public context

itself was used in a public context

itself was used in a public context where a serbian-american author went on

where a serbian-american author went on

where a serbian-american author went on to claim that we as a free people have

to claim that we as a free people have

to claim that we as a free people have freely decided to live in some post

freely decided to live in some post

freely decided to live in some post truth world now this was when he was

truth world now this was when he was

truth world now this was when he was referring to the iran-contra scandal and

referring to the iran-contra scandal and

referring to the iran-contra scandal and Persian Gulf War which I won’t be

Persian Gulf War which I won’t be

Persian Gulf War which I won’t be getting into in the interest of time but

getting into in the interest of time but

getting into in the interest of time but following this the United States saw its

following this the United States saw its

following this the United States saw its politics

politics

politics transform itself into what was commonly

transform itself into what was commonly

transform itself into what was commonly known back then as show business for

known back then as show business for

known back then as show business for ugglys governments became less about the

ugglys governments became less about the

ugglys governments became less about the objective truth and more about the

objective truth and more about the

objective truth and more about the subjective truths always plural easily

subjective truths always plural easily

subjective truths always plural easily personalised and frequently relativized

personalised and frequently relativized

personalised and frequently relativized now with the rise in post truth in our

now with the rise in post truth in our

now with the rise in post truth in our society

society

society if we go on to juxtapose the usage of

if we go on to juxtapose the usage of

if we go on to juxtapose the usage of this term post truth in 2015 and 2016

this term post truth in 2015 and 2016

this term post truth in 2015 and 2016 we’d see a staggering increase of two

we’d see a staggering increase of two

we’d see a staggering increase of two thousand percent so what could have

thousand percent so what could have

thousand percent so what could have possibly happened in just two years 2015

possibly happened in just two years 2015

possibly happened in just two years 2015 and 2016 paved the way for the two

and 2016 paved the way for the two

and 2016 paved the way for the two events that went on to reinforce the

events that went on to reinforce the

events that went on to reinforce the existence of post growth in our society

existence of post growth in our society

existence of post growth in our society the first of which was brexit now I’m

the first of which was brexit now I’m

the first of which was brexit now I’m fairly certain all of us here know what

fairly certain all of us here know what

fairly certain all of us here know what brexit is but very briefly this was when

brexit is but very briefly this was when

brexit is but very briefly this was when Britain decided to exit the European

Britain decided to exit the European

Britain decided to exit the European Union after over 40 years of being a

Union after over 40 years of being a

Union after over 40 years of being a member state of this customs union now I

member state of this customs union now I

member state of this customs union now I understand that the reasons to leave or

understand that the reasons to leave or

understand that the reasons to leave or remain in the EU are still up for debate

remain in the EU are still up for debate

remain in the EU are still up for debate but let’s take a look at what exactly

but let’s take a look at what exactly

but let’s take a look at what exactly happened here why would the people have

happened here why would the people have

happened here why would the people have voted to leave the EU what exactly was

voted to leave the EU what exactly was

voted to leave the EU what exactly was the political rhetoric that was used by

the political rhetoric that was used by

the political rhetoric that was used by the people of power at the time Nigel

the people of power at the time Nigel

the people of power at the time Nigel Farage the leader of the lead campaign

Farage the leader of the lead campaign

Farage the leader of the lead campaign identified the unquestionable importance

identified the unquestionable importance

identified the unquestionable importance of appealing to the emotional side of

of appealing to the emotional side of

of appealing to the emotional side of the people and so he and his campaign

the people and so he and his campaign

the people and so he and his campaign came up with this leaving the EU would

came up with this leaving the EU would

came up with this leaving the EU would save the UK 350 million pounds a week

save the UK 350 million pounds a week

save the UK 350 million pounds a week let’s use this to fund the NHS our

let’s use this to fund the NHS our

let’s use this to fund the NHS our national health services we can build

national health services we can build

national health services we can build more hospitals now I for one wouldn’t

more hospitals now I for one wouldn’t

more hospitals now I for one wouldn’t want my country to be involved in some

want my country to be involved in some

want my country to be involved in some sort of a trade deal where we’d be

sort of a trade deal where we’d be

sort of a trade deal where we’d be losing this much of money on a weekly

losing this much of money on a weekly

losing this much of money on a weekly basis it just doesn’t make sense but

basis it just doesn’t make sense but

basis it just doesn’t make sense but what we need to know about brexit is

what we need to know about brexit is

what we need to know about brexit is that Nigel Faraj and his campaign

that Nigel Faraj and his campaign

that Nigel Faraj and his campaign dropped this claim as soon as the leave

dropped this claim as soon as the leave

dropped this claim as soon as the leave remained vote concluded he went on to

remained vote concluded he went on to

remained vote concluded he went on to say that he had never made this claim he

say that he had never made this claim he

say that he had never made this claim he also went on to say that if this claim

also went on to say that if this claim

also went on to say that if this claim had gotten out it was a mistake on the

had gotten out it was a mistake on the

had gotten out it was a mistake on the leave campaign spot

leave campaign spot

leave campaign spot so yes the very reason that people would

so yes the very reason that people would

so yes the very reason that people would have voted to leave the EU was never a

have voted to leave the EU was never a

have voted to leave the EU was never a reason to begin with

reason to begin with

reason to begin with that’s line number one and that’s not

that’s line number one and that’s not

that’s line number one and that’s not all

all

all if sauce mori is one of the one of the

if sauce mori is one of the one of the

if sauce mori is one of the one of the UK’s leading research agencies and

UK’s leading research agencies and

UK’s leading research agencies and according to their researchers this

according to their researchers this

according to their researchers this figure of three hundred and fifty

figure of three hundred and fifty

figure of three hundred and fifty million pounds a week was false to begin

million pounds a week was false to begin

million pounds a week was false to begin with it conveniently excluded the

with it conveniently excluded the

with it conveniently excluded the millions of pounds of support that the

millions of pounds of support that the

millions of pounds of support that the European Union provided the UK with for

European Union provided the UK with for

European Union provided the UK with for their educational sectors for the

their educational sectors for the

their educational sectors for the agricultural sectors and various other

agricultural sectors and various other

agricultural sectors and various other sectors so yes the very crux of this

sectors so yes the very crux of this

sectors so yes the very crux of this claim was forced to begin with

claim was forced to begin with

claim was forced to begin with so that’s lie number two so what do we

so that’s lie number two so what do we

so that’s lie number two so what do we know about these two lies did it work

know about these two lies did it work

know about these two lies did it work did it pay off now of course we know

did it pay off now of course we know

did it pay off now of course we know that it paid off because we know of the

that it paid off because we know of the

that it paid off because we know of the phenomenon that is a brexit the leave

phenomenon that is a brexit the leave

phenomenon that is a brexit the leave campaign ended up winning the vote 52%

campaign ended up winning the vote 52%

campaign ended up winning the vote 52% to 48% but this in itself doesn’t really

to 48% but this in itself doesn’t really

to 48% but this in itself doesn’t really tell us much about the post truth aspect

tell us much about the post truth aspect

tell us much about the post truth aspect of this vote but this does 47% 47% of

of this vote but this does 47% 47% of

of this vote but this does 47% 47% of all voters who voted 47% of all voters

all voters who voted 47% of all voters

all voters who voted 47% of all voters who walked into those polling booths

who walked into those polling booths

who walked into those polling booths believed the lead campaigns claimed and

believed the lead campaigns claimed and

believed the lead campaigns claimed and the numbers to be true now this tells us

the numbers to be true now this tells us

the numbers to be true now this tells us exactly how effective these claims were

exactly how effective these claims were

exactly how effective these claims were so what happened here the people the

so what happened here the people the

so what happened here the people the citizens had an emotional response they

citizens had an emotional response they

citizens had an emotional response they acted on it they didn’t follow up they

acted on it they didn’t follow up they

acted on it they didn’t follow up they got caught up in the lies they got

got caught up in the lies they got

got caught up in the lies they got caught up in the rhetoric and the next

caught up in the rhetoric and the next

caught up in the rhetoric and the next thing you know they weren’t a member

thing you know they weren’t a member

thing you know they weren’t a member state of the

state of the

state of the anymore now that escalated pretty fast

anymore now that escalated pretty fast

anymore now that escalated pretty fast if you ask me so let’s move into the

if you ask me so let’s move into the

if you ask me so let’s move into the second event the event that had post

second event the event that had post

second event the event that had post truth written all over it from start to

truth written all over it from start to

truth written all over it from start to finish the 2016 US presidential election

the fact-checking site PolitiFact deemed

the fact-checking site PolitiFact deemed 33 of Hillary Clinton’s 263 fact check

33 of Hillary Clinton’s 263 fact check

33 of Hillary Clinton’s 263 fact check statements to be false or pence on file

statements to be false or pence on file

statements to be false or pence on file now a pants on fire statement refers to

now a pants on fire statement refers to

now a pants on fire statement refers to a statement that is worse than a false

a statement that is worse than a false

a statement that is worse than a false statement and absolutely false statement

statement and absolutely false statement

statement and absolutely false statement in the same way PolitiFact deemed 144 of

in the same way PolitiFact deemed 144 of

in the same way PolitiFact deemed 144 of donald trump’s 274 fact check statements

donald trump’s 274 fact check statements

donald trump’s 274 fact check statements to be false or pants on fire now looking

to be false or pants on fire now looking

to be false or pants on fire now looking at this to me it just seems like we had

at this to me it just seems like we had

at this to me it just seems like we had two blatant Liars running for presidency

terrorism and terrorist attacks in the

terrorism and terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe have gotten to

United States and Europe have gotten to

United States and Europe have gotten to a point where they’re not even being

a point where they’re not even being

a point where they’re not even being reported I am the only candidate who ran

reported I am the only candidate who ran

reported I am the only candidate who ran in either primary who said I will not

in either primary who said I will not

in either primary who said I will not raise taxes on the middle class now as

raise taxes on the middle class now as

raise taxes on the middle class now as you may have already guessed it wasn’t

you may have already guessed it wasn’t

you may have already guessed it wasn’t entirely difficult for me to find these

entirely difficult for me to find these

entirely difficult for me to find these two examples but who said what the dates

two examples but who said what the dates

two examples but who said what the dates should give you a bit of a clue but

should give you a bit of a clue but

should give you a bit of a clue but there you go now I’m not going to say

there you go now I’m not going to say

there you go now I’m not going to say anything more about these two statements

anything more about these two statements

anything more about these two statements instead let’s see what PolitiFact

instead let’s see what PolitiFact

instead let’s see what PolitiFact had to say about them

now I know by now that I don’t need to

now I know by now that I don’t need to explain why these lies and so many of

explain why these lies and so many of

explain why these lies and so many of the other lies were said right

the other lies were said right

the other lies were said right throughout the campaign it was to appeal

throughout the campaign it was to appeal

throughout the campaign it was to appeal emotionally to the voters it was to sway

emotionally to the voters it was to sway

emotionally to the voters it was to sway their perception the very same voters

their perception the very same voters

their perception the very same voters who would have believed close to

who would have believed close to

who would have believed close to anything that either one of the

anything that either one of the

anything that either one of the candidates would have gone on to see but

candidates would have gone on to see but

candidates would have gone on to see but this election was interesting because

this election was interesting because

this election was interesting because there was more than just two candidates

there was more than just two candidates

there was more than just two candidates trying to bend the truth to their favor

trying to bend the truth to their favor

trying to bend the truth to their favor there was also an alarming number of

there was also an alarming number of

there was also an alarming number of inaccurate news Hillary Clinton is

inaccurate news Hillary Clinton is

inaccurate news Hillary Clinton is running a child sex ring out of a pizza

running a child sex ring out of a pizza

running a child sex ring out of a pizza shop Democrats want to impose Islamic

shop Democrats want to impose Islamic

shop Democrats want to impose Islamic law in Florida thousands of people at a

law in Florida thousands of people at a

law in Florida thousands of people at a Donald Trump rally in Manhattan chanted

Donald Trump rally in Manhattan chanted

Donald Trump rally in Manhattan chanted we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want

we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want

we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want so a great country back and so I’m gonna

so a great country back and so I’m gonna

so a great country back and so I’m gonna say it one more time

say it one more time

say it one more time we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want

we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want

we hate Muslims we hate blacks we want our great country back very very catchy

our great country back very very catchy

our great country back very very catchy also very very untrue in fact none of

also very very untrue in fact none of

also very very untrue in fact none of these three news items ever happened

these three news items ever happened

these three news items ever happened anywhere in the United States the one

anywhere in the United States the one

anywhere in the United States the one thing that we need to acknowledge is

thing that we need to acknowledge is

thing that we need to acknowledge is that technology and its advancement has

that technology and its advancement has

that technology and its advancement has always been a part and parcel of the

always been a part and parcel of the

always been a part and parcel of the rise in this concept of post truth in

rise in this concept of post truth in

rise in this concept of post truth in our society technology or more

our society technology or more

our society technology or more specifically the Internet is the primary

specifically the Internet is the primary

specifically the Internet is the primary method by which inaccurate news gets

method by which inaccurate news gets

method by which inaccurate news gets disseminated so how do we protect

disseminated so how do we protect

disseminated so how do we protect ourselves from post truth or most

ourselves from post truth or most

ourselves from post truth or most specifically inaccurate news now I admit

specifically inaccurate news now I admit

specifically inaccurate news now I admit it I love Facebook I love it I won’t lie

it I love Facebook I love it I won’t lie

it I love Facebook I love it I won’t lie but I love it for the right reasons in

but I love it for the right reasons in

but I love it for the right reasons in 2004 when Mark Zuckerberg and his

2004 when Mark Zuckerberg and his

2004 when Mark Zuckerberg and his colleagues first launched Facebook they

colleagues first launched Facebook they

colleagues first launched Facebook they named it a social networking site they

named it a social networking site they

named it a social networking site they never named

never named

never named News Agency they never named it a new

News Agency they never named it a new

News Agency they never named it a new source and news website or anything of

source and news website or anything of

source and news website or anything of the sort

the sort

the sort unfortunately that is how a majority of

unfortunately that is how a majority of

unfortunately that is how a majority of the people in our society today are

the people in our society today are

the people in our society today are using Facebook and so many of the other

using Facebook and so many of the other

using Facebook and so many of the other social networking sites this is how we

social networking sites this is how we

social networking sites this is how we allow ourselves to be susceptible to

allow ourselves to be susceptible to

allow ourselves to be susceptible to post truth and inaccurate news now I

post truth and inaccurate news now I

post truth and inaccurate news now I want to share something with you that I

want to share something with you that I

want to share something with you that I use on a day to day basis

use on a day to day basis

use on a day to day basis this is fib it is a google chrome

this is fib it is a google chrome

this is fib it is a google chrome plug-in developed by for christian

plug-in developed by for christian

plug-in developed by for christian graduates and it detects inaccurate news

graduates and it detects inaccurate news

graduates and it detects inaccurate news on facebook very effective the

on facebook very effective the

on facebook very effective the advancement of technology has also

advancement of technology has also

advancement of technology has also provided us with an abundance of methods

provided us with an abundance of methods

provided us with an abundance of methods for us to protect ourselves from post

for us to protect ourselves from post

for us to protect ourselves from post truth and inaccurate news fib just being

truth and inaccurate news fib just being

truth and inaccurate news fib just being one of them now the technology aside

one of them now the technology aside

one of them now the technology aside what we need to know is that post truth

what we need to know is that post truth

what we need to know is that post truth in itself is a deep cultural mutation

in itself is a deep cultural mutation

in itself is a deep cultural mutation that we need to better understand if we

that we need to better understand if we

that we need to better understand if we want to avoid the horrible specters of

want to avoid the horrible specters of

want to avoid the horrible specters of the past the horrible specters including

the past the horrible specters including

the past the horrible specters including the likes of brexit and the 2016 US

the likes of brexit and the 2016 US

the likes of brexit and the 2016 US presidential election as global citizens

presidential election as global citizens

presidential election as global citizens we must always be aware and always

we must always be aware and always

we must always be aware and always follow up regardless of what emotions

follow up regardless of what emotions

follow up regardless of what emotions may be invoked after all keeping in line

may be invoked after all keeping in line

may be invoked after all keeping in line with this year’s theme where is the

with this year’s theme where is the

with this year’s theme where is the disruption if we allow ourselves to be

disruption if we allow ourselves to be

disruption if we allow ourselves to be susceptible to false political rhetoric

susceptible to false political rhetoric

susceptible to false political rhetoric where is the disruption if we let

where is the disruption if we let

where is the disruption if we let ourselves be gullible to false facts

ourselves be gullible to false facts

ourselves be gullible to false facts where is the disruption if you’ve

where is the disruption if you’ve

where is the disruption if you’ve believed every single word I’ve said up

believed every single word I’ve said up

believed every single word I’ve said up until this point and you’re not gonna

until this point and you’re not gonna

until this point and you’re not gonna follow it up for yourselves now I’d like

follow it up for yourselves now I’d like

follow it up for yourselves now I’d like to tie this back to where I’m from while

to tie this back to where I’m from while

to tie this back to where I’m from while it has been an absolute honor standing

it has been an absolute honor standing

it has been an absolute honor standing here in front of you

here in front of you

here in front of you representing my country sharing my

representing my country sharing my

representing my country sharing my research through a bilateral platform

research through a bilateral platform

research through a bilateral platform like TEDx sometimes my mind wanders I

like TEDx sometimes my mind wanders I

like TEDx sometimes my mind wanders I think about what Sri Lanka as the

think about what Sri Lanka as the

think about what Sri Lanka as the country could have avoided if we were

country could have avoided if we were

country could have avoided if we were able to travel back in time say 40 or 50

able to travel back in time say 40 or 50

able to travel back in time say 40 or 50 years I think about what we could have

years I think about what we could have

years I think about what we could have avoided as a country if we had never

avoided as a country if we had never

avoided as a country if we had never left the minorities in Sri Lanka be

left the minorities in Sri Lanka be

left the minorities in Sri Lanka be oppressed if we had never left political

oppressed if we had never left political

oppressed if we had never left political rhetoric made the decisions for the

rhetoric made the decisions for the

rhetoric made the decisions for the people of Sri Lanka who knows what might

people of Sri Lanka who knows what might

people of Sri Lanka who knows what might have changed maybe just maybe this

have changed maybe just maybe this

have changed maybe just maybe this picture you’re looking at right now

picture you’re looking at right now

picture you’re looking at right now would never have existed thank you

would never have existed thank you

would never have existed thank you [Applause]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *