Press "Enter" to skip to content

Por favor enciendan sus celulares, la clase empieza. | Francesc Pedró | TEDxPuraVidaED


[Music]

good afternoon

how long new technology is intended

change the processes that define our

everyday life either work or

school

generally we always receive it with

a certain apprehension or at least

sometimes also with rejection

education

this aversion to change is explained very

well because an important part of what

what families and centers do

school is precisely to conserve

our cultural heritage and the

values ​​that defines us who think

that education should be just that

that is, preservation and transmission

from the past will always always have

aversion to the field and a change

technological in particular is a door

open to a huge disguise option and

you better than anyone know what

it means a disruption in the classroom

in fact the story is full of

examples that show us up to what

point education is one or the other

inherent way to the camp

For example, about two thousand

500 years

Socrates will surprise you he opposed

the dissemination of writing by

consider that it would undermine capacity

of memorization of young people and their

access to wisdom in the 16th century

the Benedictine monks that he earned in

a part of your income through the

copied manually

the writing materials came to

mobilize and go out to the street to

show your disagreement with the

mechanization of your work through

print

more recently the arrival of the

radio was received as a threat by

many educators as strange to them

It may seem more specifically in the

year 1936 a magazine that was called

grammophon published an article in the

that was literally saying something that

will sound very close to the youth of

nowadays it has taken for custom

divide your attention between the routine

task of completing the exercises

schoolchildren and pay attention to the call

stimulating speaker right nowadays

we find a technology that

like no other to us I ask in

our lives and those of the children and

the young people who are your students for

they represent to start a door

open to a new dimension of the game

and entertainment and also to

get to adolescence a

very important tool for

socialization that would be a young man ‘s

nowadays that could not water sapear

really well the data show us

to what extent this penetration is

modifying our childhood concept

and youth

look at the year 2015 a

French study that proved that the

58 percent of French children

under two years of age had already

played more than once with a phone

cell phone or with a tablet two years in

united states we know that only the

12 percent of young people do not have

a cellular phone of his property and

those who have it use it to

to finish

mediated among many other things 30

daily messages is one way or another

when they are openly asked

of every four of those young people do not

answer me is that I live almost

permanently connected they were fixed in

he almost clear everywhere except in

Classroom

it’s not strange that in the world of

education, there are certain doubts about

whether or not to allow the use of

cell phones in the classroom

in fact it is logical to think that in

situations like the one we see is

become an important source of

distraction

there are many experiments that so

show

one of the best known asked a

group of students that did something

very simple that they would see a choice in

video will take notes to then pass a

small exercise to a third of those

students were authorized to use

your cell phone during the class session

without any kind of restriction and

obviously they did it to their liking

another third was also authorized

the use of cell phones but only to

condition that the activity that

had with them be

directly related to the

content of the lesson and finally to

last third was not allowed

no access to the cell phone

the results showed that in

education and that knows it very well

you pay a very high price

for the distraction while barely

there was difference in the results in the

final exercise among those who do not

they had access to the cell phone and those who

they used only to search

information related

content of the election those that do not

they used freely they got a few

results 70% worse in the year

final

a recent study of the academy

North American pp

the cold found a correlation

between the frequency of use of

children and youth of cell phones tablets

and computers and the amount of

occasions when they did not present their

Homeworks

data like these have been used to

effectively demonize the use of these

devices not only in general but

specifically in education you think

that in one way or another are going to convert

to children and young people themselves

they allow the expression idiots

connected that are going to fail in the

carrying out their school work

will get very bad results and for

consequently they will have very black

prospects for future success not only

in school but in general life

but some of you will tell me good

but it is that the subject not only the

cellular the subject are the applications and

they are partly right but only in

part

although there are thousands of applications

that are self-proclaimed educational but of

done in the app store for example less

of 10 percent is able to present

some kind of evidence of the kindness of

the results obtained through

its use and the percentage of

those applications that contains some

type of orientation dedicated to

adults and families

that is the teachers to know

no party truly like to extract

it is strange in these circumstances that

in many schools despite

that the public policies that

permit

fortunately its use in many centers

school premises are prohibited

effectively its use by different

reasons among many others

because the digital nature of

device and the contents with the

that is worked is the most opposite to the

dominant culture of the printed book that

characterizes most of our

schools of one or another

what is important is to realize that

this denial of the existence of those

cell phones can be considered by the

teachers how to close the door to

threat that there is a challenge to your

authority as demi burgos of

knowledge is to say the door of

only access to knowledge and

true but the reality is that seen

from the student’s perspective

There is a huge contradiction between

your daily life

outside of school and within the

school

the most important tool in your

Life outside of school is prohibited

when he will not chase inside the classroom

well this is paradoxical

notice why we have other

technologies for example pens

that never ban is in spite of that

we know that thanks to the pens

there are many students who write with

misspellings and there are also

many students that when we give ourselves the

back they pass notes they have written

by the pen of each other

truth and despite that despite their

risks

we do not prohibit the use of pens

On the contrary, we consider ourselves a

essential tool to teach you to

children and young people write with

correction that happens with cell phones

you mediate part of the problem lies

where teachers do not have the

adequate capabilities we do not know how

extract truly played that

tool from the point of view

pedagogical but deep down too

there is something much more important that has

to do with our conception of

role of the school in the formation of

future generations

We believe that the fundamental role of

school is to teach children and

young people that their future has to be what

more similar to what it was

our past

or on the contrary our mission is

help them to invent their future as

said the song we heard

learning from the past and

committing to the present

that is the real question if

they truly respond that they believe in

a school that is relevant to

children and young people living in the

today’s world

they really have no option have

than finding effective strategies

use of those cell phones and so they see

that is not impossible

I’m going to show you three examples that

they come from different countries

this is jesus jesus is a professor of

social sciences that has devised a

series of activities for their students of

upper secondary in which he asks them

that go out into the neighborhood to

document thanks to their cell phones

problematic aspects that have to

see with economic social issues

or environmental aspects of the place where

lives and they do it by taking pictures with

his cell phone recording videos

interviewing neighbors and also to

the political representatives that

they would have to offer solutions to this

problematic and finally publishing

the results of your research in

a digital magazine

this is the case of jesus this other is

Maria is a language teacher

French that at the end of each

lesson to their students 10 10 years of

age asks you to connect comes

using your personal device comes

using the tablets that the

own center to a website in which

they have to answer a very short

exercises on the contents that

have dealt with today in class

this very short exercise does not work for

qualify each of the students

but it is extremely useful

yellow because thanks to those

results knows perfectly

if in the next class you should insist on

some elements that attracts

if some of those elements were not

completely understood by nobody

in the class and even more important

which are the students to whom

should pay more attention either

because they can go faster or by the

opposite because they require support

additional and finally this one is jose

Joseph

is convinced that the fact that

your students have in their pocket a

cell phone is not only a huge savings

economically to the school since it no longer

it is necessary to buy more equipment

the boys and the girls come to class

with them but also think that

thanks to those cell phones you can take

the teaching and learning processes

to another level with three more partners

from other centers has built a series

of elections on video using a

very simple technology that are

available on youtube and asks their

students that once a week

visualize at home because not using

your cell phone one of those lessons when

the students go to class to the day

next jose will not tell you

No story like parrot is going to

allow them to raise their doubts starting

that video they saw and especially going

to use class time to

experience alternative solutions to

the problems that arose in that

video like seeing jesus maria and jose

and they represent three different strategies

three different strategies

harnessing the potential of a

tool that are not only the

pockets of the students but that way

part of your daily life and will follow it

being as it is also part of your

own daily life

so the question is very simple

are you in agreement to support and

applaud jesus maria and joseph in

these efforts or on the contrary

they think it’s much better to follow

prohibiting the use of

dollars in the classroom look if they want to

Give them my personal opinion

I believe that the day has come when

to know if a good teacher a good

teacher is really committed

with a quality and relevant teaching

for your students

just attend with putting a lot

Attention to the first words that goes

to pronounce when the class starts

guess which are they understand the

cell phones

the class begins many thanks

[Music]

”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *